Interaction of the D2short dopamine receptor with G proteins: analysis of receptor/G protein selectivity

Efficacy of Hybrid Tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole Based Aryl Piperazines D-264 and D-301 at D₂ and D₃ Receptors

In elucidating the role of pharmacodynamic efficacy at D3 receptors in therapeutic effectiveness of dopamine receptor agonists, the influence of study system must be understood. Here two compounds with D3 over D2 selectivity developed in our earlier work, D-264 and D-301, are compared in dopamine receptor-mediated G-protein activation in striatal regions of wild-type and D2 receptor knockout mice and in CHO cells expressing D2 or D3 receptors. In caudate-putamen of D2 knockout mice, D-301 was ~3-fold more efficacious than D-264 in activating G-proteins as assessed by [(35)S]GTPγS binding; in nucleus accumbens, D-301 stimulated G-protein activation whereas D-264 did not. In contrast, the two ligands exerted similar efficacy in both regions of wild-type mice, suggesting both ligands activate D2 receptors with similar efficacy. In D2 and D3 receptor-expressing CHO cells, D-264 and D-301 appeared to act in the [(35)S]GTPγS assay as full agonists because they produced maximal stimulation equal to dopamine. Competition for [(3)H]spiperone binding was then performed to determine Ki/EC50 ratios as an index of receptor reserve for each ligand. Action of D-301, but not D-264, showed receptor reserve in D3 but not in D2 receptor-expressing cells, whereas dopamine showed receptor reserve in both cell lines. Gαo1 is highly expressed in brain and is important in D2-like receptor-G protein coupling. Transfection of Gαo1 in D3- but not D2-expressing CHO cells led to receptor reserve for D-264 without altering receptor expression levels. D-301 and dopamine exhibited receptor reserve in D3-expressing cells both with and without transfection of Gαo1. Altogether, these results indicate that D-301 has greater intrinsic efficacy to activate D3 receptors than D-264, whereas the two compounds act on D2 receptors with similar intrinsic efficacy. These findings also suggest caution in interpreting Emax values from functional assays in receptor-transfected cell models without accounting for receptor reserve.

Active-state models of ternary GPCR complexes: determinants of selective receptor-G-protein coupling

Based on the recently described crystal structure of the β₂ adrenergic receptor - G_s-protein complex, we report the first molecular-dynamics simulations of ternary GPCR complexes designed to identify the selectivity determinants for receptor-G-protein binding. Long-term molecular dynamics simulations of agonist-bound β2AR-Gα_s and D2R-Gα_i complexes embedded in a hydrated bilayer environment and computational alanine-scanning mutagenesis identified distinct residues of the N-terminal region of intracellular loop 3 to be crucial for coupling selectivity. Within the G-protein, specific amino acids of the α5-helix, the C-terminus of the Gα-subunit and the regions around αN-β1 and α4-β6 were found to determine receptor recognition. Knowledge of these determinants of receptor-G-protein binding selectivity is essential for designing drugs that target specific receptor/G-protein combinations.

Increasing the density of the D2L receptor and manipulating the receptor environment are required to evidence the partial agonist properties of aripiprazole

The clinical efficacy of aripiprazole in the treatment of psychosis relies on a partial agonism at D2 receptors. As the expression of this receptor differs physiologically between pre- and post-synaptic sites and is affected by pathological conditions or pharmacological treatments, it appears difficult to predict the clinical response to partial agonists. In addition, the response to this novel antipsychotic was shown to depend on the cell-line and the pathway analyzed, suggesting a functional selective profile at the D2 receptor. This study aims at examining the influence of receptor density and ionic environment on the pharmacological properties of aripiprazole. A cell line was developed in which the expression of the recombinant D2 receptor can be tightly manipulated using doxycycline and sodium butyrate. The potency and efficacy of aripiprazole and other reference D2 receptor ligands were examined in [35S]GTPγS binding assays, in buffers containing either NaCl or N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG) which is proposed to enhance G protein coupling. Increasing the density of D2 receptors considerably enhanced the [35S]GTPγS binding induced by dopamine and the full agonist NPA. In maximally induced cells, the agonist properties of the partial agonist (-)-3-PPP was revealed in a buffer containing NaCl, whereas the response to aripiprazole was not evidenced. Substituting NMDG for NaCl promoted the response to dopamine and (-)3-PPP and was proven efficient to reveal the partial agonist profile of aripiprazole. While NMDG substitution for NaCl strongly enhanced receptor-G protein coupling, these ionic manipulations are likely to influence receptor conformations, thereby modulating the activation of signaling pathways. Our data obtained with partial agonists acting at the D2 receptor suggest that these changes in the experimental conditions could contribute to reveal the functional selective profile of GPCR ligands. They also emphasize that the properties of functional selective ligands do not only depend on receptor density but also on the surrounding environment which likely differs between brain structures.

Use of the GTPγS ([35S]GTPγS and Eu-GTPγS) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

In this review I consider assays for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity based on the binding of labelled analogues of GTPγS ([(35) S]GTPγS or Eu-GTPγS) to G proteins in tissues (GTPγS binding assays). Such assays provide convenient measures of GPCR activity close to the receptor in the signalling cascade. In order to set up a GTPγS binding assay, the requirements of the assay must be considered. These are tissue source, GTPγS analogue, G protein, GDP, Mg(2+) /Na(+) ions, saponin, incubation time. The assay, once optimized, can be used to generate concentration/response curves for GPCRs signalling via G(i/o) proteins (or to other G proteins with a modified assay) and actions of agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists may, in principle, be assessed. For agonists and inverse agonists, data for the maximal agonist effect, the concentration of ligand giving a half-maximal response and the Hill coefficient may be derived. For antagonists, data for the equilibrium dissociation constant can be obtained. The mechanistic basis of the assay is considered. Although the assay can be used to profile ligands, under the conditions it is used, it may not be measuring the same event that determines GPCR action in cells.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Analytical Receptor Pharmacology in Drug Discovery. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2010.161.issue-6

Understanding the effect of different assay formats on agonist parameters: a study using the µ-opioid receptor

The correct interpretation of data is fundamental to the study of G-protein-coupled receptor pharmacology. Often, new assay technologies are assimilated into the drug discovery environment without full consideration of the data generated. In this study, the authors look at µ-opioid receptor agonists in three different assays: (1) [(35)S]GTPγS binding, (2) inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, and (3) β-arrestin recruitment. Agonist-concentration effect curves were performed before and after treatment with the irreversible antagonist β-funaltrexamine, and where appropriate, these data were fitted to the operational model of agonism. The Z' value was highest in the β-arrestin assay, followed by the [(35)S]GTPγS and cAMP assays. The cAMP data fitted well to the operational model, as did the [(35)S]GTPγS data, but the [(35)S]GTPγS assay led to an apparent overestimation of K(A) values. However, in the β-arrestin assay, data did not fit the operational model, as treatment with β-funaltrexamine reduced the Emax proportionally to receptor number, with no change in EC(50). In addition, the EC(50) values generated correlated well with affinity values. In conclusion, the β-arrestin recruitment assay does not fit with traditional pharmacological theory but is of great utility as the EC(50) value generated is a good approximation of affinity.

Modelling the interdependence between the stoichiometry of receptor oligomerization and ligand binding for a coexisting dimer/tetramer receptor system

Many G protein-coupled receptors have been shown to exist as oligomers, but the oligomerization state and the effects of this on receptor function are unclear. For some G protein-coupled receptors, in ligand binding assays, different radioligands provide different maximal binding capacities. Here we have developed mathematical models for co-expressed dimeric and tetrameric species of receptors. We have considered models where the dimers and tetramers are in equilibrium and where they do not interconvert and we have also considered the potential influence of the ligands on the degree of oligomerization. By analogy with agonist efficacy, we have considered ligands that promote, inhibit or have no effect on oligomerization. Cell surface receptor expression and the intrinsic capacity of receptors to oligomerize are quantitative parameters of the equations. The models can account for differences in the maximal binding capacities of radioligands in different preparations of receptors and provide a conceptual framework for simulation and data fitting in complex oligomeric receptor situations.

Investigation of cooperativity in the binding of ligands to the D(2) dopamine receptor

The D(2) dopamine receptor exists as dimers or as higher-order oligomers, as determined from data from physical experiments. In this study, we sought evidence that this oligomerization leads to cooperativity by examining the binding of three radioligands ([(3)H]nemonapride, [(3)H]raclopride, and [(3)H]spiperone) to D(2) dopamine receptors expressed in membranes of Sf9 cells. In saturation binding experiments, the three radioligands exhibited different B(max) values, and the B(max) values could be altered by the addition of sodium ions to assays. Despite labeling different numbers of sites, the different ligands were able to achieve full inhibition in competition experiments. Some ligand pairs also exhibited complex inhibition curves in these experiments. In radioligand dissociation experiments, the rate of dissociation of [(3)H]nemonapride or [(3)H]spiperone depended on the sodium ion concentration but was independent of the competing ligand. Although some of the data in this study are consistent with the behavior of a cooperative oligomeric receptor, not all of the data are in agreement with this model. It may, therefore, be necessary to consider more complex models for the behavior of this receptor.

Autoradiographic mapping of dopamine-D2/D3 receptor stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the human brain

Agonist stimulated [35S]guanosine 5'-gamma-thiotriphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding autoradiography was established for the examination of dopamine-D2/D2 receptors in human brain sections. The distribution of G proteins activated by dopamine-D2/D3 receptors was studied in whole hemisphere cryosections. Dopamine stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in brain regions with high densities of dopamine D2-like receptors, i.e. putamen (23 +/- 2%, mean +/- SEM,% stimulation over basal binding), caudate (20 +/- 0%) and substantia nigra (22 +/- 2%), but also in regions with lower receptor densities such as amygdala (17 +/- 8%), hippocampus (16 +/- 6%), anterior cingulate (13 +/- 3%), and thalamus (12 +/- 2%). Dopamine stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to significantly higher levels in the dorsal than in the ventral part of the striatum. Dopamine caused low or very low stimulation in all cortical areas. Raclopride, a selective D2/D3 receptor antagonist, potently inhibited dopamine stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding, whereas R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390), a selective D1 antagonist, did not block the [35S]GTPgammaS binding response stimulated by dopamine. Hence, the stimulatory effect of dopamine was primarily mediated by D2/D3 receptors. Quinpirole stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the same regions as dopamine. The maximal level of stimulation induced by dopamine and quinpirole was not significantly different. The present study demonstrates that agonist stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding autoradiography could be a suitable technique for the examination of dopamine-D2/D3 receptors in the human brain. This functional assay could provide useful new information about dopamine receptor/G protein coupling in the postmortem human brain, and reveal possible disease related alterations of the interaction between D2/D3 receptors and G proteins.

Modulation of agonist binding to human dopamine receptor subtypes by L-prolyl-L-leucyl-glycinamide and a peptidomimetic analog

The present study was undertaken to investigate the role of the hypothalamic tripeptide L-prolyl-L-leucyl-glycinamide (PLG) and its conformationally constrained analog 3(R)-[(2(S)-pyrrolidinylcarbonyl)amino]-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidineacetamide (PAOPA) in modulating agonist binding to human dopamine (DA) receptor subtypes using human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected with respective cDNAs. Both PLG and PAOPA enhanced agonist [3H]N-propylnorapomorphine (NPA) and [3H]quinpirole binding in a dose-dependent manner to the DA D2L,D2S, and D4 receptors. However, agonist binding to the D1 and D3 receptors and antagonist binding to the D2L receptors by PLG were not significantly affected. Scatchard analysis of [3H]NPA binding to membranes in the presence of PLG revealed a significant increase in affinity of the agonist binding sites for the D2L, D2S, and D4 receptors. Analysis of agonist/antagonist competition curves revealed that PLG and PAOPA increased the population and affinity of the high-affinity form of the D2L receptor and attenuated guanosine 5'-(beta,gamma-imido)-triphosphate-induced inhibition of high-affinity agonist binding sites for the DA D2L receptor. Furthermore, direct NPA binding with D2L cell membranes pretreated with suramin, a compound that can uncouple receptor/G protein complexes, and incubated with and without DA showed that both PLG and PAOPA had only increased agonist binding in membranes pretreated with both suramin and DA, suggesting that PLG requires the D2L receptor/G protein complex to increase agonist binding. These results suggest that PLG possibly modulates DA D2S, D2L, and D4 receptors in an allosteric manner and that the coupling of D2 receptors to the G protein is essential for this modulation to occur.

Functional selectivity of melanocortin 4 receptor peptide and nonpeptide agonists: evidence for ligand-specific conformational states

Agonists of the melanocortin 4 (MC4) receptor have potential pharmaceutical benefit in the treatment of obesity and sexual dysfunction. In this study, we have compared the ability of a number of peptide and nonpeptide agonists to activate a FLAG-tagged human MC4 (FMC4) receptor, as measured by both cAMP accumulation and calcium mobilization using a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR). In addition, we have analyzed the ability of these agonists to cause receptor internalization, as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. The endogenous agonist alpha-melanocortin-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) increased cAMP accumulation, calcium mobilization, and receptor internalization in a dose-dependent manner in human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing the FMC4 receptor. The activity of the other agonists varied considerably in these assays, and overall, the potency and intrinsic activity of the agonists in the cAMP accumulation assays did not correlate with their potency or intrinsic activity in either the FLIPR or receptor internalization assays. Agonists could be clearly separated into two functional classes based on their structure. Peptide agonists beta-MSH, des-acetyl-alpha-MSH, and [Nle(4), D-Phe(7)]-alpha-melanocortin-stimulating hormone exhibited 80 to 112% of the maximal alpha-MSH response in cAMP accumulation and 62 to 96% in FLIPR assays and were able to cause 75 to 118% of receptor internalization induced by alpha-MSH. Conversely, although the nonpeptide agonists exhibited 73 to 149% of the alpha-MSH response in the cAMP accumulation assays, they were significantly impaired in the FLIPR (7-40%) and receptor internalization (-5-38%) assays. These findings demonstrate an important difference in activation and internalization of the MC4 receptor by nonpeptide versus peptide agonists and provides evidence of agonist-specific conformational states.

The influence of G protein subtype on agonist action at D2 dopamine receptors

In previous studies, we have shown that agonists influence the ability of D2 dopamine receptors to couple to G proteins and here we extend this work. The human D2Short dopamine receptor and a natural polymorphism of this D(2Short)(Ser311Cys), have been studied by co-expressing the receptors in insect cells with Gbeta1gamma2 and either Galpha(o), Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2) or Galpha(i3) G protein subunits. These preparations have been used to study the G protein coupling profiles of the two receptors and the influence of agonists. Receptor/G protein coupling was analysed in dopamine/[3H]spiperone competition binding experiments and through stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Although the Ser311Cys polymorphism itself had no appreciable effect on the G protein coupling specificity of the D2 receptor, agonist stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding, revealed that both dopamine and (+)-3PPP showed a clear preference for Galpha(o) compared to the Galpha(i) subtypes, but quinpirole did not. These results indicate that agonists are able to stabilise different receptor conformations with different abilities to couple to G proteins.

Dopamine Receptor Signaling

The D1-like (D1, D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, D4) classes of dopamine receptors each has shared signaling properties that contribute to the definition of the receptor class, although some differences among subtypes within a class have been identified. D1-like receptor signaling is mediated chiefly by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphas and Galphaolf, which cause sequential activation of adenylate cyclase, cylic AMP-dependent protein kinase, and the protein phosphatase-1 inhibitor DARPP-32. The increased phosphorylation that results from the combined effects of activating cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and inhibiting protein phosphatase 1 regulates the activity of many receptors, enzymes, ion channels, and transcription factors. D1 or a novel D1-like receptor also signals via phospholipase C-dependent and cyclic AMP-independent mobilization of intracellular calcium. D2-like receptor signaling is mediated by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphai and Galphao. These pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins regulate some effectors, such as adenylate cyclase, via their Galpha subunits, but regulate many more effectors such as ion channels, phospholipases, protein kinases, and receptor tyrosine kinases as a result of the receptor-induced liberation of Gbetagamma subunits. In addition to interactions between dopamine receptors and G proteins, other protein:protein interactions such as receptor oligomerization or receptor interactions with scaffolding and signal-switching proteins are critical for regulation of dopamine receptor signaling.

Identification of CC chemokine receptor 7 residues important for receptor activation

The binding pocket of family A GPCRs that bind small biogenic amines is well characterized. In this study we identify residues on CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR-7) that are involved in agonist-mediated receptor activation but not in high affinity ligand binding. The mutations also affect the ability of the ligands to induce chemotaxis. Two of the residues, Lys3.33(137) and Gln5.42(227), are consistent with the binding pocket described for biogenic amines, while Lys3.26(130) and Asn7.32(305), are found at, or close to, the cell surface. Our observations are in agreement with findings from other peptide and chemokine receptors, which indicate that receptors that bind larger ligands contain contact sites closer to the cell surface in addition to the conventional transmembrane binding pocket. These findings also support the theory that chemokine receptors require different sets of interactions for high affinity ligand binding and receptor activation.