Visceral afferent stimulation-evoked changes in the release of peptides into the parabrachial nucleus in vivo

Von Economo Neuron Pathology in Familial Dysautonomia: Quantitative Assessment and Possible Implications

Von Economo neurons (VENs) and fork cells are principally located in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the frontoinsular cortex (FI). Both of these regions integrate inputs from the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and are involved in decision-making and perception of the emotional states of self and others. Familial dysautonomia (FD) is an orphan disorder characterized by autonomic dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities including repetitive behavior and emotional rigidity, which are also seen in autism spectrum disorder. To understand a possible link between the ANS and the cortical regions implicated in emotion regulation we studied VENs and fork cells in an autonomic disorder. We determined the densities of VENs, fork cells, and pyramidal neurons and the ratio of VENs and fork cells to pyramidal neurons in ACC and FI in 4 FD patient and 6 matched control brains using a stereologic approach. We identified alterations in densities of VENs and pyramidal neurons and their distributions in the ACC and FI in FD brains. These data suggest that alterations in migration and numbers of VENs may be involved in FD pathophysiology thereby supporting the notion of a functional link between VENs, the ANS and the peripheral nervous system in general.

Neuromodulatory function of neuropeptides in the normal CNS

Neuropeptides are small protein molecules produced and released by discrete cell populations of the central and peripheral nervous systems through the regulated secretory pathway and acting on neural substrates. Inside the nerve cells, neuropeptides are selectively stored within large granular vesicles (LGVs), and commonly coexist in neurons with low-molecular-weight neurotransmitters (acetylcholine, amino acids, and catecholamines). Storage in LGVs is responsible for a relatively slow response to secretion that requires enhanced or repeated stimulation. Coexistence (i.e. the concurrent presence of a neuropeptide with other messenger molecules in individual neurons), and co-storage (i.e. the localization of two or more neuropeptides within individual LGVs in neurons) give rise to a complicated series of pre- and post-synaptic functional interactions with low-molecular-weight neurotransmitters. The typically slow response and action of neuropeptides as compared to fast-neurotransmitters such as excitatory/inhibitory amino acids and catecholamines is also due to the type of receptors that trigger neuropeptide actions onto target cells. Almost all neuropeptides act on G-protein coupled receptors that, upon ligand binding, activate an intracellular cascade of molecular enzymatic events, eventually leading to cellular responses. The latter occur in a time span (seconds or more) considerably longer (milliseconds) than that of low-molecular-weight fast-neurotransmitters, directly operating through ion channel receptors. As reviewed here, combined immunocytochemical visualization of neuropeptides and their receptors at the ultrastructural level and electrophysiological studies, have been fundamental to better unravel the role of neuropeptides in neuron-to-neuron communication.

The role of substance P in stress and anxiety responses

Substance P (SP) is one of the most abundant peptides in the central nervous system and has been implicated in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes including stress regulation, as well as affective and anxiety-related behaviour. Consistent with these functions, SP and its preferred neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor has been found within brain areas known to be involved in the regulation of stress and anxiety responses. Aversive and stressful stimuli have been shown repeatedly to change SP brain tissue content, as well as NK1 receptor binding. More recently it has been demonstrated that emotional stressors increase SP efflux in specific limbic structures such as amygdala and septum and that the magnitude of this effect depends on the severity of the stressor. Depending on the brain area, an increase in intracerebral SP concentration (mimicked by SP microinjection) produces mainly anxiogenic-like responses in various behavioural tasks. Based on findings that SP transmission is stimulated under stressful or anxiety-provoking situations it was hypothesised that blockade of NK1 receptors may attenuate stress responses and exert anxiolytic-like effects. Preclinical and clinical studies have found evidence in favour of such an assumption. The status of this research is reviewed here.

Neurotensin enhances glutamate excitotoxicity in mesencephalic neurons in primary culture

The tridecapeptide neurotensin has been demonstrated to increase glutamate release in discrete rat brain regions, leading to the hypothesis of a possible involvement of the peptide in neurodegenerative pathologies. The role of neurotensin in modulating glutamate excitotoxicity and the possible neuroprotective action of the neurotensin receptor antagonist SR48692 were investigated in primary cultures of mesencephalic neurons by measuring [(3)H]dopamine uptake and tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry 24 hr after glutamate treatment. The exposure to glutamate (30 and 100 microM, 10 min) decreased [(3)H]dopamine uptake into mesencephalic neurons. Neurotensin (10 and 100 nM), added before glutamate (30 microM) exposure, significantly enhanced the glutamate-induced reduction of [(3)H]dopamine uptake. In addition, the peptide (10 nM) also significantly enhanced the effect of 100 microM glutamate. The effects of neurotensin were counteracted by the neurotensin receptor antagonist SR48692 (100 nM) and by the protein kinase C inhibitor calphostin C. The exposure to 100 microM, but not 30 microM, glutamate significantly reduced the number of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive cells, and neurotensin (10 nM) significantly enhanced this effect. SR48692 (100 nM) prevented the neurotensin-induced action. These findings support the view of a possible pathophysiological role of neurotensin in mesencephalic dopamine neuronal function. Furthermore, selective neurotensin antagonists in combination with conventional drug treatments could provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease.

Decrease of substance P in the parabrachial nucleus of multiple system atrophy

In the parabrachial nucleus (PBN), which has been known to play an important regulating role for various autonomic functions, many projecting nerve fiber terminals containing substance P (SP) from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and other areas are found and effect a modulatory influence on the transmission in the PBN. Postmortem brains were obtained from four multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients with autonomic failure and four control patients without any nervous disease, and an immunohistochemical staining for SP was performed on serial 10-microm-thick sections from paraffin-embedded pons including the PBN after immersion fixation in 10% formalin. In the PBN of all MSA patients, a marked decrease in SP-like immunoreactive (SPLI) nerve fiber terminals was revealed compared with the controls. In addition, an obvious astrocytosis was found in the PBN by simultaneous histopathological evaluation, for the preservation of neurons themselves. Therefore, the projecting SP pathway to the PBN may also be primarily involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of the autonomic failure of MSA patients.

Neuropeptides and the integration of motor responses to dehydration

Drinking and eating are critically important motivated behaviors whose expression is usually tightly linked; under conditions of spontaneous intake, disruption of one usually disturbs the other. This characteristic is exemplified by dehydration-induced anorexia in which increasing plasma osmolality leads to a centrally generated reduction in food intake, which is then rapidly reversed as water is again made available. This review discusses, at a systems level, how the brain is organized to generate these behaviors and how dehydration affects the expression of neuropeptides in sets of anatomically defined forebrain circuits that contribute to the integration of motor outputs. These findings are then used to consider how altered neuropeptidergic signaling operates within motor drive networks and how these changes may impact the way neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral motor systems respond to this fundamental homeostatic challenge.

Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders

Despite the fact that many research articles have been written about stress and stress-related diseases, no scientifically accepted definition of stress exists. Selye introduced and popularized stress as a medical and scientific idea. He did not deny the existence of stressor-specific response patterns; however, he emphasized that such responses did not constitute stress, only the shared nonspecific component. In this review we focus mainly on the similarities and differences between the neuroendocrine responses (especially the sympathoadrenal and the sympathoneuronal systems and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis) among various stressors and a strategy for testing Selye's doctrine of nonspecificity. In our experiments, we used five different stressors: immobilization, hemorrhage, cold exposure, pain, or hypoglycemia. With the exception of immobilization stress, these stressors also differed in their intensities. Our results showed marked heterogeneity of neuroendocrine responses to various stressors and that each stressor has a neurochemical "signature." By examining changes of Fos immunoreactivity in various brain regions upon exposure to different stressors, we also attempted to map central stressor-specific neuroendocrine pathways. We believe the existence of stressor-specific pathways and circuits is a clear step forward in the study of the pathogenesis of stress-related disorders and their proper treatment. Finally, we define stress as a state of threatened homeostasis (physical or perceived treat to homeostasis). During stress, an adaptive compensatory specific response of the organism is activated to sustain homeostasis. The adaptive response reflects the activation of specific central circuits and is genetically and constitutionally programmed and constantly modulated by environmental factors.

Irritable bowel syndrome: an update on therapeutic modalities

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common condition that a physician faces in the GI clinic. Of the general population, 10 - 25% suffer from symptoms judged to be IBS. The negative impact of this disease includes not only pain, suffering and direct medical expenses but also significant social and job-related consequences. IBS can be the result of dysfunction in any part of the brain-gut axis: alterations in the CNS caused by psychological or other factors, abnormal gastrointestinal motility, or heightened visceral sensations. Diagnosis is based on either the Manning or Rome-II criteria. Education, reassurance and emotional support are the cornerstones of successful treatment. The mainstays of the current therapeutic approach continue to be: stress management strategies, dietary modification entailing addition of dietary fibre and pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy is still limited to treating symptoms. Newer drugs that modulate motility or drugs that modulate visceral sensation may be useful in selected cases. Psychopharmacological agents are useful in the treatment of IBS, especially in those with psychological co-morbidity. Alternative therapies such as homeopathy, acupuncture, special diets, herbal medication and several forms of psychological treatments and hypnotherapy are sought by many patients and are now being offered by physicians as treatment options, either alone or in conjunction with conventional forms of therapy in patients with refractory symptoms.

A subpopulation of neurons in the rat rostral nucleus of the solitary tract that project to the parabrachial nucleus express glutamate-like immunoreactivity

In rodents, gustatory information is transmitted from second order neurons in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) to the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) in the pons. The chemical nature of this projection is unknown. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to determine if rNST neurons that project to the PBN express glutamate-like immunoreactivity. Projection neurons were retrogradely labeled following stereotaxic injection of rhodamine-filled latex microspheres into the right PBN of seven rats while glutamate-immunoreactive (GLU-IR) structures were visualized in the same tissue using an immunoperoxidase procedure. The number of single- and double-labeled neurons located in the right (ipsilateral) and left rNST, in each of the nuclear subdivisions as well as their position along the rostral-caudal axis of the rNST was determined. GLU-IR cell bodies were located throughout the rNST. Although the rostral central subdivision contained the highest percentage (33.8%) of GLU-IR perikarya, immunolabeled neurons were most concentrated (number/area of subdivision) within the medial subnucleus. The rostral third of the rNST contained the fewest (20. 5%) and lowest density of GLU-IR cell bodies. The highest percentage of rNST neurons retrogradely labeled from the PBN were located ipsilateral (85.4%) to the pontine injection site, in the middle third of the nucleus (44.2%) and within the rostral central subdivision (52.4%). Overall, 18% of the labeled rNST projection neurons were GLU-IR. The distribution of double-labeled neurons mirrored that of the projection neurons with the largest number located in the ipsilateral rNST (84.5%), middle third of the nucleus (40.5%) and rostral central subdivision (64.7%). These results indicate that glutamate may be a main component of the ascending pathway from the rNST to the PBN. In addition, since GLU-IR neurons were located throughout the rNST and most were not retrogradely-labeled, the current results suggest that glutamate may be an important neurotrans-mitter within the medulla.

The induction of pain: an integrative review

The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.