Safety of lumbar drains in thoracic aortic operations performed with extracorporeal circulation

Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage for Prevention of Spinal Cord Ischemia in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Surgery-Pros and Cons

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) carries a risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) which exerts a devastating impact on patient's quality of life and life expectancy. Although routine prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is not unequivocally supported by current data, several studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes. Patients at high risk for SCI following TEVAR likely will benefit from prophylactic CSF drains. However, the intervention is not risk free, and thorough risk/benefit analysis should be individualized to each patient.

Lumbar drains: Practical understanding and application for the otolaryngologist

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar drains are frequently used in patients with otolaryngologic concerns. These can be used therapeutically or prophylactically with the primary purpose being to modulate CSF pressure. Within otolaryngology, lumbar drains are most frequently used for cerebrospinal fluid leaks - either due to cerebrospinal fluid fistulas or in skull base surgery as these allow for potential healing of the defect. While not typically placed by otolaryngologists, a basic understanding of lumbar drains is beneficial in the context of patient management.

MANAGEMENT

A lumbar drain is inserted into the intrathecal space in a patient's lumbar spine. Though considered to be a benign procedure, complications are relatively frequent, and adjustment or replacement of the drain may be required. Complications include infection, epidural bleeding, retained hardware, sequelae of relative immobility, or may relate to over-drainage, ranging from mild headache to cranial neuropathies, altered mental status, pneumocephalus, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. While in place, neurologic exams should be performed routinely and should include motor and sensory exams of the lower extremities. A patient should be monitored for fevers, nuchal rigidity, and other signs of infection or meningitis. The CSF fluid should be grossly examined to identify changes, but routine laboratory tests are not typically run on the fluid itself. Drainage rates will vary usually between 5 and 20 mL per hour and must be frequently reassessed and adjusted based upon signs of intracranial hypotension. Drains should be removed when appropriate and should not be left in more than 5 days due to the increased infectious risk.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar drains are important tools used in patients with otolaryngologic pathologies. Otolaryngologists and otolaryngology residents should be familiar with these catheters to determine if they are working correctly and to identify adverse effects as early as possible.

Spinal Subdural Hematoma owing to the Removal of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Tube During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage during the treatment of aortic disease is commonly performed to prevent spinal cord ischemia. Spinal subdural hematoma (SDH) has never been reported after CSF drainage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). We present a case of concurrent intracranial subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and spinal SDH after CSF drainage tube removal in a patient with TEVAR.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 73-year-old man was hospitalized to undergo TEVAR. The day before the procedure, a lumbar CSF drainage tube was inserted. Continuous CSF drainage was performed only during the procedure, and the tube was removed the following day. The patient complained of mild back pain on postoperative day 2; headache, bilateral lower limb paresis, and bladder and rectal disturbances developed on postoperative day 5. Brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging revealed spinal subdural or subarachnoid hematoma and intracranial SAH. Lumbar laminectomies for spinal SDH removal were performed; lower limb strength improved immediately after surgery. At postoperative 2 years, the patient returned to his preoperative activity level; only mild right lower limb numbness persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a rare case of intracranial SAH and spinal SDH that developed after CSF drainage tube removal in a patient with TEVAR. CSF drainage should be carefully considered in patients undergoing aortic procedures, as SAH and spinal SDH may occur in addition to spinal cord ischemia.

Spinal Subarachnoid Hematoma After Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage reduces the risk of paraplegia in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Intracranial hemorrhage after TAAA repair has been reported as a rare complication of CSF drainage; however, spinal subarachnoid hematoma has never been reported. Here, we present a case of lumbosacral subarachnoid hematoma after CSF drainage in TAAA repair.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient was a 76-year-old man who was hospitalized for TAAA repair. Just before the operation, a CSF drainage catheter was inserted into the L4/5 vertebral interspace. Continuous CSF drainage was performed during the operation. The CSF drain was clamped just after the operation, and the drainage catheters were removed at 24 hours after the operation. On postoperative day 1, the patient experienced pain and paralysis in both lower limbs that worsened over time. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spinal cord was indicative of a spinal subarachnoid hematoma. Removal of hematoma with thoracolumbar and lumbosacral laminectomy was performed, and immediately after the surgery, the pain and paralysis in both lower limbs improved. Six months after the removal of the hematoma, the paralysis in both lower limbs completely resolved and the patient achieved the preinjury activity level.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a rare case of lumbosacral subarachnoid hematoma after CSF drainage in TAAA repair. We should consider spinal subarachnoid hematoma when paralysis in the lower limbs occurs after CSF drainage.

Outcomes of a Spinal Drain and Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Protocol in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

Adjuncts for early detection and treatment of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in thoracic aortic surgery are supported by robust clinical experience in open repair. The utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and neurophysiologic monitoring (NPM) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is less clear. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the influence of a selective institutional spinal cord protection protocol using prophylactic NPM and CSF on outcomes for standard TEVAR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing standard TEVAR entered into a prospectively maintained database from a single institution from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative characteristics, aneurysm extent, and etiology were reviewed. Utilization of CSF drains including volume of fluid removed, duration of drainage, and catheter-related complications were collected. NPM data were reviewed to determine the influence on intraoperative management. Exact logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of SCI.

RESULTS

Of 223 patients undergoing TEVAR, 130 met inclusion criteria for the study. CSF drains were used in 71 patients (54.6%), and 56 of 130 (43%) had NPM. SCI occurred in 7 patients (5.4%), of whom 5 had partial or complete recovery. Median time to symptoms of SCI was delayed in all cases (median 52 hr, range 8-312), and none of the 4 of 7 patients with adjunct NPM demonstrated intraoperative changes. Intraoperative changes in NPM occurred in 26 (46%), and represented unilateral leg ischemia in all but 2 cases. In both patients, changes consistent with SCI were associated with intraoperative hypotension and resolved with blood pressure augmentation. Neither patient developed postoperative SCI. Median length of stay (22 vs. 9 days, P = 0.012), operative room time (262 vs. 209, P = 0.040), and perioperative mortality (28.6% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.046) were significantly higher for patients with SCI versus those without. Length of aortic coverage was found to be the sole independent predictor of SCI (odds ratio 8.2, P = 0.026). Complications related to CSF drainage occurred in 4 patients (5.6%) with major complications occurring in 2 patients (2.8%), including 1 with an intrathecal hematoma and permanent bilateral paraparesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective use of prophylactic CSF drainage in TEVAR was associated with moderate risk and questionable benefit. The use of neurophysiological monitoring allowed for early detection and treatment of spinal ischemia, but its utility is limited by logistical factors and to the minority of patients with intraoperative spinal ischemic events.

Cerebrospinal fluid leaks after spine tumor resection: avoidance, recognition and management

Post-operative CSF leaks are a known complication of spine surgery in general, and patients undergoing surgical intervention for spinal tumors may be particularly predisposed due to the presence of intradural tumor and a number of other factors. Post-operative CSF leaks increase morbidity, lengthen hospital stays, prolong immobilization and subject patients to a number of associated complications. Intraoperative identification of unintended durotomies and effective primary repair of dural defects is an important first step in the prevention of post-operative CSF leaks, but in patients who develop post-operative pseudomeningoceles, durocutaneous fistulae or other CSF-leak-related sequelae, early recognition and secondary intervention are paramount to preventing further CSF-leak-related complications and achieving the best patient outcomes possible. In this article, the incidence, risk factors and complications of CSF leaks after spine tumor surgery are reviewed, with an emphasis on avoidance of post-operative CSF leaks, early post-operative identification and effective secondary intervention.

A case report of successful endovascular repair of a giant 15 cm diameter asymptomatic thoracic aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION

Giant thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) are extremely uncommon, and there are only a few cases reported in the literature. Most patients presented with symptoms before the size of the aneurysm reached a magnitude >10 cm, and most of the reported cases were treated with open repair.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Here we report a 15 cm asymptomatic thoracic aortic aneurysm of a 72-year-old male patient, treated successfully with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The patient was discharged asymptomatic on postoperative day 2.

DISCUSSION

Only 20 case reports of giant TAAs were found in the literature, and this is the biggest TAA reported treated with TEVAR. This procedure is a promising treatment as morbidity and mortality is lower when compared with open aortic repair (OAR).

CONCLUSION

Even though there is limited documented experience, use of TEVAR seems a safe and promising option in the treatment of giant thoracic aneurysms as presented in this case.

Cerebrospinal fluid drains reduce risk of spinal cord injury for thoracic/thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery: A review

Background

The risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) due to decreased cord perfusion following thoracic/thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery (T/TL-AAA) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) ranges up to 20%. For decades, therefore, many vascular surgeons have utilized cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) to decrease intraspinal pressure and increase blood flow to the spinal cord, thus reducing the risk of SCI/ischemia.

Methods

Multiple studies previously recommend utilizing CSFD following T/TL-AAA/TEVAR surgery to treat SCI by increasing spinal cord blood flow. Now, however, CSFD (keeping lumbar pressures at 5-12 mmHg) is largely utilized prophylactically/preoperatively to avert SCI along with other modalities; avoiding hypotension (mean arterial pressures >80-90 mmHG), inducing hypothermia, utilizing left heart bypass, and employing intraoperative neural monitoring [somatosensory (SEP) or motor evoked (MEP) potentials]. In addition, preoperative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) scans identify the artery of Adamkiewicz to determine its location, and when/whether reimplantation/reattachment of this critical artery and or other major segmental/lumbar arterial feeders are warranted.

Results

Utilizing CSFD for 15-72 postoperative hours in T/TL-AAA/TEVAR surgery has reduced the risks of SCI from a maximum of 20% to a minimum of 2.3%. The major complications of CSFD include; spinal and cranial epidural/subdural hematomas, VI nerve palsies, retained catheters, meningitis/infection, and spinal headaches.

Conclusions

By increasing blood flow to the spinal cord during/after T/TL-AAA/TEVAR surgery, CSFD reduces the incidence of permanent SCI from, up to 10-20% down to down to 2.3-10%. Nevertheless, major complications, including spinal/cranial subdural hematomas, still occur.

Minimally invasive repair of a pseudomeningocele caused by a sheared intrathecal catheter following implantation of a drug delivery system

Background:

Shearing of an intrathecal catheter during implantation of a drug delivery system is an underreported complication that can be challenging to manage.

Case Description:

A 53-year-old man with refractory cancer pain had an intrathecal pump system implanted. The procedure was complicated with catheter shear and retention in the intrathecal space. A second catheter was successfully placed but formation of a painful pseudomeningocele and ineffective pain relief complicated the outcome. A minimally invasive approach through a tubular retractor was employed to access the spinal canal via a laminotomy, the sheared catheter was removed and the dural defect repaired. Complete resolution of the pseudomeningocele and efficient pain control were observed at follow-up.

Conclusion:

Minimally invasive approach to the spine is demonstrated as a safe and effective alternative in this case of retained catheter induced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair

Spinal cord complications including paraplegia and partial neurologic deficits remain a frequent problem during repair of descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Effective prevention of this dreaded complication is of paramount importance. Among the many adjuncts that have been proposed to prevent spinal cord complications, spinal fluid drainage is one that has been used by numerous teams. The aim of this review is to answer the following question: does spinal fluid drainage afford spinal cord protection during both open and endovascular repair of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms?

Organ Protection During Thoracoabdominal Aortic Surgery: Rationale for a Multimodality Approach

Surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) remains a technically challenging operation that requires a systematic approach to prevent ischemic complications and achieve excellent clinical outcomes. Techniques for organ protection have evolved substantially over the past 20 years. This review describes our current multimodality approach to organ protection during TAAA repair.

Cranial nerve palsy secondary to cerebrospinal fluid diversion

OBJECTIVE

Cranial nerve palsy (CNP) secondary to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is less familiar to us as a result of its rarity in incidence and insidiousness in presentation. This study aims to further expound the pathophysiological mechanism, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and prognosis of CNP.

METHODS

From June 2012 to February 2015, 5 of 347 consecutive patients with CNPs secondary to different CSF diversion procedures were treated at our institution. A systematic PubMed search of published studies written in English for patients developing CNPs after CSF diversion procedures from January 1950 to June 2015 was conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 studies and 5 patients of the current series totaling 53 CNPs met the inclusion criteria. CN II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII were got involved in 2 (3.8%), 2 (3.8%), 5 (9.4%), 1 (1.9%), 44 (83.0%), 4 (7.5%) and 1 (1.9%) patients respectively. Thirty-eight patients (71.7%) developed CNPs following inadvertent lumbar puncture, 8 (15.1%) following lumbar drainage, and 7 (13.2%) following ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Forty-eight (90.6%) patients got resolved completely.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed mechanism of CNP after CSF diversion procedure is CSF hypovolemia and subsequent downward displacement of the brain and traction and distortion of the vascular and peripheral neural structures. As a result of its distinct anatomic characteristics rather than long intracranial course, CN VI is most commonly affected. With early recognition and timely conservative management, most patients could get favorable recovery.

Spinal cord injury following thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repairs

Objective

To discuss the currently available approaches to prevent spinal cord injury during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repairs.

Methods

We carried out a PubMed search up to 2013 using the Medical Subject Headings: “aortic aneurysm/surgery” and “spinal cord ischemia”; “aortic aneurysm, thoracic/surgery” and “spinal cord ischemia”; “aneurysm/surgery” and “spinal cord ischemia/cerebrospinal fluid”; “aortic aneurysm/surgery” and “paraplegia”. All 190 original articles satisfying our inclusion criteria were analyzed for incidence, predictors, and other pertinent variables related to spinal cord injury, and we compared the results in recent publications with those in earlier reports.

Results

The mean age of the 38,491 patients was 65.3 ± 4.9 years. The overall incidence of paraplegia and/or paraparesis was 7.1% ± 6.1% (range 0%–32%). The incidence of spinal cord injury before 2000, from 2001 to 2007, and 2008–2013 was 9.0% ± 6.7%, 7.0% ± 6.1%, and 5.9% ± 5.2%, respectively ( p = 0.019). Various predictors of spinal cord injury were identified, extent of disease being the most common. Modification of surgical techniques, use of adjuncts, and better understanding of spinal cord perfusion physiology were attributed to the decrease in postoperative spinal cord injury in recent years.

Conclusions

Spinal cord injury after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair poses a real challenge to cardiovascular surgeons. However, with evolving surgical strategies, identification of predictors, and use of various adjuncts over the years, the incidence of spinal cord injury after thoracic/thoracoabdominal aortic repair has declined. Embracing a multimodality approach offers a good insight into combating this grave complication.

Percutaneous retrieval of an intrathecal foreign body: technical note

A 58-year-old man had an intrathecal baclofen pump implanted. A guidewire used during removal of a previously placed lumbar drain catheter fractured, and a fragment was left within the thecal sac. Using fluoroscopic guidance, a loop snare device was used to retrieve the intrathecal foreign body successfully and without complication. The pump was placed without any difficulty, and the patient's hospital course was uneventful.

[Transient delayed paraplegia after repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms]

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm requires multidisciplinary management due to its complexity both in surgical technique and anesthetic considerations. One of the most feared postoperative complication is spinal cord ischemia. It can be presented as different clinical patterns, and its recovery may be partial or complete. The postoperative management of spinal cord ischemia is mainly based on techniques to increase spinal cord perfusion, above all, hemodynamic stability and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. We present two cases of delayed paraplegia after an open repair of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm and a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair using an endovascular stent graft. They both had a complete neurological recovery after cerebrospinal fluid drainage.

Is cerebrospinal fluid drainage of benefit to neuroprotection in patients undergoing surgery on the descending thoracic aorta or thoracoabdominal aorta?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage of benefit in patients undergoing surgery on the descending thoracic aorta or thoracoabdominal aorta?' Altogether 1177 papers were found using the reported search, of which 17 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Ten of 13 studies demonstrate significant neurological protection from CSF drainage (± additional adjuncts), with two further papers showing no significant difference between patients who had or had not had CSF drainage and one study unable to provide any conclusions. For patients having surgery on the thoracic aorta or thoracoabdominal aorta CSF drainage, maintaining pressures <10 mmHg (P < 0.03), in conjunction with other neuroprotective strategies, minimizes the risk of neurological sequelae when compared with patients treated with similar adjuncts but without CSF drainage. The majority of studies used additional neuroprotective strategies, including cooling and reattachment of the intercostal arteries as adjuncts to CSF drainage. Logistic regression curves demonstrated that the longer the ischaemia time, the greater the benefit from CSF drainage (P < 0.04). Four papers observed complications of CSF drainage, of which the main complications were: catheter occlusion or dislodgement, headache, meningitis and subdural haematoma. Overall, CSF drainage does offer a neuroprotective benefit; preventing paraplegia if CSF pressures are maintained <10 mmHg.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to retained lumbar drain

Intrathecal spinal catheters (lumbar drains) are indicated for several medical and surgical conditions. In neurosurgical procedures, they are used to reduce intracranial and intrathecal pressures by diverting CSF. They have also been placed for therapeutic access to administer drugs, and more recently, vascular surgeons have used them to improve spinal cord perfusion during the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Insertion of these lumbar drains is not without attendant complications. One complication is the shearing of the distal end of the catheter with a resultant retained fragment. The authors report the case of a 65-year-old man who presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage due to the migration of a retained lumbar drain that sheared off during its removal. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of rostral migration of a retained intrathecal catheter causing subarachnoid hemorrhage. The authors review the literature on retained intrathecal spinal catheters, and their findings support either early removal of easily accessible catheters or close monitoring with serial imaging.

[Spinal cord protection during open and endovascular surgery in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta diseases]

In recent decades great advances have been made in surgical procedures for treating thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta defects. Associated mortality and morbidity rates have dropped considerably, mainly in major reference centers, but nonetheless continue to be significant. The need for new strategies to reduce mortality and morbidity has made endovascular approaches an attractive alternative for high-risk surgical patients. The most feared complications of these procedures include paraparesis and paraplegia, which have devastating consequences on patients' quality of life. We provide an updated review of the pathophysiology of spinal cord ischemia in open and endovascular surgery, as well as perioperative measures designed to protect the spinal cord in both types of procedure.

Cerebral epidural hematoma following cerebrospinal fluid drainage during thoracoabdominal aortic repair

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is a common adjunct to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. CSF drainage may improve perioperative spinal cord perfusion and thereby decrease the incidence of paraplegia or paraparesis. Complications of CSF drainage may arise. We present a case of cerebral epidural hematoma (EDH), possibly arising from excessive CSF drainage, during thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Endovascular stenting of thoracic aortic aneurysm

In 2005, the findings of the multicenter Gore Tag study led to United States Food and Drug Administration approval for endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TEVAR). TEVAR provides a therapeutic option for patients who have thoracic aortic aneurysm and for the treatment of type B aortic dissection with malperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia and stroke are recognized neurologic complications of TEVAR. Identification of high-risk patients combined with targeted anesthetic and perioperative management may decrease the risk of neurologic complications after TEVAR.