Evidence for the shuttle model for Gs alpha activation of adenylyl cyclase

Endogenous regulators of G protein signaling differentially modulate full and partial mu-opioid agonists at adenylyl cyclase as predicted by a collision coupling model

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the endogenous GTPase activity of Galpha(i/o) proteins to increase the rate of deactivation of active Galpha-GTP and Gbetagamma signaling molecules. Previous studies have suggested that RGS proteins are more effective on less efficiently coupled systems such as with partial agonist responses. To determine the role of endogenous RGS proteins in functional responses to mu-opioid agonists of different intrinsic efficacy, Galpha(i/o) subunits with a mutation at the pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive cysteine (C351I) and with or without a mutation at the RGS binding site (G184S) were stably expressed in C6 glioma cells expressing a mu-opioid receptor. Cells were treated overnight with PTX to inactivate endogenous G proteins. Maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase by the low-efficacy partial agonists buprenorphine and nalbuphine was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o)(CIGS), Galpha(i2)(CIGS), or Galpha(i3)(CIGS) compared with their Galpha(CI) counterparts, but the RGS-insensitive mutation had little or no effect on the maximal inhibition by the higher efficacy agonists DAMGO and morphine. The potency of all the agonists to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o)(CIGS), Galpha(i2)(CIGS), or Galpha(i3)(CIGS), regardless of efficacy. These data are comparable with predictions based on a collision coupling model. In this model, the rate of G protein inactivation, which is modulated by RGS proteins, and the rate of G protein activation, which is affected by agonist intrinsic efficacy, determine the maximal agonist response and potency at adenylyl cyclase under steady state conditions.

Differential expression of adenylyl cyclase subtypes in human cardiovascular system

In human myocardium, beta1-adrenoceptor stimulation achieves maximal inotropic response but less than 50% of maximal adenylyl cyclase activation, whereas the reverse is true of the beta2-adrenoceptor. Four types of adenylyl cyclase, type IV-VII, have been described in mammalian heart, but their expression and relative distribution in human heart and blood vessels is not known. We found that type IV, V, VI and VII adenylyl cyclases were all expressed in cardiomyocytes. Whereas types IV and VII RNA were more abundant in extra-cardiac than cardiac tissues, both absolute and relative expression of type VI was greatest in heart, and lower in tissues lacking a beta1-adrenoceptor. Type V expression was virtually confined to atrium. In situ mRNA hybridisation showed that the beta1-adrenoceptor co-localised with type VI adenylyl cyclase but not other subtypes in juxtoglomerular cells of human kidney. The tissue specific expression of these adenylyl cyclase subtypes may favour its coupling to corresponding receptors expressed in the given tissue type.

Allosteric effects of G protein overexpression on the binding of beta-adrenergic ligands with distinct inverse efficacies

Allosteric models of G protein-coupled receptors predict that G protein influences the spontaneous isomerization between inactive (R) and active (R*) conformations. Since inverse agonists have been proposed to preferentially bind to the inactive and uncoupled form(s), changes in the G protein content should influence the binding properties of these ligands. To test this hypothesis, we systematically assessed the effect of G proteins on the binding of beta(2)-adrenergic ligands with distinct levels of inverse efficacy. Recombinant baculoviruses encoding the human beta(2)-adrenoreceptor (beta(2)AR) were expressed alone or in combination with G protein subunits in Sf9 cells. Coexpression with the G protein alpha s beta 1 gamma 2 did not influence the relative efficacy of the ligands to inhibit the adenylyl cyclase but induced considerable decrease in number of sites detected by [(3)H]ICI 118551, [(3)H]propranolol, and (125)I-cyanopindolol. This loss was proportional to the inverse efficacy of the ligand used as the radiotracer in the assay. The addition of Gpp(NH)p inhibited the effects of G protein overexpression indicating that the G proteins acted allosterically. Consistent with this notion, Western blot analysis revealed that coexpression with the G proteins was not accompanied by a loss of immunoreactive beta(2)AR. Such allosteric effects of the G proteins were also observed in mammalian cells expressing endogenous level of G proteins indicating that the phenomenon is not unique to overexpression systems. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the apparent receptor number detected by radiolabeled inverse agonists is affected by the content in G proteins as a result of their influence on R/R* isomerization.

Role of G-protein availability in differential signaling by alpha 2-adrenoceptors

The impact of G-protein expression on the coupling specificity of the human alpha(2B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2B)-AR) was studied in Sf9 cells. The alpha(2B)-AR was shown to activate both coexpressed G(s)- and G(i)-proteins in a [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay. Noradrenaline and the synthetic agonist UK14,304 were equally potent and efficacious in stimulating G(i) activation. At the effector level (adenylyl cyclase), both ligands stimulated cAMP production. In the presence of forskolin, the effects of the agonists were more complex. Noradrenaline stimulated cAMP production, while UK14,304 showed a biphasic concentration-response curve with inhibition of stimulated cAMP production at low agonist concentrations and further stimulation at high agonist concentrations. G(s) coexpression caused a monophasic stimulatory response with both ligands. Coexpression with G(i) resulted in a biphasic concentration-response curve for noradrenaline and a monophasic inhibition with UK14,304. Experiments with a panel of agonists demonstrated that the more efficacious an agonist is in stimulating cAMP production, the weaker is its ability to couple to inhibition of cAMP accumulation via exogenous G(i). To be able to explain the mechanistic consequences of dual G-protein coupling described above, we developed a mathematical model based on the hypothesis that an agonist induces different conformations of the receptor having different affinity for different G-proteins. The model reproduced the profiles seen in the concentration-response curves with G(s) and G(i) coexpression. The model predicts that the affinity of the receptor conformation for G-proteins as well as the availability of G-proteins will determine the ultimate response of the receptor.

Activation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]thio-triphosphate binding through M(1) muscarinic receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes; 1. Mathematical analysis of catalytic G protein activation

I analyzed in this work the effect of agonists and unlabeled guanyl nucleotides on [(35)S]GTP gamma S and [(3)H]NMS binding to transfected CHO cells expressing hM(1) muscarinic receptors. I was unable to explain my kinetic results by "traditional" (one-site, two-site, or two-step) bimolecular binding models. I therefore examined the equations that describe catalytic G protein activation. My results were fully consistent with the following interpretation: G protein-coupled receptors either interacted with GDP-bound G proteins and facilitated the GDP release or recognized empty G proteins, depending on the incubation conditions. The receptor-coupled empty G proteins (RG) then recognized GTP gamma S, and the occupied G protein (G) dissociated reversibly from the receptor. Agonists accelerated the GDP release from receptor-coupled G proteins and accelerated the G dissociation: both effects accelerated synergically the G protein-GTP gamma S association reaction in the presence of GDP. GTP gamma S-bound G proteins, G, competed efficiently with inactive (empty or GDP-bound) G proteins for receptor recognition, and were able, therefore, at low concentrations, to quench the [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding reaction.

Kinetics versus equilibrium: the importance of GTP in GPCR activation

Agonist-bound G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) facilitate GDP-GTP exchange on their cognate G proteins. The binding properties of GPCRs are adequately described by the ternary complex model. However, in this article a more realistic (steady-state) model, which is necessary to describe the catalytic effect of agonist-bound receptors on G-protein activation, will be discussed. This model predicts that agonist potency and efficacy might vary from tissue to tissue, depending on the G-protein concentration and can be extended to explain why an agonist's ability to increase the receptor's affinity for empty G proteins (in the absence of GTP) is related to the agonist's efficacy.

Examination of the effects of increasing Gs protein on beta2-adrenergic receptor, Gs, and adenylyl cyclase interactions

We have examined the effect of increased Gs protein levels on the abilities of three different beta2-agonists to induce GTP shifts and stimulate adenylyl cyclase response in an effort to investigate the kinetic association between the beta2-adrenergic receptor Gs and adenylyl cyclase. Agonist competition binding analysis and adenylyl cyclase concentration-response assays revealed that increases in Gs protein resulted in proportional increases in the areas of the GTP shift and adenylyl cyclase activity. Changes in the magnitude of the GTP shift were evaluated with a novel and straightforward approach for analyzing the GTP shift data that allowed us to determine the proportion of high agonist affinity binding receptor population and the apparent dissociation constant between the agonist bound receptor and Gs, regardless of the Gs protein level or the type of beta2-agonist. Using this method, we concluded that increased Gs results in the accumulation of the receptor population displaying high affinity towards agonist (HRGs) by increasing the number of receptor-Gs complexes (to a receptor:Gs protein ratio of about 0.7 at maximal Gs expression) without affecting the affinity between hormone bound receptor and Gs. Using the Gs protein levels determined with our novel analysis, we ran simulations using the theoretical shuttle model equation that relates the EC50 to available Gs. Fitting the simulations to experimental data required a receptor to catalytic unit ratio of 0.45 and revealed at least two distinct stages for beta2-agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, namely, the activation of Gs by the beta2-adrenergic receptor (a step whose rate is dependent on the type of agonist used to stimulate activity), and the activation of adenylyl cyclase by active Gs (a step whose rate is independent of the type of agonist).