Stool chymotrypsin activity measured by a spectrophotometric procedure to identify pancreatic disease in infants

Chymotrypsin activity signals to intestinal epithelium by protease-activated receptor-dependent mechanisms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chymotrypsin is a pancreatic protease secreted into the lumen of the small intestine to digest food proteins. We hypothesized that chymotrypsin activity may be found close to epithelial cells and that chymotrypsin signals to them via protease-activated receptors (PARs). We deciphered molecular pharmacological mechanisms and gene expression regulation for chymotrypsin signalling in intestinal epithelial cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The presence and activity of chymotrypsin were evaluated by Western blot and enzymatic activity tests in the luminal and mucosal compartments of murine and human gut samples. The ability of chymotrypsin to cleave the extracellular domain of PAR1 or PAR2 was assessed using cell lines expressing N-terminally tagged receptors. The cleavage site of chymotrypsin on PAR1 and PAR2 was determined by HPLC-MS analysis. The chymotrypsin signalling mechanism was investigated in CMT93 intestinal epithelial cells by calcium mobilization assays and Western blot analyses of (ERK1/2) phosphorylation. The transcriptional consequences of chymotrypsin signalling were analysed on colonic organoids.

KEY RESULTS

We found that chymotrypsin was present and active in the vicinity of the colonic epithelium. Molecular pharmacological studies have shown that chymotrypsin cleaves both PAR1 and PAR2 receptors. Chymotrypsin activated calcium and ERK1/2 signalling pathways through PAR2, and this pathway promoted interleukin-10 (IL-10) up-regulation in colonic organoids. In contrast, chymotrypsin disarmed PAR1, preventing further activation by its canonical agonist, thrombin.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results highlight the ability of chymotrypsin to signal to intestinal epithelial cells via PARs, which may have important physiological consequences in gut homeostasis.

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation evidence-based guidelines for management of infants with cystic fibrosis

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) offers the opportunity for early medical and nutritional intervention that can lead to improved outcomes. Management of the asymptomatic infant diagnosed with CF through newborn screening, prenatal diagnosis, or sibling screening is different from treatment of the symptomatically diagnosed individual. The focus of management is on maintaining health by preventing nutritional and respiratory complications. The CF Foundation convened a committee to develop recommendations based on a systematic review of the evidence and expert opinion. These guidelines encompass monitoring and treatment recommendations for infants diagnosed with CF and are intended to help guide families, primary care providers, and specialty care centers in the care of infants with CF.

Management of infants with cystic fibrosis: a summary of the evidence for the cystic fibrosis foundation working group on care of infants with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To inform the development of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Foundation guidelines on the care of infants with CF, we systematically reviewed the evidence for diagnosis and assessment of pancreatic and pulmonary disorders; management of pancreatic and pulmonary function; management of nutrition and nutritional disorders; and prevention and control of infections.

STUDY DESIGN

In May-June 2008, we searched The Cochrane Library for existing reviews; and MEDLINE, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the CF Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements, and the UK CF Trust for existing guidelines. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) were searched for primary studies in January 2008. Bibliographies of eligible articles were searched and expert input was sought. We selected English-language articles of any study design that provided original data on any of our questions on infants up to 2 years of age.

RESULTS

We identified 14 relevant guidelines and 3 Cochrane reviews. Fifty-nine articles (55 primary studies) were included. Only four of these were randomized controlled trials. Sample sizes of infants ranged from 2 to 768 study participants; the median sample size was 24. Of our 21 review topics, 5 topics had only one study while for 5 we identified no relevant studies. We identified one or no primary studies for 20 of 32 review questions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of evidence on the care of infants diagnosed with CF. For several of the review questions no guidelines or primary studies were identified, but for other questions, studies limited by weak design and small sample sizes were the only studies identified. With increasing numbers of infants with CF being diagnosed by newborn screening there is an opportunity to study the management of infants diagnosed with CF.

Fecal elastase-1 is superior to fecal chymotrypsin in the assessment of pancreatic involvement in cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Exocrine pancreatic function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) can be evaluated by direct and indirect tests. In pediatric patients, indirect tests are preferred because of their less invasive character, especially in CF patients with respiratory disease. Fecal tests are noninvasive and have been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity. However, there is no comparative study in CF patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and the specificity of the fecal elastase-1 (E1) test with the fecal chymotrypsin (ChT) test in a large cohort of CF patients and healthy subjects (HS).

DESIGN

One hundred twenty-three CF patients and 105 HS were evaluated. In all subjects, E1 concentration and ChT activity were measured. In the CF group, fecal fat excretion was also determined. The sensitivity and specificity of the fecal E1 test and ChT test were compared.

RESULTS

With a cutoff level of 3 U/g, ChT specificity in HS was similar to that of E1, but E1 sensitivity in CF patients was significantly higher (90.2% vs 81.3%). With a cutoff level of 6 U/g, ChT and E1 sensitivity in CF patients was identical, but E1 specificity in HS was again significantly higher (98.1% vs 90.5%). In all CF patients with severe steatorrhea (>15 g/d), E1 concentrations were abnormal and ChT activity was lower than 3 U/g. In contrast, in pancreatic-sufficient patients and patients with mild steatorrhea (< or =15 g/d), the E1 sensitivity was significantly higher compared with ChT (69.2% vs 41.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The fecal E1 test is superior to fecal ChT determination in the assessment of CF pancreatic involvement in pancreatic-sufficient patients and those patients with mild steatorrhea.

Biochemical tests in diseases of the intestinal tract: their contributions to diagnosis, management, and understanding the pathophysiology of specific disease states

Biochemical testing plays a major role in the complete evaluation of patients with suspected or established intestinal disease. We have classified these tests according to the medium in which they are performed: breath tests, including isotopic and nonisotopic tests, fecal tests, urine tests, serum tests, tissue tests, and other tests. The principles of various tests are outlined, and the role of each test in the evaluation of particular gastrointestinal disorders is discussed.

Biochemical tests in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and in the evaluation of pancreatic insufficiency

Chronic pancreatitis (adults) and cystic fibrosis (children) are the most common diseases leading to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency that, when reduced to < 5% of normal function, is characterised by steatorrhoea. The pathogenesis of the former condition is outlined, and recent concepts are emphasized. Biochemical tests to detect pancreatic insufficiency and to identify pancreatic disease as the cause of steatorrhoea include: serum enzyme tests (lipase, amylase, trypsin); stool chymotrypsin; isotopic tests based upon the assimilation of [14C] lipids and starch or excretion of the isotope as breath CO2, as well as the dual-labelled Schilling test; oral function tests utilising substrates hydrolysed by pancreatic enzymes such as benzoyl tyrosyl-p-aminobenzoic acid and fluorescein dilaurate; and duodenal intubation studies following meal-induced or hormonal stimulation of the pancreas. The rationale for these tests and the cumulative clinical experience of their utility are reviewed. A recommended diagnostic strategy is briefly presented. The role of various biochemical procedures to evaluate the efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is also described.

Enzymes as agents for the treatment of disease

The replacement of genetically deficient enzymes in patients with inherited metabolic disorders by infusion of purified enzymes or by organ transplantation has had very limited success, although good results with bone marrow transplantation have been obtained in some patients with mucopolysaccharidosis, Gaucher disease and inherited immunodeficiency diseases. Genetic engineering of the patient's lymphocytes may ultimately render these approaches redundant, at least for some of these diseases. Treatment of chronic pancreatic insufficiency and of disaccharidase deficiency with oral enzymes can be very effective; therapy can be monitored in the latter by measuring the breath hydrogen excretion and in the former by a range of tests of which stool chymotrypsin assay is the most convenient. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by intracoronary perfusion of thrombolytic enzymes can improve both cardiac function and long-term survival if given early enough. Successful reperfusion can be identified by changes in the kinetics of serum enzyme release and clearance, especially for the isoenzymes and isoforms of creatine kinase. In cancer chemotherapy, L-asparaginase has long been a useful adjunct in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but recent experience suggests a role in acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia as well.