Urinary free light chain analysis by the Freelite immunoassay: a preliminary study in multiple myeloma

Diagnostic Advances in Multiple Myeloma

There have been several advances in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) in recent years. Serum free light chains have improved the ability to diagnose light chain MM; however, there are still difficulties in the serologic diagnosis of MM in some cases, particularly IgA MM. A novel heavy/light chain assay is able to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in these cases. Free light chains may also improve the diagnosis of extramedullary disease in difficult cases such as disease involving the central nervous system, pleura, or ascites. Advances in imaging such as whole body low-dose computed tomography (CT) whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have improved sensitivity in identifying lytic bone lesions, which would enable earlier treatment, and monitoring of osseous disease particularly in non- or oligosecretory disease. New techniques such as fused PET/MRI may further enhance the diagnosis of both bone lesions and extramedullary disease.

A Patient with Abnormal Kidney Function and a Monoclonal Light Chain in the Urine

Monoclonal gammopathy is increasingly recognized as a cause of kidney injury. These renal conditions behave differently than ones without monoclonal gammopathy and require specific treatment. To avoid misdiagnosis, testing for paraprotein should be performed in addition to vasculitis and autoimmune diseases serologies in adults with unexplained AKI or proteinuria. Because the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy is much more common than glomerular diseases, the nephrotoxicity of the monoclonal protein must be confirmed before cytotoxic therapy is initiated. This can only be done by a kidney biopsy. After a monoclonal gammopathy of renal significant is verified, the evaluation should then focus on the identification of the pathologic clone, because therapy is clone specific. We present this patient to illustrate the clinical presentation of a patient with renal dysfunction and a monoclonal gammopathy. This patient is also used to discuss the diagnostic process in detail when monoclonal gammopathy-associated renal disease is suspected.

[Value of serum free light chains assay in plasma cell disorders]

The identification and quantification of the monoclonal immunoglobulin in Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) is based on electrophoresis, immunofixation (IFE) and on immunoglobulins nephelometric measurement. Even though the combination of these techniques is highly sensitive, there are two entities which pose a diagnostic challenge: Non-secretory Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Amyloidosis (AL) patients. Furthermore, when it comes to the results, these techniques have a degree of subjective interpretation and the IFE does not provide quantitative results. Within these limitations a new assay capable of quantifying free light chains (FLC) in serum has been developed. This is a great improvement in PCD and its major indication is the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with AL and non-secretory MM. In addition, its use has been recommended in the screening of all gammopathies; in the prognostic evaluation of MM and other PCD; and the definition of the stringent complete response for patients who achieve a complete remission (CR) with negative IFE and a normalized FLC ratio.

International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders

The serum immunoglobulin-free light chain (FLC) assay measures levels of free kappa and lambda immunoglobulin light chains. There are three major indications for the FLC assay in the evaluation and management of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders (PCD). In the context of screening, the serum FLC assay in combination with serum protein electrophoresis (PEL) and immunofixation yields high sensitivity, and negates the need for 24-h urine studies for diagnoses other than light chain amyloidosis (AL). Second, the baseline FLC measurement is of major prognostic value in virtually every PCD. Third, the FLC assay allows for quantitative monitoring of patients with oligosecretory PCD, including AL, oligosecretory myeloma and nearly two-thirds of patients who had previously been deemed to have non-secretory myeloma. In AL patients, serial FLC measurements outperform PEL and immunofixation. In oligosecretory myeloma patients, although not formally validated, serial FLC measurements reduce the need for frequent bone marrow biopsies. In contrast, there are no data to support using FLC assay in place of 24-h urine PEL for monitoring or for serial measurements in PCD with measurable disease by serum or urine PEL. This paper provides consensus guidelines for the use of this important assay, in the diagnosis and management of clonal PCD.

Clinical usefulness of free light chain concentration as a tumor marker in multiple myeloma

Monoclonal immunoglobulin, as a marker for monoclonal gammopathy, is evaluated by protein electrophoresis (PEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). However, PEP and IFE are not satisfactory in sensitivity, objectivity, and facility. Recently, a highly sensitive, automated immunoassay for measurement of free light chain (FLC) concentrations in serum and urine has been developed for the identification and monitoring of patients with monoclonal gammopathy. To explore the clinical usefulness of measurement of FLC concentrations, we measured the kappa and lambda FLC concentrations and calculated the kappa/lambda FLC ratios for three groups [multiple myeloma (MM), other diseases, and control] and compared the results of the FLC assay with the results of PEP or IFE. The concentrations of serum kappa and lambda FLCs and the kappa/lambda FLC ratios for the MM group and non-MM groups were distinct. In the MM group, some sera and urine samples had no evidence of M protein on PEP and IFE, but FLC assay showed abnormal concentrations of FLCs and abnormal kappa/lambda FLC ratios in most cases. As compared with the PEP, the kappa/lambda FLC ratio revealed higher sensitivity in all diagnostic ranges with different cutoff values. Particularly, when the cutoff value 2.0 for kappa/lambda FLC ratio was used, specificity and positive predictive value were largely improved than when the cutoff values 1.2 and 1.5 were used. These findings indicated that FLC assay enables to detect myeloma patients with very low M protein due to early stage or after therapy and to distinguish patients with monoclonal increase of FLC from patients with polyclonal increase of FLC due to other conditions, particularly using kappa/lambda FLC ratio 0.3-2.0 as a diagnostic range. Despite some technical limitations of the assay, the incorporation of kappa/lambda FLC ratios with FLC concentrations is useful in the detection of M protein, particularly with negative serum or urine IFE results, and differentiation of monoclonal gammopathies from patients with polyclonal increase in FLC due to other conditions.

Practical considerations for the measurement of free light chains in serum

BACKGROUND

A new immunoassay for free light chain measurements has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal light chain diseases and nonsecretory myeloma. We describe experience with and some potential pitfalls of the assay.

METHODS

The assay was assessed for precision, sample type and stability, recovery, and harmonization of results between two analyzers on which the reagents are used. Free-light-chain concentrations were measured in healthy individuals (to determine biological variation), patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplants, and patients with renal disease.

RESULTS

Analytical imprecision (CV) was 6-11% for kappa and lambda free-light-chain measurement and 16% for the calculated kappa/lambda ratio. Biological variation was generally insignificant compared with analytical variation. Despite the same reagent source, values were not completely harmonized between assay systems and may produce discordant free-light-chain ratios. In some patients with clinically stable myeloma, or post transplantation, or with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, free-light-chain concentration and ratio were within the population reference interval despite the presence of monoclonal intact immunoglobulin in serum. In other patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, values were abnormal although there was no clinical evidence of progression to multiple myeloma.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of free-light-chain measurements alone cannot differentiate some groups of patients with monoclonal gammopathy from healthy individuals. As with the introduction of any new test, it is essential that more scientific data about use of this assay in different subject groups are available so that results can be interpreted with clinical certainty.