A phase II single-institution study of neoadjuvant stage IIIA/B chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) induction and adjuvant therapy for N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

The integration of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery in the management of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung carcinoma is challenging. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria Lung Cancer Panel was charged to update management recommendations for this clinical scenario. The Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. There is limited level I evidence to guide patient selection for induction, postoperative RT (PORT), or definitive RT. Literature interpretation is complicated by inconsistent diagnostic procedures for N2 disease, disease heterogeneity, and pooled analysis with other stages. PORT is an appropriate therapy following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with incidental pN2 disease. In patients with clinical N2 disease who are potential candidates for a lobectomy, both definitive and induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT are appropriate treatments. In N2 patients who require a pneumonectomy, definitive concurrent chemotherapy/RT is most appropriate although induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT may be considered in expert hands. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- PORT may also be an option in N2 patients. For preoperative RT and PORT, 3-dimensional conformal techniques and intensity-modulated RT are most appropriate.

Role of surgery following induction therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Over the last 30 years neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB disease has significantly improved the overall results of treatment for patients with stage III NSCLC as well as for those with locally invasive tumors. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used, although in most studies some combination of drugs that include cisplatin is the standard. Radiation when given as part of the induction protocol appears to offer a higher rate of resection and complete resection, and higher doses of radiation are associated with better nodal downstaging. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial.

Mortality related to neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or with concurrent radiation is often used for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer but is often tried in patients with stage IIIB and at times in patients with stage I or II disease. Newer neoadjuvant regimens would need to be compared with currently used programs to see if they increased toxicity. For such a comparison, a baseline estimate is needed of the mortality of currently used regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this review, we searched PubMed and associated references, and data on mortality were identified in 34 publications.

RESULTS

The mortality of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation has been estimated in 2015 patients was 0.7%, and the postsurgical mortality in 2195 patients was 4.3%.

CONCLUSION

These estimates might provide a benchmark for comparison for innovative trials.

Cardiopulmonary co-morbidity: a critical negative prognostic predictor for pulmonary resection following preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative therapy is an optional strategy for locally advanced lung cancer, although the indication for pulmonary resection is often marginal, when considering the survival benefit and perioperative risks. The aim of the present study was to identify prognostic predictors by assessing clinical factors including pre-thoracotomy co-morbidity.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 54 patients who underwent complete resection after preoperative therapy was performed.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. In patients without cardiopulmonary co-morbidity the 5-year survival rate was 49%, whereas it was 0% for those who had associated cardiopulmonary co-morbidity (P = 0.004). When analyzing only those who died from lung cancer, the group without cardiopulmonary comorbidity showed a tendency for longer survival than those in the co-morbidity group (P = 0.092). The 5-year survival rate for patients--evaluated with a Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI)--with a CCI score of 0, was 45%, which tended to be better than that for those with a CCI score of 1-2 (P = 0.066). Furthermore, patients with a normal prethoracotomy level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) had a 5-year survival rate of 44%, which was better than the 22% for patients with elevated CEA (P = 0.013). The 5-year survival rate for patients without lymph node metastasis was 52%, whereas it was 14% for those with residual node involvement (P = 0.002). Lymph node metastasis and cardiopulmonary co-morbidity were shown to be independent poor prognostic predictors by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In addition to nodal status, preoperative cardiopulmonary co-morbidity should be noted when considering the operative indications following preoperative therapy for lung cancer patients.