Different protofilament-dependence of the microtubule binding between MAP2 and MAP4

Mechanism for the catastrophe-promoting activity of the microtubule destabilizer Op18/stathmin

Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability is crucial for cellular processes, ranging from mitosis to membrane transport. Stathmin (also known as oncoprotein 18/Op18) is a prominent microtubule destabilizer that acts preferentially on microtubule minus ends. Stathmin has been studied intensively because of its association with multiple types of cancer, but its mechanism of action remains controversial. Two models have been proposed. One model is that stathmin promotes microtubule catastrophe indirectly, and does so by sequestering tubulin; the other holds that stathmin alters microtubule dynamics by directly destabilizing growing microtubules. Stathmin's sequestration activity is well established, but the mechanism of any direct action is mysterious because stathmin binds to microtubules very weakly. To address these issues, we have studied interactions between stathmin and varied tubulin polymers. We show that stathmin binds tightly to Dolastatin-10 tubulin rings, which mimic curved tubulin protofilaments, and that stathmin depolymerizes stabilized protofilament-rich polymers. These observations lead us to propose that stathmin promotes catastrophe by binding to and acting upon protofilaments exposed at the tips of growing microtubules. Moreover, we suggest that stathmin's minus-end preference results from interactions between stathmin's N terminus and the surface of α-tubulin that is exposed only at the minus end. Using computational modeling of microtubule dynamics, we show that these mechanisms could account for stathmin's observed activities in vitro, but that both the direct and sequestering activities are likely to be relevant in a cellular context. Taken together, our results suggest that stathmin can promote catastrophe by direct action on protofilament structure and interactions.

Proline-rich domain in dynamin-2 has a low microtubule-binding activity: how is this activity controlled during mitosis in HeLa cells?

The large GTPase dynamin is strongly accumulated in the constricted area including midzonal microtubules of dividing cells. The proline-rich domain (PRD) of dynamin has been considered as a microtubule-binding domain. However, it remains unclear how PRD controls dynamin-microtubule interaction in mitotic cells. Here, we found that the microtubule-binding activity of PRD is low in dynamin-2. One of the mitosis-specific kinase activities to PRD in HeLa cells was identified as cyclin B-Cdc2 kinase. The kinase phosphorylated PRD at Ser(764) and/or Thr(766) and reduced the microtubule-binding activity of PRD. These results suggest that phosphorylation of PRD by cyclin B-Cdc2 kinase plays an important role to control dynamin-2-microtubule interaction in mitotic HeLa cells.

Truncation of the projection domain of MAP4 (microtubule-associated protein 4) leads to attenuation of microtubule dynamic instability

MAP4, a ubiquitous heat-stable MAP, is composed of an asymmetric structure common to the heat-stable MAPs, consisting of an N-terminal projection (PJ) domain and a C-terminal microtubule (MT)-binding (MTB) domain. Although the MTB domain has been intensively studied, the role of the PJ domain, which protrudes from MT-wall and does not bind to MTs, remains unclear. We investigated the roles of the PJ domain on the dynamic instability of MTs by dark-field microscopy using various PJ domain deletion constructs of human MAP4 (PJ1, PJ2, Na-MTB and KDM-MTB). There was no obvious difference in the dynamic instability between the wtMAP4 and any fragments at 0.1 microM, the minimum concentration required to stabilize MTs. The individual MTs stochastically altered between polymerization and depolymerization phases with similar profiles of length change as had been observed in the presence of MAP2 or tau. We also examined the effects at the increased concentrations of 0.7 microM, and found that in some cases the dynamic instability was almost entirely attenuated. The length of both the polymerization and depolymerization phases decreased and "pause-phases" were occasionally observed, especially in the case of PJ1, PJ2 or Na-MTB. No obvious change was observed in the increased concentration of wtMAP4 and KDM-MTB. Additionally, the profiles of MT length change were quite different in 0.7 microM PJ2. Relatively rapid and long depolymerization phases were sometimes observed among quite slow length changes. Perhaps, this unusual profile could be due to the uneven distribution of PJ2 along the MT lattice. These results indicate that the PJ domain of MAP4 participates in the regulation of the dynamic instability.