Inhibitory binding of adenosine diphosphoribosyl transferase to the DNA primer site of reverse transcriptase templates

Identification of domains of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase for protein binding and self-association

Cellular proteins extracted from normal and cancer cells bind polymerizing ADP-ribose transferase (pADPRT) on nitrocellulose membrane transblots. Histones at 1 mg/ml concentration completely prevent the binding of pADPRT to cellular proteins, indicating that the binding of histones to pADPRT sites competitively blocks the association of pADPRT to proteins other than histones. The direct binding of pADPRT to histones is shown by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. The COOH-terminal basic histone H1 tail binds to the basic polypeptide domain of pADPRT. The basic domain present in the NH2-terminal part of core histones is the probable common structural feature of all core histones that accounts for their binding to pADPRT. Two polypeptide domains of pADPRT were identified, by way of CNBr fragments, to bind histones. These two domains are located within the 64-kDa fragment of pADPRT and are contiguous with the polypeptide domains that were shown to participate in self-association of pADPRT, ending at the 606th amino acid residue. The polypeptide domains of pADPRT which participate in DNA binding are thus shown to associate also with other proteins. Intact pADPRT binds to both the zinc-free or zinc-reconstituted basic polypeptide fragments of pADPRT. Histones activate auto-poly(ADP)-ribosylation of pADPRT by increasing the number of short oligomers on pADPRT. This reaction is also dependent in a biphasic manner on the concentration of pADPRT. Histones in solution are only marginally poly(ADP)-ribosylated but are good polymer acceptors when incorporated into artificial nucleosome structures.

Interaction of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase with DNA polymerase alpha

Homogeneously purified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) specifically stimulated the activity of immunoaffinity-purified calf or human DNA polymerase alpha by about 6 to 60-fold. Apparently, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of DNA polymerase alpha was not necessary for the stimulation. The effects of PARP on DNA polymerase alpha were biphasic: at very low concentrations of DNA, it rather inhibited its activity, whereas, at higher DNA concentrations, PARP greatly stimulated it. The autopoly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of PARP suppressed both its stimulatory and inhibitory effects. By immunoprecipitation with an anti-DNA polymerase alpha antibody, it was clearly shown that PARP may be physically associated with DNA polymerase alpha. Stimulation of DNA polymerase alpha may be attributed to the physical association between the two, rather than to the DNA-binding capacity of PARP, since the PARP fragment containing only the DNA binding domain showed little stimulatory activity. The existence of PARP-DNA polymerase alpha complexes were also detected in crude extracts of calf thymus.

Inhibition of DNA binding by the phosphorylation of poly ADP-ribose polymerase protein catalysed by protein kinase C

Purified type II (beta) and type III (alpha) protein kinase C phosphorylates highly purified polyADP-ribose polymerase in vitro whereby 2 mols of phosphate are transferred from ATP to serine and threonine residues present in the 36 and 56 kDa polypeptide domains of the polymerase protein. Calf thymus DNA was a non-competitive inhibitor of the protein kinase C catalyzed phosphorylation of polyADP-ribose polymerase. Coincidental with the phosphorylation of the protein the polymerase activity and DNA binding capacity of polyADP-ribose polymerase were inhibited. These in vitro findings may have possible cell biological significance in cellular signal transduction.

Inhibition of HIV-1 IIIb replication in AA-2 and MT-2 cells in culture by two ligands of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase: 6-amino-1,2-benzopyrone and 5-iodo-6-amino-1,2-benzopyrone

The effects of two adenosine diphosphoribose transferase (ADPRT) enzyme inhibitory ligands, 6-amino-1,2-benzopyrone and its 5-iodo-derivative, were determined in AA-2 and MT-2 cell cultures on the replication of HIV-1 IIIb, assayed by an immunochemical test for the HIV protein p24, and syncytium formation, characteristic of HIV-infected cells. Intracellular concentrations of both drugs were sufficient to inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity within the intact cell. Both drugs inhibited HIV replication parallel to their inhibitory potency on ADPRT, but distinct differences were ascertained between the two cell lines. In AA-2 cells both p24 and syncytium formation were depressed simultaneously, whereas in MT-2 cells only syncytium formation was inhibited by the drugs, and the p24 production, which remained unchanged during viral growth, was unaffected. Both drugs only moderately depressed the growth rate of the AA-2 and MT-2 cells and there was no detectable cellular toxicity. Results suggest the feasibility of the development of a new line of ADPRT ligand anti-HIV drugs that fundamentally differ in their mode of action from currently used chemotherapeutics.