Ventajas y peculiaridades del abordaje laparoscópico en el anciano

Is laparoscopic TAPP the preferred approach for the treatment of inguinal hernia? Technique, indications and future perspectives

The repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in General Surgery units. The laparoscopic approach for these hernias will be clearly considered as the gold standard, based on its advantages over the open approach. There are no clear advantages of the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) over the totally preperitoneal approach (TEP), although it has been shown to be more reproducible, presenting a shorter learning curve, although it presents more possibilities of developing trocar site hernias. Laparoscopic TAPP could be superior to TEP in the following indications: incarcerated hernias, emergencies, previous preperitoneal surgery, previous Pfanestiel-type incision, recurrent hernias, inguinoscrotal hernias and obese, being also a better alternative for females. Robotic TAPP is a safe approach with similar results to laparoscopy; however, it is related to an increase in costs and operating time. The value of this technology for the repair of complex hernias (multiple recurrences, inguino-scrotal or after previous preperitoneal surgery) remains to be determined, since they represent a certain challenge for the conventional laparoscopic approach. On the other hand, robotic repair of inguinal hernias may be a way to reduce the learning curve before addressing complex ventral hernias. Finally, artificial intelligence applied to the laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia will undoubtedly have a significant impact in the future especially to determine the best the indications for this approach, on the performance of a safer technique, on the correct selection of meshes and fixation mechanisms, and on learning curve.

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarian patients. A comparative study between two geriatric population groups]

INTRODUCTION

In the current article, we analyse the results and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Retrospective study in patients older than 80 years, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2002 and August 2007. Variables analysed were presentation, physical condition, anaesthetic risk, conversion rate, morbidity and hospital stay. A comparison was made with patients aged between 70 and 79 years old. The chi(2) and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was defined as a p value less than 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were operated on, of which 39 (63%) were women and 25 men, with a mean age 83.7 years. Surgery was scheduled in 40 (62.5%) cases and urgent in 24 cases. The conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 10.9% and the average hospital stay was 3.9 days. Two patients required re-intervention and two patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis in octogenarians. The laparoscopic approach should be considered for the management of acute cholecystitis in the very old (except where contraindicated) before the development of complications.

[Acute cholecystitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of age in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for the treatment of acute cholecystitis by determining the benefits and postoperative complications in patients older than 65 years.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between January 2003 and March 2006, we performed 134 urgent LC for acute cholecystitis: 58 patients older than 65 years (group 1) were compared with 76 patients younger than 65 years (group 2). Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between groups 1 and 2. ASA score was used in the preoperative anesthetic evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 31.2% of patients in group 1 had high surgical risk (24% ASA III and 9.2% ASA IV). The conversion rate was 24.1% in group 1 versus 11.3% in group 2 (p = 0.04), due to difficulty in surgical dissection and advanced cholecystitis. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 +/- 3.2 days in group 1 versus 3.3 +/- 2.4 days in group 2 (p = 0.001). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 33.1% and 18.7% respectively, with a predominance of infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although age should not be an exclusion factor for LC, the conversion rate, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay are increased in the elderly. Higher morbidity due to the underlying disease and longer disease duration with more advanced cholecystitis complicate the laparoscopic approach in these patients.