Clozapine treatment of persistent paroxysmal dyskinesia associated with concomitant paroxetine and sumatriptan use

Clozapine and tardive movement disorders: a review

BACKGROUND

Tardive syndromes (TS) arise from long term exposure to dopamine receptor blocking agents. Clozapine has been considered to have low risk of causing new onset TS and is considered as a treatment option in patients with TS.

AIM

This review evaluates the usefulness of clozapine in patients with TS and occasional reports of clozapine causing TS.

METHODOLOGY

Electronic searches were carried out using the search engines of PUBMED, Science direct and Google Scholar databases. All reports describing use of clozapine in management of TS, monitoring of TS while on clozapine and onset of TS after initiation of clozapine were identified.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials and 28 case series/case reports describe the use of clozapine in TS. Most of these reports show that clozapine is useful in patients with TS, in the dose range of 200-300 mg/day and the beneficial effect is seen within 4-12 weeks of initiation. One case series and two case reports described clozapine withdrawal emergent dyskinesias suggesting a masking role of clozapine. One trial, three case series and two case reports describe beneficial effects of clozapine on long standing neurological syndromes. There is relatively less literature (2 trials and 15 case series/reports) describing the emergence of TS with clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of beneficial effects of clozapine in TS is greater than its role in causation/worsening of TS. Hence, clozapine should be considered in symptomatic patients who develop TS while receiving other antipsychotics. Further research on mechanism of TS and clozapine effect on TS is required.

Clinically significant drug interactions with agents specific for migraine attacks

The drugs which provide specific relief from migraine attacks, the ergopeptides (ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) and the various 'triptans' (notably sumatriptan), are often prescribed for persons already taking various migraine preventative agents, and sometimes drugs for other indications. As a result, migraine-specific drugs may become involved in drug-drug interactions. The migraine-specific drugs all act as agonists at certain subclasses of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor, particularly those of the 5-HT1D subtype, and produce vasoconstriction through these receptor-mediated mechanisms. The oral bioavailabilities of these drugs, particularly those of the ergopeptides, are often incomplete, due to extensive presystemic metabolism. As a result, if migraine-specific agents are coadministered with drugs with vasoconstrictive properties, or with drugs which inhibit the metabolism of the migraine-specific agents, there is a risk of interactions occurring which produce manifestations of excessive vasoconstriction. This can also occur through pharmacodynamic mechanisms, as when ergopeptides or triptans are coadministered with methysergide or propranolol (although a pharmacokinetic element may apply in relation to the latter interaction), or if one migraine-specific agent is used shortly after another. When ergopeptide metabolism is inhibited by the presence of macrolide antibacterials, particularly troleandomycin and erythromycin, the resultant interaction can produce ergotism, sometimes leading to gangrene. Similar pharmacokinetic mechanisms, with their vasoconstrictive consequences, probably apply to combination of the ergopeptides with HIV protease inhibitors (indinavir and ritonavir), heparin, cyclosporin or tacrolimus. Inhibition of triptan metabolism by monoamine oxidase A inhibitors, e.g. moclobemide, may raise circulating triptan concentrations, although this does not yet seem to have led to reported clinical problems. Caffeine may cause increased plasma ergotamine concentrations through an as yet inadequately defined pharmacokinetic interaction. However, a direct antimigraine effect of caffeine may contribute to the claimed increased efficacy of ergotamine-caffeine combinations in relieving migraine attacks. Serotonin syndromes have been reported as probable pharmacodynamic consequences of the use of ergots or triptans in persons taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors. There have been two reports of involuntary movement disorders when sumatriptan has been used by patients already taking loxapine. Nearly all the clinically important interactions between the ergopeptide antimigraine agents and currently marketed drugs are likely to have already come to notice. In contrast, new interactions involving the triptans are likely to be recognised as additional members of this family of drugs, with their different patterns of metabolism and pharmacokinetics, are marketed.

Current and emerging second-generation triptans in acute migraine therapy: a comparative review

Sterile neurogenic inflammation within cephalic tissue, involving vasodilation and plasma protein extravasation, has been proposed as a pathophysiological mechanism in acute migraine. The action of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1B/1D) agonists--so-called triptans--on receptors located in meningeal arteries (5-HT1B) and trigeminovascular fiber endings (5-HT1D) has an inhibitory effect on this neurogenic inflammation. Recently, a series of second-generation 5-HT1B/1D agonists (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan) have been developed and are reviewed in this article. Their in vitro pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, drug interactions, and adverse effects are evaluated and compared to the golden standard in the treatment of acute migraine, sumatriptan.

The current status of tardive dystonia

Tardive dystonia (TDt), a persistent dystonia associated with exposure to neuroleptic drugs, is an uncommon disorder. It differs from tardive dyskinesia (TDk) in epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors, pathophysiology, course, prognosis, and treatment outcome. TDt seems to develop faster and is more painful, distressing, and disabling than tardive dyskinesia. In this article, evidence is reviewed on the face, descriptive, construct, and predictive validity of this iatrogenic complication of antipsychotic drugs. It is suggested that TDt should not be lumped together with TDk. It deserves a separate nosological status as an independent diagnostic category. The subclassification of TDt into various subtypes based on coexistence of other movement disorders is suggested.