[Surgery and blood transfusion in Jehovah's witnesses: a medical-legal review]

End-of-life Decision-making and Religious Beliefs

This paper analyzes the opinions on and attitudes towards the end of life among the population residing in Argentina. The data presented are taken from the Second National Survey of Religious Beliefs and Attitudes in Argentina, which was conducted on a multi-stage sample of 2421 cases in 89 districts throughout the country. Opinions about the end of life include positions in favor of euthanasia, requesting life extension through life support technologies, and leaving death to God’s will. Religious beliefs and affiliations prove to be determining variables in the positions taken by Argentine citizens regarding the end of life, death, and euthanasia. Furthermore, among those without any religious affiliation, some positions of autonomy over their bodies stand out: prolonging life and bringing life to an end, which means that their support for euthanasia can be assumed. The data presented here intend to contribute to planning health policies about the end-of-life process. The different views on this process or, in other words, the beliefs, values, and needs of patients and their families have a unique relevance that must be considered in the organization of care settings in end-of-life contexts.

Transoperative refusion: a simple and safe method in emergency surgery

The objective is to reinforce the importance of blood reinfusion as a cheap, safe and simple method, which can be used in small hospitals, especially those in which there is no blood bank. Moreover, even with the use of devices that perform the collection and filtration of blood, more recent studies show that the cost-benefit ratio is much better when autologous transfusion is compared with blood transfusions, even when there is injury to hollow viscera and blood contamination. It is known that the allogeneic blood transfusion carries a number of risks to patients, among them are the coagulation disorders mediated by excess enzymes in the conserved blood, and deficiency in clotting factors, mainly the Factor V, the proacelerin. Another factor would be the risk of contamination with still unknown pathogens or that are not investigated during screening for selection of donors, such as the West Nile Fever and Creutzfeldt-Jacob, better known as "Mad Cow" disease. Comparing both methods, we conclude that blood autotransfusion has numerous advantages over heterologous transfusion, even in large hospitals. We are not against blood transfusions, just do not agree that the patient's own blood is discarded without making sure there will be enough blood in stock to get him out of the hemorrhagic shock.

[Is the claiming of costs justifiable in Jehovah's witness surgical patients after healthcare that is not part of the public health system?]

INTRODUCTION

Jehovah's witnesses refuse blood transfusions. The conflict arises when the patient, entitled to public health treatment, come to surgical centres without blood, to later claim the costs incurred.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the legal claims for the refunding of costs by Jehovah's witnesses treated outside the public health system. To make a cost comparison regarding this, using Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in a similar hypothetical healthcare model and equal to a stay in our hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was made of the High, Constitutional, and Supreme Court rulings. A cost analysis was made using the clinical information obtained in the rulings, to process this in the DRG in our hospital using 3MHealth Information Systems.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

The State is not obliged to finance religious aspects or those outside the general interest. The establishment of working protocols would avoid ethical conflicts. There are very difficult to justify differences in the costs demanded, 431,001.66 €, and compared to a model with an equal stay, 397,404.48 €.