"Low-dose" aprotinin modifies hemostasis but not proinflammatory cytokine release

Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults

BACKGROUND

Organ injury is a common and severe complication of cardiac surgery that contributes to the majority of deaths. There are no effective treatment or prevention strategies. It has been suggested that innate immune system activation may have a causal role in organ injury. A wide range of organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult cardiac surgery patients, with inconsistent results in terms of effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the review was to summarise the results of RCTs of organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response in adult cardiac surgery. The review considered whether the interventions had a treatment effect on inflammation, important clinical outcomes, or both.

SEARCH METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, conference proceedings and two trial registers were searched on October 2022 together with reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response versus placebo or no treatment in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery where the treatment effect on innate immune activation and on clinical outcomes of interest were reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Searches, study selection, quality assessment, and data extractions were performed independently by pairs of authors. The primary inflammation outcomes were peak IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations in blood post-surgery. The primary clinical outcome was in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Treatment effects were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 40,255 participants from 328 RCTs were included in the synthesis. The effects of treatments on IL-6 (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.58, I2 = 92%) and IL-8 (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.65, I2 = 91%) were unclear due to heterogeneity. Heterogeneity for inflammation outcomes persisted across multiple sensitivity and moderator analyses. The pooled treatment effect for in-hospital or 30-day mortality was RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.91, I2 = 0%, suggesting a significant clinical benefit. There was little or no treatment effect on mortality when analyses were restricted to studies at low risk of bias. Post hoc analyses failed to demonstrate consistent treatment effects on inflammation and clinical outcomes. Levels of certainty for pooled treatment effects on the primary outcomes were very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of RCTs of organ protection interventions targeting innate immune system activation did not resolve uncertainty as to the effectiveness of these treatments, or the role of innate immunity in organ injury following cardiac surgery.

Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?

Background Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used to limit perioperative bleeding and reduce the need for donated blood transfusions during cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin evaluating its effect on the outcome of perioperative transfusion have been published since 1987, and systematic reviews were conducted in 1992 and 1997.

Methods A systematic search was conducted for all RCTs of aprotinin that used placebo controls or were open-label with no active control treatment. Data collected included the primary outcome, objective of each study, whether a systematic review was cited or conducted as part of the background and/or rationale for the study and the number of previously published RCTs cited. Cumulative meta-analyses were performed.

Results Sixty-four randomized, controlled trials of aprotinin were found, conducted between 1987 and 2002, reporting an endpoint of perioperative transfusion. Median trial size was 64 subjects, with a range of 20 to 1784. A cumulative meta-analysis indicated that aprotinin greatly decreased the need for perioperative transfusion, stabilizing at an odds ratio of 0.25 (p, 10 2 6) by the 12th study, published in June of 1992. The upper limit of the confidence interval never exceeded 0.65 and results were similar in all subgroups. Citation of previous RCTs was extremely low, with a median of 20% of prior trials cited. Only 7 of 44 (15%) of subsequent reports referenced the largest trial (N 1/4 1784), which was 28 times larger than the median trial size.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that investigators evaluating aprotinin were not adequately citing previous research, resulting in a large number of RCTs being conducted to address efficacy questions that prior trials had already definitively answered. Institutional review boards and journals could reduce the number of redundant trials by requiring investigators to conduct adequate searches for prior evidence and conducting systematic reviews.

The effect of RBC transfusions on cytokine gene expression after cardiac surgery in patients developing post-operative multiple organ failure

AIM

To determine the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during cardiac surgery on cytokine gene expression (GE) in relation to multiple organ failure (MOF) development after systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

BACKGROUND

RBC transfusion in cardiac surgery patients is dose-dependently associated with post-operative MOF, possibly acting as a second hit after cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

For this observational study, 29 patients divided into four groups of cardiac surgery patients were selected from a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Group 1: no-RBC, no-MOF (N = 8); group 2: MOF, no-RBC (N = 7); group 3: RBC, no-MOF (N = 6); group 4: RBC and MOF (N = 8). Selection was based on age, gender, number of (leukocyte-depleted) RBC transfusions, type and duration of surgery. A 114 cytokine GE array was applied to blood samples withdrawn before and 24 h after surgery. Expression of selected genes was confirmed with reverse transcriptase real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 39 detectable genes showed a significant change in GE after surgery. Confirmed by RT-PCR, transfused MOF patients exhibit significantly less downregulation of CD40 ligand than control patients. Patients who would develop MOF show significantly larger increases in GE of transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-superfamily members 10 and 13B (TNFsf10/13B).

CONCLUSIONS

When tested at 24 h after surgery, cytokine GE in peripheral blood leucocytes showed no significant differences between those transfused and those not transfused. Some alterations were seen in those developing MOF compared to those who did not, but the findings offer no role of leukocyte depleted (LD) RBC transfusion in the development of MOF.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Pump Prime Aprotinin Fails to Limit Proinflammatory Cytokine Release After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to establish whether pump prime aprotinin could limit the cytokine responses in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients admitted for first-time elective coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized into control or aprotinin groups. Patients in the aprotinin group received 280 mg aprotinin in the pump prime. Leukocyte count, creatine kinase cardiac isoenzyme (CK-MB), cytokine production and postoperative blood loss were analyzed perioperatively and compared with preoperative values.

RESULTS

The peak level of leukocyte count was lower in the aprotinin group than in controls (9.3 +/- 0.58 vs 11.2 +/- 0.68 x 10(9)/L, p = 0.01). Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 did not differ significantly between the groups throughout the study period. Plasma IL-10 levels were higher in the controls than in the aprotinin group at 5 min (49.6 +/- 24.9 vs 8.13 +/- 2.8 pg/ml, p = 0.01) after reperfusion.

CONCLUSION

Pump prime aprotinin fails to limit proinflammatory cytokine response in circulating blood.

Assessment of aprotinin influence on periodontal clinical status and matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2 and their tissue inhibitors saliva concentrations in patients with chronic periodontitis

PURPOSE

Assessment of the effect of treatment with aprotinin-containing drug on the clinical status of the periodontal tissue and on the concentrations of metalloproteinases released in the course of periodontitis (MMP-1, MMP-2) as well as their tissue inhibitors (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) in the saliva of patients with chronic periodontitis (CP).

MATERIAL/METHODS

The study involved 25 subjects with CP (39-68 years), including 16 women and 9 men. The patients were prescribed aprotinin preparation to be taken for 2 weeks. The control group (C) involved 14 healthy subjects (41-65 years), including 10 women and 4 men. Two periodontal indices were assessed: the approximal plaque index (API) and bleeding on probing index (BOP). Periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment level were also evaluated. The concentrations of MMP-1 and MMP-2 as well as TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were determined by the ELISA method.

RESULTS

The mean salivary MMP-1 concentration in patients with CP was significantly higher before and after treatment, as compared to healthy subjects. The mean salivary MMP-2 concentration in CP patients at baseline was also higher as compared to the C group and increased after treatment. The mean salivary TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 concentration in CP patients was higher as compared to C group and increased after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the mean MMPs levels were found to be growing it can be assumed that aprotinin has no significant effect on the regulation of MMPs in the saliva of CP patients. It thus seems that aprotinin application after scaling has no additional therapeutic effect.

Efficacy of a High-Dose Aprotinin Regimen for Reducing Transfusion Requirements and Inflammatory Responses in Adult Cardiac Surgery

This study evaluated and compared the risks and effects to the inflammatory response of low- and high-dose aprotinin regimens. Between January and June 2006, patients scheduled for cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled and randomly allocated to either low- ( n = 15) or high-dose ( n = 13) aprotinin groups. The incidences of mortality and adverse events were comparable in both groups. Post-operative creatinine levels and blood loss were not significantly different between the two groups. With the exception of platelets, the counts of transfused allogenic blood products were not significantly different between the groups. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, soluble tumour necrosis factor II receptor, and interferon-γ levels increased in both groups compared with baseline, but no significant intergroup differences were detected. In conclusion, high- and low-dose aprotinin had similar effects in the reduction of mediastinal bleeding and attenuation of systemic inflammatory responses, and high-dose aprotinin therapy could be used without any increased adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion. Recently, questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs and the safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the internet. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 211 RCTs that recruited 20,781 participants. Data from placebo/inactive controlled trials, and from head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of operative blood loss, but the differences were small. Aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.71). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and it was 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared superior in reducing the need for RBC transfusion: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding: RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.68). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of just under 3% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 37 (95% CI 27 to 56). Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, but the data were sparse and the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias. Evidence of publication bias was not observed in trials reporting re-operation rates. Adjustment for these effects reduced the magnitude of estimated benefits but did not negate treatment effects. However, the apparent advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues was small and may be explained by publication bias and non-equivalent drug doses. Aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18), stroke (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.64) renal dysfunction (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70) or overall mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20). The analyses of myocardial infarction and death included data from the majority of subjects recruited into the clinical trials of aprotinin. However, under-reporting of renal events could explain the lack of effect seen with aprotinin. Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues but data were sparse. These results conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion. Based on the results of randomised trials their efficacy does not appear to be offset by serious adverse effects. In most circumstances the lysine analogues are probably as effective as aprotinin and are cheaper; the evidence is stronger for tranexamic acid than for aminocaproic acid. In high risk cardiac surgery, where there is a substantial probability of serious blood loss, aprotinin may be preferred over tranexamic acid. Aprotinin does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of vascular occlusion and death, but the data do not exclude an increased risk of renal failure. There is no need for further placebo-controlled trials of aprotinin or lysine analogues in cardiac surgery. The principal need is for large comparative trials to assess the relative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in different surgical procedures.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) has been performed for many years, but its use is increasing in frequency, and it remains an open question whether OPCAB is associated with better outcomes than on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

New York State patients who underwent either OPCAB with median sternotomy (13 889 patients) or on-pump CABG surgery (35 941 patients) between 2001 and 2004 were followed up via New York databases. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared after adjustment for patient risk factors and after patients were matched on the basis of significant predictors of type of CABG surgery. OPCAB had a significantly lower inpatient/30-day mortality rate (adjusted OR 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 0.97), lower rates for 2 perioperative complications (stroke: adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86; respiratory failure: adjusted OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93), and a higher rate of unplanned operation in the same admission (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.15). In the matched samples, no difference existed in 3-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.22), but OPCAB patients had higher rates of subsequent revascularization (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.80). The 3-year OPCAB and on-pump survival rates for matched patients were 89.4% and 90.1%, respectively (P=0.20). For freedom from subsequent revascularization, the respective rates were 89.9% and 93.6% (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and complication rates than on-pump CABG, but long-term outcomes are comparable, except for freedom from revascularization, which favors on-pump CABG.

Effect of Clopidogrel Premedication in Off-Pump Cardiac Surgery

Background— Premedication with clopidogrel has reduced thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. However, because of the enhanced and irreversible platelet inhibition by clopidogrel, patients requiring surgical revascularization have a higher risk of bleeding complications and transfusion requirements. A principal benefit of surgical coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass is its lower hemorrhagic sequelae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative clopidogrel administration in the incidence of hemostatic reexploration, blood product transfusion rates, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery using a large patient sample and a risk-adjusted approach.

Methods and Results— Two hundred eighty-one patients (17.9%) did and 1291 (82.1%) did not receive clopidogrel before their surgery, for a total of 1572 patients undergoing isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 2000 and June 2002. Risk-adjusted logistic regression analyses and a matched pair analyses by propensity scores were used to assess the association between clopidogrel administration and reoperation as a result of bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusions received, and the need for multiple transfusions. Hemorrhage-related preoperative risk factors identified in the literature and those found significant in a univariate model were used. The clopidogrel group had a higher likelihood of hemostatic reoperations (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47 to 10.47; P <0.01) and an increased need in overall packed red blood cell (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.94 to 3.60; P <0.01), multiple unit (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.48; P =0.02), and platelet (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.77 to 3.66; P <0.01) transfusions. Surgical outcomes and operative mortality (1.4% versus 1.4%; P =1.00) were not statistically different.

Conclusions— Clopidogrel administration in the cardiology suite increases the risk for hemostatic reoperation and the requirements for blood product transfusions during and after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

The Impact of Heparin-coated Circuits on Hemodynamics During and After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

This study was performed to investigate if heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits can reduce the systemic inflammatory reaction with the subsequent release of vasoactive substances during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Fifty-one patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were perfused with either a heparin-coated or an uncoated circuit. During bypass the mean arterial pressure was maintained as near as possible to 60 mm Hg. Mediators for inflammation, hemodynamic, and oxygen parameters were determined during and after bypass. To reach the target mean arterial pressure in the first hour of bypass the pump flow in the uncoated group had to be increased (P<0.05), consequently the systemic vascular resistance index decreased (P<0.05). After bypass more inotropic support was necessary in this group to reach this pressure. In the coated group less bradykinin, complement activation, and elastase was generated during bypass (P<0.05). The results of this study suggest that heparin coating not only improves biocompatibility, but also ameliorates the hemodynamic instability during and after bypass.

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells.

IMPLICATIONS

Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.

Inflammatory response in an immunosuppressed patient with Wegener's granulomatosis

BACKGROUND

The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers a systemic inflammatory response (IR), but it is not known if a similar response occurs in an immunosuppressed patient with autoimmune disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Observational study in a 56-year-old man receiving immunosuppressive therapy for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) who underwent aortic valve replacement on CPB. The following markers for IR were studied in the perioperative period: C3a, C5a, neutrophil elastase (NE), interleukin eight (IL-8), white cell count (WCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Results were compared with published literature on the IR in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation with and without the use of CPB. All inflammatory markers increased in the perioperative period. The intensity of IR was markedly reduced compared to published literature for patients undergoing coronary revascularisation on CPB and the temporal patients and extend resembled that for off-pump.

CONCLUSION

In a patient with WG on immunosuppressive therapy the CPB-related IR is reduced.

ONO-6818, a novel, potent neutrophil elastase inhibitor, reduces inflammatory mediators during simulated extracorporeal circulation

BACKGROUND

Among the serine proteases, neutrophil elastase is a powerful cytotoxic enzyme and plays a pivotal role in the inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. This study assesses the effects of the specific inhibition of neutrophil elastase by a novel, potent, low-molecular-weight neutrophil elastase inhibitor, ONO-6818. We hypothesized that ONO-6818 reduces inflammatory mediators and modulates adhesion molecules and the deformability of neutrophils during simulated extracorporeal circulation.

METHODS

Simulated extracorporeal circulation was established by recirculating fresh heparinized (3.75 U/mL) human blood for 120 minutes in a membrane oxygenator and a roller pump with and without 1.0 micromol/L of ONO-6818 (n = 9 for control group, n = 7 for ONO-6818 group). The neutrophil adhesion molecules, CD11b and L-selectin, and the cytoplasmic F-actin of neutrophils were measured by flow cytometry. Neutrophil deformability was evaluated using simulated silicon microcapillaries. Neutrophil elastase, interleukin 8, and C5b-9 were measured using enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Neutrophil elastase levels were significantly lower in the ONO-6818 group. ONO-6818 significantly reduced interleukin 8 and C5b-9 production. ONO-6818 did not modulate changes of CD11b and L-selectin during recirculation. Cytoplasmic F-actin content and changes of neutrophil deformability did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of neutrophil elastase activity with ONO-6818 reduces further interleukin 8 production and the formation of the complement membrane attack complex, and this results in a reduction of neutrophil elastase levels during simulated extracorporeal circulation. This study suggests that specific neutrophil elastase inhibition with ONO-6818 is a feasible therapeutic option to attenuate the exaggerated inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Fibrinolytic activity and bleeding after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and low-dose aprotinin therapy

Low-dose aprotinin inhibits hyperfibrinolysis in cardiac surgery. However, excessive postoperative bleeding and increased fibrinolysis may occur despite low dose-aprotinin administration. We investigated (i) whether fibrinolytic activity significantly rises under low-dose aprotinin administration, and (ii) whether this is associated with excessive postoperative bleeding (> or = 1000 ml/24 h). In a prospective single-blind trial, 120 consecutive patients were randomized to receive 280 mg aprotinin or no aprotinin before skin incision. D-dimer levels increased significantly to the end of surgery, reaching higher levels in the control group. The risk for excessive bleeding was lower in the aprotinin group (12 versus 37%, = 0.001). Fifteen minutes after heparin reversal, patients were at risk for excessive bleeding, when enhanced fibrinolysis was documented (aprotinin group, D-dimer > or = 1.0 micro g/ml, odds ratio = 9.1, = 0.047; control group, D-dimer > or = 3.0 micro g/ml, odds ratio = 4.6, = 0.014). Ninety-seven per cent of the aprotinin group and 81% of control group patients had no excessive bleeding when the D-dimer plasma level was below these values. We conclude that (i) fibrinolytic activity significantly rises under low-dose aprotinin administration, and (ii) plasma D-dimer levels at end of surgery may help to identify patients who are unlikely to develop excessive postoperative bleeding.

Stroke after cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis of the effect of aprotinin dosing regimens

BACKGROUND

Half-dose aprotinin (HDA) appears to be equivalent to full-dose aprotinin (FDA) in its ability to prevent bleeding. However, data regarding the potential effect of aprotinin use and dosage on other outcomes such as the occurrence of perioperative stroke are limited. It has been postulated that the higher level of kallikrein inhibition obtained with FDA dosing may be required for end-organ protection. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study in cardiac surgery patients at high risk for developing stroke to determine the relative effects of FDA and HDA regimens on the incidence of postoperative stroke.

METHODS

Records of 1,524 patients undergoing cardiac surgery over a 15-month period were reviewed. Patients at high risk for stroke were selected if they met all of the following predefined criteria: age greater than 70 years, history of hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and presence of aortic atheroma. A validated preoperative stroke risk index was calculated for each patient. Postoperative stroke required confirmation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into three groups according to whether they were administered no aprotinin, HAD, or FDA.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients fulfilled the criteria for being at high risk for stroke. Stroke risk index was very similar (p = 0.56) in the three groups: those who received no aprotinin and served as a control group (124 +/- 15, n = 56), those who were given HDA (123 +/- 12, n = 67), and those who received FDA (122 +/- 11 n = 26). Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were also similar between the three study groups. Overall, the incidence of stroke was 16% (24/149). The incidence of stroke differed (p < 0.05) among the three groups: no aprotinin 16% (9/56), HDA 22% (15/67), and FDA 0% (0/26).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study of cardiac surgery patients at high risk for postoperative stroke, the administration of FDA but not HDA was associated with a lower incidence of stroke.

High-dose aprotinin reduces activation of hemostasis, allogeneic blood requirement, and duration of postoperative ventilation in pediatric cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Though multiple studies have affirmed the effectiveness of aprotinin in reducing blood loss in adult cardiac surgery, the possible benefit in pediatric cardiac surgery is controversial.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of aprotinin in attenuating the hemostatic and inflammatory activation during cardiopulmonary bypass in 60 patients weighing less than 10 kg was investigated. Secondary endpoints were the influence of aprotinin on the reduction of blood loss and allogeneic blood requirement, as well as postoperative oxygenation and length of mechanical ventilation. Aprotinin was administered in a high-dose of 3 x 10(4) KIU/kg plus a bolus of 5 x 10(5) KIU (not weight adjusted) added to the pump prime.

RESULTS

Aprotinin plasma concentration at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was with 184 +/- 45 KIU/mL, within the targeted range of 200 KIU/mL. Coagulation and fibrinolysis were suppressed (F1.2 1 hour after CPB: 5.35 +/- 2.9 nmol/L vs 14.5 +/- 23.1 nmol/L; D-dimer 1 hour after CPB: 0.63 +/- 0.6 ng/mL vs 2.3 +/- 3.1 ng/mL; p < 0.05), inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10) increased over time without significant differences between the groups, and only complement C3a activation was significantly attenuated at the end of CPB in the aprotinin group. Chest tube drainage was significantly reduced (24 hours: median 13.5 [IQR 12.2] mL/kg vs 19.4 [8.2] mL/kg; p < 0.05). All patients received one unit of packed cells to prime the heart lung machine. A second unit was needed significantly less often in the aprotinin group (13% vs 47%; p < 0.05). Postoperative oxygenation (pO2/FIO2 172 [IQR 128] mm Hg vs 127 [74]; p < 0.05) improved, and the time on ventilator was shorter in the aprotinin group (median 45 hours [IQR 94] vs 101 [IQR 74]; p < 0.05). No side effects were attributable to the use of aprotinin.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose aprotinin effectively attenuated hemostatic activation and reduced blood loss and transfusion requirement in pediatric cardiac surgery. Postoperative ventilation was also shortened in the aprotinin group.

Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Release of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α from the Isolated Rat Heart: The Effect of Aprotinin and Forskolin

Aprotinin has been reported to reduce plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Because CPB is also associated with elevated levels of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS stimulates release of inflammatory cytokines from the heart we tested the hypothesis that aprotinin would inhibit cardiac release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) provoked by LPS. Isolated rat hearts were perfused Langendorf style. After 30 minutes of equilibration LPS (100 ng/mL) was infused for 60 minutes. Timed samples of coronary effluent were collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after the initiation of LPS for the measurement of coronary flow and the determination of TNF and cyclic AMP. Other hearts were perfused with buffer containing aprotinin [137 kallikrein-inhibiting units (KIU)/mL or 250 KIU/mL] and then infused with LPS. An additional group received forskolin (10 μM) and LPS. In hearts perfused as controls with buffer alone no TNF was detected in the coronary effluent. In hearts perfused with LPS TNF was reliably detected in the coronary effluent at 60 minutes (606 ± 450 pg/min) and increased with time to a level of 1792 ± 650 pg/min at 150 minutes. The addition of aprotinin had no significant effect on LPS-stimulated TNF release. For instance in hearts perfused with 137 KIU/mL aprotinin LPS-stimulated release at 150 minutes was 2141 ± 732 pg/min and in hearts perfused with 250 KIU/mL LPS-stimulated TNF release was 2049 ± 789 pg/min. Forskolin administration was associated with release of cyclic AMP from the heart and completely inhibited LPS-stimulated TNF release. We conclude that LPS stimulated release of TNF from the heart. Adding aprotinin to the perfusion buffer in either high or low concentrations did not attenuate LPS-stimulated cytokine release. Elevating myocardial cyclic AMP with forskolin completely attenuated LPS-stimulated TNF release.

Does aprotinin influence the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in patients?

OBJECTIVES

Aprotinin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties, but its effects on the inflammatory reaction to cardiopulmonary bypass remain controversial. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the influence of aprotinin on various blood markers of inflammation during and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

Sixty male patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: a placebo group, a second group receiving 2,000,000 KIU of aprotinin followed by an infusion of 500,000 KIU/h and 2,000,000 KIU in the pump prime, and a third group receiving half this dosage. Measurements of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, interleukin 10, endotoxin, histamine, complement factors, prekallikrein, and prostaglandin D(2) were obtained at baseline, 30 minutes after study drug loading, 10 minutes after the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass, before the end of bypass, 4 hours after bypass, and on the first and second postoperative days.

RESULTS

Aprotinin had no significant effect on any of these parameters. As expected, aprotinin reduced early blood loss in both treated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that aprotinin at doses currently used to reduce blood loss has no significant influence on the systemic inflammatory response during moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in human subjects, as assessed by the mediators measured in this study.

Aprotinin in coronary operation with cardiopulmonary bypass: does "low-dose" aprotinin inhibit the inflammatory response?

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass induces a systemic inflammatory response. Aprotinin, a nonspecific proteinase inhibitor is known to improve postoperative hemostasis and may modify the inflammatory reaction. This study evaluates the effects of low-dose aprotinin on inflammatory markers in patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the control group (C) (n = 14) and the low-dose aprotinin group (A) (n = 15) with (2 x 10(6) KIU = 280 mg) aprotinin added to the pump prime. Cytokine response (interleukin-6, soluble TNF II receptor), terminal complement production (SC5b-9), and neutrophil activation (lactoferrin) were assessed up to 6 hours postoperatively. Clinical data and hemostatic factors including fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, and plasmin/alpha2-antiplasmin were investigated.

RESULTS

In both study groups, a significant increase of all inflammatory markers was seen (IL-6, sTNF-IIR, SC5b-9, lactoferrin), p less than 0.001. Peak levels of complement production occurred after protamine administration, whereas cytokine increases were more pronounced postoperatively with marked elevation up to 6 hours. The markers did not differ significantly between groups throughout the study period (p > 0.05 at each time of determination). However, after protamine administration reduced fibrinolysis (D-dimer, plasmin/alpha2-antiplasmin) was detected in group A. Measurements for coagulation (fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin complex) were not significantly influenced by aprotinin. The total amount of blood loss during the first 24 hours was significantly reduced in group A (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin added to the pump prime does not inhibit the inflammatory response caused by cardiopulmonary bypass, but improves postoperative hemostasis. A potential effect of high-dose aprotinin on inflammatory markers remains to be elucidated.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) blood transfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon aminocaproic acid, on peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (to May 1998), EMBASE (to December 1997), web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 participants). Aprotinin reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 30% (RR=0.70: 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.76). The average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 20.4% (95%CI: 15.6% to 25.3%). On average, aprotinin use saved 1.1 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.69 to 1.47) in those requiring transfusion. Aprotinin also significantly reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding (RR=0.40: 95%CI: 0.25 to 0.66). We found 18 trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) (1,342 participants). TXA reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (RR=0.66: 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.81). This represented an ARR of 17.2% (95%CI: 8.7% to 25.7%). TXA use resulted in a saving of 1.03 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.67 to 1.39) in those requiring transfusion. We found four trials of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) (208 participants). EACA use resulted in a statistically non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion (RR=0.48: 95%CI: 0.19 to 1.19). Comparisons between agents Eight trials made 'head-to-head' comparisons between TXA and aprotinin. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the rate of RBC transfusion: RR=1.21 (95%CI: 0.83 to 1.76) for TXA compared to aprotinin. Adverse Effects Aprotinin did not seem to be associated with an excess risk of adverse effects, including thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis RR=0.64: 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.31) and renal failure (RR=1.19: 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.79). Fewer data were available for TXA and EACA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From this review it appears that aprotinin reduces the need for red cell transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to bleeding, without serious adverse effects. However, there was significant heterogeneity in trial outcomes, and some evidence of publication bias. Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, although the data were rather sparse. The poor evaluation of these latter drugs is unfortunate as results suggest they may be equally as effective as aprotinin, but are significantly cheaper. The evidence reviewed here supports the use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery. Further small trials of this drug are not warranted. Future trials should be large enough to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aprotinin with that of TXA and EACA.

One-year clinical outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is a new surgical technique by which the left internal mammary artery is anastomosed under direct visualization to the left anterior descending artery without cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We followed all 274 patients who underwent MIDCAB from the time it was introduced at a single center. In-hospital and 1-year clinical events were source-documented and adjudicated. The in-hospital major acute cardiac event rate was 2.2%; this included a 1.1% mortality rate. At 1 year, the respective rates were 7.8% and 2. 5%. When compared with the initial 100 procedures, the subsequent 174 procedures had shorter vessel occlusion times (10+/-5 versus 14+/-6 minutes; P:=0.009), times to extubation (6+/-3 versus 14+/-10 hours; P:<0.001), and lengths of hospital stay (2.1+/-1.9 versus 3. 2+/-3.1 days; P:=0.04). Cumulative 1-year adverse cardiac events were 11% in the initial 100 cases and 6% in the subsequent 174 cases (P:=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent clinical results can be achieved with the MIDCAB technique. The clinical adverse event rate may decrease with accumulated experience.

Role of aprotinin in the management of patients during and after cardiac surgery

Management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery has evolved in recent years as more is understood about the physiological changes and responses that occur during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In particular, our understanding of the mechanisms involved in haemostasis and in the inflammatory response to bypass surgery, has allowed significant refinements in patient management. Improvements in the pharmacological conservation of blood loss have been striking, particularly with the development of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer). Aprotinin represents a significant improvement, especially for patients at high risk, since it reduces the need for allogeneic and (sometimes scarce) blood products. However, in view of its cost, making an appropriate selection of patients most at risk of serious blood loss is a major consideration in the use of aprotinin. While its mechanisms of action are not well understood, the use of aprotinin also appears to reduce inflammatory response to CPB.

High-dose aprotinin modulates the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses during coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

To rule out the effect of high-dose aprotinin in respect to the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

University-affiliated cardiac center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

In group A patients (n = 10), high-dose aprotinin was administered (2 x 106 KIU pre-CPB, 2 x 10(6) KIU in prime, 500,000 KIU/hr during CPB). In group C patients (n = 10), placebo was used instead. Proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6, anti-inflammatory IL-1-receptor antagonist, and clinical parameters were measured 8 times perioperatively. The values are presented as mean +/- SEM.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Four hours after CPB, IL-6 concentration reached the maximum value, being significantly lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (615 +/- 62 pg/mL v 1,409 +/- 253 pg/mL; p = 0.019). On the first postoperative day, the concentration of IL-6 in group A patients remained lower (219 +/- 24 pg/mL v 526 +/- 123 pg/mL; p = 0.015). In contrast, IL-1-receptor antagonist concentration was higher in group A patients as compared with group C patients after CPB (13,857 +/- 4,264 pg/mL v 5,675 +/- 1,832 pg/mL; p = 0.03). Total postoperative blood loss was lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (648 +/- 64 mL v 1,284 +/- 183 mL; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose aprotinin treatment reduced the inflammatory reaction and postoperative blood loss. The anti-inflammatory reaction was significantly enhanced in these patients, which suggests that the physiologic reaction of the organism to reduce the deleterious effects from CPB is more pronounced by using high-dose aprotinin.

Cytokine release and neutrophil activation are not prevented by heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin administration

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) initiates a whole-body inflammatory response where complement and neutrophil activation and cytokine release play an important role. This prospective trial examined the effects of both heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin on the inflammatory processes during CPB, with respect to cytokine release and neutrophil activation.

METHODS

Two hundred patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized in four groups of 50 patients each: heparin-coated circuit with aprotinin (HCO-A) or without aprotinin (HCO) administration, and uncoated circuit with aprotinin (C-A) or without aprotinin administration (C). In groups receiving aprotinin, a high-dose regimen was given. In all groups, high initial doses of heparin were used (3 mg/kg intravenously). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8, and myeloperoxidase and elastase levels were measured in plasma samples taken before, during, and after CPB.

RESULTS

In all groups, the TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-8 levels reached a maximum after protamine administration. After 24 hours, they remained significantly elevated (IL-6 and IL-8) or returned to baseline values (TNF-alpha). A similar pattern was observed with myeloperoxidase and elastase levels. No significant intergroup differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CPB is associated with cytokine release and neutrophil activation, which are not attenuated by the use of heparin-coated circuits or by the administration of aprotinin. Aprotinin and heparin-coated circuits do not show additive effects.

Low-dose aprotinin is ineffective to treat excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled clinical experience at our institution suggested that low-dose aprotinin could control excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of low-dose aprotinin in the treatment of hemorrhage after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were included. Forty-four patients (26%) bled significantly in the intensive care unit (>100 mL/h) and received either aprotinin (200,000 KIU bolus + 100,000 KIU/h for 8 hours) or placebo in addition to our standard management of excessive bleeding.

RESULTS

Median bleeding before study drug administration was not different between aprotinin (200 mL) and placebo (212.5 mL) groups. Bleeding decreased significantly with time and similarly in both groups. Ninety-five percent of patients required transfusions in both groups. Median blood products transfused were 13 and 8 units per patient in the aprotinin and placebo groups respectively (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine administration of low-dose aprotinin as part of the treatment protocol to control hemorrhage after CPB does not reduce bleeding or transfusion requirements and, therefore, cannot be recommended.

Effects of Duraflo II heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release in patients with cardiac operation employing aprotinin and steroids

The effects of Duraflo II heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, low-dose aprotinin, and steroids on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release were evaluated by comparing those treated with low-dose aprotinin and steroids. Twenty-four adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or valve repair surgery were randomly assigned to 2 groups: either heparin-coated (Duraflo group, n = 12) or noncoated equipment (noncoated group, n = 12) groups. In the Duraflo group, the cardiopulmonary reservoir was also coated with heparin. There were no significant differences in age at the time of operation, aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and rectal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard systemic heparinization was performed. Methylpredonisolone and low-dose aprotinin were given in both groups of patients. Serum XIIa factor, TAT, and IL-6 were significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.01). Serum IL-8 was significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group at 24 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in serum thrombomodulin and TNF-alpha; both were within normal during the study period. These results indicate that the use of Duraflo II heparin coated equipment and a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary reservoir suppressed excess coagulation and inflammatory reaction induced by cardiopulmonary bypass.

Inhibitory effect of milrinone on cytokine production after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that cyclic adenosine monophosphate-elevating agents suppress cytokine production. To evaluate the effects of milrinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, on cytokine production after cardiopulmonary bypass, we conducted a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to receive either milrinone treatment (milrinone, n = 12) or no milrinone treatment (control, n = 12). Administration of milrinone (0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started after induction of anesthesia and was continued for 24 hours. Blood samples for determination of plasma cyclic adenosine monophosphate, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 levels were collected perioperatively.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8 levels between the groups. Interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 levels after cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the milrinone group than in the control group. Plasma levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate increased significantly (p < 0.05) after the administration of milrinone and the levels correlated inversely (r = -0.55, p < 0.01) with interleukin-6 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that milrinone suppresses cytokine production by elevating cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. With its positive inotropic and vasodilator activities, milrinone may have antiinflammatory effects.

Retrospective analysis of effect of low-dose aprotinin priming on allogeneic blood transfusion in repeated cardiac operations

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate efficacy of low-dose aprotinin priming therapy on the requirement of allogeneic transfusion and to identify risk factors for allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing repeated cardiac operations. The present study includes a critical review of 124 consecutive charts of patients undergoing elective repeat cardiac surgery. We examined the effect of low-dose aprotinin priming therapy on blood loss, amounts of mediastinal drainage following intensive care unit (ICU) administration and the number of units of blood products given during the perioperative period. The rate of nonallogeneic transfusion was not affected by low-dose aprotinin priming therapy, although aprotinin reduced the amount of allogeneic transfusion and the amount of mediastinal drainage 12 h following ICU admission. In conclusion, low-dose aprotinin priming therapy is effective in reducing blood loss and the amount of allogeneic transfusion. However, it failed to improve the rate of cardiac reoperations without allogeneic blood transfusion.

The effect of aprotinin on interleukin-8 concentration and leukocyte adhesion molecule expression in an isolated cardiopulmonary bypass system

We examined the effect of aprotinin on the production of interleukin-8 and the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules in an isolated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Five healthy volunteers each donated 500 ml blood which was divided into equal portions (A) and (B). Portion A was treated with aprotinin 250000 kallikrein inactivator units and added to a circuit primed with a further 250000 kallikrein inactivator units. Portion B was simultaneously treated with 25 ml normal saline and added to an aprotinin-free circuit. Samples of blood were taken at donation, after addition of a drug and at 30-min intervals throughout isolated cardiopulmonary bypass. The interleukin-8 increase was smaller in the aprotinin group but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In contrast, aprotinin inhibited the cardiopulmonary bypass-induced increase in monocyte (p < 0.05) and granulocyte (p < 0.01) CD18 and the increase in granulocyte, but not monocyte, CD11b (p < 0.05). Cardiopulmonary bypass had little effect on expression of L-selectin. These results confirm that aprotinin attenuates leukocyte activation during isolated cardiopulmonary bypass.

Does high-dose methylprednisolone in aprotinin-treated patients attenuate the systemic inflammatory response during coronary artery bypass grafting procedures?

OBJECTIVE

To discover the possible effects of methylprednisolone on the systemic inflammatory response during aprotinin treatment.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

University-affiliated heart center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

In the methylprednisolone group (n = 26), 1 g of methylprednisolone was administered 30 minutes before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The 26 control patients received a placebo instead. High-dose aprotinin was administered to all participants.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After CPB, the concentration of the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, was significantly less in the methylprednisolone group. The anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 concentration was, in contrast, greater. After CPB, PaO2 was greater in the methylprednisolone group (245+/-17 v 195+/-16 mmHg). Dynamic pulmonary compliance was also greater, whereas the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference was less (376+/-17 v 428+/-16 mmHg). On arrival in the intensive care unit, the oxygen delivery index was greater in the methylprednisolone group (62+/-2.7 v 54+/-2.3 mL/min/m2) and the oxygen extraction rate was less (25%+/-0.02% v 30%+/-0.02%). After CPB, the cardiac index was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone group (4.1+/-0.2 v 3.6+/-0.2 L/min/m2). These patients had less blood loss postoperatively (616+/-52 v 833+/-71 mL; p = 0.017) and a greater urine output (8,015+/-542 v 6,417+/-423 mL/24 h; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The use of methylprednisolone attenuates the systemic inflammatory response during aprotinin treatment and improves clinical outcome parameters.

Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass using roller or centrifugal pumps

BACKGROUND

The inflammatory response in 29 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using either roller or centrifugal (CFP) pumps was evaluated in a prospective study.

METHODS

Patients were randomized in roller pump (n = 15) and CFP (n = 14) groups. Terminal complement complex activation (SC5b-9) and neutrophil activation (elastase) were assessed during the operation. Cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, interleukin-8) and circulating adhesion molecules (soluble endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1) were assessed after the operation.

RESULTS

Release of SC5b-9 after stopping cardiopulmonary bypass and after protamine administration was higher in the CFP group (p = 0.01 and p = 0.004). Elastase level was higher after stopping cardiopulmonary bypass using CFP (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed differences between roller pump and CFP groups in complement and neutrophil activation. After the operation, a significant production of cytokines was detected similarly in both groups, with peak values observed within the range of 4 to 6 hours after starting cardiopulmonary bypass. However, interleukin-8 levels were higher using CFP 2 hours after starting cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.02). Plasma levels of adhesion molecules were similar in both groups within the investigation period.

CONCLUSIONS

During the operation, CFP caused greater complement and neutrophil activation. After the operation, the inflammatory response was similar using either roller pump or CFP.

Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass using two different types of heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits

Previous reports have highlighted the disparity in biocompatibility of two differently engineered heparin coatings during the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedure. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of the difference in haemocompatibility provided by either the Duraflo II equipment or the Carmeda equipment in the terminal inflammatory response observed after coronary artery surgery. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to two groups to be operated on using either Duraflo II equipment (group I) or Carmeda equipment (group 2) for extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Initial inflammatory response was assessed by terminal complement complex activation (SC5b-9). The late inflammatory response observed in the postoperative period was assessed by measuring cytokine production (tumour factor necrosis (TNF alpha), interleukin IL-6, interleukin IL-8) and circulating concentrations of adhesion molecules (ELAM-1, ICAM-1). The release of SC5b-9 after CPB and after protamine administration was lower in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.006, respectively). A significant production of cytokines was detected in both groups with peak values observed within the time range of 4-6 h after the start of CPB.

Measures to control blood activation during assisted circulation

Major improvements in heart assist devices have allowed prolonged mechanical circulatory support with successful subsequent weaning or heart transplantation. The contact of blood with biomaterials used in life-sustaining devices and numerous biomaterial-independent factors elicit a systemic inflammatory response, which involves activation of various plasma protein systems and blood cells. Prolonged mechanical circulatory support elicits a systemic inflammatory response and hemostatic perturbations similar to that reported during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, in the setting of prolonged assistance, time has a complex and ill-known influence on blood activation. Methods to reduce blood activation during prolonged assisted circulation are derived from cardiopulmonary bypass investigations. Improving the biocompatibility of artificial devices can be achieved either by biomaterial surface modifications, by inhibition of biologic cascades leading to blood activation, or by controlling end points of biologic cascades. However, the necessity to respect the integrity of the organism during prolonged assistance precludes most systemic interventions and limits the control of blood activation to the area of the device.

Aprotinin complements heparin bonding in an in vitro model of cardiopulmonary bypass

The relative contribution of full-dose aprotinin, used with heparin-bonded surfaces, to contact activation during cardiopulmonary bypass was examined. In vitro Carmeda-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were perfused with whole blood anticoagulated with heparin (3.3 U/ml). Aprotinin (300 kIU/ml) was added to the circuits of one set of experiments. Samples were taken prior to perfusion and at 30, 60, 120 and 360 min. The activated coagulation time was extended in the aprotinin experiments, significantly at 30 min (P=0.003) and 120 min (P=0.001). Thrombin-antithrombin complexes and prothrombin fragment F1+2 were both higher in the non-aprotinin experiments at 120 min (P=0.02 each) and 360 min (P=0.005 and 0.001, respectively). Plasma leucocyte elastase was raised in the non-aprotinin experiments in comparison to the aprotinin experiments at each timepoint (30 min, P=0.04; 60 min, P=0.006; 120 min, P=0.001; 360 min, P=0.0001), as was interleukin-8 at 120 min (P=0.05) and 360 min (P=0.0001). No differences were found for the platelet activation marker P-selectin. Platelet and white blood cell counts fell significantly in the non-aprotinin experiments compared with the aprotinin experiments at 360 min (P=0.05 and 0.03, respectively). It would appear that the use of aprotinin has additional haemostatic beneficial effects to those found with heparin-bonded circuits in terms of effects on contact activation and inflammation.