Surgical revascularization of acute evolving myocardial infarction without blood cardioplegia fails to restore postischemic function in the involved segment

Postcardioplegia acute cardiac dysfunction and reperfusion injury

In cardiac surgery, an obligatory period of ischemia is imposed in order to provide a convenient operative field. Brief periods of ischemia produce systolic and diastolic abnormalities related to pathology occurring during ischemia per se (ischemic injury) or expressed after the onset of reperfusion (reperfusion injury). In the surgical setting, ischemia may be encountered preoperatively with preexisting coronary disease, hypotension, or ventricular fibrillation, between intermittent infusions of cardioplegia solutions, or as a result of maldistribution of cardioplegia solution. The potential for reperfusion injury exists not only at the time of cross-clamp removal, but also with each infusion of cardioplegia solution. Infusion of cardioplegic solution is, in fact, a form of reperfusion to previously ischemic myocardium. Ischemic injury and reperfusion injury are intimately linked in that the severity of ischemia sets the stage for and determines, in part, the extent of reperfusion injury. Mild-to-moderate systolic dysfunction, which may be called "postcardioplegia stunning," remains a significant complication after cardiac surgery. More significant postoperative functional depression may occur in hearts with severe preoperative dysfunction, and in operations requiring long cross-clamp times. In addition, the failure to adequately distribute cardioplegic solution to all areas of the myocardium because of coronary stenoses, high coronary resistance or inadequate delivery pressure-flow relations, contributes to postcardioplegia dysfunction. However, the cardioplegic solution itself may also contribute to postcardioplegic dysfunction by creating temporary ionic and metabolic abnormalities. In addition, systemic hypocalcemia or hyperkalemia resulting from using large doses of cardioplegic solution may temporarily aggravate postcardioplegic mechanical dysfunction. Current formulations and strategies for delivery of cardioplegia solutions are designed to address the various contributors to both ischemic and reperfusion injury that may impact on postoperative mechanical performance. Ischemic injury is avoided by reducing myocardial oxygen demand by engaging immediate arrest and cooling the heart to approximately 10 degrees centigrade, and intermittently infusing solution to reoxygenate the myocardium, maintain hypothermia, and wash out accumulated metabolites. Reperfusion injury may be avoided by infusing hyperosmotic solutions at moderate pressures, and by incorporating oxygen radical scavengers or inhibitors to reduce membrane lipid peroxidation, myocellular and microcirculatory (endothelium) damage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Reperfusion of infarcting myocardium: benefit of surgical reperfusion in a chronic model

Surgical reperfusion of experimental infarction leads to improved recovery of regional function compared with medical reperfusion, but sustained myocardial salvage has not been demonstrated. Twenty-two dogs were subjected to two hours of anterior descending occlusion and divided into three groups: group P (n = 7), no reperfusion; group M (n = 8), medical reperfusion; and group S (n = 7), controlled surgical reperfusion. Ischemia caused systolic bulging (-36% of control systolic shortening, p less than 0.01) and decreased regional work (9% of control pressure-length loop area, p less than 0.05). Thirty minutes after reperfusion group M had persistent systolic bulging (-9% of control systolic shortening) and decreased regional work (9% of control pressure-length loop area), whereas group S had +17% of control systolic shortening and 33% of control pressure-length loop area. After 1 week, regional function improved in all three groups (percent of control systolic shortening: group P, 26%; group M, 19%; group S, 52%), but systolic shortening was significantly better in group S (p less than 0.05 versus group M). Surgical reperfusion also resulted in one half of the eventual myocardial necrosis found in the other groups (group P, 45% of area at risk; group M, 38%; group S, 19%; p less than 0.05, group S versus group P or M). In this model, medical reperfusion offered no demonstrable benefit, whereas controlled surgical reperfusion led to a sustained (1 week) improvement in regional function and significant myocardial salvage.