Prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after open heart operation by low-dose sotalol: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Literature and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia to occur after cardiac surgery, with an incidence of 10% to 50%. It is associated with postoperative complications including increased risk of stroke, prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Despite new insights into the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, no specific etiologic factor has been identified as the sole perpetrator of the arrhythmia. Current evidence suggests that the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in general, as well as after cardiac surgery, is multifactorial. Studies have also shown that new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that prophylactic medical therapy decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Of note, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has not changed during the last decades despite the numerous preventive strategies and operative techniques proposed, although the perioperative and postoperative care of cardiac patients as such has improved.

2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The guideline for coronary artery revascularization replaces the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines, providing a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Coronary revascularization is an important therapeutic option when managing patients with coronary artery disease. The 2021 coronary artery revascularization guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with coronary artery disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests.

Patients who develop post-operative atrial fibrillation have reduced survival after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective

Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) increases hospital stay, resource utilization, morbidity, and mortality. However, there is paucity of data about its effect in Indian patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

Seven hundred forty-eight patients underwent off-pump CABG from January 2015 to December 2016 (24 months). One hundred twenty-seven patients (16.7%) developed POAF. In an effort to mitigate the effects of wider risk factors on perioperative outcomes, a separate sub-analysis of patients based on risks quantified by EuroSCORE II (<> 3) was also performed.

Results

Age > 60 years and development of sepsis were the independent predictors for the development of POAF. Thirty-day/mortality rate was higher in the POAF group (7.1% vs. 1.4%; p value < 0.001). POAF was associated with increased ICU and hospital stay and increased incidence of stroke and renal dysfunction. The survival was significantly lower in the POAF group compared with the normal sinus rhythm (NSR) (3-year survival in POAF was 81.3% vs. 94.4% in the NSR group; Hazard ratio (HR) 3.867 (1.989–7.516)). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) usage, age ≥ 60 years and sepsis were independent predictors for the development of POAF in low-risk patients. For the NSR group, 1-year survival was 98% and 3-year survival was 95.7%. For the POAF group, 1-year survival was 94.4% and 3-year survival was 84.0% (HR. 3.794 (1.897–7.591)).

Conclusion

The incidence of POAF was lower than reported in the wider global literature. Increasing age and development of post-operative sepsis were strong independent predictors of POAF. POAF increases the morbidity; length of hospital stay and these patients show decreased survival after off-pump CABG.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity in adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue. A previous version of this review assessing the effectiveness of perioperative beta-blockers in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery was last published in 2018. The previous review has now been split into two reviews according to type of surgery. This is an update and assesses the evidence in cardiac surgery only.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for the prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Biosis Previews and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science on 28 June 2019. We searched clinical trials registers and grey literature, and conducted backward- and forward-citation searching of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs and quasi-randomized studies comparing beta-blockers with a control (placebo or standard care) administered during the perioperative period to adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We excluded studies in which all participants in the standard care control group were given a pharmacological agent that was not given to participants in the intervention group, studies in which all participants in the control group were given a beta-blocker, and studies in which beta-blockers were given with an additional agent (e.g. magnesium). We excluded studies that did not measure or report review outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 studies with 7768 participants; six studies were quasi-randomized and the remaining were RCTs. All participants were undergoing cardiac surgery, and in most studies, at least some of the participants were previously taking beta-blockers. Types of beta-blockers were: propranolol, metoprolol, sotalol, esmolol, landiolol, acebutolol, timolol, carvedilol, nadolol, and atenolol. In twelve studies, beta-blockers were titrated according to heart rate or blood pressure. Duration of administration varied between studies, as did the time at which drugs were administered; in nine studies this was before surgery, in 20 studies during surgery, and in the remaining studies beta-blockers were started postoperatively. Overall, we found that most studies did not report sufficient details for us to adequately assess risk of bias. In particular, few studies reported methods used to randomize participants to groups. In some studies, participants in the control group were given beta-blockers as rescue therapy during the study period, and all studies in which the control was standard care were at high risk of performance bias because of the open-label study design. No studies were prospectively registered with clinical trials registers, which limited the assessment of reporting bias. We judged 68% studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain.Study authors reported few deaths (7 per 1000 in both the intervention and control groups), and we found low-certainty evidence that beta-blockers may make little or no difference to all-cause mortality at 30 days (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.90; 29 studies, 4099 participants). For myocardial infarctions, we found no evidence of a difference in events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.52; 25 studies, 3946 participants; low-certainty evidence). Few study authors reported cerebrovascular events, and the evidence was uncertain (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.51 to 3.67; 5 studies, 1471 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Based on a control risk of 54 per 1000, we found low-certainty evidence that beta-blockers may reduce episodes of ventricular arrhythmias by 32 episodes per 1000 (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63; 12 studies, 2296 participants). For atrial fibrillation or flutter, there may be 163 fewer incidences with beta-blockers, based on a control risk of 327 incidences per 1000 (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.59; 40 studies, 5650 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the evidence for bradycardia and hypotension was less certain. We found that beta-blockers may make little or no difference to bradycardia (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.91; 12 studies, 1640 participants; low-certainty evidence), or hypotension (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.89 to 3.80; 10 studies, 1538 participants; low-certainty evidence).We used GRADE to downgrade the certainty of evidence. Owing to studies at high risk of bias in at least one domain, we downgraded each outcome for study limitations. Based on effect size calculations in the previous review, we found an insufficient number of participants in all outcomes (except atrial fibrillation) and, for some outcomes, we noted a wide confidence interval; therefore, we also downgraded outcomes owing to imprecision. The evidence for atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay had a moderate level of statistical heterogeneity which we could not explain, and we, therefore, downgraded these outcomes for inconsistency.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a difference in early all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, hypotension and bradycardia. However, there may be a reduction in atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias when beta-blockers are used. A larger sample size is likely to increase the certainty of this evidence. Four studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of this review.

Does Sotalol Still Have a Role in the Management of Arrhythmias?

Despite proven effectiveness in treating tachyarrhythmias, sotalol is proarrhythmic and can cause torsades de pointes. Given the emergence of studies that show no benefit from rhythm control strategies in managing atrial fibrillation, as well as the introduction of nonpharmacological approaches to treating arrhythmias, we felt it necessary to ascertain if there was any role for sotalol given its side effects. Review of the literature regarding sotalol use in the prevention and treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias seems to show that more effective and safer agents and nonpharmacological alternatives are currently available. However, sotalol still seems to be useful in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias postcardiac surgery and in reverting hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardias in the setting of coronary artery disease. Its role in the prevention of tachyarrhythmias in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy requires further investigation.

The more you look, the more you find: atrial fibrillation - nowhere to hide

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide an updated review on the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery as determined by enhanced cardiac rhythm monitoring technology and provide a rationale for why a more aggressive detection approach for POAF may be clinically useful.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most of the published literature had focused on the in-hospital incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. However, recent studies using continuous cardiac rhythm technologies revealed that the incidence of POAF during the postdischarge, subacute (<1 month) phase could be as high as 28%. This is a clinically relevant finding since that POAF is linked with occurrence of future, 'late' atrial fibrillation, and adverse clinical outcomes even beyond 1 year after cardiac surgery. Furthermore, the role of oral anticoagulation is still not well established for cardiac surgical patients with POAF because of lack of randomized trials specifically designed for this patient population.

SUMMARY

Emerging data suggest that POAF after cardiac surgery is not a transient, self-resolving phenomenon. Rather, its occurrence is associated with future risk of atrial fibrillation and long-term adverse outcomes such as stroke and death. This highlights the potential importance of enhanced cardiac rhythm monitoring to refine prognostic stratification in this high-risk patient population.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically analyse the effects of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing any type of surgery while under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by searching the following databases from the date of their inception until June 2013: MEDLINE, Embase , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Derwent Drug File, Science Citation Index Expanded, Life Sciences Collection, Global Health and PASCAL. In addition, we searched online resources to identify grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials if participants were randomly assigned to a beta-blocker group or a control group (standard care or placebo). Surgery (any type) had to be performed with all or at least a significant proportion of participants under general anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from all studies. In cases of disagreement, we reassessed the respective studies to reach consensus. We computed summary estimates in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for various potential effect modifiers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 88 randomized controlled trials with 19,161 participants. Six studies (7%) met the highest methodological quality criteria (studies with overall low risk of bias: adequate sequence generation, adequate allocation concealment, double/triple-blinded design with a placebo group, intention-to-treat analysis), whereas in the remaining trials, some form of bias was present or could not be definitively excluded (studies with overall unclear or high risk of bias). Outcomes were evaluated separately for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery.CARDIAC SURGERY (53 trials)We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• All-cause mortality: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52, 3783 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.51, 3553 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.05, 166 participants, low quality evidence.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.02, 1400 participants, low quality evidence.• Hypotension: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.51, 558 participants, low quality evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.66, 660 participants, low quality evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.34, 311 participants, low quality evidence.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 29, 2292 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.53, NNTB five, 6420 participants, high quality evidence.• On average, beta-blockers reduced length of hospital stay by 0.54 days (95% CI -0.90 to -0.19, 2450 participants, low quality evidence).NON-CARDIAC SURGERY (35 trials)Beta-blockers significantly increased the occurrence of the following adverse events.• All-cause mortality: RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.57, 11,413 participants, low quality of evidence, number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 167.• Hypotension: RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.64, NNTH 16, 10,947 participants, high quality evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.36, NNTH 21, 11,033 participants, moderate quality evidence.We found a potential increase in the occurrence of the following outcomes with the use of beta-blockers.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.71, 9150 participants, low quality evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was found when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in cerebrovascular events with the use of beta-blockers: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.82, NNTH 265, 8648 participants.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• AMI: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87, NNTB 76, 10,958 participants, high quality evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77, NNTB nine, 978 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.94, NNTB 112, 8744 participants, high quality evidence.We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.49, 476 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.48, 9173 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Length of hospital stay: mean difference -0.45 days, 95% CI -1.75 to 0.84, 551 participants, low quality evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, perioperative application of beta-blockers still plays a pivotal role in cardiac surgery, as they can substantially reduce the high burden of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the aftermath of surgery. Their influence on mortality, AMI, stroke, congestive heart failure, hypotension and bradycardia in this setting remains unclear.In non-cardiac surgery, evidence shows an association of beta-blockers with increased all-cause mortality. Data from low risk of bias trials further suggests an increase in stroke rate with the use of beta-blockers. As the quality of evidence is still low to moderate, more evidence is needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn. The substantial reduction in supraventricular arrhythmias and AMI in this setting seems to be offset by the potential increase in mortality and stroke.

Prognostic factors of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery. To prevent this complication, routine pharmacological prophylactic drugs could be administered. Our study aimed to analyze the various perioperative factors associated with the development of POAF after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

This prospective study included 617 patients, who received CABG surgery in the year 2014.

RESULTS

There were 429 (69.5%) male and 188 (30.5%) female patients. Mean patient age was 67.2 (9.4) years, and 365 patients (59.2%) were more than 65 years. Incidence of POAF was 24.1% (N = 149). Multivariable analysis showed that independent predictors of POAF after CABG surgery were: age >65 (P  = 0.008; OR 2.089; 95% CI 1.208-3.613), AF in the past (P < 0.001; OR 10.838; 95% CI 5.28-22.247), preoperative hypertrophy or dilation of left atrium (P = 0.002; OR 4.996; 95% CI 1.823-13.691), CABG surgery using 4 or more bypass grafts (P = 0.042; OR 1.669; 95% CI 0.972-2.866), preoperative hypokalemia (P = 0.001; OR 3.317; 95% CI 1.678-6.559), >trivial mitral (P = 0.024; OR 7.556; 95% CI 0.964-20.376), and aortic (P = 0.009; OR 1.937; 95% CI 1.178-3.187) valve regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The profile of patients affected by POAF was considerably different with regard to the demographics, preoperative heart condition, history of previous heart rhythm disorders, and operative data. The most important independent factors that predicted POAF after CABG surgery were associated with structural heart defects, advanced age, history of previous AF, and preoperative hypokalemia.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically analyse the effects of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing any type of surgery while under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by searching the following databases from the date of their inception until June 2013: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Derwent Drug File, Science Citation Index Expanded, Life Sciences Collection, Global Health and PASCAL. In addition, we searched online resources to identify grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials if participants were randomly assigned to a beta-blocker group or a control group (standard care or placebo). Surgery (any type) had to be performed with all or at least a significant proportion of participants under general anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from all studies. In cases of disagreement, we reassessed the respective studies to reach consensus. We computed summary estimates in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for various potential effect modifiers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 89 randomized controlled trials with 19,211 participants. Six studies (7%) met the highest methodological quality criteria (studies with overall low risk of bias: adequate sequence generation, adequate allocation concealment, double/triple-blinded design with a placebo group, intention-to-treat analysis), whereas in the remaining trials, some form of bias was present or could not be definitively excluded (studies with overall unclear or high risk of bias). Outcomes were evaluated separately for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. CARDIAC SURGERY (53 trials)We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• All-cause mortality: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52, 3783 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.51, 3553 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.05, 166 participants, low quality of evidence.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.02, 1400 participants, low quality of evidence.• Hypotension: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.51, 558 participants, low quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.66, 660 participants, low quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.34, 311 participants, low quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 29, 2292 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.53, NNTB six, 6420 participants, high quality of evidence.• On average, beta-blockers reduced length of hospital stay by 0.54 days (95% CI -0.90 to -0.19, 2450 participants, low quality of evidence). NON-CARDIAC SURGERY (36 trials)We found a potential increase in the occurrence of the following outcomes with the use of beta-blockers.• All-cause mortality: RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.54, 11,463 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was noted when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in all-cause mortality with the use of beta-blockers: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.59, number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 189, 10,845 participants.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.71, 9150 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was found when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in cerebrovascular events with the use of beta-blockers: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.82, NNTH 255, 8648 participants.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• AMI: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87, NNTB 72, 10,958 participants, high quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.70, NNTB seven, 1028 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92, NNTB 111, 8794 participants, high quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly increased the occurrence of the following adverse events.• Hypotension: RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.64, NNTH 15, 10,947 participants, high quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.35, NNTH 18, 11,083 participants, moderate quality of evidence.We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.33, 526 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.47, 9223 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Length of hospital stay: mean difference -0.27 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.75, 601 participants, low quality of evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, perioperative application of beta-blockers still plays a pivotal role in cardiac surgery , as they can substantially reduce the high burden of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the aftermath of surgery. Their influence on mortality, AMI, stroke, congestive heart failure, hypotension and bradycardia in this setting remains unclear.In non-cardiac surgery, evidence from low risk of bias trials shows an increase in all-cause mortality and stroke with the use of beta-blockers. As the quality of evidence is still low to moderate, more evidence is needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn. The substantial reduction in supraventricular arrhythmias and AMI in this setting seems to be offset by the potential increase in mortality and stroke.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical correlates

Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Although usually self-limiting, it represents an important predictor of increased patient morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Numerous studies have attempted to determine the underlying mechanisms of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) with varied success. A multifactorial pathophysiology is hypothesized, with inflammation and postoperative β-adrenergic activation recognized as important contributing factors. The management of POAF is complicated by a paucity of data relating to the outcomes of different therapeutic interventions in this population. This article reviews the literature on epidemiology, mechanisms, and risk factors of POAF, with a subsequent focus on the therapeutic interventions and guidelines regarding management.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common post-operative complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of post-operative stroke, increased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, healthcare costs and mortality. Numerous trials have evaluated various pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylactic interventions for their efficacy in preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation. We conducted an update to a 2004 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects on post-operative stroke or cerebrovascular accident, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of treatment during the hospital stay.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of ControlLed Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2011), MEDLINE (from 1946 to July 2011), EMBASE (from 1974 to July 2011) and CINAHL (from 1981 to July 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were allocated to pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia, except digoxin, potassium (K(+)), or steroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen studies with 138 treatment groups and 17,364 participants were included in this review. Fifty-seven of these studies were included in the original version of this review while 61 were added, including 27 on interventions that were not considered in the original version. Interventions included amiodarone, beta-blockers, sotalol, magnesium, atrial pacing and posterior pericardiotomy. Each of the studied interventions significantly reduced the rate of post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with a control. Beta-blockers (odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval) CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 55%) and sotalol (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 3%) appear to have similar efficacy while magnesium's efficacy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73; I(2) = 51%) may be slightly less. Amiodarone (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.54; I(2) = 63%), atrial pacing (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.61; I(2) = 50%) and posterior pericardiotomy (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; I(2) = 66%) were all found to be effective. Prophylactic intervention decreased the hospital length of stay by approximately two-thirds of a day and decreased the cost of hospital treatment by roughly $1250 US. Intervention was also found to reduce the odds of post-operative stroke, though this reduction did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01; I(2) = 0%). No significant effect on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.

The efficacy of sotalol in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias including atrial fibrillation are common and troubling complications after cardiac surgery, and thus considerable interest in pharmacologic prophylaxis has developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sotalol in the prevention of postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

METHODS

Standard methods of meta-analysis were used. Randomized clinical trials published in English language were eligible for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A systematic review revealed 15 eligible publications that provided 20 comparisons of sotalol with a control group. The incidence and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of developing postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias while taking sotalol were sotalol (n=489) versus placebo (n=499): 22.5% versus 41.5%, RR=0.55 (CI, 0.454-0.667, P<.001); sotalol (n=304) versus no treatment (n=311): 12% versus 39%, RR=0.329 (CI, 0.236-0.459, P<.001); sotalol (n=488) versus beta-blocker (n=555): 14% versus 23%, RR=0.644 (CI, 0.495-0.838, P<.001); sotalol (n=139) versus amiodarone (n=146): no significant differences in supraventricular tachyarrhythmia prevention; and sotalol (n=51) versus magnesium (n=54): no significant differences in supraventricular tachyarrhythmia prevention. Initiating sotalol orally or intravenously had no significant effect on efficacy. Initiating sotalol after surgery showed a trend toward less adverse events (before: RR=1.700 [CI, 0.903-3.200] and after: RR=0.767 [CI, 0.391-1.505]).

CONCLUSION

Sotalol is more effective in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia than placebo or beta-blockers. Initiating sotalol before cardiac surgery has no advantage compared with initiating sotalol shortly after surgery. Starting sotalol intravenously after surgery may be a more reliable method than administering via a nasogastric tube or delaying treatment until the patient can take oral medication.

Atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery trends toward management

Post operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is more common than before due to increased numbers of cardiac surgeries. This in turn is associated with increased incidence of post operative complication, length of hospital stay and subsequent increase the cost of hospitalization. Therefore preventing and/or minimizing atrial fibrillation by pharmacological or nonpharmacological means is a reasonable goal. POAF has also been associated with postoperative delirium and neurocognitive decline. The precise pathophysiology of POAF is unknown, however most of the evidence suggests it is multifactorial. Different risk factors have been reported, and many studies have evaluated the prophylactic effects of different interventions. This review article highlights the incidence, risk factors, and pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment strategies of POAF.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Its incidence varies depending on type of surgery. Postoperative AF may cause hemodynamic deterioration, predispose to stroke and increase mortality. Effective treatment for prophylaxis of postoperative AF is vital as reduces hospitalization and overall morbidity. Beta-blockers, have been proved to prevent effectively atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery and should be routinely used if there are no contraindications. Sotalol may be more effective than standard b-blockers for the prevention of AF without causing an excess of side effects. Amiodarone is useful when beta-blocker therapy is not possible or as additional prophylaxis in high risk patients. Other agents such as magnesium, calcium channels blocker or non-antiarrhythmic drugs as glycose-insulin--potassium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine and statins have been studied as alternative treatment for postoperative AF prophylaxis.

Developing a safe intravenous sotalol dosing regimen

Recently, an intravenous formulation of sotalol has been approved by the food and drug administration for substitution for oral therapy in patients who are unable to take oral sotalol. The purpose of this randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, crossover study was to develop a safe dosing regimen for intravenous sotalol that provides similar blood levels and therefore similar efficacy and safety to orally administered sotalol. Fifteen healthy subjects received 75 mg intravenous sotalol infusion administered over 2.5 hours and 80 mg oral sotalol. Standard pharmacokinetic methods were used to obtain maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) and areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC). Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were used in simulation studies to determine the optimal intravenous administration regimen. Intravenous sotalol administered over 2.5 hours resulted in a significantly greater Cmax than oral administration (830 +/- 391 vs. 601 +/- 289 ng/mL, P < 0.001). With increasing the length of infusions to 3, 4, and 5 hours, simulation studies showed that the Cmax decreased to 128%, 113%, and 102% of the oral Cmax. The length of infusion did not affect AUC. Based on these studies, a safe intravenous regimen for the replacement of 80-mg oral therapy requires 75 mg intravenous sotalol administered as a 5-hour infusion. Because the pharmacokinetics of sotalol are linear and dose proportional, 150 mg intravenous sotalol administered over 5 hours will provide similar Cmax and AUC as 160 mg oral sotalol. The food and drug administration-approved dosing regimen is 75 mg intravenous sotalol to replace 80 mg oral sotalol and 150 mg intravenous sotalol to replace 160 mg oral sotalol, both administered over 5 hours.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia that occurs after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion.

Effect of low-dose landiolol, an ultrashort-acting beta-blocker, on postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG surgery

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This complication is associated with prolongation of the intensive care unit stay and hospitalization time with attendant increased hospitalization costs, and it is an important risk factor for perioperative cerebrovascular accidents. Landiolol is a newly developed ultrashort-acting beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with a half-life of 3 min that is eight times more cardioselective than esmolol. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prophylactic effect of continuous administration of low-dose landiolol on postoperative atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent CABG alone at our hospital from April 2002 and September 2006. Patients with a previous history of atrial arrhythmias were excluded. The remaining patients were divided to two groups: landiolol group (n = 20), and control group (n = 35). Administration of landiolol started after cardiopulmonary bypass with a loading dose of 1.5-2.5 mug.kg(t-1).min(-1) and continued for the first 2 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was noted. Continuous variables were compared between groups by means of Student's t-test. Categorical variables were compared by means of the chi(2) test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The occurrence of atrial fibrillation after CABG in the control group was statistically more than in the landiolol group (P = 0.04). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding the cardiac index or the dose of inotropic agents during the perioperative period.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative and perioperative administration of low-dose landiolol has a preventive effect on the appearance of atrial fibrillation after CABG surgery.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion. Patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 48 hours should receive antithrombotic therapy for thromboembolism prevention.

Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia occurring after heart surgery. Its prevalence after coronary artery bypass surgery is 17-33%. Atrial fibrillation requires additional treatment, lengthens hospitalization and increases the overall expenses of cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation can cause hemodynamic problems, predispose to congestive heart failure and increase the risk of stroke. Beta-blockers have been shown to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation, and beta-blockers should be a part of the medication of every patient undergoing cardiac surgery, if there are no contraindications. Amiodarone therapy can also be considered for especially high-risk patients.

Atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery surgery: a prospective, matched study

The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischaemia on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was studied in 136 patients undergoing off-pump CABG who were matched for age and number of distal anastomoses with 136 patients undergoing on-pump CABG. Possible risk factors for post-operative new-onset AF were recorded. AF occurred in 64 (24%) of the 267 patients for whom data could be analysed. AF occurred in 29 patients (22%) in the off-pump group versus 35 (26%) in the on-pump group, but this difference was not statistically significant. On univariate analysis, age and length of hospital stay were significant risk factors for the occurrence of AF. In a multivariate analysis that included operative technique, age was found to be the only significant risk factor. In conclusion, the occurrence of AF after CABG does not depend on the type of operation.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative beta-blockers are suggested to reduce cardiovascular mortality, myocardial-ischemia/infarction, and supraventricular arrhythmias after surgery. We reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of perioperative beta-blockers for improving patient outcomes after cardiac and noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

Eleven large databases were searched from the time of their inception until October 2005. Various online-resources were consulted for the identification of unpublished trials and conference abstracts. We included randomized, controlled trials comparing perioperative beta-blockers with either placebo or the standard-of-care. Of the 3680 retrieved titles, 69 met inclusion criteria for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) assuming random effects were computed in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Beta-blockers reduced the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.57; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.45], atrial fibrillation/flutter [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.48], other supraventricular arrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.35; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.43, 95% CI 0.14-1.37], and myocardial ischemia [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.49, 95% CI 0.17-1.4; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69]. Length of hospitalization was not reduced [weighted mean difference (cardiac surgery): -0.35 days, 95% CI -0.77-0.07; weighted mean difference (noncardiac surgery): -5.59 days, 95% CI -12.22-1.04] and, in contrast to previous reports, beta-blockers did not reduce mortality [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.55, 95% CI 0.17-1.83; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.78, 95% CI 0.33-1.87], and they had no influence on the occurrence of perioperative myocardial infarction [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.5; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.59; 0.25-1.39].

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers reduced perioperative arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia, but they had no effect on myocardial infarction, mortality, or length of hospitalization.

Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in up to 50% of cardiac surgery patients and represents the most common postoperative arrhythmic complication. The etiology of AF after open-heart surgery is incompletely understood and its prevention remains suboptimal. Identification of patients vulnerable for postoperative AF would allow targeting of those most likely to benefit from aggressive prophylactic intervention. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical predictors of postoperative AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery in the absence of significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age 65 +/- 11 years) were recruited to the present prospective study. Ninety-nine patients (39.1%) of the total study population developed AF during the postoperative period. The median age for patients with postoperative AF was 69 years compared with 64 years for patients without (p < 0.001). In addition to advanced age, AF patients were more likely to have surgery for valvular heart disease and less likely to have preoperative beta-adrenergic blockers than patients without AF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, +/-95% CI, p value) was used to identify the following independent clinical predictors of postoperative AF: increasing age (above vs. below median [OR = 2.6; CI, 1.2 to 3.9; p < 0.01]), and surgery for valvular heart disease (vs. coronary artery bypass grafting [OR 2.8; CI, 1.1 to 3.5; p < 0.01)]). Additionally, postoperative complications (stroke, infections, unstable hemodynamics [OR = 1.9; CI, 1.0 to 7.5; p < 0.05]), and preoperative nonuse of beta-adrenergic blockers (OR = 1.7; CI, 1.1 to 4.9; p < 0.05) were associated with increased risk for postoperative AF. Both, patients with and without AF had similar body mass index, preoperative heart rate, preoperative blood pressure, and duration of surgery. Male sex did not identify patients at high risk for development of AF after cardiac surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AF remains the most common complication after cardiac surgery. A combination of advanced age and type of surgery identifies patients at high risk for development of AF after cardiac surgery.

Atrial arrhythmias after cardiac surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Prevention of AF is a reasonable clinical goal, and, consequently, many randomized trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for prevention of AF. To better understand the role of various prophylactic therapies against postoperative AF, a systematic review of evidence from randomized trials was performed.

METHODS

MEDLINE search of English-language reports published between 1966 and July 2005 and a search of references of relevant papers were conducted. Clinical studies on AF after cardiac surgery were selected for this analysis. Relevant clinical information was extracted from selected articles.

RESULTS

Postoperative AF is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and longer, more expensive hospital stays. Prophylactic use of beta-adrenergic blockers reduces the incidence of postoperative AF and should be administered before and after cardiac surgery to all patients without contraindication. Prophylactic amiodarone and atrial overdrive pacing should be considered in patients at high risk for postoperative AF (for example, patients with previous AF or mitral valve surgery). For patients who develop AF after cardiac surgery, a strategy of rhythm management or rate management should be selected. For patients who are hemodynamically unstable or highly symptomatic or who have a contraindication to anticoagulation, rhythm management with electrical cardioversion, amiodarone, or both is preferred. Treatment of the remaining patients should focus on rate control because most will spontaneously revert to sinus rhythm within 6 weeks after discharge. All patients with AF persisting for more than 24 to 48 hours and without contraindication should receive anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

AF frequently complicates cardiac surgery. Many cases can be prevented with appropriate prophylactic therapy. A strategy of rhythm management for symptomatic patients and rate management for all other patients usually results in reversion to sinus rhythm within 6 weeks of discharge.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs frequently in patients after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the published trials and to provide clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Trials of pharmacologic prophylaxis against AF after heart surgery were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the bibliographies of published reports. Evidence grades and clinical recommendation scores were assigned to each prophylactic drug based on published evidence. Ninety-one trials were identified. The primary study design was a randomized, controlled trial of one drug vs placebo/usual care. Pharmacologic therapies that are reviewed include Vaughan-Williams class II agents (ie, beta-receptor antagonists) [29 trials; 2,901 patients], Vaughan-Williams class III agents (ie, sotalol and amiodarone) [18 trials; 2,978 patients], Vaughan-Williams class IV agents (ie, verapamil and diltiazem) [5 trials; 601 patients], and Vaughan-Williams class I agents (ie, quinidine and procainamide) [3 trials; 246 patients], as well as digitalis (10 trials; 1,401 patients), magnesium (14 trials; 1,853 patients), dexamethasone (1 trial; 216 patients), glucose-insulin-potassium (3 trials; 102 patients), insulin (1 trial; 501 patients), triiodothyronine (2 trials; 301 patients), and aniline (1 trial; 32 patients). A consistent finding in this review is that antiarrhythmic drugs with beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking effects (ie, class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) demonstrated successful prophylaxis. Furthermore, those therapies that did not inhibit beta-receptors generally failed to demonstrate a decreased incidence in postoperative AF. While sotalol and amiodarone have been shown in some studies to be effective, their safety and the incremental prophylactic advantage in comparison with beta-blockers has not been conclusively demonstrated. On the basis of evidence that has been reviewed and graded for quality, it is recommended that strong consideration should be given to the prophylactic administration of Vaughan-Williams class II beta-blocking drugs as a means of lowering the incidence of new-onset post-cardiac surgery AF.

Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an evidence-based approach to prevention

A number of advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques have reduced the risk for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, postoperative atrial fibrillation remains common, with an incidence ranging between 25% and 40%. It is associated with an increased incidence of congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and stroke that prolongs hospitalization and increases rates of readmission after discharge. Consequently, there has been great interest in strategies to prevent this arrhythmia. When both safety and efficacy are considered, the available evidence to date suggests that only beta-blockers can be recommended for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Other treatments might be considered on an individual basis after careful consideration of the patient's potential for side effects.

Pharmacologic Strategies for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Open Heart Surgery

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a common complication after open heart surgery; it increases morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. In an analysis of 8 large cardiac surgery trials totaling 20,193 patients, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was estimated to be 26% and ranged from 17% to 35%. We reviewed the results of 52 studies published between 1966 and 2003 that evaluated pharmacologic strategies to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in nearly 10,000 patients undergoing open heart operations. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, after open heart operations occurred in 29% of patients who did not receive prophylactic drugs, compared with 12% in patients who received intravenous followed by oral amiodarone, 15% in those given sotalol, 16% in those given oral amiodarone, and 19% in those given beta-blockers. Pharmacologic strategies and regimens aimed at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation are necessary to optimize the postoperative care of patients undergoing open heart operations. Although no strategy has consistently been shown to be superior to another, the most effective approach to preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation likely involves multiple interventions. In the absence of contraindications, all patients should receive beta-blocker therapy before and after the operation. For patients with 1 or more risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation, regimens consisting of either sotalol (beta-blocker with class III antiarrhythmic properties) alone or beta-blockers in combination with amiodarone seem to be the safest, most effective pharmacologic strategies for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Oral cibenzoline reduces postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative oral administration of cibenzoline for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

A total of 39 patients who underwent isolated CABG from September 2000 to February 2001 and who took oral cibenzoline (300 mg per day for 10 days beginning immediately after surgery) were compared to 59 patients who underwent surgery in our department 8 months prior to the study and who did not take cibenzoline for incidence of postoperative AF. Exclusion criteria encompassed age (>80 years), low ejection fraction (<30%), high serum creatinine level (>2.0 mg/dL), and history of supraventricular arrhythmia with or without treatment by anti-arrhythmic drugs.

RESULTS

Postoperative AF occurred in 2 patients in the cibenzoline group (2/35, 5.7%) and 20 patients in the control group (20/59, 33.9%). There were significant differences in the incidence of postoperative AF (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that the administration of cibenzoline reduced the incidence of AF significantly, and that a large number of bypass grafts significantly contributed to postoperative AF in CABG. The number of bypass grafts was significantly larger in the cibenzoline group, indicating that cibenzoline administration significantly suppresses the incidence of AF after CABG in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative administration of oral cibenzoline for 10 days is one effective method for the prevention of AF after CABG.

Pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Post-CABG AF occurs most commonly on the second postoperative day and declines in incidence thereafter. A number of risk factors have been found to be associated with a higher frequency of post-CABG AF. These risk factors include advanced age, a prior history of AF, hypertension, and heart failure. Postoperative complications--including low cardiac output, use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, pneumonia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation--are also associated with higher rates of post-CABG AF. Post-CABG AF increases the risk of stroke, and the length and cost of hospitalization. Prophylactic administration of conventional beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) or sotalol produces a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of post-CABG AF; however, results with prophylactic amiodarone or magnesium are less consistent. Termination of post-CABG AF, once it occurs, can be accomplished with a number of antiarrhythmic agents. Ibutilide has been the most widely studied agent for this indication. Sotalol is not indicated for cardioversion of AF and has not been studied in the post-CABG setting. Electrical cardioversion and biatrial pacing have also been used to terminate post-CABG AF. Ventricular rate is best controlled with beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Esmolol has a rapid onset of action and is easily titrated to effect. Digoxin can control the ventricular rate, but has a slow onset of action. There are limited data available to guide decisions regarding the optimal management of post-CABG AF.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications including post-operative stroke, increased hospital length of stay and increased cost of hospitalisation. Prevention of atrial fibrillation is a reasonable clinical goal and, consequently, many randomised trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. We systematically reviewed the literature and prepared meta-analyses to better understand the role and effects of various prophylactic therapies against post-operative atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from earliest achievable date to June 2003. We hand searched references from reports and earlier reviews. We searched abstract books and CD-ROMs from annual scientific meetings of American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology and European Heart Organization between 1997-2003. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions or non-pharmacological interventions with control treatment, placebo or usual care for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation in post-coronary artery bypass grafting or combined CABG and valvular surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty eight studies were included with a total of 8565 participants. Interventions included were amiodarone, beta blockers, solatol and pacing. Results favoured treatment for post-operative atrial fibrillation. The data for stroke favoured treatment by a non-significant effect size of 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.28. Similarly, a positive indication for length of stay was derived but it too was not significant with a weighted mean difference of -0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37. A positive result for cost of hospitalisation in favour of treatment was achieved, but the statistic is not significant due to low power and large standard deviations: a weighted mean difference of -2717, 95% confidence interval 7518 to 2084. Beta-blockers had the greatest magnitude of effect across 28 trials (4074 patients) with an odds ratio (random) of 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.49. Across all treatment, the odds ratio favoured treatment with a ratio (random) of 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.51.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Intervention is favoured across the three pharmacological interventions studied and the one non-pharmacological intervention, pacing. The length of stay data favoured treatment (-0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37).

Amiodarone versus sotalol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Reduction in Postoperative Cardiovascular Arrhythmic Events (REDUCE) trial

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) following open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias following open heart surgery ranges from 20% to 40%, with AF being the most common. Both amiodarone and sotalol have been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but no direct comparison of these agents has been conducted.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients were randomized, of whom 134 underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone, 17 underwent CABG and concomitant aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR), 9 underwent AVR only, and 1 patient's surgery was canceled. Patients with signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), ejection fraction < or =30%, estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive either sotalol 80 mg 2 times per day (n = 76) or intravenous amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hours followed by oral amiodarone 200 mg 3 times per day (n = 83). Study drug was started at the time of surgery and continued for 7 days or until discharge, whichever came first.

RESULTS

AF occurred in 17% of patients randomized to amiodarone and 25% of the patients randomized to sotalol (P =.21). However, the duration of AF was significantly shorter in amiodarone-treated patients (169 +/- 224 min) compared to sotalol treated patients (487 +/- 505 min; P =.04). In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AF in patients undergoing AVR or CABG with AVR was significantly less with amiodarone (1/15, 7%) compared to sotalol (9/11, 82%) (P <.001). Blood pressure was lower immediately after surgery with amiodarone but comparable to sotalol at 24 hours. Of the hemodynamic indices measured, only stroke volume was significantly lower in patients randomized to sotalol at 24 hours (P =.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone and sotalol share similar efficacy and safety in reducing postoperative AF. Hemodynamic effects were similar between both drugs at 24 hours, with the exception that stroke volume was lower in sotalol-treated patients. In patients undergoing more complex surgery, postoperative AF occurred more frequently with sotalol than with amiodarone.

Efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

This study was designed to test whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications could reduce the frequency of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The study was designed as an open-label, randomized trial. Patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery were considered eligible. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, on antiarrhythmic treatment, and those undergoing concomitant valvular surgery were excluded. The study was conducted in a single, university-affiliated community hospital. The researchers' role in the study was restricted to randomizing the patients and collecting data. The primary clinical care team made all decisions regarding patient care. One hundred patients were randomized to two groups: one received 30 mg ketorolac intravenously every 6 hours until able to take oral medications, at which point the patients were switched to 600 mg ibuprofen orally three times a day; the other group received conventional treatment. The primary end point of the study was incidence of atrial fibrillation in the immediate postoperative period. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 14 patients (28.6%) in the conventional treatment group vs. five patients (9.8%) in the ibuprofen group (p<0.017). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications were relatively safe and effective in significantly reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

A comparison between oral antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the pilot study of prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (SPPAF), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 +/- 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P <.01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P =.01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P =.16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P =.65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P <.05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P <.05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 +/- 8.9 days vs 11.3 +/- 7; P =.10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF.

Preoperative use of sotalol versus atenolol for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common complications of cardiac surgery. Beta blockers have been demonstrated to decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Preliminary investigations reporting sotalol and atenolol to be effective in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation are encouraging, but no studies have been conducted comparing both drugs.

METHODS

A total of 253 consecutive eligible patients (66 +/- 8 years; mean +/- standard deviation) scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized in a prospective open manner 1.5:1 to atenolol group (50 mg/daily; 153 patients) or sotalol group (80 mg twice daily; 100 patients).

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation occurred in 44/253 patients (17.45%). A significant difference was found in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the atenolol group (34 patients, 22%) compared with those receiving sotalol (10 patients, 10%; p = 0.013). Therapeutic efficiency and efficacy was 12% and 54%, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age more than 68 years old (odds ratio = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-5.41; p = 0.004), the use of beta-adrenergic agents (odds ratio = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.5-5; p = 0.001), and sotalol (odds ratio = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.23-0.95; p = 0.035) were independently associated with development of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral low-dose sotalol provides a considerable reduction in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. A selective approach based on clinical risk prediction should decrease the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

Combination of sotalol and magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication reported in 20% to 40% of patients after coronary operations. Sotalol alone and magnesium alone have been shown to partially decrease the incidence of AF. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these two pharmacological agents, used alone or in combination, to reduce postoperative AF.

METHODS

Two hundred seven consecutive coronary artery bypass patients (mean age 62 +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive sotalol alone (80 mg twice daily for 5 days starting from the morning of the first postoperative day) (group S), magnesium alone (1.5 g daily for 6 days starting in the operating room just before cardiopulmonary bypass) (group M), both pharmacologic agents at the same dosages (group S+M), or no antiarrhythmic agents (group CTR). All patients with an ejection fraction less than 0.40 were excluded.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative AF was 11.8% (6/51) in the S group, 14.8% (8/54) in the M group, 1.9% (1/52) in the S+M group, and 38% (19/50) in the CTR group. The following differences were significant: group CTR versus groups S, M, and S+M with values of p = 0.002, p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively; and group S+M versus groups S and M with p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of AF after coronary operation was significantly reduced by the administration of sotalol alone and magnesium alone; more importantly, the incidence was further reduced by combining these agents.

Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Prevention of AF is a reasonable clinical goal, and, consequently, many randomized trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for prevention of AF. To better understand the role of various prophylactic therapies against postoperative AF, a systematic review of evidence from randomized trials was performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-two randomized trials (controlled by placebo or routine treatment) of beta-blockers, sotalol, amiodarone, or pacing were identified by systematic literature search. The 3 drug treatments each prevented AF with the following odds ratios (ORs): beta-blockers, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.52); sotalol, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.49); and amiodarone, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.61). Pacing was also effective; for biatrial pacing, the OR was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.71). The influence of pharmacological interventions on LOS was as follows: -0.66 day (95% CI, 2.04 to 0.72) for beta-blockers; -0.40 day (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.08) for sotalol; and -0.91 day (95% CI, 1.59 to -0.23) for amiodarone. The influence for biatrial pacing was -1.54 day (95% CI, -2.85 to -0.24). The incidence of stroke was 1.2% in all the treatment groups combined and 1.4% in controls (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone all reduce risk of postoperative AF with no marked difference between them. There is evidence that use of these drugs will reduce LOS. Biatrial pacing is a promising new treatment opportunity. There was no evidence that reducing postoperative AF reduces stroke; however, data on stroke are incomplete.

A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

We performed an open, prospective, randomized, controlled study of the incidence of major organ complications in 420 patients undergoing routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery with or without thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia (TEA). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic. Group TEA received TEA for 96 h. Group GA (general anesthesia) received narcotic analgesia for 72 h. Both groups received supplementary oral analgesia. Twelve patients were excluded-eight in Group TEA and four in Group GA-because of incomplete data collection. New supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 21 of 206 patients (10.2%) in Group TEA compared with 45 of 202 patients (22.3%) in Group GA (P = 0.0012). Pulmonary function (maximal inspiratory lung volume) was better in Group TEA in a subset of 93 patients (P < 0.0001). Extubation was achieved earlier (P < 0.0001) and with significantly fewer lower respiratory tract infections in Group TEA (TEA = 31 of 206, GA = 59 of 202; P = 0.0007). There were significantly fewer patients with acute confusion (GA = 11 of 202, TEA = 3 of 206; P = 0.031) and acute renal failure (GA = 14 of 202, TEA = 4 of 206; P = 0.016) in the TEA group. The incidence of stroke was insignificantly less in the TEA group (GA = 6 of 202, TEA = 2 of 206; P = 0.17). There were no neurologic complications associated with the use of TEA. We conclude that continuous TEA significantly improves the quality of recovery after coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with conventional narcotic analgesia.

Cardiac arrhythmias: drugs and devices

This review focuses on the important role played by the various types of remedial therapy in the prevention and treatment of perioperative cardiac arrhythmias. It discusses the new concepts of arrhythmogenesis and pro-arrhythmia; the long QT interval syndrome; newer, more selective class 3 antiarrhythmic drugs; cardiac rhythm management devices; drugs or devices used as prophylaxis for postoperative atrial arrhythmias; intravenous amiodarone for destabilizing ventricular arrhythmias; and preoperative potassium imbalance.

Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: A prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the morbidity of CABG. The pathophysiology is uncertain, and its prevention remains suboptimal. This prospective, randomized study was designed to define the role of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest in the pathogenesis of this complication.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized to (1) on-pump conventional surgery [(100 patients, 79 men, mean age 63 (40 to 77) years)] with normothermic CPB and cardioplegic arrest of the heart or (2) off-pump surgery [(100 patients, 82 men, mean age 63 (38 to 86) years)] on the beating heart. Heart rate and rhythm were continuously monitored with an automated arrhythmia detector during the first 72 hours after surgery. Thereafter, routine clinical observation was performed and continuous monitoring restarted in the case of arrhythmia. The association of perioperative factors with AF was investigated by univariate analysis. Significant variables were then included into a stepwise logistic regression model to ascertain their independent influence on the occurrence of AF. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. Thirty-nine patients in the on-pump group and 8 patients in the off-pump group had postoperative sustained AF (P:=0.001). Univariate analysis showed that CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest, postoperative inotropic support, intubation time, chest infection, and hospital length of stay were predictors of AF (all P:<0.05). However, stepwise multivariate regression analysis identified CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest as the only independent predictor of postoperative AF (OR 7.4; CI 3.4 to 17.9).

CONCLUSIONS

CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest is the main independent predictor of postoperative AF in patients undergoing coronary revascularization.

Esmolol versus diltiazem in the treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter after open heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are common after open heart surgery. Possible causative factors for these arrhythmias include operative trauma, atrial ischemia, electrolyte imbalances, pericardial irritation, and excess catecholamines. Two agents commonly used to control ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF/AFL) are beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This randomized study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous diltiazem versus intravenous esmolol in patients with postoperative AF/AFL after coronary bypass surgery and/or valve replacement surgery. A comparative cost analysis was also performed. Thirty patients received either esmolol (n = 15) or diltiazem (n = 15) for AF/AFL. During the first 6 hours of treatment, 66.6% of esmolol-treated patients converted to sinus rhythm compared with 13.3% of the diltiazem-treated patients (P <.05). At 24 hours, 66.6% of the diltiazem group converted to SR compared with 80% of the esmolol group (not significant). Drug-induced side effects, time to rate control (<90 beats/min), number of patients requiring cardioversion, and length of hospitalization were similar for the two groups. The drug cost/successfully treated patient for esmolol versus diltiazem was $254 versus $437 at 6 hours and $529 versus $262 at 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is a small study, it suggests that esmolol is more effective in converting patients to normal sinus rhythm than diltiazem during the initial dosing period. No differences in conversion rates were observed between the two groups after 24 hours. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether esmolol is the initial drug of choice in patients with postoperative AF/AFL after coronary bypass surgery.

[Perioperative beta-blockers. Part two: therapeutic indications]

PURPOSE

To review the pharmacologic and pathophysiologic information necessary to prescribe beta-blockers (BB) in perioperative medicine.

DATA SOURCE

Manual retrieval and electronic research of the literature using MEDLINE (key-words: anesthesia and beta- blocker; surgery and beta-blocker).

DATA SYNTHESIS

In non cardiac surgery, the beneficial effects of BB have been demonstrated in hypertensive patients since 1979. In 1996, the beneficial effects of atenolol in patients with coronary artery disease (reduction of postoperative myocardial ischemia and overall reduction in two-year mortality) were demonstrated. In coronary surgery, the interest of preoperative BB treatment has been shown since 1983. Administration of BB has been shown to be beneficial in acute myocardial infarction or chronic cardiac failure (except in NYHA class IV patients).

CONCLUSION

BB have been shown to exert a beneficial effect on postoperative outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and their more widespread use in perioperative medicine is encouraged.

Drug choices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

When considering therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), the dominant issues are rate control, anticoagulation, rhythm control, and treatment of any underlying disorder. Drug choices for rate control include beta-blockers, verapamil and diltiazem, and digitalis as first-line agents, with consideration of other sympatholytics, amiodarone, or nonpharmacologic approaches in resistant cases. Anticoagulation may be accomplished with aspirin or warfarin, with the latter preferred in all older or high-risk patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy may be used (1) to produce cardioversion (most effective with ibutilide or class IC agents in recent onset AF); (2) to facilitate electrical conversion (class III agents); (3) to prevent early reversion after cardioversion; (4) to maintain sinus rhythm during chronic therapy; and/or (5) to facilitate conversion of fibrillation to flutter, which may then be amenable to termination or prevention with antitachypacing or ablative techniques. Antiarrhythmic drug selection for AF is guided by efficacy considerations (most drugs are similar), by convenience, cost, and discontinuation considerations; and, most importantly, by safety considerations. When possible, agents with serious organ toxicity potential and proarrhythmic risk should be avoided as first-line choices. In structurally normal hearts, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs are least proarrhythmic and least organ toxic (when considered together). In normal hearts, sotalol, dofetilide, and potentially azimilide also appear to have attractive profiles. Amiodarone has low proarrhythmic risk but can produce bradyarrhythmias and toxicity. In hypertrophied hearts, the risk of torsade de pointes with class III/IA agents is enhanced, whereas in ischemia or conditions with impaired cell contact, whether functionally (as by ischemia) or anatomically (as by fibrosis, infiltration, etc), proarrhythmic risk with class I antiarrhythmic drugs (sustained ventricular fibrillation/flutter) is greatly increased. The class I drugs should be avoided in these circumstances. Additional issues to consider are where to initiate therapy (in- or outpatient), what follow-up protocols to use, and whether to limit therapy to proprietary drugs or to allow generic formulation substitution. Each of these considerations is detailed in this article.