Strabismus after regional anesthesia for cataract surgery

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of isolated inferior rectus palsy

Aim

As isolated inferior rectus muscle (IRM) palsy represents a rare clinical entity, very limited information is available on this condition. The aim of this report was to elucidate the etiology, clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of isolated IRM palsy.

Methods

Isolated IRM palsy cases who underwent surgical treatments at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, China over the period from January 2008 to June 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Data evaluated from these cases included their etiology, ocular alignment, ocular motility, surgical procedures and surgical outcomes.

Results

A total of 61 patients (40 males, 21 females) were included in this review. Their mean ± SD age was 27.21 ± 16.03 years (range: 2 to 73 years). In these cases, 32 (52.5%) involved traumatic injury, 28 (45.9%) congenital hypoplasia or absence of inferior rectus and 1 (1.6%) with thyroid ophthalmopathy. The right eye was affected in 33 patients (54.1%), the left in 24 patients (39.3%), and both eyes in 4 patients (6.6%). The main clinical presentations consisted of hypertropia of the affected eye, motility limitation in abduction and depression and incyclotropia. After treatment consisting of various surgical approaches, including muscle repair or resection of the affected inferior rectus, recession of ipsilateral superior rectus, elongation of contralateral superior oblique and partial transposition of the horizontal rectus, the isolated IRM palsy was rectified in 49 patients (80.4%) with one surgery, while 11 cases (18.0%) required two surgeries and 1 case (1.6%) needed three surgeries. Finally, 52 patients (85.2%) showed a complete recovery, 6 (9.9%) improved and 3 (4.9%) experienced a surgical failure.

Conclusion

The main etiologies of isolated IRM palsy involved traumatic injury and developmental events. Overall, surgical outcomes of the various approaches employed were quite effective.

Does the addition of hyaluronidase improve the quality of peribulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery? - A randomized double blinded study

Purpose

To determine the necessity of hyaluronidase as an anesthetic adjuvant for peribulbar anesthesia during cataract surgery and to assess differences in anesthetic outcomes in the absence of hyaluronidase.

Methods

In this double blinded randomized study, 202 patients reporting for surgery for senile cataract in their first eye under regional ocular anesthesia without pre-existing extra ocular movement restriction were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group 1 – anesthesia without hyaluronidase, Group 2 – anesthesia with 50 IU/ml Hyaluronidase. Peribulbar block with 5 ml of anesthetic mixture of 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline and 0.5% bupivacaine with or without hyaluronidase was performed with 3 ml deposited in the infero-medial quadrant and 2 ml in the supero-medial quadrant followed by ocular massage. Surgeons’ score for akinesia, patients’ score for analgesia, augmentation of block if any and extra ocular movements on first post-operative day were compared between the groups.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in akinesia (p = 0.22, 0.68 and 0.98), analgesia (p = 0.44 and 0.09) or requirement of anesthetic augmentation (p = 0.3). Extraocular movement restriction was not noted in any patient. Onset of akinesia and analgesia was earlier in Group 2 (p = 0.004 and p = 0.005 respectively).

Conclusions

Hyaluronidase is not an essential adjuvant for peribulbar block for cataract surgeries. Appropriate deposition of a smaller volume of anesthetic agent and adequate ocular massage provide adequate and safe anesthesia.

Strabismus After Ocular Surgery

Many types of ocular surgery can cause diplopia, including eyelid, conjunctival, cataract, refractive, glaucoma, retinal, and orbital surgery. Mechanisms include direct injury to the extraocular muscles from surgery or anesthesia, scarring of the muscle complex and/or conjunctiva, alteration of the muscle pulley system, mass effects from implants, and muscle displacement. Diplopia can also result from a loss of fusion secondary to long-standing poor vision in one eye or from a decompensation of preexisting strabismus that was not recognized preoperatively. Treatment, which typically begins with prisms and is followed by surgery when necessary, can be challenging. In this review, the incidence, mechanisms, and treatments involved in diplopia after various ocular surgeries are discussed. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017;54(5):272-281.].

Diplopia as the Complication of Cataract Surgery

The authors present systematic review of aetiology and treatment of diplopia related to cataract surgery. The problem is set in the modern perspective of changing cataract surgery. Actual incidence is discussed as well as various modalities of therapeutic options. The authors provide the guidance for the contemporary cataract surgeon, when to expect potential problem in ocular motility after cataract surgery.

Post-cataract surgery diplopia: aetiology, management and prevention

Diplopia is an infrequent but distressing adverse outcome after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Many factors may contribute to the occurrence of this problem, including prolonged sensory deprivation resulting in disruption of sensory fusion, paresis of one or more extraocular muscles, myotoxic effects of local anaesthesia, optical aberrations (for example, aniseikonia) and pre-existing disorders (for example, thyroid orbitopathy). The purpose of this review is to present the aetiology and clinical features of diplopia after cataract surgery and to discuss the possible modalities for the prevention and treatment of this frustrating complication.