Sensitization with clozapine: beyond the dopamine hypothesis

Clozapine's multiple cellular mechanisms: What do we know after more than fifty years? A systematic review and critical assessment of translational mechanisms relevant for innovative strategies in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Almost fifty years after its first introduction into clinical care, clozapine remains the only evidence-based pharmacological option for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which affects approximately 30% of patients with schizophrenia. Despite the long-time experience with clozapine, the specific mechanism of action (MOA) responsible for its superior efficacy among antipsychotics is still elusive, both at the receptor and intracellular signaling level. This systematic review is aimed at critically assessing the role and specific relevance of clozapine's multimodal actions, dissecting those mechanisms that under a translational perspective could shed light on molecular targets worth to be considered for further innovative antipsychotic development. In vivo and in vitro preclinical findings, supported by innovative techniques and methods, together with pharmacogenomic and in vivo functional studies, point to multiple and possibly overlapping MOAs. To better explore this crucial issue, the specific affinity for 5-HT₂R, D1R, α_2c, and muscarinic receptors, the relatively low occupancy at dopamine D2R, the interaction with receptor dimers, as well as the potential confounder effects resulting in biased ligand action, and lastly, the role of the moiety responsible for lipophilic and alkaline features of clozapine are highlighted. Finally, the role of transcription and protein changes at the synaptic level, and the possibility that clozapine can directly impact synaptic architecture are addressed. Although clozapine's exact MOAs that contribute to its unique efficacy and some of its severe adverse effects have not been fully understood, relevant information can be gleaned from recent mechanistic understandings that may help design much needed additional therapeutic strategies for TRS.

Clozapine: Why Is It So Uniquely Effective in the Treatment of a Range of Neuropsychiatric Disorders?

Clozapine is superior to other antipsychotics as a therapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder with increased risk of suicidal behavior. This drug has also been used in the off-label treatment of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Although usually reserved for severe and treatment-refractory cases, it is interesting that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has also been used in the treatment of these psychiatric disorders, suggesting some common or related mechanisms. A literature review on the applications of clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to the disorders mentioned above was undertaken, and this narrative review was prepared. Although both treatments have multiple actions, evidence to date suggests that the ability to elicit epileptiform activity and alter EEG activity, to increase neuroplasticity and elevate brain levels of neurotrophic factors, to affect imbalances in the relationship between glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and to reduce inflammation through effects on neuron-glia interactions are common underlying mechanisms of these two treatments. This evidence may explain why clozapine is effective in a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. Future increased investigations into epigenetic and connectomic changes produced by clozapine and ECT should provide valuable information about these two treatments and the disorders they are used to treat.

Antipsychotic-induced sensitization and tolerance: Behavioral characteristics, developmental impacts, and neurobiological mechanisms

Antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance refer to the increased and decreased drug effects due to past drug use, respectively. Both effects reflect the long-term impacts of antipsychotic treatment on the brain and result from the brain's adaptive response to the foreign property of the drug. In this review, clinical evidence of the behavioral aspect of antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance is selectively reviewed, followed by an overview of preclinical literature that examines these behavioral characteristics and the related pharmacological and nonpharmacological factors. Next, recent work on the developmental impacts of adolescent antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance is presented and recent research that delineates the neurobiological mechanisms of antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance is summarized. A theoretical framework based on "drug learning and memory" principles is proposed to account for the phenomena of antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance. It is maintained that antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance follow basic principles of learning or acquisition ("induction") and memory ("expression"). The induction and expression of both effects reflect the consequences of associative and nonassociative processing and are strongly influenced by various pharmacological, environmental, and behavioral factors. Drug-induced neuroplasticity, such as functional changes of striatal dopamine D2 and prefrontal serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors and their mediated signaling pathways, in principle, is responsible for antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance. Understanding the behavioral characteristics and neurobiological underpinnings of antipsychotic sensitization and tolerance has greatly enhanced our understanding of mechanisms of antipsychotic action, and may have important implications for future drug discovery and clinical practice.

Effects of chronic Clozapine administration on apolipoprotein D levels and on functional recovery following experimental stroke

Elevated brain levels of apolipoprotein D (ApoD) correlate with improved neurological recovery after experimental stroke. Hence, a pharmacological induction of ApoD in the postischemic brain could be beneficial for recovery after stroke. Here we investigated the effect of Clozapine, a compound that increases the expression of ApoD, in two rat models of experimental stroke. Rats were subjected to permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (pMCAO) and treated with Clozapine (i.p. 10 mg/kg body weight) or saline for 8 or 28 days starting on the second day after MCAO. ApoD levels increased by 35% in the peri-infarct area after 10 and 30 days after pMCAO, mainly in neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) positive neurons and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) positive astrocytes. Clozapine did not affect the neurological deficit assessed by the rotating pole test and a grip strength test at 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days after pMCAO. Functional outcome and the infarct size were similar in rats subjected to transient MCAO and injected with Clozapine (i.p. 10 mg/kg body weight) or saline for 26 days starting on the second day after tMCAO. We conclude that Clozapine affects cellular processes involved in peri-infarct tissue reorganization, but does not affect functional recovery after MCAO.

Lack of pro-convulsant activity of the antipsychotic alkaloid alstonine

Psychiatry co-morbidity with epilepsy is common and often requires the combined use of psychotropic and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). For schizophrenic patients, the occurrence of seizures with atypical agents is highest among antipsychotics, although these agents are more effective in alleviating symptoms (including negative symptoms) and are associated with fewer extrapiramidal effects. The indol alkaloid alstonine is the major component of plants used by traditional Nigerian psychiatrists as anti-dementia drugs. The alkaloid presents an experimental profile very similar to the atypical antipsychotic clozapine. This study aimed to compare the pro-convulsant activity of these two antipsychotic compounds. Through repetitive administration over a 30-day period in a kindling paradigm, it is shown that, unlike clozapine, alstonine does not possess pro-convulsant activity. The data adds to previous suggestions that alstonine deserves to be scrutinized as a model for the development of newer antipsychotics.

Atypical antipsychotics and serotoninergic antidepressants in patients with epilepsy: pharmacodynamic considerations

PURPOSE

To discuss the pharmacodynamic aspects of the administration of atypical antipsychotics (APs) and serotoninergic antidepressants (SSRIs) to patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This article represents an overview of all studies concerning the administration of APs and SSRIs to people with epilepsy. In particular, it deals with the relationship between neuroleptics (NLTs), APs, SSRIs, serotonin, and dopamine, with special focus on the possible epileptogenic role of psychoactive drugs.

RESULTS

NLTs may induce seizures by blocking D2, H1, and.1 receptors, or by sexual hormone activation or a pharmacologic kindling mechanism. The difference among APs in their ability to induce seizures is related mainly to the percentage of D2-receptor occupancy and possibly also to their action on neurosteroids. Seizures occur at SSRIs therapeutic doses, with a 0.1-4% incidence. Coversely, in animal studies fluoxetine was claimed to exert an anticonvulsant action.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of the pharmacodynamic aspects of the administration of APs and SSRIs to patients with epilepsy can help to evaluate the importance of some mechanisms of action of several psychoactive drugs in relation to their pro- or anticonvulsant activity.

Manic symptoms induced by olanzapine

We present the case of a never medicated patient with a diagnosis of DSM-IV paranoid schizophrenia in which olanzapine therapy induced manic symptoms. The latter remitted after drug discontinuation.

Clozapine inhibits synaptic transmission at GABAergic synapses established by ventral tegmental area neurones in culture

Elucidation of the mechanism of action of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine is complicated by the finding that this molecule interacts with multiple targets including dopaminergic and serotonergic receptors. Binding studies have suggested that clozapine also antagonises GABA(A) receptors, but physiological evidence for such a block at functional synapses is lacking. In this study, we explored this antagonism by using electrophysiological techniques on GABAergic neurones of the ventral tegmental area in culture. Inhibitory post-synaptic currents (IPSCs) evoked in isolated GABAergic neurones were found to be dose-dependently inhibited by clozapine. Compatible with a post-synaptic mechanism, we found that membrane currents evoked by exogenous applications of GABA were similarly dose-dependently inhibited by clozapine. An analysis of miniature inhibitory post-synaptic currents (mIPSCs) showed that clozapine reduced the amplitude of quantal events in a way similar to SR-95531, a specific GABA(A) receptor antagonist. Both drugs caused a similar leftward shift of the cumulative probability distribution of mIPSC amplitudes. This suggests that clozapine acts on both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. In conclusion, our work demonstrates that clozapine produces a functional antagonism of GABA(A) receptors at synapses. Because this effect occurs at concentrations that could be found in the brain of patients treated with clozapine, a reduction in GABAergic synaptic transmission could be implicated in the therapeutic actions and/or side-effects of clozapine.

Behavioral, psychotic, and anxiety disorders in epilepsy: etiology, clinical features, and therapeutic implications

This chapter deals with some aspects of psychiatric disturbances in people with epilepsy. Because depression and its treatment are extensively described later in this issue, they are not discussed here. The same pertains to forced normalization.

Epilepsy, schizophrenia, and the extended amygdala

Propagation and prolongation of rapid neuronal discharge underlies the epilepsies. However, episodic focal rapid neuronal discharges limited to discrete nuclei and pathways of the amygdala-hippocampal-septal-hypothalamic networks are the language of physiologic message systems for endocrine regulation and reproductive activities vital to the survival of the organism and the species. To prevent prolongation and propagation of physiologic pulsed excitation to areas outside specific networks and resultant epileptic seizures, these discharges must be limited in extent and time by powerful inhibitory processes. The nucleus accumbens, a unit of the extended amygdala, and the monoamines and GABA are components of the inhibitory networks that restrict physiologic rapid discharge in duration and in location. In parallel to the relationship of excessive neuronal excitation to epilepsy, evidence will be presented that excessive inhibition via one or more components of these inhibitory networks or diminished excitation underlies development of some psychoses, including schizophrenia.