A review of pulmonary problems following valve replacement in 100 consecutive patients: The case against routine use of assisted ventilation

The Practice of Fast-Track Liver Transplant Anesthesia

Prior to the 1990s, prolonged postoperative intubation and admission to the intensive care unit was considered the standard of care following liver transplantation. Advocates of this practice speculated that this time allowed patients to recover from the stress of major surgery and allowed their clinicians to optimize the recipients' hemodynamics. As evidence in the cardiac surgical literature on the feasibility of early extubation grew, clinicians began applying these principles to liver transplant recipients. Further, some centers also began challenging the dogma that patients need to be cared for in the intensive care unit following liver transplantation and instead transferred patients to the floor or stepdown units immediately following surgery, a technique known as "fast-track" liver transplantation. This article aims to provide a history of early extubation for liver transplant recipients and offer practical advice on how to select patients that may be able to bypass the intensive care unit and be recovered in a non-traditional manner.

Risk factor analysis for fast track protocol failure

BACKGROUND

The introduction of fast-track treatment procedures following cardiac surgery has significantly shortened hospitalisation times in intensive care units (ICU). Readmission to intensive care units is generally considered a negative quality criterion. The aim of this retrospective study is to statistically analyse risk factors and predictors for re-admission to the ICU after a fast-track patient management program.

METHODS

229 operated patients (67 ± 11 years, 75% male, BMI 27 ± 3, 6/2010-5/2011) with use of extracorporeal circulation (70 ± 31 min aortic crossclamping, CABG 62%) were selected for a preoperative fast-track procedure (transfer on the day of surgery to an intermediate care (IMC) unit, stable circulatory conditions, extubated). A uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for re-admission to the ICU.

RESULTS

Over the 11-month study period, 36% of all preoperatively declared fast-track patients could not be transferred to an IMC unit on the day of surgery (n = 77) or had to be readmitted to the ICU after the first postoperative day (n = 4). Readmission or ICU stay signifies a dramatic worsening of the patient outcome (mortality 0/10%, mean hospital stay 10.3 ± 2.5/16.5 ± 16.3, mean transfusion rate 1.4 ± 1,7/5.3 ± 9.1). Predicators for failure of the fast-track procedure are a preoperative ASA class > 3, NYHA class > III and an operation time >267 min ± 74. The significant risk factors for a major postoperative event (= low cardiac output and/or mortality and/or renal failure and/or re-thoracotomy and/or septic shock and/or wound healing disturbances and/or stroke) are a poor EF (OR 2.7 CI 95% 0.98-7.6) and the described ICU readmission (OR 0.14 CI95% 0.05-0.36).

CONCLUSION

Re-admission to the ICU or failure to transfer patients to the IMC is associated with a high loss of patient outcome. The ASA > 3, NYHA class > 3 and operation time >267 minutes are independent predictors of fast track protocol failure.

Fast-Track Recovery in Noncoronary Cardiac Surgery Patients

Objective: Fast-track recovery protocols result in shorter hospital stays and decreased costs in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. However, data based on an objective scoring system are lacking for the impact of these protocols on patients undergoing cardiac surgery other than isolated CABG. Methods: Between March 1999 and March 2003, 299 consecutive patients who underwent open cardiac surgery other than isolated CABG were analyzed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fast-track recovery. The parameters evaluated as predictors of mortality, ie, delayed extubation (>360 minutes), intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (>24 hours), increased length of hospital stay (>5 days), and red blood cell transfusion, were determined by regression analysis. Standard perioperative data were collected prospectively for every patient. Results: Seventy-two percent of the patients were extubated within 6 hours, 87% were discharged from the ICU within 24 hours, and 60% were discharged from the hospital within 5 days. No red blood cells were transfused in 67% of the patients. There were no predictors of mortality. The predictors of delayed extubation were preoperative congestive heart failure (P = .005; odds ratio [OR], 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-12.6) and peripheral vascular disease (P = .02; OR, 6; 95% CI, 1.9-19.4). Factors leading to increased ICU stay were diabetes (P = .05; OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1-12.6), emergent operation (P = .04; OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1-33.2), red blood cell transfusion (P = .03; OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-7.8), chest tube drainage >1000 mL (P = .03; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.2). The predictors of increased length of hospital stay were ICU stay >24 hours (P = .001; OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2-17), EuroSCORE >5 (P = .05; OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1-3.2), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .003; OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-8.7). Predictive factors for transfusion of red blood cells were diabetes (P = .04; OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1), delayed extubation (P = .02; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.1), increased ICU stay (P = .04; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1-6.4), and chest tube drainage >1000 mL (P = .001; OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2-9.3). Conclusions: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of the fast-track recovery protocol in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery other than isolated CABG.

Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria

We hypothesized that variation in extubating brain injured patients would affect the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia, length of stay, and hospital charges. In a prospective cohort of consecutive, intubated brain-injured patients, we evaluated daily: intubation status, spontaneous ventilatory parameters, gas exchange, neurologic status, and specific outcomes listed above. Of 136 patients, 99 (73%) were extubated within 48 h of meeting defined readiness criteria. The other 37 patients (27%) remained intubated for a median 3 d (range, 2 to 19). Patients with delayed extubation developed more pneumonias (38 versus 21%, p < 0.05) and had longer intensive care unit (median, 8.6 versus 3.8 d; p < 0.001) and hospital (median, 19.9 versus 13.2 d; p = 0.009) stays. Practice variation existed after stratifying for differences in Glasgow Coma Scale scores (10 versus 7, p < 0.001) at time of meeting readiness criteria, particularly for comatose patients. There was a similar reintubation rate. Median hospital charges were $29,057.00 higher for extubation delay patients (p < 0.001). This study does not support delaying extubating patients when impaired neurologic status is the only concern prolonging intubation. A randomized trial of extubation at the time brain-injured patients fulfill standard weaning criteria is justifiable.

Influence of fast-track anesthetic technique on cardiovascular infusions and weight gain

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether cardiac surgical patients receiving conventional versus fast-track anesthetic management are statistically significantly different with regard to cardiovascular drug infusions, weight gain, cardiac and pulmonary morbidity, length of intubation, and length of stay.

DESIGN

Retrospective, (partially) sequential, cohort design.

SETTING

Surgical suite and intensive care unit (ICU) at a community hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred seven patients who presented for coronary artery bypass graft and/or cardiac valve replacement.

INTERVENTIONS

None

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Group comparisons of the seven individual cardiovascular drug infusions showed less frequent use in the fast-track patients for lidocaine (9% v 28%; p = 0.00046) only. However, the fast-track group received fewer combinations of cardiovascular drug infusions overall for the first 24-hour postoperative period (p < 0.0005). Hourly comparisons of inotropes showed significantly fewer combinations of dobutamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine for the first postoperative hour and for postoperative hours 7 through 12 (p < 0.01 for each hour). Fast-track patients had less postoperative weight gain for days 1 through 4 (p < 0.01 for each day), shorter length of ICU stay (p < 0.00005), and shorter total length of postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0004). No differences were found with respect to myocardial infarction, death, pulmonary complications, rate of reintubation, or length of hospital stay once discharged from the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-track anesthetic management may be associated with decreased need for inotropic and antiarrhythmic drug infusions and decreased weight gain.

Early vs conventional extubation after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

Sedation and ventilation overnight after cardiac surgery is common practice. However, early extubation may be feasible with no increase in postoperative complications. This study examines (1) if early extubation is possible in a significant number of patients, (2) if it reduces ICU stay, and (3) if this practice increases postoperative complications.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 404 consecutive patients to early extubation (7 to 11 h postoperatively) (group A, 201 patients) or conventional extubation (between 8 and 12 AM the following day) (group B, 203 patients). Variables included type and severity of the disease, surgical risk, type of operation, operative incidences, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, intubation and ICU stay, bleeding, reoperation, vasoactive drugs, and mortality.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable. Extubation within the preestablished time was successful in 60.2% of patients in group A and 74.4% in group B. Median ICU stay was 27 h in group A and 44 h in group B (p=0.008). Discharge from ICU within the first 24 h postoperatively was 44.3% in group A and 30.5% in group B (p=0.006). There was no significant difference in complications between groups. Successfully extubated patients in group A had more reintubation and prolonged ventilation than in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Sixty percent of our patients were extubated within 11 h of operation. (2) As a result, the length of stay in ICU was reduced and the percentage of patients discharged within 24 h was increased. (3) There was no increase in clinically important postoperative complications.

Timing of tracheal extubation in adult cardiac surgery patients

In this article, we examine 14 studies conducted from 1974 to 1994 on "early" endotracheal extubation (0 to 12 hours postoperatively) in adult cardiac surgery patients. Aspects reviewed include: criteria for patient selection; criteria for extubation; analyses of feasibility and safety; effects of anesthetic technique; and patient morbidity. Advantages and disadvantages of early or "fast-track" extubation are discussed as are directions for future research. Selection criteria varied among studies; patients were most commonly excluded because of severe, preexisting pulmonary disease or ventricular dysfunction. Based on the studies examined, however, at least 70% to 80% of adult patients would meet selection criteria. Three universal criteria were applied in all studies: (1) patient is awake and responsive; (2) adequate gas exchange while breathing spontaneously; and (3) cardiovascular stability. To facilitate early extubation in appropriately selected patients, the choice of anesthetic technique and postoperative sedation technique appears to be important. Anesthetic techniques based on inhalational anesthetic agents, supplemented by moderate doses of narcotics, are more appropriate than high-dose narcotic anesthesia for early extubation protocols. Postoperative sedation with propofol, which has a rapid offset of action, may be particularly advantageous. Every published investigation has concluded that early extubation is safe, feasible, and desirable. Morbidity and mortality have not been shown to be affected by early extubation. Anesthetic technique and the patient's medical condition are the two major factors to consider in accomplishing early extubation.

Anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery--a plea for a goal-directed approach

The purpose of the current literature review was to examine whether changes in current anaesthetic techniques are warranted for patients undergoing coronary artery surgery in light of recent information presented in the literature. The objectives of a cardiac anaesthetic technique are to maintain haemodynamic stability and myocardial oxygen balance, minimize the incidence and severity of ischaemic episodes, be aware of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced pharmacokinetic changes, and facilitate early tracheal extubation if appropriate. Many techniques have been utilized. Provided attention is paid to the details of managing myocardial oxygen supply and demand, none has emerged as superior in preventing intraoperative myocardial ischaemia. Silent myocardial ischaemia (i.e., ischaemia occurring in the absence of haemodynamic aberrations) is common throughout the perioperative period and may occur even in the presence of an appropriately used anaesthetic technique. The incidence and severity appear to be greatest in the postoperative period when the effects of anaesthesia are dissipating. The use of high-dose opioid anaesthesia may no longer be the most appropriate technique to facilitate the anaesthetic objectives. The role of pain management in altering the incidence of ischaemia requires further study. Increased waiting lists for cardiac surgery and ever-diminishing resources should prompt a re-evaluation of early extubation (i.e., within eight hours) as a method of improving utilization of scarce ICU resources. It is suggested that this should be possible with currently available agents to achieve the anaesthetic objectives. Future suggestions for research in this area are made.

Current management of patients after cardiopulmonary bypass

The postoperative management of cardiac surgical patients is reviewed with particular reference to some of the recent advances and current controversies. It is emphasised that there has been a marked decrease in the incidence of many of the major problems associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and that, in the majority of cases, cardiac surgery is now a routine procedure associated with a very low morbidity and mortality.

Intubation and other experiences in cardiac surgery: the consumer's views

Recently publications have advocated earlier weaning and early extubation of the trachea in patients after cardiac surgery. Greater comfort of the patients is one of the advantages claimed for this policy. One hundred consecutive adult patients were questioned on the fifth postoperative day to assess the relative comfort or discomfort of the patients during tracheal intubation and ventilation. Overnight tracheal intubation and ventilation were easily tolerated by over 90 per cent of patients who had received morphine and diazepam. There was a high incidence of amnesia. Some of the other claimed advantages appear inconclusive and further study is desirable to elucidate the effect of early removal of the tracheal tube upon the indicence of pulmonary complications.

The effect of positive end expiratory pressure after three types of open heart surgery

It has previously been shown that patients who have undergone mitral valve replacement (MVR) tolerate a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.0 kPa better than patients who have had aortic valve replacement (AVR). the difference was explained by the fact that the mitral patients had pre-existing pulmonary vascular disease. In the present study the effect of PEEP up to 2.0 kPa is investigated in three types of operations: aortocoronary bypass graft (ACBG), mitral valve replacement, and aortic valve replacement; there were five patients in each group. We found that our mitral patients tolerated PEEP better than the two other groups, and that tolerance was not correlated to a higher pulmonary vascular resistance, but rather to a higher level of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The influence of PEEP varies in different types of patients and the effect is still difficult to predict.

Intermittent mandatory ventilation and controlled mechanical ventrilation without positive end-expiratory pressure following cardio-pulmonary bypass

In a group of 18 male patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass, the overall incidence of post-operative atelectasis was 60%. Nearly three-quarters occurred during anaesthesia. After operation there was no difference whether CMV or IMV without PEEP was provided overnight. Atelectasis already present did not improve and further atelectasis occurred. A role for IMV is not excluded, since it facilitates the use of PEEP. Many factors operate and interact to provoke atelectasis during anaesthesia, which increases post-operative morbidity. Many of these factors are prevertible or reversible if their physiological basis is understood. Optimal post-operative ventilation should be tailored to the needs of the individual patient and demands close co-operation between anaesthetist and surgeon.