Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery via median sternotomy for severe pulmonary emphysema

Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery

OBJECTIVES

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors.

METHODS

Consecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3-5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered.

RESULTS

In total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11-33) vs. 5 days (3-11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line.

Association between Image Characteristics on Chest CT and Severe Pleural Adhesion during Lung Cancer Surgery

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between image characteristics on preoperative chest CT and severe pleural adhesion during surgery in lung cancer patients. We included consecutive 124 patients who underwent lung cancer surgeries. Preoperative chest CT was retrospectively reviewed to assess pleural thickening or calcification, pulmonary calcified nodules, active pulmonary inflammation, extent of emphysema, interstitial pneumonitis, and bronchiectasis in the operated thorax. The extent of pleural thickening or calcification was visually estimated and categorized into two groups: localized and diffuse. We measured total size of pulmonary calcified nodules. The extent of emphysema, interstitial pneumonitis, and bronchiectasis was also evaluated with a visual scoring system. The occurrence of severe pleural adhesion during lung cancer surgery was retrospectively investigated from the electrical medical records. We performed logistic regression analysis to determine the association of image characteristic on chest CT with severe pleural adhesion. Localized pleural thickening was found in 8 patients (6.5%), localized pleural calcification in 8 (6.5%), pulmonary calcified nodules in 28 (22.6%), and active pulmonary inflammation in 22 (17.7%). There was no patient with diffuse pleural thickening or calcification in this study. Trivial, mild, and moderate emphysema was found in 31 (25.0%), 21 (16.9%), and 12 (9.7%) patients, respectively. Severe pleural adhesion was found in 31 (25.0%) patients. The association of localized pleural thickening or calcification on CT with severe pleural adhesion was not found (P = 0.405 and 0.107, respectively). Size of pulmonary calcified nodules and extent of emphysema were significant variables in a univariate analysis (P = 0.045 and 0.005, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, moderate emphysema was significantly associated with severe pleural adhesion (odds ratio of 11.202, P = 0.001). In conclusion, severe pleural adhesion might be found during lung cancer surgery, provided that preoperative chest CT shows substantial pulmonary calcified nodules or emphysema.

Special situations: air leak after lung volume reduction surgery and in ventilated patients

Patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery and those supported by mechanical ventilation are among our most vulnerable patients. Prolonged air leak in these fragile patients can have dire, even fatal, consequences. This article describes the incidence of prolonged air leak in these populations, the causes ascribed to their development, and strategies that may be applied to their prevention and treatment.

Distance and oxygen desaturation in 6-min walk test predict prognosis in COPD patients

The aim of the present study was to predict the prognosis of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who underwent comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). A total of 144 patients who performed PR between 1992 and 1999 was assessed. After PR, 67 patients underwent lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Baseline data before PR consisted of body mass index, serum albumin levels, use of supplement oxygen at home, pulmonary function, arterial blood gas analysis, and distance and fall of hemoglobin oxygen saturation (DeltaSpO(2)) in 6-min walk test. In addition to pre-PR factors, treatment with LVRS was taken into the analysis. The prognostic significance of variables influencing survival was determined by univariate analysis with Log rank test or multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model. By a median follow-up time of 8.4 years, the median survival time was 8.1 years (95% confidence interval: 6.9-9.4 years). Albumin level, PaCO(2), distance and DeltaSpO(2) were significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis. LVRS did not affect the prognosis. The multivariate analysis showed short distance and increase of DeltaSpO(2) as significant independent predictors of the risk of death. 6-min walk test was very useful for predicting the prognosis of the COPD patients.

Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation according to severity of COPD

A new classification for the severity of COPD was proposed at GOLD 2003: stage I: FEV(1) > or = 80% predicted; stage II: 50% < or = FEV(1)<80%; stage III: 30% < or = FEV(1)<50%; and stage IV: FEV(1) < 30%. To elucidate the acute effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients with different stages of COPD, data on pulmonary function, arterial blood gas analysis, the 6-min walk test, respiratory muscle strength, and activities of daily living were analyzed before and after our comprehensive 4- to 8-week inpatient PR program between 1992 and 2003. A total of 225 patients (201 men and 24 women; 21 with stage II, 79 with stage III, and 125 with stage IV COPD) was assessed. There were significant differences in FEV(1)% predicted and % residual volume in stages III and IV, in % vital capacity in stages II, III and IV, and in % total lung capacity in stage II when comparing the changes between pre- and post-PR. Significant differences of PaO(2) in stages III and IV and PaCO(2) in stage IV were found when comparing the changes between pre- and post-PR. The 6-min walk distance was significantly increased after PR by an average of approximately 50m for all staged patients. Respiratory muscle strength was also significantly increased in stages III and IV. Activities of daily living were significantly improved in all stages. These results showed that patients with COPD had benefited from PR regardless of disease severity. The effects included improvement in pulmonary function, arterial blood gas analysis, 6-min walk distance, respiratory muscle strength, and activities of daily living although there were some differences among the three stages.

Endobronchial Valves for Treatment of Bronchopleural Fistula

Endobronchial valves have recently emerged as a possible alternative to lung volume reduction surgery to treat incapacitating emphysema. The early experience with placement of these valves has been shown to be safe, with short-term improvements of quality of life in this patient population. We report a case in which these valves were used to treat a patient with a persistent air leak.

Complications after lung volume reduction surgery

LVRS has greater morbidity than most general thoracic surgical procedures. Proper care of patients after LVRS is a labor-intensive activity, but it is worthwhile because LVRS can be performed with acceptable risk. Patient selection, postoperative care, and an understanding of the potential complications are the keys to successful LVRS.

Lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in patients with emphysema. Studies on LVRS to August 2000 were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library. Human studies of patients with upper, lower or diffuse distributions of emphysema were included. All types of bullous emphysema were excluded. A surgeon and researcher independently assessed the retrieved articles for their inclusion in the review. When LVRS was compared with medical management, at 2 years LVRS was associated with a higher FEV1 and at least equivalent survival. The use of staple excision of selected areas of lung appeared to be more efficacious than laser ablation. There is insufficient evidence to show preference for median sternotomy or videoscopically assisted thoracotomy, as the more safe and efficacious procedure. In highly selected patients with emphysema LVRS is deemed an acceptable treatment. To fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of LVRS, outcomes beyond 2 years must be included. The results of prospective randomized trials between medical management and LVRS, now in progress, are essential before a final assessment can be made.

Acute respiratory failure after lung volume reduction surgery

In this study, we characterized patients who developed respiratory failure postoperatively after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 72 patients who underwent LVRS from February 1995 to February 1998, examining perioperative variables and complications. Twenty-one patients (29%) developed postoperative respiratory failure, five due to hypoxemia, nine due to hypercapnia, and seven secondary to hemodynamic instability. The hospital mortality was 33% among patients who developed respiratory failure. No preoperative clinical or physiologic variable (including percent ideal body weight, serum albumin, prednisone use, lung function, maximal O(2) uptake on exercise testing, 6-min walk distance, and hemodynamic parameters) was predictive of postoperative respiratory failure. Patients who developed respiratory failure were older (63 +/- 7 versus 57 +/- 8 yr, p = 0.01), had longer anesthesia time (188 +/- 96 versus 127 +/- 56 min, p = 0.001), had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (40% versus 10%, p = 0.001) and performance of concomitant surgical procedures during the LVRS operation (40% versus 2%, p < 0.001) compared with those without respiratory failure. All patients who underwent simultaneous surgery, which were mostly for cardiac disease, developed respiratory failure. Risk factor analysis confirmed that older patients and those undergoing cardiac surgery combined with LVRS are at increased risk for postoperative respiratory failure.

Different effects of lung volume reduction surgery and lobectomy on pulmonary circulation

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on cardiopulmonary circulation during exercise in comparison with pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LVRS improves pulmonary function and dyspnea symptoms acutely in selected patients with heterogeneous emphysema. However, there are few data concerning the effects of LVRS on the cardiopulmonary circulation, especially during exercise.

METHODS

Pulmonary function tests and pulmonary hemodynamic study at rest and during exercise were performed before and 6 months after LVRS (seven patients) or pulmonary lobectomy (eight patients). In the workload test, an electrically braked bicycle ergometer (25 w) was used in the supine position for at least 2 minutes or until exhaustion or breathlessness developed.

RESULTS

After lung lobectomy, the values of vital capacity, percentage of predicted vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, residual volume/total lung capacity, and maximal voluntary ventilation deteriorated significantly. Six months after LVRS, however, vital capacity, percentage vital capacity showed no significant change, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, and maximal voluntary ventilation showed marked improvement. Cardiac index was changed neither at rest nor during exercise in either group by the operation. Although postoperative pulmonary arterial pressure in the lobectomy group was significantly increased by the exercise, LVRS did not affect postoperative pulmonary arterial pressure at rest or during exercise. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in the lobectomy group showed no significant change after the operation, whereas LVRS ameliorated the marked elevation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure observed during exercise. After lobectomy, significant increases in the pulmonary vascular resistance index were observed at rest and during exercise. LVRS markedly increased the pulmonary vascular resistance index at rest but not during exercise. In the lobectomy group, the postoperative flow-pressure curve moved upward, and its gradient became steeper than the preoperative one. In the LVRS group, the curve moved upward in a parallel fashion. These results show that much more right-sided heart work is needed to achieve the same cardiac output against higher pulmonary arterial pressure, not only after lobectomy but also LVRS.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that the effects of LVRS on the cardiopulmonary circulation were not negligible, especially during exercise, and successful LVRS may depend on improved respiratory function and also preserved cardiac function that can tolerate the damage to the pulmonary vascular bed induced by this operation.

Comparison of open and thoracoscopic bilateral volume reduction surgery: complications analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of lung volume reduction for the treatment of patients with emphysema is well established, but data about the surgical approach, the postoperative management, and complications are limited. We report a comparison of patients undergoing bilateral lung volume reduction (BLVRS) via median sternotomy and thoracoscopic techniques with emphasis on hospital course and complications.

METHODS

All patients undergoing BLVRS at Hospital of University of Pennsylvania were analyzed for mortality and morbidity, using a combination of prospective data analysis and retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing BLVRS via median sternotomy were older than those undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures (63.9+/-6.89 vs 59.3+/-9.4 years, p = 0.005). Operating time was longer for the VATS procedure (147 versus 129 minutes, p = 0.006) while estimated blood less was greater for median sternotomy (209 versus 82 L, p = 0.0000017). Significant differences were found in intensive care unit stay, days intubated, life-threatening complications, respiratory complications, requirement for tracheostomy, and death that favored VATS BLVRS. When only later cohorts of patients were compared, more life-threatening complications and deaths were found in patients undergoing BLVRS by median sternotomy. There were no differences between early and late median sternotomy BLVRS patients. Twenty-six percent of the lethal complications in median sternotomy BLVRS patients were bowel perforations, equally divided between duodenal ulcers and colons.

CONCLUSIONS

Managing patients after BLVRS remains complex. Bilateral video-assisted volume reduction offers equivalent functional outcome with potentially decreased morbidity and mortality. Gastrointestinal perforations can complicate the management of these patients.