Revascularization after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of 573 patients

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery after thrombolytic therapy in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Trial, Phase II (TIMI II)

OBJECTIVES

We examined the results of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after thrombolytic therapy in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial, Phase II (TIMI II) with particular emphasis on patient characteristics, the impact of antecedent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and morbidity and mortality in certain subgroups.

BACKGROUND

Coronary bypass surgery is frequently used after thrombolytic therapy, but there is relatively little information with regard to early and late outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 3,339 patients enrolled in the TIMI II trial. Bypass surgery was performed in 390 patients (11.7%): 54 (14%) within 24 h after entry into the trial or within 24 h of coronary angioplasty and 336 (86%) between 24 h and 42 days after entry.

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality rates were, respectively, 16.7% and 3.9% (p < 0.001); perioperative myocardial infarction rates were 5.6% and 6.2%, respectively; and major hemorrhagic events occurred in 74% and 50.9%, respectively (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of perioperative mortality was bypass surgery within 24 h after entry or after coronary angioplasty. Among patients undergoing bypass surgery within 24 h of entry or after coronary angioplasty, the prevalence of multivessel disease (59.1% vs. 77.8%) and use of the internal thoracic artery (18.5% vs. 62.5%) were lower than in the remaining surgical patients. Among the 322 perioperative survivors, the 1-year mortality rate after discharge was only 2.2% and 1.9%, respectively, in the two groups. Only one patient had a documented recurrent myocardial infarction during the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased mortality rate with bypass surgery after thrombolytic therapy, particularly in patients undergoing operation within 24 h of coronary angioplasty or during the involving phase of infarction, must be balanced against the excellent 1-year prognosis and perioperative survivors, who are in general a group at higher risk of death or recurrent infarction. These data provide a basis for comparison for future studies.

A difference between front-loaded streptokinase and standard-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in preserving left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction (the Central Illinois Thrombolytic Therapy Study)

A blinded, randomized trial compared the effects of front-loaded streptokinase with those of the conventional dose of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) on left ventricular (LV) function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Thrombolytic therapy was administered in the emergency departments of 30 community hospitals in central Illinois, and subsequent studies were performed at 1 tertiary referral center. Patients aged < or = 75 years with a first AMI who could be treated within 4 hours of the onset of chest pain were randomly assigned to receive either streptokinase (375,000 IU bolus, followed by 1,125,000 IU over 1 hour) or rt-PA (10 mg bolus, followed by 50 mg in the first hour, and 20 mg/hour for the next 2 hours). All patients were treated with aspirin (325 mg) and intravenous heparin. Patients were transferred for angiography within 24 hours. During the 30-month study, 253 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy 2.4 +/- 1.0 hour after the onset of AMI. In patients with anterior wall AMI (n = 90), global LV ejection fraction measured by angiography within 24 hours was 45 +/- 12% with rt-PA, and 39 +/- 13% with streptokinase (p < 0.03). Convalescent radionuclide angiography documented a persistent beneficial effect of rt-PA on LV regional wall contractility, but not global ejection fraction. There were no differences between rt-PA and streptokinase in preserving global or regional LV function in patients with inferior wall AMI.

Blood coagulation and autologous blood transfusion in cardiac surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To review the basic pathophysiology of altered coagulation associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and autologous blood transfusion in cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Review of rational use of heparin, mechanisms and treatment of coagulation disorders, and autologous blood transfusion.

SETTING

Cardiac surgery in community and academic hospitals.

PATIENTS

Adult cardiac surgical patients.

MAIN RESULTS

Heparin is most commonly used for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Although activated clotting time is widely used to assess heparin-induced anticoagulation, the minimum time to prevent clotting during cardiopulmonary bypass remains unclear. Activated clotting time is affected by many factors other than heparin, such as antithrombin III, blood temperature, platelet count, and age. The rational use of activated clotting time still must be defined. The frequency of abnormal bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass is significant. Although inadequate surgical hemostasis is the most frequent cause of bleeding, altered coagulation often is present. A decreased number of functional platelets is one of the important causes of bleeding diathesis. Platelet dysfunction is induced by perioperative medication such as aspirin. Cardiopulmonary bypass decreases functional platelets by degranulation, fragmentation, and loss of fibrinogen receptors. Medications such as prostacyclin and iloprost may be useful to protect these platelets. Desmopressin increases factor VIII:C and von Willebrand's factor, leading to a decrease in bleeding time. Desmopressin may be useful to decrease blood loss in repeat cardiac operations, complex cardiac surgery, and abnormal postoperative bleeding. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting immediately after streptokinase infusion also are at risk for abnormal bleeding. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate may be necessary. Autologous blood transfusion is cost-effective and the safest way to avoid or decrease homologous blood transfusion. Predonation, intraoperative salvage, and postoperative salvage are encouraged. Erythropoietin may be useful in increasing the amount of predonation red cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Coagulation disorders in cardiac surgery are caused by many factors, such as heparin, platelet dysfunction, and fibrinolysis. Rational use of blood component therapy and medications such as heparin, protamine, and desmopressin are mandatory. Autologous blood transfusion is very useful in decreasing or obviating the use of homologous blood transfusion.

Management of the patient following coronary thrombolysis

Myocardial salvage can be maximized by the early institution of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin. Certain patients may benefit from the administration of intravenous heparin, beta blockers, or nitroglycerin. The routine use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or calcium-channel blockers does not appear to be warranted. Recurrent myocardial ischemia should be vigorously treated with medical therapy and there may be value in cardiac catheterization, followed by PTCA or bypass surgery, depending upon the extent of myocardium at risk and the underlying coronary anatomy. Long-term morbidity and mortality may be reduced by instituting aspirin and beta blockers as well as by modifying risk factors. There is no evidence for the long-term benefit from any calcium-channel blocker. Oral anticoagulation may be warranted in those patients with a mural thrombus, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. ACE inhibitors may be of value in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and certainly in the presence of symptomatic congestive heart failure. Antiarrhythmic therapy is generally indicated only for symptomatic or life-threatening arrhythmias. Residual myocardial ischemia should be sought by exercise testing, and those patients with poor exercise tolerance generally warrant cardiac catheterization in consideration for revascularization.

Current status of cardiac surgery: a 40 year review

Cardiac surgery has undergone dramatic advancements during the past 3 decades. The introduction of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest ushered in the true era of open heart surgery. Bioprostheses and mechanical valves as well as techniques for valve reconstruction permit routine repair or replacement of stenotic and regurgitant native valves. Progress in the disciplines of mechanical and electrical engineering has led to the development of pocket watch-sized, physiologically responsive pacemakers as well as a variety of circulatory assist devices that include the intraaortic balloon pump, ventricular assist device and total artificial heart. The synthesis of cardiotonic and vasoactive drugs and advancements in anesthetic management, postoperative monitoring and nursing care greatly facilitate perioperative patient management. This summary of state of the art cardiac surgery begins with a brief historical background followed by a review of recent advances in six main categories: coronary artery disease, acquired valvular heart disease, congenital cardiac disease, cardiac transplantation, myocardial preservation and mechanical circulatory assistance. In conducting the review of recent literature, particular attention was directed to large clinical series that document the results of contemporary surgical procedures, novel therapeutic approaches to current clinical problems and unresolved controversies in the field of cardiac surgery. The abundance of surgical literature and constraints on the length of this article do not permit an exhaustive review. Apologies are extended to clinicians and laboratory investigators whose important contributions to the understanding and treatment of cardiac disease are not included herein.