Debenzylation of O(6)-benzyl-8-oxoguanine in human liver: implications for O(6)-benzylguanine metabolism

The dual role of DNA repair protein MGMT in cancer prevention and treatment

Alkylating agents are genotoxic chemicals that can induce and treat various types of cancer. This occurs through covalent bonding with cellular macromolecules, in particular DNA, leading to the loss of functional integrity under the persistence of modifications upon replication. O⁶-alkylguanine (O⁶-AlkylG) adducts are proposed to be the most potent DNA lesions induced by alkylating agents. If not repaired correctly, these adducts can result, at the molecular level, in DNA point mutations, chromosome aberrations, recombination, crosslinking, and single- and double-strand breaks (SSB/DSBs). At the cellular level, these lesions can result in malignant transformation, senescence, or cell death. O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein capable of removing the alkyl groups from O⁶-AlkylG adducts in a damage reversal process that can prevent the adverse biological effects of DNA damage caused by guanine O⁶-alkylation. MGMT can thereby defend normal cells against tumor initiation, however it can also protect tumor cells against the beneficial effects of chemotherapy. Hence, MGMT can play an important role in both the prevention and treatment of cancer; thus, it can be considered as a double-edged sword. From a clinical perspective, MGMT is a therapeutic target, and it is important to explore the rational development of its clinical exploitation.

The specific role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy

The DNA repair protein, O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), can confer resistance to guanine O⁶-alkylating agents. Therefore, inhibition of resistant MGMT protein is a practical approach to increase the anticancer effects of such alkylating agents. Numerous small molecule inhibitors were synthesized and exhibited potential MGMT inhibitory activities. Although they were nontoxic alone, they also inhibited MGMT in normal tissues, thereby enhancing the side effects of chemotherapy. Therefore, strategies for tumor-specific MGMT inhibition have been proposed, including local drug delivery and tumor-activated prodrugs. Over-expression of MGMT in hematopoietic stem cells to protect bone marrow from the toxic effects of chemotherapy is also a feasible selection. The future prospects and challenges of MGMT inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy were also discussed.

Targeting O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase with specific inhibitors as a strategy in cancer therapy

O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs the cancer chemotherapy-relevant DNA adducts, O (6)-methylguanine and O (6)-chloroethylguanine, induced by methylating and chloroethylating anticancer drugs, respectively. These adducts are cytotoxic, and given the overwhelming evidence that MGMT is a key factor in resistance, strategies for inactivating MGMT have been pursued. A number of drugs have been shown to inactivate MGMT in cells, human tumour models and cancer patients, and O (6)-benzylguanine and O (6)-[4-bromothenyl]guanine have been used in clinical trials. While these agents show no side effects per se, they also inactivate MGMT in normal tissues and hence exacerbate the toxic side effects of the alkylating drugs, requiring dose reduction. This might explain why, in any of the reported trials, the outcome has not been improved by their inclusion. It is, however, anticipated that, with the availability of tumour targeting strategies and hematopoetic stem cell protection, MGMT inactivators hold promise for enhancing the effectiveness of alkylating agent chemotherapy.

Radioiodinated O(6)-Benzylguanine derivatives containing an azido function

INTRODUCTION

Drug resistance to alkylator chemotherapy has been primarily attributed to the DNA repair protein alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT); thus, personalizing chemotherapy could be facilitated if tumor AGT content could be quantified prior to administering chemotherapy. We have been investigating the use of radiolabeled O(6)-benzylguanine (BG) analogues to label and quantify AGT in vivo. BG derivatives containing an azido function were sought to potentially enhance the targeting of these analogues to AGT, which is primarily present in the cell nucleus, either by conjugating them to nuclear localization sequence (NLS) peptides or by pretargeting via bio-orthogonal approaches.

METHODS

Two O(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)guanine (IBG) derivatives containing an azido moiety-O(6)-(4-azidohexyloxymethyl-3-iodobenzyl)guanine (AHOMIBG) and O(6)-(4-azido-3-iodobenzyl)guanine (AIBG)--and their tin precursors were synthesized in multiple steps and the tin precursors were converted to radioiodinated AHOMIBG and AIBG, respectively. Both unlabeled and radioiodinated AHOMIBG analogues were conjugated to alkyne-derivatized NLS peptide heptynoyl-PK(3)RKV. The ability of these radioiodinated compounds to bind to AGT was determined by a trichloroacetic acid precipitation assay and gel electrophoresis/phosphor imaging. Labeling of an AGT-AIBG conjugate via Staudinger ligation using the (131)I-labeled phosphine ligand, 2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl 4-[(131)I]iodobenzoate, also was investigated.

RESULTS

[(131)I]AHOMIBG was synthesized in two steps from its tin precursor in 52.2 ± 7.5% (n = 5) radiochemical yield and conjugated to the NLS peptide via click reaction in 50.7 ± 4.9% (n = 6) yield. The protected tin precursor of AIBG was radioiodinated in an average radiochemical yield of 69.6 ± 4.5% (n = 7); deprotection of the intermediate gave [(131)I]AIBG in 17.8 ± 4.2% (n = 9) yield. While both [(131)I]AHOMIBG and its NLS conjugate bound to AGT pure protein, their potency as a substrate for AGT was substantially lower than that of [(125)I]IBG. Uptake of [(131)I]AHOMIBG-NLS conjugate in DAOY medulloblastoma cells was up to eightfold higher than that of [(125)I]IBG; however, the uptake was not changed when the cellular AGT content was first depleted with BG treatment. [(131)I]AIBG was almost equipotent as [(125)I]IBG with respect to binding to pure AGT; however, attempts to radiolabel AGT by treatment with unlabeled AIBG followed by Staudinger ligation using the radiolabeled phosphine ligand, 2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl 4-[(131)I]iodobenzoate were not successful.

CONCLUSION

Although AHOMIBG, and AIBG were synthesized successfully in both unlabeled and radioiodinated forms, the radioiodinated compounds failed to label AGT either after NLS peptide conjugation or via Staundiger ligation. Currently, other bio-orthogonal approaches are being evaluated for labeling AGT by pretargeting.

DNA binding, nucleotide flipping, and the helix-turn-helix motif in base repair by O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and its implications for cancer chemotherapy

O(6)-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) is a crucial target both for the prevention of cancer and for chemotherapy, since it repairs mutagenic lesions in DNA, and it limits the effectiveness of alkylating chemotherapies. AGT catalyzes the unique, single-step, direct damage reversal repair of O(6)-alkylguanines by selectively transferring the O(6)-alkyl adduct to an internal cysteine residue. Recent crystal structures of human AGT alone and in complex with substrate DNA reveal a two-domain alpha/beta fold and a bound zinc ion. AGT uses its helix-turn-helix motif to bind substrate DNA via the minor groove. The alkylated guanine is then flipped out from the base stack into the AGT active site for repair by covalent transfer of the alkyl adduct to Cys145. An asparagine hinge (Asn137) couples the helix-turn-helix DNA binding and active site motifs. An arginine finger (Arg128) stabilizes the extrahelical DNA conformation. With this newly improved structural understanding of AGT and its interactions with biologically relevant substrates, we can now begin to unravel the role it plays in preserving genetic integrity and discover how it promotes resistance to anticancer therapies.

Molecular imaging of alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: further evaluation of radioiodinated derivatives of O6-benzylguanine

PURPOSE

An inverse correlation has been established between tumor levels of the DNA repair protein alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) and a positive outcome after alkylator chemotherapy. Quantitative imaging of AGT could provide important information for patient-specific cancer treatment. Several radiolabeled analogues of O6-benzylguanine (BG), a potent AGT inactivator, have been developed and shown to be capable of labeling pure AGT protein. Herein, two of these analogues--O6-3-[*I]iodobenzylguanine ([*I]IBG) and O6-3-[*I]iodobenzyl-2'-deoxyguanosine ([*I]IBdG)--were further evaluated in two murine xenograft models. (AcO)2-[131I]IBdG, a peracetylated derivative of IBdG, also was investigated as an alternative agent.

METHODS

Several biodistribution studies of radioiodinated IBG and IBdG were performed in TE-671 human rhabdomyosarcoma and DAOY human medulloblastoma murine xenograft models. Mice were treated with BG or its nucleoside analogue dBG to deplete the tumor AGT content. The effect of unlabeled IBG and that of 7,8-benzoflavone (BF), an inhibitor of the cytochrome P-450 isozyme CYP1A2, on the tumor uptake of the tracers was determined. The uptake of (AcO)2-[131I]IBdG along with that of [125I]IBdG in DAOY cells in vitro was determined in the presence and absence of a nucleoside transporter inhibitor, dipyridamole.

RESULTS

Pretreatment of mice either with BG or dBG failed to reduce tumor levels of [*I]IBG or [*I]IBdG even though such treatments completely depleted tumor AGT content. Treatment of mice with BF increased tumor uptake of [125I]IBG by 56%; however, differentiation of tumors with and without AGT still was not possible. (AcO)2-[131I]IBdG, a peracetylated derivative of IBdG, had a higher uptake in vitro in DAOY tumor cells. However, its uptake, like that of [125I]IBdG, was blocked by dipyridamole.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that labeled agents that are more specific for cellular AGT and that are more metabolically stable are needed.

Phase II trial of the O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase inhibitor O6-benzylguanine and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea in advanced melanoma

PURPOSE

1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) induces DNA damage via a chloroethyl adduct at the O(6) position of guanine, which can be repaired by O(6)-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) expressed in melanoma. We postulated that the addition of O(6) benzylguanine (O(6)BG), a potent inactivator of AGT, would improve the clinical response to BCNU in melanoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients had measurable disease, adequate organ function, and a corrected Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) of > or =70% predicted. They were accrued into two cohorts based on prior chemotherapy. O(6)BG (120 mg/m(2)) was administered i.v. followed by BCNU (40 mg/m(2)) on an outpatient basis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected pre- and 18 hours post-O(6)BG to analyze AGT depletion. Treatment was every 6 weeks, and clinical response was assessed after every two cycles.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled, 22 of these patients were chemotherapy-naïve. In the chemotherapy-naïve cohort, there was a patient with a complete response (CR), 4 with stable disease (SD), 13 with progressive disease (PD), and 4 nonevaluable patients; the median time to progression was 80 days and the median survival was 211 days. In the prior-chemotherapy cohort, there were no responses, 3 SD, 15 PD, and 2 nonevaluable patients; median time to progression was 54 days and median survival was 120 days. AGT was depleted from PBMC in the 15 patients tested. Grades 3 to 4 myelosuppression was seen in 57% of patients; toxicities were similar between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

O(6)BG/BCNU was successfully administered on an outpatient basis and depleted AGT from PBMC. However, significant myelosuppression was observed and the clinical outcome was not improved. Alternative mechanisms of resistance to melanoma cell death need to be investigated.

An update on in vitro test methods in human hepatic drug biotransformation research: pros and cons

The liver is the predominant organ in which biotransformation of foreign compounds takes place, although other organs may also be involved in drug biotransformation. Ideally, an in vitro model for drug biotransformation should accurately resemble biotransformation in vivo in the liver. Several in vitro human liver models have been developed in the past few decades, including supersomes, microsomes, cytosol, S9 fraction, cell lines, transgenic cell lines, primary hepatocytes, liver slices, and perfused liver. A general advantage of these models is a reduced complexity of the study system. On the other hand, there are several more or less serious specific drawbacks for each model, which prevents their widespread use and acceptance by the regulatory authorities as an alternative for in vivo screening. This review describes the practical aspects of selected in vitro human liver models with comparisons between the methods.