Physical association of the APIS complex and general transcription factors

The versatility of the proteasome in gene expression and silencing: Unraveling proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions

The 26S proteasome consists of a 20S core particle and a 19S regulatory particle and critically regulates gene expression and silencing through both proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions. The 20S core particle mediates proteolysis, while the 19S regulatory particle performs non-proteolytic functions. The proteasome plays a role in regulating gene expression in euchromatin by modifying histones, activating transcription, initiating and terminating transcription, mRNA export, and maintaining transcriptome integrity. In gene silencing, the proteasome modulates the heterochromatin formation, spreading, and subtelomere silencing by degrading specific proteins and interacting with anti-silencing factors such as Epe1, Mst2, and Leo1. This review discusses the proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome in regulating gene expression and gene silencing-related heterochromatin formation. This article is part of a special issue on the regulation of gene expression and genome integrity by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

The leucine-rich repeat signaling scaffolds Shoc2 and Erbin: cellular mechanism and role in disease

Leucine-rich repeat-containing proteins (LRR proteins) are involved in supporting a large number of cellular functions. In this review, we summarize recent advancements in understanding functions of the LRR proteins as signaling scaffolds. In particular, we explore what we have learned about the mechanisms of action of the LRR scaffolds Shoc2 and Erbin and their roles in normal development and disease. We discuss Shoc2 and Erbin in the context of their multiple known interacting partners in various cellular processes and summarize often unexpected functions of these proteins through analysis of their roles in human pathologies. We also review these LRR scaffold proteins as promising therapeutic targets and biomarkers with potential application across various pathologies.

SAGA DUBm-mediated surveillance regulates prompt export of stress-inducible transcripts for proteostasis

During stress, prompt export of stress-inducible transcripts is critical for cell survival. Here, we characterize a function of the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase) deubiquitylating module (DUBm) in monitoring messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) biogenesis to regulate non-canonical mRNA export of stress-inducible transcripts. Our genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that there is a functional relationship between Sgf73p of DUBm and the essential mRNA export factor, Yra1p. Under physiological conditions, Sgf73p is critical for the proper chromatin localization and RNA binding of Yra1p, while also quality controlling the biogenesis of mRNPs in conjunction with the nuclear exosome exonuclease, Rrp6p. Under environmental stress, when immediate transport of stress-inducible transcripts is imperative, Sgf73p facilitates the bypass of canonical surveillance and promotes the timely export of necessary transcripts. Overall, our results show that the Sgf73p-mediated plasticity of gene expression is important for the ability of cells to tolerate stress and regulate proteostasis to survive under environmental uncertainty.

Stress-inducible transcripts are quickly exported to preserve cell survival when cells are under stress. Here, the authors suggest that Sgf73p of the SAGA deubiquitylating module monitors messenger ribonucleoprotein biogenesis to regulate non-canonical export of stress-inducible transcripts.

Epigenetic mechanisms and implications in tendon inflammation (Review)

Cellular inflammation is not just an immediate response following pathogenic infections or resulting from damage due to injury, it is also associated with normal physiological functions, including wound healing and tissue repair. The existence of such a definitive role in normal physiology and in disease pathology indicates the presence of a regulatory mechanism that is tightly controlled in normal cells. A tight control over gene expression is associated with regulatory mechanisms in the cells, which can be either inducible or epigenetic. Among other intracellular mechanisms that contribute to epigenetic gene regulation, DNA methylation has been shown to maintain a tight control over gene expression through the actions of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). With a clear role in developmental and tissue‑specific temporal gene regulation, the involvement of DNMTs is evident in normal and pathological conditions. In this review article, inflammation in tendons associated with disease pathology and tissue repair or regeneration at the musculoskeletal joints is critically reviewed. More specifically, the review focuses on known epigenetic mechanisms and their role in the clinical presentation of the disease in human joint disorders associated with tendon inflammation, with an emphasis on the gene regulatory mechanisms that are controlled through DNA methylation, histone deacetylation, and microRNAs.

The proteasome and epigenetics: zooming in on histone modifications

The proteasome is a structural complex of many proteins that degrades substrates marked by covalent linkage to ubiquitin. Many years of research has shown a role for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated proteolysis in synaptic plasticity and memory mainly in degrading synaptic, cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins. Recent work indicates that the proteasome has wider proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles in processes such as histone modifications that affect synaptic plasticity and memory. In this review, we assess the evidence gathered from neuronal as well as non-neuronal cell types regarding the function of the proteasome in positive or negative regulation of posttranslational modifications of histones, such as acetylation, methylation and ubiquitination. We discuss the critical roles of the proteasome in clearing excess histone proteins in various cellular contexts and the possible non-proteolytic functions in regulating transcription of target genes. In addition, we summarize the current literature on diverse chromatin-remodeling machineries, such as histone acetyltransferases, deacetylates, methyltransferases and demethylases, as targets for proteasomal degradation across experimental models. Lastly, we provide a perspective on how proteasomal regulation of histone modifications may modulate synaptic plasticity in the nervous system.

The function of Shoc2: A scaffold and beyond

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) cascade regulates a myriad of functions in multicellular organisms. Scaffold proteins provide critical spatial and temporal control over the specificity of signaling. Shoc2 is a scaffold that accelerates activity of the ERK1/2 pathway. Loss of Shoc2 expression in mice results in embryonic lethality, thus highlighting the essential role of Shoc2 in embryogenesis. In agreement, patients carrying mutated Shoc2 suffer from a wide spectrum of developmental deficiencies. Efforts to understand the mechanisms by which Shoc2 controls ERK1/2 activity revealed the intricate machinery that governs the ability of Shoc2 to transduce signals of the ERK1/2 pathway. Understanding the mechanisms by which Shoc2 contributes to a high degree of specificity of ERK1/2 signaling as well as deciphering the biological functions of Shoc2 in development and human disorders are major unresolved questions.

Spatial control of Shoc2-scaffold-mediated ERK1/2 signaling requires remodeling activity of the ATPase PSMC5

The scaffold protein Shoc2 accelerates activity of the ERK1 and ERK2 (ERK1/2, also known as MAPK3 and MAPK1) pathway. Mutations in Shoc2 result in Noonan-like RASopathy, a developmental disorder with a wide spectrum of symptoms. The amplitude of the ERK1/2 signals transduced through the complex is fine-tuned by the HUWE1-mediated ubiquitylation of Shoc2 and its signaling partner RAF-1. Here, we provide a mechanistic basis of how ubiquitylation of Shoc2 and RAF-1 is controlled. We demonstrate that the newly identified binding partner of Shoc2, the (AAA+) ATPase PSMC5, triggers translocation of Shoc2 to endosomes. At the endosomes, PSMC5 displaces the E3 ligase HUWE1 from the scaffolding complex to attenuate ubiquitylation of Shoc2 and RAF-1. We show that a RASopathy mutation that changes the subcellular distribution of Shoc2 leads to alterations in Shoc2 ubiquitylation due to the loss of accessibility to PSMC5. In summary, our results demonstrate that PSMC5 is a new and important player involved in regulating ERK1/2 signal transmission through the remodeling of Shoc2 scaffold complex in a spatially-defined manner.

Functions of the proteasome on chromatin

The proteasome is a large self-compartmentalized protease complex that recognizes, unfolds, and destroys ubiquitylated substrates. Proteasome activities are required for a host of cellular functions, and it has become clear in recent years that one set of critical actions of the proteasome occur on chromatin. In this review, we discuss some of the ways in which proteasomes directly regulate the structure and function of chromatin and chromatin regulatory proteins, and how this influences gene transcription. We discuss lingering controversies in the field, the relative importance of proteolytic versus non-proteolytic proteasome activities in this process, and highlight areas that require further investigation. Our intention is to show that proteasomes are involved in major steps controlling the expression of the genetic information, that proteasomes use both proteolytic mechanisms and ATP-dependent protein remodeling to accomplish this task, and that much is yet to be learned about the full spectrum of ways that proteasomes influence the genome.

The 26S proteasome and initiation of gene transcription

Transcription activation is the foremost step of gene expression and is modulated by various factors that act in synergy. Misregulation of this process and its associated factors has severe effects and hence requires strong regulatory control. In recent years, growing evidence has highlighted the 26S proteasome as an important contributor to the regulation of transcription initiation. Well known for its role in protein destruction, its contribution to protein synthesis was initially viewed with skepticism. However, studies over the past several years have established the proteasome as an important component of transcription initiation through proteolytic and non-proteolytic activities. In this review, we discuss findings made so far in understanding the connections between transcription initiation and the 26S proteasome complex.

The 19S proteasome subunit Rpt3 regulates distribution of CENP-A by associating with centromeric chromatin

CENP-A, a variant of histone H3, is incorporated into centromeric chromatin and plays a role during kinetochore establishment. In fission yeast, the localization of CENP-A is limited to a region spanning 10-20 kb of the core domain of the centromere. Here, we report a mutant (rpt3-1) in which this region is expanded to 40-70 kb. Likely due to abnormal distribution of CENP-A, this mutant exhibits chromosome instability and enhanced gene silencing. Interestingly, the rpt3(+) gene encodes a subunit of the 19S proteasome, which localizes to the nuclear membrane. Although Rpt3 associates with centromeric chromatin, the mutant protein has lost this localization. A loss of the cut8(+) gene encoding an anchor of the proteasome to the nuclear membrane causes similar phenotypes as observed in the rpt3-1 mutant. Thus, we propose that the proteasome (or its subcomplex) associates with centromeric chromatin and regulates distribution of CENP-A.

Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription

Regulation of gene transcription is vitally important for the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis. Failure to correctly regulate gene expression, or to deal with problems that arise during the transcription process, can lead to cellular catastrophe and disease. One of the ways cells cope with the challenges of transcription is by making extensive use of the proteolytic and nonproteolytic activities of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Here, we review recent evidence showing deep mechanistic connections between the transcription and ubiquitin-proteasome systems. Our goal is to leave the reader with a sense that just about every step in transcription-from transcription initiation through to export of mRNA from the nucleus-is influenced by the UPS and that all major arms of the system--from the first step in ubiquitin (Ub) conjugation through to the proteasome-are recruited into transcriptional processes to provide regulation, directionality, and deconstructive power.

The 19S proteasome subcomplex promotes the targeting of NuA4 HAT to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes to facilitate the recruitment of TFIID for transcriptional initiation in vivo

Previous studies have implicated SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase) and TFIID (Transcription factor-IID)-dependent mechanisms of transcriptional activation in yeast. SAGA-dependent transcriptional activation is further regulated by the 19S proteasome subcomplex. However, the role of the 19S proteasome subcomplex in transcriptional activation of the TFIID-dependent genes has not been elucidated. Therefore, we have performed a series of chromatin immunoprecipitation, mutational and transcriptional analyses at the TFIID-dependent ribosomal protein genes such as RPS5, RPL2B and RPS11B. We find that the 19S proteasome subcomplex is recruited to the promoters of these ribosomal protein genes, and promotes the association of NuA4 (Nucleosome acetyltransferase of histone H4) co-activator, but not activator Rap1p (repressor-activator protein 1). These observations support that the 19S proteasome subcomplex enhances the targeting of co-activator at the TFIID-dependent promoter. Such an enhanced targeting of NuA4 HAT (histone acetyltransferase) promotes the recruitment of the TFIID complex for transcriptional initiation. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the 19S proteasome subcomplex enhances the targeting of NuA4 HAT to activator Rap1p at the promoters of ribosomal protein genes to facilitate the recruitment of TFIID for transcriptional stimulation, hence providing a new role of the 19S proteasome subcomplex in establishing a specific regulatory network at the TFIID-dependent promoter for productive transcriptional initiation in vivo.

Distinct regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by SAGA and TFIID

A growing number of human diseases are linked to abnormal gene expression which is largely controlled at the level of transcriptional initiation. The gene-specific activator promotes the initiation of transcription through its interaction with one or more components of the transcriptional initiation machinery, hence leading to stimulated transcriptional initiation or activation. However, all activator proteins do not target the same component(s) of the transcriptional initiation machinery. Rather, they can have different target specificities, and thus, can lead to distinct mechanisms of transcriptional activation. Two such distinct mechanisms of transcriptional activation in yeast are mediated by the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase) and TFIID (Transcription factor IID) complexes, and are termed as "SAGA-dependent" and "TFIID-dependent" transcriptional activation, respectively. SAGA is the target of the activator in case of SAGA-dependent transcriptional activation, while the targeting of TFIID by the activator leads to TFIID-dependent transcriptional activation. Both the SAGA and TFIID complexes are highly conserved from yeast to human, and play crucial roles in gene activation among eukaryotes. The regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by SAGA and TFIID are discussed here. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!

The proteasome and its regulatory roles in gene expression

Cumulative evidence indicates that the proteasome, which is mainly known as a protein-degrading machine, is very essential for gene expression. Destructive functions of the proteasome, i.e., ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic activity, are significant for activator localization, activator destruction, co-activator/repressor destruction and PIC disassembly. Non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome are important for recruitment of activators and co-activators to promoters, ubiquitin-dependent histone modification, transcription elongation and possibly maturation of mRNA via the facilitation of mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this review, we discuss how the proteasome regulates transcription at numerous stages during gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!

The 19 s proteasome subcomplex establishes a specific protein interaction network at the promoter for stimulated transcriptional initiation in vivo

The 26 S proteasome complex that comprises the 20 S core and 19 S regulatory (with six ATPases) particles is engaged in an ATP-dependent degradation of a variety of key regulatory proteins and, thus, controls important cellular processes. Interestingly, several recent studies have implicated the 19 S regulatory particle in controlling eukaryotic transcriptional initiation or activation independently of the 20 S core particle. However, the mechanism of action of the 19 S proteasome subcomplex in regulation of eukaryotic transcriptional activation is not clearly understood in vivo. Here, using a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay in conjunction with mutational and transcriptional analyses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that the 19 S proteasomal subcomplex establishes a specific protein interaction network at the upstream activating sequence of the promoter. Such an interaction network is essential for formation of the preinitiation complex at the core promoter to initiate transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the formation of the transcription complex assembly at the promoter is dependent on 19 S ATPase activity. Intriguingly, 19 S ATPases appear to cross-talk for stimulation of the assembly of transcription factors at the promoter. Together, these results provide significant insights as to how the 19 S proteasome subcomplex regulates the formation of the active transcription complex assembly (and, hence, transcriptional initiation) at the promoter in vivo.

No Splicing, no dicing: non-proteolytic roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in transcription

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is responsible for most programmed turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells, and this activity has been known for some time to be involved in transcriptional regulation. More recently, intersections of the UPP and transcription have been discovered that are not proteolytic in nature and appear to revolve around the chaperonin-like activities of the ATPases in the 19 S regulatory subunit of the proteasome. Moreover, monoubiquitylation, which does not signal degradation, has been found to be a key modification of many transcription factors and histones. These various non-proteolytic roles of the UPP in transcription are reviewed here, and plausible mechanistic models are discussed.

The Snf1 kinase and proteasome-associated Rad23 regulate UV-responsive gene expression

The transcriptional response to damaging agents is of fundamental significance for understanding mechanisms responsible for cell survival and genome maintenance. However, how damage signals are transmitted to the transcriptional apparatus is poorly understood. Here we identify two new regulators of the UV response transcriptome: Snf1, a nutrient-sensing kinase, and Rad23, a nucleotide excision repair factor with no previously known function in transcriptional control. Over half of all UV-responsive genes are dependent on Snf1 or Rad23 for proper regulation. After irradiation, Snf1 targets the Mig3 repressor, a new effector of the UV response. Snf1 and Rad23 are both required for the displacement of Mig3 from the UV-activated HUG1 promoter, and Rad23's activity is functionally linked to the proteasome 19S regulatory particle. Our data reveal overlapping functions for Snf1 and Rad23 in UV-responsive transcriptional regulation and provide mechanistic insight into the action of these factors at a UV-activated promoter. These results also highlight how diverse environmental stimuli are processed by a limited repertoire of signalling molecules to result in tailored patterns of gene expression.

FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation

The packaging of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin represses gene expression by blocking access of the general transcription machinery to the underlying DNA sequences. Accordingly, eukaryotes have developed a variety of mechanisms to disrupt, alter, or disassemble nucleosomes from promoter regions and open reading frames to allow transcription to occur. Although we know that chromatin disassembly from the yeast PHO5 promoter is triggered by the Pho4 activator, the mechanism is far from clear. Here we show that the Pho4 activator can occupy its nucleosome-bound DNA binding site within the PHO5 promoter. In contrast to the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) complex in assembling chromatin within open reading frames, we find that FACT is involved in the disassembly of histones H2A/H2B from the PHO5 promoter during transcriptional induction. We have also discovered that the proteasome is required for efficient chromatin disassembly and transcriptional induction from the PHO5 promoter. Mutants of the degradation function of the proteasome have a defect in recruitment of the Pho4 activator, whereas mutants of the ATPase cap of the proteasome do recruit Pho4 but are still delayed for chromatin assembly. Finally, we rule out the possibility that the proteasome or ATPase cap is driving chromatin disassembly via a potential ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activity.

Diverse regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by the proteasome complex

The life of any protein within a cell begins with transcriptional activation, and ends with proteolytic degradation. Intriguingly, the 26S proteasome complex, a non-lysosomal protein degradation machine comprising the 20S proteolytic core and 19S regulatory particles, has been implicated in intimate regulation of eukaryotic transcriptional activation through diverse mechanisms in a proteolysis-dependent as well as independent manner. Here, we discuss the intricate mechanisms of such proteasomal regulation of eukaryotic gene activation via multiple pathways.

Proteasomal ATPases are associated with rDNA: the ubiquitin proteasome system plays a direct role in RNA polymerase I transcription

Significant amount of data have accumulated in the last several years pointing to the essential role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in the regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription; however, its involvement in RNA polymerase I transcription has remained largely unexplored. In this study, we demonstrate that proteasome activity is required for pre-rRNA synthesis. We can detect the association of proteasomal ATPases with both the rDNA promoter and coding region. Additionally, we show that the RNA polymerase I associated transcription factor, TIF-IA interacts with proteasomal ATPases, representing a potential link via which proteasomes and/or proteasome related complexes are recruited to rRNA genes. In summary, our findings suggest that the ubiquitin proteasome system is directly involved in RNA polymerase I transcription in analogy to the RNA polymerase II system.

Physical and functional interactions of monoubiquitylated transactivators with the proteasome

Destabilization of activator-DNA complexes by the proteasomal ATPases can inhibit transcription by limiting activator interaction with DNA. Modification of the activator by monoubiquitylation protects the activator from this destabilization activity. In this study, we probe the mechanism of this protective effect of monoubiquitylation. Using novel label transfer and chemical cross-linking techniques, we show that ubiquitin contacts the ATPase complex directly, apparently via Rpn1 and Rpt1. This interaction results in the dissociation of the activation domain-ATPase complex via an allosteric process. A model is proposed in which activator monoubiquitylation serves to limit the lifetime of the activator-ATPase complex interaction and thus the ability of the ATPases to unfold the activator and dissociate the protein-DNA complex.

Coupling and coordination in gene expression processes: a systems biology view

Genome-scale analyses have allowed us to progress beyond studying gene expression at the level of individual components of a given process by providing global information about functional connections between genes, mRNAs and their regulatory proteins. Such analyses have greatly increased our understanding of the interplay between different events in gene regulation and have highlighted previously unappreciated functional connections, including coupling between nuclear and cytoplasmic processes. Genome-wide approaches have also revealed extensive coordination within regulatory levels, such as the organization of transcription factors into regulatory motifs. Overall, these studies enhance our understanding of how the many components of the eukaryotic cell function as a system to allow both coordination and versatility in gene expression.

Role of proteasomes in cellular regulation

The 26S proteasome is the key enzyme of the ubiquitin-dependent pathway of protein degradation. This energy-dependent nanomachine is composed of a 20S catalytic core and associated regulatory complexes. The eukaryotic 20S proteasomes demonstrate besides several kinds of peptidase activities, the endoribonuclease, protein-chaperone and DNA-helicase activities. Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway controls the levels of the key regulatory proteins in the cell and thus is essential for life and is involved in regulation of crucial cellular processes. Proteasome population in the cell is structurally and functionally heterogeneous. These complexes are subjected to tightly organized regulation, particularly, to a variety of posttranslational modifications. In this review we will summarize the current state of knowledge regarding proteasome participation in the control of cell cycle, apoptosis, differentiation, modulation of immune responses, reprogramming of these particles during these processes, their heterogeneity and involvement in the main levels of gene expression.

The role of the proteasomal ATPases and activator monoubiquitylation in regulating Gal4 binding to promoters

Recent studies have shown that the intersection between transcription and proteins involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway encompasses both proteolytic and nonproteolytic functions. Examples of the latter type include evidence that monoubiquitylation of some transcriptional activators stimulates their activity. In addition, the proteasomal ATPases are recruited to many active promoters through binding to activators and play an important, nonproteolytic role in promoter escape and elongation. In this study, we report the discovery of a new nonproteolytic activity of the proteasome (specifically the proteasomal ATPases): the active destabilization of activator-promoter complexes. This reaction depends on the presence of an activation domain and ATP. Destabilization is inhibited in vitro and in vivo if the protein is monoubiquitylated or if ubiquitin is genetically fused to the activator. The fact that monoubiquitylated activator is resistant to the "stripping" activity of the proteasomal ATPases may explain, in part, why some activators require this modification in order to function efficiently.

The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription?

A growing body of evidence demonstrates that the components of the proteasome are involved directly and mechanistically in the regulation of gene transcription. Proteolytic activities of the proteasome are important for establishing limits for transcription, for promoting the exchange of transcription factors on chromatin, and possibly for facilitating multiple rounds of transcription initiation. Non-proteolytic activities of the proteasome are important for co-activator recruitment, transcriptional elongation, and histone modification. Here, we discuss different ways in which the proteasome can influence transcription, and argue that its unique combination of biological activities makes it ideally suited to act at multiple stages in the transcription process.

Coupling caspase cleavage and ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of SSRP1 during apoptosis

Structure-specific recognition protein (SSRP1) is an 87 kDa protein that heterodimerizes with Spt16 to form FACT, a complex initially shown to facilitate chromatin transcription. Despite its crucial roles in transcription and replication, little is known about the dynamics of FACT turnover in vivo. Here, we show that SSRP1 is cleaved during apoptosis by caspase 3 and/or 7 at the DQHD(450) site. Analysis of the resulting fragments suggests that cleavage of SSRP1 generates a truncated, chromatin-associated form of FACT. Furthermore, the N-terminal product is stabilized by proteasome inhibitors and ubiquitylated in cells, suggesting degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. These results demonstrate that SSRP1 degradation during apoptosis is a two-step process coupling caspase cleavage and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis.

The Proteasome Regulatory Particle Alters the SAGA Coactivator to Enhance Its Interactions with Transcriptional Activators

Promoter recruitment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex is required for RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription of several genes. SAGA is targeted to promoters through interactions with sequence-specific DNA binding transcriptional activators and facilitates preinitiation-complex assembly and transcription. Here, we show that the 19S proteasome regulatory particle (19S RP) alters SAGA to stimulate its interaction with transcriptional activators. The ATPase components of the 19S RP are required for stimulation of SAGA/activator interactions and enhance SAGA recruitment to promoters. Proteasomal ATPases genetically interact with SAGA, and their inhibition reduces global histone H3 acetylation levels and SAGA recruitment to target promoters in vivo. These results indicate that the 19S RP modulates SAGA complex using its ATPase components, thereby facilitating subsequent transcription events at promoters.

Subcellular distribution of components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in non-diseased human and rat brain

Our aim was to investigate and to compare the intracellular distribution of ubiquitin, 20S proteasome, and all six proteasomal regulatory ATPases in non-diseased human and rat brains. Ubiquitin and ATPases S4 and S7 show dominant nuclear immunostaining, whereas subunits S6a, S6b, and S10b show mainly cytoplasmic immunostaining in both species. However, S8 localization is inconsistent, prevailing nuclear in rat and cytoplasmic in human. In rat brain, small clastosome-like nuclear bodies demonstrate strong ubiquitin, 20S, and S6a immunoreactivity both in neurons and glial cells. Prominent nuclear immunolocalization of members of the ubiquitin-proteasome system provides morphological evidence for function of these proteins in transcription regulation and/or DNA repair.

TFIID and Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase functions probed by genome-wide synthetic genetic array analysis using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae taf9-ts allele

TAF9 is a TATA-binding protein associated factor (TAF) conserved from yeast to humans and shared by two transcription coactivator complexes, TFIID and SAGA. The essentiality of the TAFs has made it difficult to ascertain their roles in TFIID and SAGA function. Here we performed a genomic synthetic genetic array analysis using a temperature-sensitive allele of TAF9 as a query. Results from this experiment showed that TAF9 interacts genetically with: (1) genes for multiple transcription factor complexes predominantly involving Mediator, chromatin modification/remodeling complexes, and regulators of transcription elongation; (2) virtually all nonessential genes encoding subunits of the SWR-C chromatin-remodeling complex and both TAF9 and SWR-C required for expressing the essential housekeeping gene RPS5; and (3) key genes for cell cycle control at the G1/S transition, as well as genes involved in cell polarity, cell integrity, and protein synthesis, suggesting a link between TAF9 function and cell growth control. We also showed that disruption of SAGA by deletion of SPT20 alters histone-DNA contacts and phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II at coding sequences. Our results raise the possibility of an unappreciated role for TAF9 in transcription elongation, perhaps in the context of SAGA, and provide further support for TAF9 involvement in cell cycle progression and growth control.

The ubiquitin–proteasome system in Creutzfeldt–Jakob and Alzheimer disease: Intracellular redistribution of components correlates with neuronal vulnerability

Creutzfeldt-Jakob (CJD) and Alzheimer disease (AD) are accompanied by selective neuronal loss in the brain. We examined the regional and subcellular immunolocalization of ubiquitin, proteasomal subunits, and the heat-shock protein Hsp72 in control, CJD, and AD cases. In control and non-affected areas of disease cases, 20S proteasomes, 19S regulatory subunits, S6a, S6b, and S10b exhibit mainly cytoplasmic, whereas S4 and S7 show predominantly nuclear localization. The intensity of immunostaining for ubiquitin, proteasomal subunits, and Hsp72 varies in different anatomical regions both in disease and control brains. Areas with weaker immunolabeling correspond to affected areas in CJD and AD. In disease cases, antibodies for 20S, S4, S6b, S7, and ubiquitin intensely immunolabel neuronal nuclei of vulnerable cells in affected areas. Our results suggest that the ubiquitin-proteasome system takes part in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration. Ubiquitin, Hsp72, and proteasomal ATPases possibly play a role in protecting certain neuronal populations in CJD and AD.

Deubiquitination by proteasome is coordinated with substrate translocation for proteolysis in vivo

The 26S proteasome mediates degradation of protein substrates labeled with polyUb chains. After recognition by the 19S proteasome regulatory complex, polyUb chains are disassembled and substrates are processed in the 20S core of proteasome. However, the exact relationship of degradation-associated deubiquitination to substrate processing remains unclear. Here, using Ub-based tagging strategies, we provided evidence that removable polyUb chains serve as the signal for proteolytic processing of ubiquitinated substrates. We showed that inhibition of the proteasome by proteasome inhibitor MG132 results in trapping of the substrate in the proteasome. Such a trapping allows proteasomal cleavage of attached non-removable Ub mutant (UbV75,76), which is otherwise a "difficult" deubiquitination substrate. Characterization of deubiquitination and degradation intermediates, generated due to incomplete proteolytic inhibition, revealed changes in proteolytic cleavage sites, within the Gal4-VP16 model substrate, suggesting that the copy number of attached UbV75,76 affects substrate processing. Conversion of lysine48 to arginine48 in UbV75,76 did not have significant effect on in vivo polyubiquitination of multiple Ub-fused substrates, but considerably reduced proteolytic intermediates. Taken together, the results support a model in which deubiquitination process is a crucial event for proteolysis of ubiquitinated substrates and such an event is coordinated with substrate translocation.

The FACT chromatin modulator: genetic and structure/function relationships

The chromatin configuration of DNA inhibits access by enzymes such as RNA polymerase II. This inhibition is alleviated by FACT, a conserved transcription elongation factor that has been found to reconfigure nucleosomes to allow transit along the DNA by RNA polymerase II, thus facilitating transcription. FACT also reorganizes nucleosomes after the passage of RNA polymerase II, as indicated by the effects of certain FACT mutations. The larger of the two subunits of FACT is Spt16/Cdc68, while the smaller is termed SSRP1 (vertebrates) or Pob3 (budding yeast). The HMG-box domain at the C terminus of SSRP1 is absent from Pob3; the function of this domain for yeast FACT is supplied by the small HMG-box protein Nhp6. In yeast, this "detachable" HMG domain is a general chromatin component, unlike FACT, which is found only in transcribed regions and associated with RNA polymerase II. The several domains of the larger FACT subunit are also likely to have different functions. Genetic studies suggest that FACT mediates nucleosome reorganization along several pathways, and reinforce the notion that protein unfolding and (or) refolding is involved in FACT activity for transcription.

Rush hour at the promoter: how the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway polices the traffic flow of nuclear receptor-dependent transcription

Nuclear receptor-dependent transcription requires the functional activities of many proteins in order to achieve proper gene expression. Progress in understanding transcription mechanisms has revealed the unexpected involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the transcriptional process. In some instances, stabilization of the transcription protein augments the functional role or activation state of that protein, but other evidence supports the hypothesis that degradation of that factor may be required in order for transcription to proceed. Perhaps most peculiar is the observation that several yeast models support the uncoupling of ubiquitylation from concomitant proteasome-mediated degradation, with the former responsible for regulating posttranslational modification of histones and controlling differential recruitment of a transcription factor to distinct promoters. Additionally, the ATPases of the 19S proteasome regulatory cap have been shown to function in transcription elongation, independently of their role in proteolysis. This review summarizes and discusses progress thus far in integrating the disparate fields of ubiquitylation and proteasome-mediated protein degradation with gene transcription.

Using oxidative crosslinking and proximity labeling to quantitatively characterize protein-protein and protein-Peptide complexes

The quantitative analysis of protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes is of fundamental importance in biochemistry. We report here that nickel-catalyzed proximity biotinylation and Ru(II)(bpy)(3)(2+)-mediated oxidative crosslinking can be used to measure the equilibrium dissociation constant and stoichiometry of protein complexes. Only small amounts of protein are required, neither of the binding partners must be immobilized on a surface, and no special instrumentation is necessary. This chemistry should provide a useful complement to existing methods for the analysis of protein-protein and protein-peptide interactions.

Modifying chromatin to permit steroid hormone receptor-dependent transcription

Lipophilic hormones, including steroids, exert their physiological effects through binding to high-affinity superfamily of steroid hormone receptor (SR) proteins that function as ligand-dependent DNA binding transcription factors. To date, SR proteins are among a few transcription factors shown to directly interact with higher order chromatin structures to regulate gene expression. To perturb chromatin, SRs employ enzymatic multicomplexes that can either remodel or modify chromatin. Here we examine the current state of knowledge concerning multicomplex chromatin remodeling/modification machines and SR-dependent transcription. We will focus on the role of these protein-protein and chromatin-protein interactions in vivo with the MMTV promoter as a primary model. In addition, we discuss emerging evidence implicating chaperone proteins and proteasome degradation machinery in SR-mediated gene regulation within chromatin.

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is required for the function of the viral VP16 transcriptional activation domain

The ability of the activation domain of specific protein factors to regulate transcription is intimately connected to their ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Here, we provide evidence that ubiquitin-proteasome function is required for a family of synthetic viral VP16 transcription activators in mammalian cells. Blocking the degradation of VP16 activators, through proteasome inhibitors or by disrupting the ubiquitylation function, severely compromises their transcriptional activity. Overexpression of SUG-1, a subunit of the proteasome, reduces both transactivation and degradation of VP16 activators. The inhibitory effect of SUG-1 overexpression is enhanced when a single non-removable ubiquitin moiety is fused to the amino-terminus of the VP16 activator. The 19S regulatory subunit of the proteasome physically associates with the general transcription factor TFIIH, indicating the direct involvement of the proteasome in transcription. These results support a model in which ubiquitin plays an accessory role, in recruiting the 19S regulatory subunit of the proteasome, for transcriptional activation.

Cyclic, proteasome-mediated turnover of unliganded and liganded ERalpha on responsive promoters is an integral feature of estrogen signaling

We present an integrated model of hERalpha-mediated transcription where both unliganded and liganded receptors cycle on estrogen-responsive promoters. Using ChIP, FRAP, and biochemical analysis we evaluate hERalpha at several points in these cycles, establishing the ubiquitination status and subnuclear distribution of hERalpha, its mobility, the kinetics of transcriptional activation, and the cyclic recruitment of E3 ligases and the 19S regulatory component of the proteasome. These experiments, together with an evaluation of the inhibition of transcription and proteasome action, demonstrate that proteasome-mediated degradation and hERalpha-mediated transactivation are inherently linked and act to continuously turn over hERalpha on responsive promoters. Cyclic turnover of hERalpha permits continuous responses to changes in the concentration of estradiol.