Temperature dependence of photoinduced electron transfer within self-associated porphyrin: guanine monophosphate complexes

Time-resolved infra-red studies of photo-excited porphyrins in the presence of nucleic acids and in HeLa tumour cells: insights into binding site and electron transfer dynamics

Cationic porphyrins based on the 5,10,15,20-meso-(tetrakis-4-N-methylpyridyl) core (TMPyP4) have been studied extensively over many years due to their strong interactions with a variety of nucleic acid structures, and their potential use as photodynamic therapeutic agents and telomerase inhibitors. In this paper, the interactions of metal-free TMPyP4 and Pt(II)TMPyP4 with guanine-containing nucleic acids are studied for the first time using time-resolved infrared spectroscopy (TRIR). In D2O solution (where the metal-free form exists as D2TMPyP4) both compounds yielded similar TRIR spectra (between 1450-1750 cm-1) following pulsed laser excitation in their Soret B-absorption bands. Density functional theory calculations reveal that vibrations centred on the methylpyridinium groups are responsible for the dominant feature at ca. 1640 cm-1. TRIR spectra of D2TMPyP4 or PtTMPyP4 in the presence of guanosine 5'-monophosphate (GMP), double-stranded {d(GC)5}2 or {d(CGCAAATTTGCG)}2 contain negative-going signals, 'bleaches', indicative of binding close to guanine. TRIR signals for D2TMPyP4 or PtTMPyP bound to the quadruplex-forming cMYC sequence {d(TAGGGAGGG)}2T indicate that binding occurs on the stacked guanines. For D2TMPyP4 bound to guanine-containing systems, the TRIR signal at ca. 1640 cm-1 decays on the picosecond timescale, consistent with electron transfer from guanine to the singlet excited state of D2TMPyP4, although IR marker bands for the reduced porphyrin/oxidised guanine were not observed. When PtTMPyP is incorporated into HeLa tumour cells, TRIR studies show protein binding with time-dependent ps/ns changes in the amide absorptions demonstrating TRIR's potential for studying light-activated molecular processes not only with nucleic acids in solution but also in biological cells.

Electron transfer in electron donor-acceptor ensembles containing porphyrins and metalloporphyrins

Recent advances in electron transfer chemistry of electron donor-acceptor ensembles reported containing porphyrins and metalloporphyrins reported in ICPP-2 are reviewed briefly by focusing on the fundamental aspects of electron transfer reactions.

Conformational dynamics and temperature dependence of photoinduced electron transfer within self-assembled coproporphyrin:cytochrome c complexes

The focus of the present study is to better understand the complex factors influencing intermolecular electron transfer (ET) in biological molecules using a model system involving free-base coproporphyrin (COP) complexed with horse heart cytochrome c (Cc). Coproporphyrin exhibits bathochromic shifts in both the Soret and visible absorption bands in the presence of Cc and an absorption difference titration reveals a 1:1 complex with an association constant of 2.63 +/- 0.05 x 10(5) M(-1). At 20 degrees C, analysis of time-resolved fluorescence data reveals two lifetime components consisting of a discrete lifetime at 15.0 ns (free COP) and a Gaussian distribution of lifetimes centered at 2.8 ns (representing (1)COP --> Cc ET). Temperature-dependent, time-resolved fluorescence data demonstrate a shift in singlet lifetime as well as changes in the distribution width (associated with the complex). By fitting these data to semiclassical Marcus theory, the reorganizational energy (lambda) of the singlet state electron transfer was calculated to be 0.89 eV, consistent with values for other porphyrin/Cc intermolecular ET reactions. Using nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy the temperature dependences of the forward and thermal back ET originating from triplet state were examined ((3)COP --> Cc ET). Fits of the temperature dependence of the rate constants to semiclassical Marcus theory gave lambda of 0.39 eV and 0.11 eV for the forward and back triplet ET, respectively (k(f) = (7.6 +/- 0.3) x 10(6) s(-1), k(b) = (2.4 +/- 0.3) x 10(5) s(-1)). The differing values of lambda for the forward and back triplet ET demonstrate that these ET reactions do not occur within a static complex. Comparing these results with previous studies of the uroporphyrin:Cc and tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin:Cc complexes suggests that side-chain flexibility gives rise to the conformational distributions in the (1)COP --> Cc ET whereas differences in overall porphyrin charge regulates gating of the back ET reaction (reduced Cc --> COP(+)).