Acute and chronic effects of bilateral lung transplantation without cardiopulmonary bypass on the first transplanted lung

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: The use of mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in lung transplantation has been steadily increasing over the prior decade, with evolving strategies for incorporating support in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. There is significant practice variability in the use of these techniques, however, and relatively limited data to help establish institutional protocols. The objective of the AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) expert panel was to review the existing literature and establish recommendations about the use of MCS before, during, and after lung transplantation.

METHODS

The AATS CPSC assembled an expert panel of 16 lung transplantation physicians who developed a consensus document of recommendations. The panel was broken into subgroups focused on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative support, and each subgroup performed a focused literature review. These subgroups formulated recommendation statements for each subtopic, which were evaluated by the entire group. The statements were then developed via discussion among the panel and refined until consensus was achieved on each statement.

RESULTS

The expert panel achieved consensus on 36 recommendations for how and when to use MCS in lung transplantation. These recommendations included the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridging strategy in the preoperative setting, a preference for central veno-arterial ECMO over traditional cardiopulmonary bypass during the transplantation procedure, and the benefit of supporting selected patients with MCS postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving optimal results in lung transplantation requires the use of a wide range of strategies. MCS provides an important mechanism for helping these critically ill patients through the peritransplantation period. Despite the complex nature of the decision making process in the treatment of these patients, the expert panel was able to achieve consensus on 36 recommendations. These recommendations should provide guidance for professionals involved in the care of end-stage lung disease patients considered for transplantation.

[Place of traditional CBP in bipulmonary transplantation]

Initially double-lung transplantation (DLT) was performed with airway anastomosis at the tracheal bifurcation requiring a cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). Complications related to ischemia of the bronchi and trachea around the carina prompted adoption of sequential single lung implantations as the method of choice for DLT. In different studies, CPB was associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity but this was probably due to the selection of more severe patients. Moreover, important progress in the technology of CPB has occurred. Therefore, the systematic use of CPB during sequential lung transplantation might have some interest by limiting the occurrence of ventilation and perfusion injuries. This article discusses the potential beneficial effects of CPB during double-lung transplantation.

Unilateral radiographic abnormalities after bilateral lung transplantation: exclusion from the definition of primary graft dysfunction?

OBJECTIVES

Unilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray films are occasionally seen after bilateral lung transplantation. In the primary graft dysfunction grading system, the presence or absence of a radiographic abnormality is crucial in determining the incidence and severity of primary graft dysfunction. However, no consideration is given as to whether unilateral infiltrates have the same impact and relevance as bilateral infiltrates. This study aims to describe the incidence, features, and outcomes of posttransplant unilateral infiltrates and their effect on the novel primary graft dysfunction grading system.

METHODS

Depending on posttransplant radiographic appearance, 144 patients who underwent bilateral lung transplantation were divided into 3 groups: no infiltrates (clear), unilateral infiltrates (unilateral), or bilateral infiltrates (bilateral).

RESULTS

Radiographic abnormalities were seen in 43% of donors and 61% of posttransplant recipients (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 50%). The percentage of recipients in the unilateral, clear, and bilateral groups was 26%, 39%, and 35%, respectively. Lower posttransplant oxygenation (P < .05), longer intubation hours, and more intensive care unit days (P < .0001) were seen in the bilateral compared with the unilateral and the clear groups. A significant difference in the prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (P < .0001) was seen, depending on whether unilateral infiltrates were included or excluded from the primary graft dysfunction grading.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of unilateral infiltrates is relatively high after bilateral lung transplantation. The early posttransplant outcome of the unilateral infiltrates is similar to that in the group having a clear chest x-ray film and significantly better than that in those with bilateral infiltrates. In bilateral lung transplantation, only bilateral infiltrates should be used as part of the definition of primary graft dysfunction.

High central venous pressure is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased mortality after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Poor oxygenation might occur in transplanted lungs as a result of reperfusion injury and lack of lymphatic drainage. Low central venous and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures are advocated to reduce pulmonary edema and maximize oxygenation but might adversely affect cardiac index, circulation, and renal function.

METHODS

Histories, intensive care unit charts, and donor data on 118 lung transplantations performed between 1999 and 2002 were retrospectively assessed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on donor, recipient, operative, and intensive care unit parameters to determine the relationship of filling pressure (central venous and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures) to prolonged mechanical ventilation and outcome. The mean central venous pressure was used to divide patients into high and low central venous pressure groups, which were then compared to determine differences in outcome and complication rates.

RESULTS

A high central venous pressure was found to be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.20; P = .008). After removing the effect of poor myocardial function by excluding patients with low cardiac index (< 2.2 L x min -1 x m(-2) ) and high inotrope requirement (> 10 microg/min), central venous pressure remained associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-4.07; P = .004). Duration of ventilation (P < .001), intensive care unit mortality (P = .02), hospital mortality (P = .09), and 2-month mortality (P = .02) were higher in patients with central venous pressures of greater than 7 mm Hg. There was no evidence of complications caused by hypovolemia in the low (< or = 7 mm Hg) central venous pressure group, who had lower inotrope requirements (P = .02) and lower creatinine levels (P = .013). Conclusions A high central venous pressure was associated with adverse outcomes after lung transplantation.

Critical care issues in lung and heart transplantation

Although much has been accomplished in HTx and LTx in the past few decades, much remains to be conquered. It is an ever-changing, always fascinating field. Though science and technology know no limits, the primary limitation of HTx and LTx continues to be the availability of donor organs. One can only hope that further advances in educating the public will help close the large gap between the list of those waiting and the organs available for transplantation.

Secondary pulmonary hypertension does not adversely affect outcome after single lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension have been associated with poor outcomes after single lung transplantation. Some groups advocate double lung transplantation and the routine use of cardiopulmonary bypass during transplantation in this population. However, the optimal procedure for these patients remains controversial. The goal of our study was to determine the safety of single lung transplantation without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 76 consecutive patients with pulmonary parenchymal disease who underwent single lung transplantation from 1992 to 1998. Recipients were stratified according to preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure. Secondary pulmonary hypertension was defined as parenchymal lung disease with a preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure of 30 mm Hg or more. Patients with primary pulmonary hypertension or Eisenmenger's syndrome were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 76 patients had secondary pulmonary hypertension. No patient with secondary pulmonary hypertension required cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas 1 patient without pulmonary hypertension required bypass. After the operation, no significant differences were seen in lung injury as measured by chest radiograph score and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, the requirement for inhaled nitric oxide, the length of mechanical ventilation, the intensive care unit or hospital length of stay, and 30-day survival. There were no differences in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second or 6-minute walk at 1 year, or the incidence of rejection, infection, or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome greater than grade 2. Survival at 1, 2, and 4 years after transplantation was 86%, 79%, and 65%, respectively, in the low pulmonary artery pressure group and 81%, 81%, and 61%, respectively, in the group with secondary pulmonary hypertension (P >.2).

CONCLUSION

We found that patients with pulmonary parenchymal disease and concomitant secondary pulmonary hypertension had successful outcomes as measured by early and late allograft function and appear to have acceptable long-term survival after single lung transplantation. Our results do not support the routine use of cardiopulmonary bypass or double lung transplantation for patients with this disorder.

Pulmonary transplantation

Anesthetic technique for pulmonary transplantation varies with recipient's underlying lung disease, procedure performed and regional practice. The pulmonary allograft is vulnerable to mechanical and biochemical injury throughout the harvesting, preservation and engraftment procedures. Mechanisms of allograft injury are reviewed, with suggestions for incorporation of strategies to minimize injury into clinical practice. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of nitric oxide for treatment of reperfusion injury.