Traumatic aortic rupture: recent outcome with regard to neurologic deficit

Bypass Techniques for Descending Thoracic Aortic Surgery

The conduct of partial left heart bypass or partial car diopulmonary bypass (CPB) during surgery involving the descending thoracic aorta or thoracoabdominal aorta is one of the most unappreciated and misunder stood extracorporeal circulation procedures in cardio vascular surgery. It is different from conventional CPB, and although some uninitiated practitioners consider it simpler, it is in fact more complicated than conven tional CPB and involves different concepts. It requires expertise and skill in regulating the flow, pressure, and oxygenation of blood going to both the proximal and distal parts of the body and management of the special bypass or shunt procedures used, specialized monitor ing, and knowledge about the protection and preserva tion of organs both proximal and distal to the aortic clamping. It demands exquisite communication and un derstanding of the unique problems faced by the sur geon, anesthesiologist, and perfusionist.

Endovascular Repair for Acute Rupture of the Descending Thoracic Aorta

Purpose:

To report the endovascular treatment of acute descending thoracic aortic rupture as an alternative to open surgery in high-risk patients.

Methods:

Between November 1999 and April 2001, 10 patients (7 men; median age 75 years) underwent endovascular stent-grafting of the descending thoracic aorta for acute rupture from an aneurysm (n = 7) or blunt trauma (n = 3). All patients were evaluated as high operative risk. The aortic rupture was associated with isolated mediastinal hematomas (n = 7), left hemothorax (n = 2), or aortobronchial fistula (n = 1). The Excluder Thoracic Endoprosthesis was used predominantly.

Results:

The mean interval to the endovascular repair was 45.3 ± 28.4 hours. All stent-grafts were successfully deployed. Two patients required common iliac artery access, and 2 needed covered stents for iatrogenic iliac artery rupture. There was 1 postoperative death (myocardial infarction) and no renal failure, neurological complications, embolization, stent-graft migration, or perigraft leak. One patient died 4 months later from an unrelated cause. At a mean follow-up of 7.9 ± 5.1 months, all aneurysms and rupture sites were excluded with no evidence of endoleak or hematoma.

Conclusions:

Endoluminal treatment is a feasible technique for the management of acute rupture of the descending thoracic aorta. Long-term studies are required to assess the effectiveness and durability of this technique in comparison to open repair.

Case-report: endovascular treatment of aortic pseudo-aneurysm caused by Fishbone

Aortic pseudo-aneurysm (APA) is a rare disease in clinic. Because of its relative rarity, we are far from making any conclusion regarding the natural history and appropriate therapeutic strategy for this condition. This study is to investigate the treatment effect of interventional therapy in aortic pseudo-aneurysm. A woman of 68 years old diagnosed with APA caused by fishbone was treated with stent grafts. After treatment, the therapeutic effect was assessed by measuring the size of trauma. The patient recovered well after stent grafts treatment, as her trauma was minimal. However, some complications of intravascular interventional treatment were observed. Compared with conventional surgery, interventional therapy of intravascular stent grafts has its merits. Therefore, this strategy was worthy to apply in the treatment of aortic pseudo-aneurysm.

Acute Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury: Considerations and Reflections on the Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a life-threatening lesion and it occurs in 10 to 30% of fatalities from blunt thoracic trauma and is the second most common cause of death after head injury. Immediate surgery is often characterized by a high mortality and morbidity rate. Delayed repair of traumatic aortic injuries has significant survival benefits and a much lower mortality rate compared with early open repair. Despite developments in operative techniques, there still remains considerable operative mortality and morbidity associated with a surgical approach even if delayed. Endovascular stent grafts for the thoracic aorta represents an alternative to the conventional approach for traumatic aortic rupture. Because of the lower invasivity avoiding thoracotomy and use of heparin, endovascular repair can be applied in acute patients without the risk of destabilizing pulmonary, head or abdominal traumatic lesions. However, despite the good deal of convincing evidence for endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic diseases and for traumatic aortic injuries as a valid and efficacious alternative to surgery, several reports show a variety of late complications of thoracic endografts especially for first-generation stent-grafts. In light of this, is the endovascular treatment really safe, efficacious and free from complications in the long term? This manuscript aims to offer a moment of reflection on this important chapter of aortic pathology.

Percutaneous balloon-expandable covered stent implantation for treatment of traumatic aortic injury in children and adolescents

Surgical treatment of pediatric acute traumatic aortic injury (TAI) after blunt chest trauma is standard of care. Use of endovascular stent grafts for treatment of TAI in adults is common but has important limitations in children. We sought to describe the use of balloon-expandable covered endovascular stents for treatment of TAI in children and adolescents. Participants of the multicenter Coarctation of the Aorta Stent Trial (COAST) had access to investigational large-diameter, balloon-expandable, covered stents (covered Cheatham-platinum stents; NuMed, Inc., Hopkinton, New York) on an emergency-use basis. From 2008 through 2011, 6 covered stents were implanted in 4 patients at 3 COAST centers for treatment of TAI. Median patient age was 13.5 years (range 11 to 14) and weight was 58 kg (40 to 130). All patients sustained severe extracardiac injuries that were judged to preclude safe open surgical repair of TAI. Median aortic isthmus and stent implantation balloon diameters were 16.4 mm (13.2 to 19) and 19 mm (16 to 20), respectively. Stent implantation was technically successful in all attempts. Complete exclusion of aortic wall injury was achieved in all cases. There were no access site complications. At a median follow-up of 24 months, there was 1 early death (related to underlying head trauma) and 1 patient with recurrent aortic aneurysm who required additional stent implantation. In conclusion, balloon-expandable covered-stent implantation for treatment of pediatric TAI after blunt trauma is generally safe and effective. Availability of this equipment may alter the standard approach to treatment of pediatric TAI.

[Traumatic thoracic aorta rupture: preclinical assessment, diagnosis and treatment options]

Traumatic aortic rupture is a life-threatening injury which is frequently associated with blunt thoracic trauma or found coincidentally in heavily traumatized patients. Depending on the degree of disruption of the damaged aortic wall, vascular injury is associated with a high primary mortality rate and a significant risk of secondary aortic rupture. Early clinical signs which may indicate a ruptured thoracic aorta are left sided thoracic pain, reduced ventilation, tachycardia and dyspnoe as well as hypotension in the lower extremities. The primary aim for emergency treatment is to maintain vital organ function and to hemodynamically stabilize the patient. Surgical treatment was previously performed by either direct aortic suture or segmental alloplastic graft interposition using the clamp and sew technique with or without extra-anatomic shunts or extracorporeal circulation. However, endovascular stent graft implantation has now become another treatment option for traumatic aortic rupture. According to the reported data and our own experience there is increasing evidence that endovascular aortic repair might become the treatment of choice for patients with traumatic aortic rupture, with the option of an early, less invasive intervention thus avoiding thoracotomy. Regular follow-up is necessary to detect possible stent graft migration or leakage which could require additional endovascular or open surgical re-interventions.

Endovascular intervention in thoracic arterial trauma

The management of thoracic vascular injury has improved dramatically over the past two decades. The availability of multi-row detector CT has facilitated early diagnosis and incorporation of minimally invasive endograft repair for traumatic aortic injury has improved mortality and paraplegia rates. This review evaluates the available data on stent-graft repair of acute blunt traumatic aortic injury and traumatic great vessel injury with regard to safety and efficacy in comparison with conventional open surgical repair.

Endovascular management of acute blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta is a life-threatening complication in patients who sustain deceleration or crush injuries. The magnitude of force necessary to cause blunt thoracic aortic injury results in a high proportion of concomitant injuries, posing a significant challenge for prioritizing management. Open surgical mortality is increased in the presence of coexisting head, lung, and abdominal injuries. Spinal cord ischemia may occur following aortic cross-clamping and operative hypotension. Endovascular stent-graft placement offers a safe, effective, and timely treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess our single center experience of endovascular repair following acute blunt traumatic aortic injury.

METHODS

Data from thirteen consecutive patients (mean age, 43.2 years; range, 16 to 84 years) with acute blunt traumatic aortic injury treated by endovascular stent-graft insertion between October 2001 and March 2007 was prospectively collected. Demographics, injury characteristics, technique, and complications were recorded. Follow-up data consisted of computed tomographic angiography and plain chest radiography at regular intervals. Mean and median follow-up after stent-graft implantation were 28.9 and 29 months, respectively.

RESULTS

All patients underwent endovascular repair within a median of 9 hours from hospital presentation. Two patients underwent carotico-carotid bypass immediately prior to endovascular stenting during a single anesthetic. Stent-graft implantation was technically successful in all patients. No patient required conversion to open surgical repair of the acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Procedure-related paraplegia was zero. Complications included proximal migration of initial stent-graft in one patient and iliac artery avulsion in another patient with consequent ilio-femoral bypass. The median hospital stay was 17 days. There were no in-hospital deaths.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular repair is evolving as the procedure of choice for acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Treatment of lesions that extend into the aortic arch is feasible with extra-anatomical bypass. In our study, endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury is a safe procedure with low morbidity and a mortality rate of zero.

Multiple subfailures characterize blunt aortic injury

BACKGROUND

Blunt aortic injuries result from rapid deceleration of the thorax as may occur during automotive impacts and falls from extreme heights. Pathological findings can range from failure of specific vessel layers to immediate vessel wall rupture. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the sequence of local structural events that may lead to aortic wall disruption.

METHODS

Fourteen porcine aorta specimens were opened to expose the intima and longitudinally distracted until rupture. Longitudinal mechanics were quantified and subfailures were identified. Histology was used to examine internal layer subfailure.

RESULTS

Videography demonstrated that subfailures propagated into complete vessel wall rupture. Subfailures occurred before complete vessel rupture in 93% of specimens. Intimal and medial subfailures were present at 74% of the stress and 82% of the strain to rupture. Multiple subfailures were evident in 79% of specimens.

CONCLUSION

Present results supported the clinical theory that nonimmediate death as a result of blunt aortic injury is commonly caused by propagation of lesser lesions, initiating on the intimal layer, into complete vessel rupture including the adventitial layer. This finding, along with histologic evidence of subfailure pathological findings, confirms the presence of an acute window during which recognition and initiation of permissive hypotension may be lifesaving.

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disease: Mid-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term follow-up in a cohort of patients with acute or chronic descending aortic disease treated by stent-graft repair.

BACKGROUND

Since 1999, endovascular stent-graft placement has been reported as an alternative treatment to surgical approach for a variety of thoracic aortic diseases; however, results beyond initial short-term follow-up are not widely available for the broad range of applications.

METHODS

From March 2001, 43 consecutive patients with traumatic aortic transection (group A = 16) and complicated type B aortic dissection or aneurysm (group B = 27) underwent stent-graft implantation. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan as preoperative assessment and in 26 a transesophageal echo (TEE) exam was performed.

RESULTS

Technically successful stent-graft deployment was achieved in all patients. No patient required surgical conversion and no cases of paraplegia occurred. The overall in-hospital mortality was 9.3%. A residual endoleak (type II) was detected in one group B patient who was managed conservatively. The mean follow-up was 29 +/- 8 months (range 10-48 months). No patient died during late follow-up after hospital discharge. At 12 months, one patient (2.5%) who had stent graft repair of an aortic dissection developed an asymptomatic type I endoleak. Three asymptomatic patients with chronic dissection had a persistent retrograde perfusion of the thoracic false lumen via a distal tear(s) in the dissection septum.

CONCLUSION

Our results of stent-graft treatment of complicated and uncomplicated diseases of the descending aorta confirms that this alternative to open repair is a safe, less invasive, and relatively low risk approach. Medium-term follow-up results suggest that it is effective and durable therapy with low associated mortality and morbidity rates.

Endovascular management of traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta: A retrospective multicenter analysis of 28 cases in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive endovascular treatment of a traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a new strategy in the care of multitrauma patients. We report the experience in The Netherlands with endovascular management of patients with acute traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta.

METHODS

We reviewed 28 patients with a traumatic thoracic aortic rupture treated with a thoracic aortic endograft between June 2000 and April 2004. All patients underwent treatment at one of the four participating level 1 trauma centers. Data collected included age, sex, injury severity score, type of endovascular graft, endovascular operation time, length of stay, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and mortality. Follow-up data consisted of computed tomographic angiography and plain chest radiographs at regular intervals.

RESULTS

All patients (mean age, 40.9 years; SD, 18.5 years) experienced severe traumatic injury, and the mean injury severity score was 37.1 (SD, 7.8). All endovascular procedures were technically successful, and the median operating time for the endovascular procedure was 58 minutes (interquartile range, 47-88 minutes). The overall hospital mortality was 14.3% (n = 4), and all deaths were unrelated to the aortic rupture or stent placement. There was no intervention-related mortality during a median follow-up of 26.5 months (interquartile range, 10-34.6 months). Postoperative data showed no severe endovascular graft- or procedure-related morbidity, except for one patient with an asymptomatic collapse of the endovascular graft during regular follow-up. This was corrected by placing a second graft.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the results of immediate endovascular repair of a traumatic aortic rupture are at least equal to those of conventional open surgical repair. Especially in these multitrauma patients with traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta, endovascular therapy seems to be preferable to conventional open surgical repair.

Immediate endovascular treatment of blunt aortic injury: our therapeutic strategy

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic aortic rupture is a potentially lethal injury. Endovascular procedure has recently proved to be a valid option. Timing of the treatment, however, is still a debated issue. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of immediate stent-graft repair of acute posttraumatic aortic injury.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2005, 15 patients (11 men and 4 women, mean age 42.3 years) with blunt aortic injury were treated with immediate stent-graft positioning. In patients with clinical and radiologic signs of impending rupture, endovascular treatment was performed in an emergency setting (11 cases). In the 4 remaining patients the aortic lesion was treated after clinical management. When present, immediate life-threatening nonaortic lesions were treated before endovascular stenting (6 cases). In 1 case emergency laparotomy and endovascular procedure were performed simultaneously. Stent positioning was monitored by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in all cases.

RESULTS

Endovascular procedure was successful in 100% of the patients. Two patients died perioperatively as a consequence of a multiorgan failure. Both patients were in American Society of Anesthetists class V and were in severe intractable hemorrhagic shock before the procedure. Computed tomography scan performed before discharge showed correct positioning of the stent graft and absence of endoleaks in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 29 months (range 1-79) all patients were alive but 1, who died of unrelated cause, and no intervention-related complication had occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate stent-graft repair of posttraumatic aortic injury is a feasible and safe procedure. It allows us to minimize the surgical risks and to treat stable and unstable lesions even when associated lesions would contraindicate traditional surgical intervention.

Stent versus Open Surgery for Acute and Chronic Traumatic Injury of the Thoracic Aorta: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta have a high morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include either open surgery or endovascular stent graft implantation.

METHODS

We have reviewed retrospectively all our patients treated for acute and chronic traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta and compared the outcome of the endovascular versus open therapy. Age, gender, severity of injuries, interventional delay, perioperative morbidity, 30-day mortality, length of intensive care, and overall hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 46 patients were treated over the past 14 years. Overall 30-day mortality was 16% in patients treated for acute or contained aortic ruptures (n = 31) and not significantly different after endovascular versus open repair (13.3% versus 18.8%). There was no mortality in the patients receiving elective stent grafting or open surgery for chronic posttraumatic aortic aneurysms (n = 15). Conversion and/or operative revision following stent graft implantation occurred in three patients (12.5%). Neurologic complications were absent in the stent graft group (0 of 24), whereas paraplegia (n = 2) or minor neurologic (n = 3) deficits developed following open surgery (5 of 22; 22.7%; p = 0.013). Length of intensive care and overall hospital stay were significantly shorter for patients after elective stent graft treatment compared with open surgery (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our midterm results, minimally invasive endovascular repair for patients with acute traumatic ruptures and chronic posttraumatic aneurysms is an equally effective treatment option compared with open surgery, with advantages regarding perioperative neurologic complications and duration of hospital stay under elective circumstances.

Management Options in Blunt Aortic Injury: A Case Series and Literature Review

Blunt aortic injury (BAI) is a devastating consequence of high-energy trauma. The majority of its victims do not survive; those who do generally have significant associated injury. The standard treatment of BAI has been emergent replacement or repair of the damaged aorta via a posterolateral thoracotomy, with or without perfusion adjuncts. In addition to the substantial morbidity and mortality secondary to multisystem traumatic injuries, patients surviving to reach the operating room have been exposed to the risks related to their surgical treatment, namely death, paraplegia, hemorrhage, transfusion, organ dysfunction, prolonged intensive care unit stays, and extensive rehabilitation requirements. Contributions to the literature over the past several years have provided support for changing practice patterns in the management of BAI. Aggressive control of blood pressure has made it safe to delay high-risk interventions in patients with complex injuries. Advanced perfusion strategies using little or no anticoagulation appear to have positively affected bleeding complications and neurologic risk. Finally, endovascular stent grafting, though not yet rigorously evaluated in BAI, has been shown to be feasible and effective in the short term. This case presentation and literature review will examine treatment options and propose a management algorithm.

Traitement endovasculaire des ruptures isthmiques de l'aorte chez le polytraumatisé : utilisation de stents de deuxième génération

OBJECTIVE

Prospective analysis of endovascular management of traumatic isthmic rupture with second generation stent grafts.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective analysis and follow-up.

PATIENTS

Ten consecutive multiple injured patients presenting an acute isthmic traumatic rupture who underwent an endovascular repair with second generation stent grafts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The aortic injury was diagnosed by spiral computed tomography scan. The appropriate time to repair was decided according to multidisciplinary decision after analysis of associated injuries status and mediastinal lesions evolution. Endovascular repair was successfully completed in all patients under general anaesthesia without requirement of haemodynamic manipulations. Despite a prolonged length of stay related to associated injuries, all patients were discharged from hospital without migration of devices or complication related to the endovascular procedure. After a 20 months follow-up (range 6 - 38 months), all patients were alive with a satisfactory CT scan analysis.

CONCLUSION

The immediate availability of the second generation of stents-grafts allowed the endovascular treatment of isthmic rupture without haemodynamic manipulations or massive heparinization. The analysis of this selected series reinforces the interest of this non-invasive technique for anaesthetists especially in polytraumatized patients.

Endovascular Stent-Graft Treatment for Blunt Aortic Injury

BACKGROUND

Thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma is usually fatal and almost always associated with multiple, complex, nonaortic injuries that can adversely affect standard surgical repair of the aorta. Endovascular stent - graft treatment offers these patients a less invasive operative treatment option.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2002 and October 2003, 6 patients with blunt aortic injury (BAI) were treated with a stent - graft. In all cases endovascular management was selected because of associated polytrauma or comorbidities. All stent - grafts were homemade and deployed through the femoral artery with 18-20 Fr delivery sheaths. There were no cases of perioperative death, renal failure, or neurologic complication. In one patient the postoperative computed tomography scan showed proximal endoleak requiring additional balloon dilatation and stenting. No other endoleaks were observed by CT in the acute phase. None of the follow-up CT scans revealed evidence of endoleak, migration, or alteration of the stent - graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair for BAI is technically feasible and is an alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients.

Endovascular repair for acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND

We report endovascular treatment of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta as a potential alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and July 2002, 9 patients with acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta were treated with a stent-graft. In all cases the endovascular management was selected because of age, associated polytrauma, or comorbidities. Preoperative workup included chest computed tomography scan, transoesophageal echography, and angiography. The devices used were the Excluder and the Talent stent-grafts.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent immediate repair and 1 patient was treated within 5 days of the accident because of delayed diagnosis of aortic rupture after surgical management of spleen rupture. The stent-graft was successfully expanded in all patients through the common femoral artery (n = 7) or the common iliac artery (n = 2). There was no perioperative death, renal failure, or neurologic complication (paraplegia or stroke). In 1 patient the computed tomography scan at 7 days postoperatively showed proximal endoleak requiring placement of a second stent-graft. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 20 months. All spiral computed tomography scans performed during follow-up revealed no evidence of endoleak, migration, or alteration of the stent-graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair in the acute phase of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is technically feasible and safe, and may represent an alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients.

Thoracic aorta endoprosthesis: the final countdown for open surgery after traumatic aortic rupture?

From December 1998 through May 2001, seven patients with thoracic aortic isthmus rupture underwent endovascular stent graft repair. Diagnosis was made by chest X-ray, transesophageal echography, CT scan, and aortography. The endoprosthesis was ordered and/or custom made on an urgent basis. During the delay period blood pressure was kept low and the tear closely monitored by means of transesophageal echography and CT scan. The mean delay period was 94 days: three patients were treated within 24 hr, two patients had their treatment postponed because of multiple organ failure, and two patients were diagnosed late. Complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysmal sac was successful in all patients. One patient underwent a preliminary carotidosubclavian bypass because of a short proximal neck, one subclavian artery was unintentionally partially covered, and a second one was deliberately overstented. None of these patients developed arm ischemia or claudication. One patient died 3 weeks after the procedure because of the severity of associated lesions and comorbidity. Our preliminary results prove that endografting for aortic isthmic rupture is technically feasible and that it represents a safe and potentially valuable alternative to the mortality and morbidity of open surgery. Further evaluation is needed to assess the full therapeutic potential and determine the mid and long-term follow-up.

Median sternotomy and extended left anterior thoracotomy for repair of traumatic aortic transection with ruptured right atrium

A 22-year-old man presented with traumatic aortic transtion associated with rupture of the right atrium and underwent urgent median sternotomy to repair the right atrium. A T-shaped extended left anterior thoracotomy was performed, and ruptured descending thoracic aorta was repaired under total bypass. A Y-shaped connector was inserted in the arterial catheter to allow cannulation of both ascending aorta and femoral arteries. A 4-cm long Hemoshield graft was used to repair the aortic transection. The patient made a full recovery and was discharged 13 days after the accident.

Management of traumatic aortic rupture: a 30-year experience

OBJECTIVE

To present the authors' 30-year experience with traumatic aortic rupture (TAR).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

TAR is a highly lethal injury. Most institutions manage a small number of cases, and most surgeons receive only modest exposure during training.

METHODS

Between 1971 and 2001, the authors operated on 219 patients with a diagnosis of TAR. Diagnosis of TAR since 1994 has been based exclusively on the use of contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography, with angiography reserved for equivocal cases (periaortic mediastinal hematoma without aortic wall abnormalities). Patients were divided according to surgical technique. Eighty-two patients (group A) were operated on with a clamp-and-sew technique. Sixty-four patients (group B) underwent surgery with the use of a passive shunt, and 73 patients (group C) were treated using heparin-less partial cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Mortality was 18 patients for group A (21.9%), 23 patients for group B (35.9%), and 13 patients for group C (17.8%) (P =.03). Paraplegia occurred in 15 of 64 survivors in group A (23.4%), 7 of 41 survivors in group B (17%), and 0 of 60 survivors in group C ( P=.0005). Aortic occlusion without lower body perfusion for longer than 30 minutes (P =.004) and surgical technique without lower body bypass support (P =.0005) were associated with paraplegia.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for TAR based on spiral computed tomography screening and diagnosis is reliable. The use of heparin-less distal cardiopulmonary bypass in the authors' hands is safe and is associated with a reduced incidence of paraplegia.

Blunt aortic injury with concomitant intra-abdominal solid organ injury: treatment priorities revisited

BACKGROUND

Patients with blunt aortic injury (BAI) often have concomitant liver or spleen (L/S) injuries. With increasing use of cardiopulmonary bypass with heparinization in repair of BAI, many advocate operative management of the L/S injury before aortic repair to eliminate risk of hemorrhage. We evaluated the safety of nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt L/S injuries in patients undergoing acute BAI repair with bypass.

METHODS

All patients admitted over a 6-year period with BAI were identified from the registry of our Level I trauma center. Patients with isolated L/S injuries without BAI admitted over the same period served as controls. Groups were compared with regard to demographics, injury characteristics, hospital course, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were diagnosed with BAI from 1994 to 2000; 28 (33%) also had blunt abdominal trauma. Three patients with severe brain injury did not undergo BAI repair, and five required laparotomy before BAI repair for other intra-abdominal injuries (two for hemodynamic instability with splenic injury, and three for concomitant bowel injury). Therefore, 20 of 28 (71.4%) BAI patients with grade I or II L/S injury (Aorta L/S group) underwent planned NOM. All BAIs were repaired using partial bypass with full heparinization. These 20 patients are compared with 894 patients with grade I or II L/S injuries with no BAI (L/S group) over the same time period. There was no difference in the nonoperative failure rate of the Aorta L/S group versus the L/S group (0% vs. 1.7%). Both groups had similar complication rates. The Aorta L/S group was also compared with 56 BAIs without solid organ injury (Aorta group). Although the Aorta L/S group was more severely injured than the Aorta group (Injury Severity Score of 35.3 vs. 26.8, < 0.0001), transfusion rates (5.7 U of packed red blood cells vs. 8.0 U of packed red blood cells, p = NS), hospital days (17.9 vs. 19.1, p = NS) and mortality (10% vs. 9%, p = NS) were similar.

CONCLUSION

NOM of patients with grade I or II L/S injury who undergo systemic anticoagulation with heparin for repair of BAI is safe and associated with transfusion rates similar to BAI alone. Patients with low-grade liver or spleen injuries do not require laparotomy before BAI repair using partial bypass.

Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: cohort study and systematic review

PURPOSE

Through a systematic review of the literature, we identified the optimal management of traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta (TRTA) and reported the results of a cohort of patients treated with the clamp-and-sew technique (CAS) at a tertiary trauma center.

METHODS

Studies were identified through Medline and the Cochrane library and from reference lists and papers from the authors' files. Studies with a single consistent protocol (CAS, Gott shunt [GS], left heart bypass [LHB], or partial cardiopulmonary bypass [PCPB]) that reported mortality and neurologic outcomes were included. Relevance, validity, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. A retrospective review of charts from June 1992 to August 2000 provided the database for our experience.

RESULTS

Twenty studies reporting on 618 patients were found to be relevant. Interobserver agreement for relevance and validity decisions was high. Mortality rates for repair with CAS, GS, LHB, and PCPB were 15%, 8%, 17%, and 10%, respectively, and for paraplegia they were 7%, 4%, 0%, and 2%, respectively. The difference in mortality rates was not statistically significant. CAS had a higher incidence of neurologic deficits than GS (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 0.4-8), LHB (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 0.8-50), and PCPB (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1-10). In our cohort of 25 patients, 21 underwent surgery with CAS. The median abbreviated injury severity score was 20 (range, 4-50). The mean aortic clamp time was 30 +/- 12 minutes. Aortic repair was achieved with graft interposition in 43% of patients, and simple suture was achieved in 57% of patients. Mortality (10%) and neurologic complication (paraplegia, 11%; paraparesis, 5%) rates were not statistically different from those reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

CAS is associated with a similar mortality rate but a higher incidence of neurologic deficits than methods with distal aortic perfusion.

Anatomical considerations in the surgical management of blunt thoracic aortic injury

PURPOSE

Blunt aortic injury (BAI) involving the thoracic aorta is usually described as occurring at the isthmus. We hypothesized that injuries 1 cm or less from the inferior border of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) are associated with an increased mortality rate compared with injuries that are more distal.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients admitted with the diagnosis of BAI was performed. Injuries were divided into two groups: group I, injuries that were 1 cm or less from the junction of the LSCA and the thoracic aorta; group II, injuries that were more than 1 cm from the LSCA. Primary outcome measures included cross-clamp time, rupture, and death.

RESULTS

In a 14-year period, 122 patients were admitted with BAI. The anatomy relative to the LSCA could be determined in 91 patients who underwent operative repair. Forty-two injuries (46%) were classified as group I, and 49 injuries were classified as group II. Group I injuries were characterized by an increased mortality rate (18/42 or 43% in group I vs 11/49 or 22% in group II, P = .04), intraoperative rupture rate (7/42 or 17% in group I vs 1/49 or 2% in group II, P = .003), and cross-clamp time (39.5 +/- 21.9 minutes in group I vs 28.4 +/- 13 minutes in group II, P = .04). Three ruptures occurred while proximal control was being obtained.

CONCLUSION

Increased technical difficulty and risk of rupture characterize injuries that occur proximally in the descending thoracic aorta, 1 cm from the LSCA. These injuries may be better managed by instituting bypass before attempting to obtain proximal control and by routinely clamping proximal to the LSCA.

The impact of intraoperative hypotension on the development of wound haematoma after breast reduction

A wound haematoma occurring after breast reduction may need to be drained surgically, and may prolong both hospital stay and the total recovery time following surgery. Intraoperative hypotension has been implicated in the development of various complications, but has not been previously studied in relation to breast reduction. A retrospective analysis of 238 breast reductions was performed with the aim of identifying risk factors for the development of wound haematoma after breast reduction. The operative time was divided into three equal periods and, in our experience, haemostasis was achieved in the middle period. In our series, 16 patients developed a postoperative wound haematoma; only four patients required operative evacuation (1.7%). Subcutaneous heparin prophylaxis, the level of the surgical team and the weight of tissue resected did not significantly affect the likelihood of wound haematoma. The lowest and the peak values of systolic blood pressure and the mean blood pressure (diastolic + 1/3 pulse) were significantly lower in the middle period of the operation in patients who developed a haematoma P values: 0.012, 0.021 and 0.005, respectively). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed the same significant findings (P values: 0.0014, 0.021 and 0.0059, respectively). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that the lowest systolic blood pressure in the middle period was significantly lower in the haematoma group than in the non-haematoma group (P= 0.0007). Intraoperative hypotension in the middle period of the operation, which is usually the period when haemostasis is achieved, is associated with the development of postoperative wound haematoma.

Experience with spiral computed tomography as the sole diagnostic method for traumatic aortic rupture

BACKGROUND

Spiral computed tomographic (CT) scan is an excellent screen for aortic trauma. Traditionally, aortography is performed when injury is suspected to confirm the diagnosis. We hypothesized that it is safe and expeditious to forgo aortography when the spiral CT demonstrates aortic injury.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing aortic repair from July 1994 to December 1999. Spiral CT was the initial diagnostic study in 52 patients. Pseudoaneurysm or aortic wall defect in the presence of mediastinal hematoma was considered diagnostic. Angiography, initially routine, was later performed only when requested by the surgeon, and for all "nonnegative" studies (periaortic hematoma without detectable aortic injury).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent angiography before operation (group 1). Nineteen group 1 spiral CTs were unequivocally diagnostic; 7 were nonnegative and angiography was required. Twenty-eight other patients underwent repair based on spiral CT alone (group 2). There was one false-positive result in both groups. There were no unexpected operative findings. Mean time from admission to diagnosis was 5.7+/-3.4 hours for group 1 and 1.7+/-1.7 hours for group 2 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Operating on the basis of a diagnostic spiral CT is safe and expeditious. Aortography may be reserved for those with equivocal studies.

Impact of Presenting Physiology and Associated Injuries on Outcome following Traumatic Rupture of the Thoracic Aorta

We hypothesized that the predominant factor influencing outcome of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) was the degree of shock on presentation and associated injuries. We reviewed our experience with TRA over a 15-year period. Patients were classified as “unstable” if presenting systolic blood pressure was <90 mm Hg or if it decreased to <90 mm Hg after admission. We determined the presence of closed head injury, cardiac risk factors, a preoperative acute lung injury (ALI). The influence of these factors on mortality, postoperative adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and paralysis was analyzed. One hundred thirty-six patients were admitted with TRA. One hundred twenty underwent operative repair with a mortality of 31 per cent. Operative mortality was significantly higher in unstable patients (62%) versus stable patients (17%, P = 0.001), in patients with cardiac risk factors (71%) versus those without (24%, P = 0.001), and in patients with preoperative free rupture (83%) with versus those without (19%, P = 0.001). Free rupture was the cause of hypotension in only 10 of 42 unstable patients, with the remainder being due to other causes. Preoperative ALI was associated with a marked increase in postoperative ARDS (47% with vs 9% without, P = 0.001) but not operative mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 59 cases, none of whom experienced paralysis, whereas eight of 61 operated on without MCS developed paralysis ( P = 0.001). When logistic regression was applied the use of MCS was not determined to be statistically significant. However, preoperative instability was found to be a significant predictor of postoperative paralysis with the risk being increased 5.5 times (confidence interval 3.3–10). The predominant factor influencing mortality, postoperative ARDS, and paralysis was preoperative instability and associated injuries. In patients who are hypotensive, other injuries should take precedence over repair of TRA. Patients who are stable but who have cardiac or pulmonary risk factors may be better managed by a period of nonoperative management until their condition improves.

Heparinless partial cardiopulmonary bypass for the repair of aortic trauma

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that partial cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparin-bonded system would be a technically simple, effective adjunct for reducing paraplegia during repair of traumatic aortic rupture. It avoids the risk of heparin, but, unlike left atrial-arterial bypass, it can heat, cool, oxygenate, and rapidly infuse volume if needed.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients admitted for aortic trauma from July 1994 to December 1999. Bypass consisted of femoral venous (right atrial) cannulation, a centrifugal pump, and an oxygenator-heater/cooler. Arterial return was to the femoral artery or distal aorta. The entire system was heparin-bonded and no systemic heparin was given.

RESULTS

Heparin-bonded partial bypass was established in 50 patients (mean age 43 +/- 17 years). Crossclamp time was 32 +/- 11 minutes (range 14-70 minutes), mean flow 3.0 +/- 0.8 L/min, and bypass time 64 +/- 43 minutes. During repair, 58% of patients received volume through the system (mean 1.1 +/- 1.9 L). Core temperature rose slightly (35.9 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C to 36.3 degrees C +/- 0.8 degrees C). Three of the 15 patients who underwent percutaneous femoral arterial and venous cannulation concomitant with their angiograms had vessel injury, with one limb loss, and this procedure was discontinued. Thirty-five patients underwent percutaneous femoral vein and direct distal aortic cannulation without event. The mortality rate for patients supported by bypass was 10%, and all deaths were due to other injuries. There were no new cases of paraplegia and no worsening of intracranial or pulmonary injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin-bonded bypass is technically simple to use and avoids the risk of anticoagulation. Paraplegia was avoided. The ability to correct hypothermia, oxygenate, and rapidly infuse volume may simplify management and improve outcomes.