Monte Carlo simulation of biospecific interactions between cells and surfaces

Past, Present, and Future of Affinity-based Cell Separation Technologies

Progress in cell purification technology is critical to increase the availability of viable cells for therapeutic, diagnostic, and research applications. A variety of techniques are now available for cell separation, ranging from non-affinity methods such as density gradient centrifugation, dielectrophoresis, and filtration, to affinity methods such as chromatography, two-phase partitioning, and magnetic-/fluorescence-assisted cell sorting. For clinical and analytical procedures that require highly purified cells, the choice of cell purification method is crucial, since every method offers a different balance between yield, purity, and bioactivity of the cell product. For most applications, the requisite purity is only achievable through affinity methods, owing to the high target specificity that they grant. In this review, we discuss past and current methods for developing cell-targeting affinity ligands and their application in cell purification, along with the benefits and challenges associated with different purification formats. We further present new technologies, like stimuli-responsive ligands and parallelized microfluidic devices, towards improving the viability and throughput of cell products for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Our comparative analysis provides guidance in the multifarious landscape of cell separation techniques and highlights new technologies that are poised to play a key role in the future of cell purification in clinical settings and the biotech industry. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Technologies for cell purification have served science, medicine, and industrial biotechnology and biomanufacturing for decades. This review presents a comprehensive survey of this field by highlighting the scope and relevance of all known methods for cell isolation, old and new alike. The first section covers the main classes of target cells and compares traditional non-affinity and affinity-based purification techniques, focusing on established ligands and chromatographic formats. The second section presents an excursus of affinity-based pseudo-chromatographic and non-chromatographic technologies, especially focusing on magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Finally, the third section presents an overview of new technologies and emerging trends, highlighting how the progress in chemical, material, and microfluidic sciences has opened new exciting avenues towards high-throughput and high-purity cell isolation processes. This review is designed to guide scientists and engineers in their choice of suitable cell purification techniques for research or bioprocessing needs.

Paracoccus seriniphilus adhered on surfaces: Resistance of a seawater bacterium against shear forces under the influence of roughness, surface energy, and zeta potential of the surfaces

Bacteria in flowing media are exposed to shear forces exerted by the fluid. Before a biofilm can be formed, the bacteria have to attach to a solid surface and have to resist these shear forces. Here, the authors determined dislodgement forces of single Paracoccus seriniphilus bacteria by means of lateral force microscopy. The first measurement set was performed on very flat glass and titanium (both as very hydrophilic samples with water contact angles below 20°) as well as highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and steel surfaces (both as more hydrophobic surfaces in the context of biological interaction with water contact angles above 50°). The different surfaces also show different zeta potentials in the range between -18 and -108 mV at the measurement pH of 7. The second set comprised titanium with different RMS (root mean square) roughness values from a few nanometers up to 22 nm. Lateral forces between 0.5 and 3 nN were applied. For Paracoccus seriniphilus, the authors found as a general trend that the surface energy of the substrate at comparable roughness determines the detachment process. The surface energy is inversely proportional to the initial adhesion forces of the bacterium with the surface. The higher the surface energy (and the lower the initial adhesion force) is, the easier the dislodgement of the bacteria happens. In contrast, electrostatics play only a secondary role in the lateral dislodgement of the bacteria and may come only into play if surface energies are the same. Furthermore, the surface chemistry (glass, titanium, and steel as oxidic surfaces and HOPG as a nonoxidic surface) seems to play an important role because HOPG does not completely follow the above mentioned general trend found for the oxide covered surfaces. In addition, the roughness of the substrates (made of the same material) is limiting the lateral dislodgement of the bacteria. All examined structures with RMS roughness of about 8-22 nm on titanium prevent the bacteria from the lateral dislodgement compared to polished titanium with an RMS roughness of about 3 nm.

Affinity adsorption of cells to surfaces and strategies for cell detachment

The use of bio-specific interactions for the separation and recovery of bio-molecules is now widely established and in many cases the technique has successfully crossed the divide between bench and process scale operation. Although the major specificity advantage of affinity-based separations also applies to systems intended for cell fractionation, developments in this area have been slower. Many of the problems encountered result from attempts to take techniques developed for molecular systems and, with only minor modification to the conditions used, apply them for the separation of cells. This approach tends to ignore or at least trivialise the problems, which arise from the heterogeneous nature of a cell suspension and the multivalent nature of the cell/surface interaction. To develop viable separation processes on a larger scale, effective contacting strategies are required in separators that also allow detachment or recovery protocols that overcome the enhanced binding strength generated by multivalent interactions. The effects of interaction valency on interaction strength needs to be assessed and approaches developed to allow effective detachment and recovery of adsorbed cells without compromising cell viability. This article considers the influence of operating conditions on cell attachment and the extent to which multivalent interactions determine the strength of cell binding and subsequent detachment.

Affinity binding of cells to cryogel adsorbents with immobilized specific ligands: effect of ligand coupling and matrix architecture

The capture of human acute myeloid leukemia KG-1 cells expressing the CD34 surface antigen and the fractionation of human blood lymphocytes were evaluated on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-cryogel beads and dimethyl acrylamide (DMAAm) monolithic cryogel with immobilized protein A. The affinity ligand (protein A) was chemically coupled to the reactive PVA-cryogel beads and epoxy-derivatized monolithic cryogels through different immobilization techniques and the binding efficiency of the cell surface receptors specific antibody-labeled cells to the gels/beads was determined. The binding of cells to monolithic cryogel was higher (90-95%) compared with cryogel beads (76%). B-lymphocytes, which bound to the protein A-cryogel beads, were separated from T-lymphocytes with yields for the two cell types 74 and 85%, respectively. About 91% of the bound B-cells could be recovered without significantly impairing their viability. Our results show differences in the percentage of cell-binding to the immunosorbents caused by ligand density, flow shear forces and bond strength between the cells and the affinity surface once distinct chemical coupling of protein A, size of beads, sequence of antibody binding to protein A adsorbents, morphology and geometry of surface matrices were compared.