Residual aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root remodeling without a direct annuloplasty

Cusp repair during aortic valve-sparing operation: technical aspects and impact on results

AIMS

Aortic valve-sparing operations are nowadays considered safe and reliable procedures in terms of mid-term and long-term results. Although surgical techniques regarding the modality of grafts' implantation have been properly addressed, the modality of cusp repair, when needed, is still open to debate. We sought to review the literature to try to shed light on when the cusp repair is required and how it should be performed.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database using the keywords aortic valve-sparing operation, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation, valve-sparing aortic root replacement, aortic valve repair, and aortic cusp repair. Only studies that included and described in detail the technique of cusp repairs in adjunct to aortic valve-sparing operation were considered.

RESULTS

Bicuspid aortic valve more often requires correction when compared with tricuspid valve. The range of the techniques varies from the 'simple' free margin plication to the more complex triangular resection with patch repair. Results in the literature seem to be encouraging, showing that, in most of the cases, cusp repair does not affect valve competence in the mid-term and long-term.

CONCLUSION

Correction of the cusp is a delicate balance between undercorrection that could lead to residual prolapse and overcorrection that could lead to cusp restriction. Although complex repair of the aortic valve in addition to root replacement provided satisfactory results, it should be reserved for experienced centers with a large volume of patients.

Aortic valve repair update

The key for successful valve repair is full understanding of the regurgitant mechanism and sufficient evaluation of the valve. Currently, multidetector computed tomography has been introduced for evaluation. The aortic valve can be analyzed in details preoperatively. The main causes of aortic regurgitation (AR) in the adult population are degenerative leaflet change and annulus dilatation. Restoration to normal structure can be accomplished mainly by plication. Central leaflet plication near the Arantius nodule is a simple technique for redundant tissue. For leaflet deficiency, pericardial patch plasty may be an option. No universal technique exists for plication of the aortic annulus. The valve-sparing aortic root replacement firmly stabilizes the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ) and assures repair durability even in patients with mild to moderate root dilatation. Subcommissural annuloplasty (Cabrol stitch) does not seem sufficient for the prevention of VAJ dilatation. Circumferential annuloplasties may have a greater potential. However, convenient device for annular plication is still in development. The bicuspid aortic valve is a congenital heart valve lesion. A basic technique is free margin plication of the fused leaflet. Aortic root dilatation may contribute to AR severity. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement may improve repair durability. Considering the great advances in valve repair, young patients with AR should be informed that valve repair is a promising option for surgical treatment.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement

The aortic root has a unique 3-dimensional configuration and the distinctive function of supporting the aortic valve and blood vessels. The sinuses of Valsalva are crucial to create appropriate eddy currents that are important in initiating and coordinating aortic valve closure and promoting coronary artery blood flow. Most aneurysms in the aortic root are associated with degenerative changes in the elastic media rather than atherosclerosis. Valve-sparing root repair has become widely accepted, although the Bentall procedure remains the gold standard. Because reimplantation using the Valsalva graft allows root geometry to be retained and theoretically and practically prevents recurrent aortic valve regurgitation, it is considered the most reliable and preferred technique among various valve-sparing aortic root repair procedures.

Restitution of the Aortic Valve: What is New, What is Proven, and What is Obsolete?

Restitution strategies of the insufficient aortic valve belong to the clinical armamentarium. To date, the accumulated body of evidence comprises 126 articles dealing with restitution strategies on the insufficient aortic valve with concomitant aortic surgery. In a cumulative analysis an almost identical number of reimplantation (506) and remodeling (489) procedures were found in the literature, whereas 357 patients underwent aortic valve resuspension. The cumulative results tend to favor the reimplantation technique in terms of longevity of the reconstruction, particularly in congenital degenerative disorders of the aortic wall, whereas remodeling appears to exhibit a more physiologic behavior of the reconstructed valve and re-suspension serves as a simplified approach particularly in acute type A dissection. Although restitution of the native aortic valve has its place in current treatment options, the accumulated worldwide numbers indicate that it is not yet routinely implemented in the vast majority of cardiac institutions.

Correction of leaflet prolapse in valve-preserving aortic replacement: pushing the limits?

BACKGROUND

For aortic dilatation with morphologically intact leaflets, valve-preserving aortic replacement has become an accepted treatment modality. Leaflet prolapse, however, may be present, making composite replacement the most frequent choice. Alternatively, valve preservation may be combined with correction of leaflet prolapse. The results of this approach should be comparable with those of valve-preserving aortic surgery in the presence of normal leaflets.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2002, 156 patients were treated by valve-preserving surgery. The aortic valve was bicuspid in 46, and tricuspid in 110 instances. In 88 aortic valves, apparently normal leaflet coaptation (normal, 12 bicuspid and 76 tricuspid), and in 68 instances, prolapse of one or more leaflets, was observed. Root remodeling (n = 133) or aortic replacement with valve reimplantation (n = 23) were performed. Leaflet prolapse was corrected by triangular resection (n = 16) or plicating sutures (n = 59), mostly placed in the central portion of the leaflet.

RESULTS

Neither operative mortality nor 5-year survival were influenced by the additional correction of prolapse. Freedom from reoperation at 1 year (normal, 98.8%; prolapse, 96.5%) and 5 years (normal, 97.3%; prolapse, 96.5%) were comparable in both cohorts, as was freedom from aortic regurgitation > or = II at 1 year (normal, 98.8%; prolapse, 94.2%) and 5 years (94.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical correction of leaflet prolapse in combination with proximal aortic replacement is feasible with good results. Midterm results are identical with those known for morphologically normal leaflets. Repair of prolapse allows for preservation of the native valve in most patients with aortic regurgitation and aortic pathology, and thus appears a beneficial addition to valve-preserving surgery.

Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure

BACKGROUND

Aortic root reconstruction by reimplantation of the native valve represents a new therapeutic option for ascending aortic aneurysms. Information about long-term follow-up is limited, and possible predictors for failure of reconstruction have not been evaluated so far.

METHODS

After aortic valve reimplantation 101 patients were followed in a prospective observational study. From this cohort the first 75 consecutive patients with a complete 1-year follow-up were chosen for further analysis. Clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained preoperatively, intraoperatively, and early postoperatively, as well as after 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

No mortality was observed within the first 30 days. There were 52 male patients, mean age was 49.1+/-20.6 years, observation period was 35.6+/-20.6 months, and Marfan's syndrome was present in 22 patients. Although in 67 patients a stable valve function could be demonstrated, 5 patients presented with mild aortic insufficiency or had to be operated on again for secondary valve failure (n = 3). Analyzing possible demographic, disease-related, and procedure-related risk factors in a multivariable approach, only level of coaptation within the graft (as assessed by echocardiography) could be identified as being related to the subsequent development of aortic insufficiency. Coaptation level within the tube graft (type A) resulted in a mean aortic regurgitation grade of 0.3+/-0.5 as compared with a mean grade of 2.5+/-0.6 for a coaptation type C (below the prosthesis; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve reimplantation is a promising alternative to alloprosthetic composite replacement. A level of coaptation within the tube graft is essential to achieve valve competence.

One-year appraisal of a new aortic root conduit with sinuses of Valsalva

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the clinical results 1 year after an anatomic reconstruction of the aortic root in which we used a specifically designed aortic root prosthesis that incorporates the sinuses of Valsalva.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The new aortic Dacron prosthesis has a proximal portion in the Dacron conduit that expands on implantation, creating pseudosinuses. During a 12-month period, 28 patients (mean age 59 +/- 14 years) underwent a Bentall operation (12 cases), a remodeling procedure (7 cases), and a reimplantation procedure (9 cases) with the use of a new aortic root conduit. All patients had aortic root aneurysm with an anatomically normal (for the valve-sparing procedure) or diseased aortic valve (for the Bentall operation). Five patients had aortic dissection and 5 had Marfan disease. The mean follow-up was 6 +/- 3 months. All patients underwent postoperative transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiographic studies.

RESULTS

All patients survived and were in good clinical condition at the latest follow-up. Postoperative echocardiography showed a marked reduction in ventricular volumes in all patient groups (P <.0005). In the Bentall group the new prosthesis appeared to reduce the tension on the coronary ostial sutures. In patients undergoing both types of valve-sparing procedures a similar normal anatomy of the aortic root was reconstructed. In the reimplantation group the anulus was smaller than in the remodeling group (P =.01). Patients undergoing the reimplantation procedure had less bleeding and a lower incidence of residual valve insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

The new aortic root prosthesis allowed the reconstruction of the aortic root anatomy in all types of surgical techniques with low postoperative morbidity.

Mid-term follow-up of aortic root remodelling compared to Bentall operation

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve sparing with root remodelling has proven useful in cases of aortic regurgitation secondary to ascending aorta disease. An excessive rate of re-operation for recurrent aortic regurgitation after this conservative approach might compensate the prosthesis-related risk of the Bentall operation.

METHODS

From January 1995 to September 2000, 69 consecutive patients with aortic expansive aneurysm and concomitant aortic valve disease, were submitted to the Bentall operation (group A, n=37) in the presence of an abnormal valve, or to root remodelling (group B, n=32) in cases of secondary aortic incompetence. One patient in group A and four in group B had Marfan syndrome. The follow-up was 1021 patient-months (range, 1-68 months) in group A and 926 in group B (1-64 months). The event-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between curves was evaluated using the Mantel-Cox log-rank test.

RESULTS

The operative mortality was 5% in group A and 0% in group B. One patient died at follow-up in group A and none in group B. Four patients (three Marfan) in group B were re-operated on because of recurrent aortic regurgitation. The 5-year event-free survival was 88+/-7% in group A and 82+/-8% in group B (P=0.58). Early residual aortic regurgitation remained stable over time only in patients with good early results.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term follow-up failed to reveal statistically significant differences in the clinical outcome between remodelling and the Bentall operation. Our results support the widespread use of root remodelling, provided that an indication to this conservative approach is achieved after careful, case-by-case evaluation. A good early operative result is likely to remain stable over time.

Concomitant aortic root remodeling and coronary bypass in a patient with poor left ventricular function

A 58-year-old man who had previously undergone rectal cancer surgery and who had poor left ventricular function underwent concomitant aortic root remodeling and coronary bypass for aortic root aneurysm with aortic regurgitation and severe coronary artery disease. Intermittent retrograde cold blood cardioplegia and leukocyte-depleted terminal blood cardioplegia were used for myocardial protection. Angiographic studies 1 month after surgery showed improved left ventricular function at an ejection fraction from 24 to 46%. During a 1-year follow-up, he has remained free of any cardiac event. Even though this report is limited to a case and follow-up, this technique is expected to be beneficial even in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function when the postoperative quality of life is considered.