Aortic root replacement with the Carboseal composite graft: 7-year experience with the first 100 implants

Bentall procedure with the CarboSeal™ and CarboSeal Valsalva™ composite conduits: long-term outcomes

 

OBJECTIVES

Data on the long-term results with the standard CarboSeal™ mechanical conduit used for the modified Bentall procedure are lacking as well as information on performance of the Valsalva CarboSeal™ conduit.

METHODS

We have analysed 208 recipients of a standard (n = 110) or a Valsalva (n = 98) CarboSeal™ conduit. The median age was 60 years and 90% were males; 35 (17%) had type A aortic dissection and 65 (30%) a bicuspid aortic valve. Data were retrospectively analysed and results were compared between the 2 conduit models.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 1.9%; the mean follow-up was 175 ± 95 for standard and 94 ± 51 months for Valsalva conduits (P < 0.01). Actuarial survival was 86 ± 4%, 75 ± 6%, 59 ± 7% and 51 ± 9% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. There were 13 thromboembolic episodes with 3 deaths with an actuarial freedom of 98 ± 1%, 94 ± 2%, 90 ± 3% and 89 ± 4% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Reoperation on the aortic root was performed in 9 patients for endocarditis (n = 8) and pseudoaneurysm at the right coronary button (n = 1) with an actuarial freedom of 97 ± 1%, 95 ± 2%, 92 ± 3% and 87 ± 4% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. There were no differences between the 2 conduit models in survival and major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The CarboSeal™ conduit has shown gratifying overall performance up to 20 years and appears a valid option for a modified Bentall operation, when a mechanical prosthesis is indicated. Both CarboSeal™ conduit models provided not statistically different overall long-term results.

Perspective. Reoperative Bentall: choice of conduits

The Bentall procedure represents the gold standard in the treatment of patients requiring aortic root replacement. The most common indications for redo Bentall are structural degeneration or graft infection. Redo aortic root replacement can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and death. The choice of the best conduit is still up for debate but is mandatory to guarantee the best and most durable option for the patient. New options are available to reduce mortality in older or fragile patients and can modify the conduit choice.

Five-year experience in aortic root replacement with the flanged composite graft

BACKGROUND

Replacement of the aortic root with a composite graft containing a prosthetic mechanic valve is the preferred surgical procedure for tailoring the aortic root. The aim of this study is to determine the 5-year experience with the composite root replacement using our new modification of the Bentall technique.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and June 2001, 96 patients underwent aortic root replacement using a flanged composite graft. Eighty patients (83.3%) were male, and 16 patients (16.7%) were female with a mean age of 48.7 +/- 14.4 years. Indications for operation were a true or false aneurysm (65.6%), severe calcified aortic valve stenosis (4.2%) or severe aortic insufficiency (2.1%) with dilated ascending aorta, acute dissection (2.1%), or combination of indications (26%). Thirty-one patients (32.3%) received a concomitant cardiac procedure. Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 89.5 +/- 28.6 minutes, and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 146.2 +/- 45.6 minutes. Total follow-up was 253.9 patient-years.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 8.3% (8 patients). The causes of hospital mortality were severe bleeding (3 patients), low cardiac output syndrome (2), acute respiratory distress syndrome (2) and cerebrovascular event (1). No patient died of flange-related complications. Univariate predictors of early mortality were low cardiac output syndrome (p < 0.001), neurologic complication (p = 0.03), and renal complication (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated only low cardiac output syndrome to be significant (p = 0.001) predictor for early mortality. There were five (5.7%) late deaths. Actuarial survival was 82.65% +/- 4.8% at 5 years (1.95% patient-year). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated only low cardiac output syndrome to be significant (p = 0.032) predictor for late mortality. Actuarial freedom from prosthetic- and technique-related mortality was 100% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The flanged composite graft offers excellent long-term results, with very low prevalence of prosthetic-related complications. The new created sinuses and the flange are especially helpful to continue physiologic function of the aortic root.

Complete aortic root replacement in patients with small aortic annulus

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effectiveness of our surgical method using a modified self-assembled valved composite graft in patients with a narrow aortic annulus.

METHODS

Between August 2000 and May 2001, 10 consecutive patients with a narrow aortic annulus underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta using a valved composite graft with mechanical valve prosthesis. The indication for surgery was aneurysm of the ascending aorta (8 patients) and aortic dissection (2 patients). To avoid valve-patient mismatch, a modified self-assembled valved composite graft was used.

RESULTS

There was no hospital mortality. Echocardiographic evaluation before discharge showed excellent hemodynamics with a mean transvalvular gradient of 10.7 mm Hg (standard deviation +/- 2.8 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

The described valved composite graft offers very good hemodynamic performance and is a simple and effective device to avoid valve-patient mismatch in patients with a small aortic annulus who need aortic root replacement.

Aortic root replacement versus aortic valve replacement: a case-match study

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that patients with aortic valve disease and dilatation of the ascending aorta are at risk for later dissection or rupture of the aortic wall when the dilated ascending aorta is not replaced or reinforced at the time of aortic valve replacement. In order to find out whether the more complex surgical procedure of aortic root replacement carries a higher early or late postoperative risk than isolated aortic valve replacement, we conducted a matched-pair study with patients of both groups.

METHODS

Between June 1993 and August 1998, 100 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease and ectasia/aneurysm of the ascending aorta underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta with a CarboSeal composite graft (CarboSeal; Sulzer Carbo-Medics Inc, Austin, TX). Identical bileaflet valve prostheses (CarboMedics; Sulzer CarboMedics Inc, Austin, TX) were implanted during the same time period in 928 patients for aortic valve disease. On the basis of various preoperative clinical variables 100 patients with aortic valve replacement were matched to the 100 patients with replacement of the aortic root. The duration of follow-up for both groups was similar with 37 + 17 months (range, 9 to 70) for the CarboSeal group and 38 + 14 months (range, 13 to 65) for the CarboMedics group. Survival and morbidity were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted mortality was evaluated by multivariate analysis in a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The early postoperative mortality of 1% in the CarboSeal group and 4% in the CarboMedics group was insignificantly different. Although the overall survival rate at 5 years was lower (60.7% vs 86.3%; p = 0.13) in the CarboSeal group, the freedom from cardiac mortality and valve-related morbidity was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve can be performed with similar operative risk, valve-related morbidity, and late cardiac mortality as isolated aortic valve replacement.