High percentage of false positive cardiac troponin I results in patients with rheumatoid factor

Review of Literature and Recommended Procedures for Management of Unusual Cases of False Positive Troponin Tests

Heterophile antibodies are immunoglobulins produced by the immune system in response to exposure to animal and bacterial antigens, blood transfusions, autoimmune disorders, hematologic malignancies, dialysis, and pregnancy. Recently, these antibodies have garnered significant attention due to their impact on the accuracy of laboratory test results. Heterophile antibodies can bind not only to specific antigens but also to those from different species, including the antibodies used in laboratory tests. This cross-reactivity with foreign proteins is the basis for their interference in immunological assays, such as those measuring cardiospecific troponins (cTn). This manuscript reviews the literature on cases of heterophile antibody interference in troponin testing and proposes an algorithm for identifying such interference when clinical discrepancies arise. Recognizing and addressing heterophile antibody interference is crucial, particularly for tests like those for troponins, which are key biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of emergency and intensive care patients. The literature emphasizes the need for accurate procedures to distinguish true cardiac damage from false positives, thereby preventing unnecessary additional tests and hospitalizations.

Troponin Test, Not Only a Number: An Unusual Case of False Positive

Heterophile antibodies, which can arise from infections, autoimmune disorders, or exposure to animal antigens, can interfere with immunoassays. These antibodies can cross-react with the test reagents used in troponin assays, causing a false elevation in troponin levels. The paper describes a case of a 37-year-old male drug abuser admitted to the emergency room with chest pain. A series of troponin measurements performed using different assays gave discrepant results. Only thanks to the use of Scantibodies HBT tubes, which remove heterophile antibodies, was it possible to make a correct diagnosis of troponin negativity. In conclusion, a correct laboratory/clinical approach to the identification of heterophile antibody interference is essential for accurate troponin testing in order to avoid false positive results. Implementing neutralizing tests can significantly improve the reliability of these diagnostic assays, ensuring better patient outcome.

Investigating outlier rates of cardiac troponin I and troponin T assays: A systematic review

Objectives

This review aimed to harmoniously summarize and compare outlier rates for various cardiac troponin (cTn) assays, including high-sensitivity-cTn (hs-cTn) assays and contemporary cTn (generation of assays prior to hs-cTn ones) assays, from the published studies.

Methods

The PRISMA guidelines were utilized to perform this systematic review. Five databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched using specific keywords up to June 30th, 2023. Studies reporting specifically calculated outlier rates for cTn assays when conducting in-vitro diagnosis in human samples were included. Selected studies were then further assessed using the GRADE tool.

Results

Thirteen studies were included. The data from the studies were summarized statistically in this review. The results showed substantial evidence of improved analytical robustness or reduced respective mean rates of outliers, critical outliers, and analytical outliers for hs-cTn assays (0.14 %, 0.18 %, and 0.18 %) compared to contemporary cTn assays (0.63 %, 0.71 %, and 0.50 %).

Conclusion

The findings offer promisingly provide a comprehensive reference for laboratory scientists and clinical staff in choosing the most suitable cTn assay for patient care regrading outlier rates. Besides, this review reveals the advancements of hs-cTn assays with lower outlier rates than contemporary cTn assays. The emerging challenges for continuously improving analytical robustness of cTn assays are also elaborated.

Falsely decreased vancomycin caused by rheumatoid factor: A case report

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is associated with potential nephrotoxicity and trough concentrations need to be monitored in certain patients. Falsely decreased vancomycin measurement may result in overtreatment and need to be identified promptly by clinicians and pharmacists to avoid toxicities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report a case of rheumatoid factor-mediated falsely low vancomycin measurement with Abbott particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) method. Reanalyzing the sample using an alternative method, removing the interferences using heterophile blocking reagent as well as rheumatoid factor clean-up solution all helped to solve the false results. Results from alternative method and interference studies showed vancomycin concentrations reached toxic concentrations in the patient and administration of the drug was immediately terminated. The patient experienced a transient increase in serum creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though most modern immunoassays use blocking agents to neutralize interfering antibodies such as rheumatoid factor, it is important for health care professionals to understand that occasional interference still occurs due to the heterogeneous nature of rheumatoid factor.

Analytical robustness of nine common assays: frequency of outliers and extreme differences identified by a large number of duplicate measurements

INTRODUCTION

Duplicate measurements can be used to describe the performance and analytical robustness of assays and to identify outliers. We performed about 235,000 duplicate measurements of nine routinely measured quantities and evaluated the observed differences between the replicates to develop new markers for analytical performance and robustness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Catalytic activity concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and concentrations of calcium, cholesterol, creatinine, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate, triglycerides and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in 237,261 patient plasma samples were measured in replicates using routine methods. The performance of duplicate measurements was evaluated in scatterplots with a variable and symmetrical zone of acceptance (A-zone) around the equal line. Two quality markers were established: 1) AZ95: the width of an A-zone at which 95% of all duplicate measurements were within this zone; and 2) OPM (outliers per mille): the relative number of outliers if an A-zone width of 5% was applied.

RESULTS

The AZ95 ranges from 3.2% for calcium to 11.5% for CRP and the OPM from 5 (calcium) to 250 (creatinine). Calcium, TSH and cholesterol have an AZ95 of less than 5% and an OPM of less than 50.

CONCLUSIONS

Duplicate measurements of a large number of patient samples identify even low frequencies of extreme differences and thereof defined outliers. We suggest two additional quality markers, AZ95 and OPM, to complement description of assay performance and robustness. This approach can aid the selection process of measurement procedures in view of clinical needs.

Advances in Cardiac Biomarkers of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a pathophysiological spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, all of which have significant morbidity and mortality. ACS was once considered an acute condition; however, new treatment strategies and improvements in biomarker assays have led to ACS being an acute and chronic disease. Cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, and there is considerable interest and efforts toward development and implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays worldwide. Analytical and clinical performance characteristics of hs-cTn assays as well as testing limitations are important for laboratorians and clinicians to understand in order to utilize testing appropriately. Furthermore, expanding the clinical utility of hs-cTn into other cohorts such as asymptomatic community dwelling populations, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease populations supports novel opportunities for improved short- and long-term prognosis.

Influence of case definition on incidence and outcome of acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are common, but their incidence and outcome might depend greatly on how data are collected. We compared case ascertainment rates for ACS and myocardial infarction (MI) in a single institution using several different strategies.

METHODS

The Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals serve a population of ∼560 000. Patients admitted with ACS to cardiology or general medical wards were identified prospectively by trained nurses during 2005. Patients with a death or discharge code of MI were also identified by the hospital information department and, independently, from Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) records. The hospital laboratory identified all patients with an elevated serum troponin-T (TnT) by contemporary criteria (>0.03 µg/L in 2005).

RESULTS

The prospective survey identified 1731 admissions (1439 patients) with ACS, including 764 admissions (704 patients) with MIs. The hospital information department reported only 552 admissions (544 patients) with MI and only 206 admissions (203 patients) were reported to the MINAP. Using all 3 strategies, 934 admissions (873 patients) for MI were identified, for which TnT was >1 µg/L in 443, 0.04-1.0 µg/L in 435, ≤0.03 µg/L in 19 and not recorded in 37. A further 823 patients had TnT >0.03 µg/L, but did not have ACS ascertained by any survey method. Of the 873 patients with MI, 146 (16.7%) died during admission and 218 (25.0%) by 1 year, but ranging from 9% for patients enrolled in the MINAP to 27% for those identified by the hospital information department.

CONCLUSIONS

MINAP and hospital statistics grossly underestimated the incidence of MI managed by our hospital. The 1-year mortality was highly dependent on the method of ascertainment.

An investigation of the comparability of commercially sourced plasma and pharmaceutical study plasma, using total protein concentration

BACKGROUND

Control blood plasma is regularly used in bioanalysis, biomarkers and proteomics, and is often obtained from commercial sources. It has always been assumed that this plasma will be comparable to plasma drawn during a drug development study.

RESULTS

When compared using total protein concentrations, plasma from only one species (dog) demonstrated statistical comparability, plasma from all other species tested (human, rabbit, mouse and rat) shows a statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

If endogenous components of blood plasma are being measured, or if an assay technique does not significantly limit matrix effects, any assay controls should be prepared using control plasma from the drug development site, or using commercial plasma that has been screened against drug development site plasma.

Elevated Troponin I in the Absence of Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Report With Review of Literature

Cardiac troponins are the most sensitive and specific markers of myocardial injury. In fact, the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction (MI) states that troponins are the preferred cardiac marker for detecting myocardial injury. For the aforementioned reasons, troponin levels are routinely ordered for patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or any other possible presentations of MI. While troponin levels do reflect the extent of myocardial damage, they do not necessarily indicate myocardial ischemia in a subset of patients. Elevated troponin levels can be due to a wide array of mechanisms in the absence of myocardial ischemia and injury. Thus, relying solely on troponin levels, in the presence of a normal electrocardiogram (ECG), to diagnose myocardial ischemia can lead to unnecessary and expensive invasive testing. It is therefore important for the clinician to keep in mind the varying causes of troponin elevations in order to provide the highest value care to the patient. We present a case and review of literature regarding patients who present with elevated troponin levels in the absence of any coronary artery disease.

The non-cardiac use and significance of cardiac troponins

Cardiac Troponins are blood markers of myocardial damage and are widely utilised across all acute medical departments. However, with a massive rise in requests for this test, the interpretation of raised serum levels in the absence of cardiac sounding clinical features can become a clinical conundrum. This is especially true if the numerous causes of positive test results are not fully appreciated. A thorough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of this blood test in light of a patient population living longer, increasing in comorbidities and possible causes of false test results can provide invaluable support in establishing an accurate diagnosis and instigating effective management. This article will describe the history of cardiac markers along with a discussion of the various causes of elevated cardiac troponins outside acute coronary syndrome. It will elaborate on the applications and significance of this blood test and the potential uses of positive results with elevated serum Troponin levels.

Identifying and reducing potentially wrong immunoassay results even when plausible and "not-unreasonable"

The primary role of the clinical laboratory is to report accurate results for diagnosis of disease and management of illnesses. This goal has, to a large extent been achieved for routine biochemical tests, but not for immunoassays which remained susceptible to interference from endogenous immunoglobulin antibodies, causing false, and clinically misleading results. Clinicians regard all abnormal results including false ones as "pathological" necessitating further investigations, or concluding iniquitous diagnosis. Even more seriously, "false-negative" results may wrongly exclude pathology, thus denying patients' necessary treatment. Analytical error rate in immunoassays is relatively high, ranging from 0.4% to 4.0%. Because analytical interference from endogenous antibodies is confined to individuals' sera, it can be inconspicuous, pernicious, sporadic, and insidious because it cannot be detected by internal or external quality assessment procedures. An approach based on Bayesian reasoning can enhance the robustness of clinical validation in highlighting potentially erroneous immunoassay results. When this rational clinical/statistical approach is followed by analytical affirmative follow-up tests, it can help identifying inaccurate and clinically misleading immunoassay data even when they appear plausible and "not-unreasonable." This chapter is largely based on peer reviewed articles associated with and related to this approach. The first section underlines (without mathematical equations) the dominance and misuse of conventional statistics and the underuse of Bayesian paradigm and shows that laboratorians are intuitively (albeit unwittingly) practicing Bayesians. Secondly, because interference from endogenous antibodies is method's dependent (with numerous formats and different reagents), it is almost impossible to accurately assess its incidence in all differently formulated immunoassays and for each analytes/biomarkers. However, reiterating the basic concepts underpinning interference from endogenous antibodies can highlight why interference will remain analytically pernicious, sporadic, and an inveterate problem. The following section discuses various stratagems to reduce this source of inaccuracy in current immunoassay results including the role of Bayesian reasoning. Finally, the role of three commonly used follow-up affirmative tests and their interpretation in confirming analytical interference is discussed.

Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)

Numerous definitions have been proposed for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary revascularization. The universal definition for MI designates post procedural biomarker thresholds for defining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related MI (type 4a) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related MI (type 5), which are of uncertain prognostic importance. In addition, for both the MI types, cTn is recommended as the biomarker of choice, the prognostic significance of which is less well validated than CK-MB. Widespread adoption of a MI definition not clearly linked to subsequent adverse events such as mortality or heart failure may have serious consequences for the appropriate assessment of devices and therapies, may affect clinical care pathways, and may result in misinterpretation of physician competence. Rather than using an MI definition sensitive for small degrees of myonecrosis (the occurrence of which, based on contemporary large-scale studies, are unlikely to have important clinical consequences), it is instead recommended that a threshold level of biomarker elevation which has been strongly linked to subsequent adverse events in clinical studies be used to define a "clinically relevant MI." The present document introduces a new definition for "clinically relevant MI" after coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), which is applicable for use in clinical trials, patient care, and quality outcomes assessment.

Negative interference in serum HBsAg ELISA from rheumatoid factors

BACKGROUND

RF(Rheumatoid factor) is usually thought to cause positive interference in immunoassay. Recently, our study showed that high-concentration RFs caused negative interference as well as positive interference in serum HBsAg(Hepatitis B surface antigen) ELISA(Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), but it is unclear that RF causing negative interference is an anomaly produced by a certain ELISA kit or a common property of most of HBsAg ELISA kits.

METHODS

Serum models were made by blending HBsAg-positive sera and high- or moderate-concentration RFs sera at the ratio of 1: 9, then one-step and two-step ELISA were adopted to determine HBsAg in serum models.

RESULTS

No matter what kind of kit used, one-step ELISA showed that HBsAg S/CO( sample/cut off) values in serum models were significantly lower than original values. Bivariate correlations tests showed decline rates of HBsAg S/CO Values were not associated to serum RF concentrations ranging from 288 to 3560 IU/mL. HBsAg converted to be negative in 69.80% serum models with original-value ranging from 1.00 to 10.00, and in 2.68% serum models with higher original-value. RF causing decline of HBsAg S/CO value provided by one-step ELISA was more obvious than that provided by two-step ELISA.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that susceptibility of all HBsAg ELISA assays to interference from RF, leading to predominantly lower and in some cases "false-negative" results, and moreover, the lower the original HBsAg S/CO Value, the higher the false-negative rate.

False decrease of HBsAg S/CO values in serum with high-concentration rheumatoid factors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether high-concentration RFs cause false decrease of S/CO values of serum HBsAg.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Serum HBsAg was determined in 100 RF-positive sera using one-step ELISA. Twenty-three HBsAg-negative sera with high-concentration RFs were selected randomly to perform dilution with mixed normal sera. Serum models consisting of HBsAg and high-concentration RFs were made by blending high-concentration RFs and HBsAg-positive sera at the ratio of 9:1.

RESULTS

In the 23 samples, one-step ELISA showed that HBsAg-positive rate was 69.57% at dilution of 1:2, 60.87% at dilution of 1:4 and 40.00% at dilution of 1:8, whereas two-step ELISA showed that it was 100% without any dilution. Thirty serum models were made and divided into six groups. Median S/CO value of HBsAg was 3.00 in control, whereas it ranged from 0.13 to 1.78 in the six groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High-concentration RFs cause false decrease of S/CO values of HBsAg using one-step ELISA.

Outliers as a Cause of False Cardiac Troponin Results: Investigating the Robustness of 4 Contemporary Assays

BACKGROUND

It is important that cardiac troponin be measured accurately with a robust method to limit false results with potentially adverse clinical outcomes. In this study, we characterized the robustness of 4 analytical platforms by measuring the outlier rate between duplicate results.

METHODS

We measured cardiac troponin concurrently in duplicate with 4 analyzers on 2391 samples. The outliers were detected from the difference between duplicate results and by calculating a z value: z = (result 1 − result 2) ÷ √(SD1est2 + SD2est2), with z > 3.48 identifying outliers with a probability of 0.0005.

RESULTS

The outlier rates were as follows: Abbott Architect i2000SR STAT Troponin-I, 0.10% (0.01%–0.19%); Beckman Coulter Access2 Enhanced AccuTnI, 0.44% (0.25%–0.63%); Roche Cobas e601 TroponinT hs, 0.06% (0.00%–0.13%); and Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP TnI-Ultra, 0.10% (0.01%–0.19%). The occurrence of outliers was higher than statistically expected on all platforms except the Cobas e601 (χ2 = 2.7; P = 0.10). A conservative approach with a constant 10% CV and z > 5.0 identified outliers with clear clinical impact and resulted in outlier rates of 0.11% (0.02%–0.20%) with the Architect i2000SR STAT Troponin-I, 0.36% (0.19%–0.53%) with the Access2 Enhanced AccuTnI, 0.02% (0.00%–0.06%) with the Cobas e601 TroponinT hs, and 0.06% (0.00%–0.13%) with the ADVIA Centaur XP TnI-Ultra.

CONCLUSIONS

Outliers occurred on all analytical platforms, at different rates. Clinicians should be made aware by their laboratory colleagues of the existence of outliers and the rate at which they occur.

False positive cardiac troponin elevation due to heterophile antibodies: more common than we recognise?

A 53-year-old woman was admitted with non-exertional chest pain and elevated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) without dynamic changes of ischaemia on the ECG. She had recently undergone coronary angiography which had shown normal coronary vessels. Repeat angiography on this admission was again unremarkable. Samples of blood were sent for analysis using different troponin assays and demonstrated chronic basal elevation of cTnI while simultaneous assay for troponin T (cTnT) remained normal. Subsequent testing revealed the presence of heterophile antibodies interfering with the troponin I assay leading to a false positive result.

Influence of anti-infliximab antibodies and residual infliximab concentrations on the occurrence of acquired drug resistance to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) can be immunogenic for humans and lead to the formation of antibodies against IFX (anti-IFX Ab), which could induce acquired IFX resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the presence of anti-IFX Ab and residual circulating IFX levels are associated with acquired IFX resistance in RA.

METHODS

A multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between anti-IFX Ab, residual IFX concentrations, and acquired IFX resistance in a nested cohort within the Swiss RA registry (SCQM-RA).

RESULTS

Sixty-four RA patients on longstanding IFX therapy were included; 24 with an acquired therapeutic resistance to IFX and 40 with continuous good response to IFX. The two groups had similar disease characteristics, but patients with acquired IFX resistance required significantly higher dosage of IFX (5.4 mg/kg versus 4.3 mg/kg, p=0.02) and shorter infusion intervals (7.1 versus 8.7 weeks, p=0.01) than long-term good responders. The presence of residual IFX tended to be associated with a decreased risk of acquired therapeutic resistance (OR 0.4 [95% CI: 0.1-1.5]), while the presence of anti-IFX Ab tended to be associated with an increased risk of acquired therapeutic resistance (OR: 1.8 [95% CI: 0.4 - 9.0]). The presence of either high anti-IFX Ab levels or low residual IFX concentrations was strongly associated with acquired therapeutic resistance to IFX (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3 - 26.6). However, just 42% of patients with acquired IFX resistance had either low IFX or high anti-IFX Ab levels.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the assessment of anti-IFX Ab and residual IFX levels is of limited value for individual patients in routine clinical care.

Falsely elevated troponin I results due to outliers indicate a lack of analytical robustness

Aims

Troponin (Tn) is the preferred biochemical marker for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Spurious false Tn results (outliers) may cause significant problems with clinical management. We investigated the occurrence of outliers and whether this phenomenon could be explained by analytical imprecision.

Methods and results

Troponin I (TnI) was measured in duplicate with Beckman AccuTnI reagent if the first TnI result was ≥0.04 μg/L ( n = 5265). All TnI requests were performed in duplicate in a subset of samples for one calendar month ( n = 881). A total of 13,178 TnI requests were received during the study period. Variables were sample type, centrifugation speed and analyser. Results were identified as outliers when the difference between two results exceeded a critical difference (CD) limit defined by CD = z × √2 × SDAnalytical. Outliers at the 0.0005 probability level were detected in 102 of 5265 duplicate observations (1.94 ± 0.37%). This translated into an outlier rate of 0.55 ± 0.13% for all TnI results and 1.37 ± 0.31% for results above 0.04 μg/L. Outliers resulted only in falsely elevated TnI values and were not dependent on the analyser, centrifugation speed or sample type.

Conclusion

TnI outliers occurred more frequently than anticipated, could not be explained by analytical imprecision and indicated a lack of robustness in the assay. The high rate and the magnitude of the errors will complicate clinical management and carry a risk of detrimental patient outcome. The outlier rate is a useful parameter to define the robustness of assays.

Present and Future Biochemical Markers for Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome

The use of biochemical markers in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome has increased continually in recent decades. The development of highly sensitive and cardiac-specific troponin assays has changed the view on diagnosis of myocardial infarction and also extended the role of biochemical markers of necrosis into risk stratification and guidance for treatment. The consensus definition of myocardial infarction places increased emphasis on cardiac marker testing, with cardiac troponin replacing creatine kinase MB as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Along with advances in the use of more cardiac-specific markers of myocardial necrosis, biochemical markers that are involved in the progression of atherosclerotic plaques to the vulnerable state or that signal the presence of vulnerable plaques have recently been identified. These markers have variable abilities to predict the risk of an individual for acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the well-established markers of myocardial necrosis, with a special focus on cardiac troponin I, together with a summary of some of the potential future markers of inflammation, plaque instability, and ischemia.

False positive PTH results: An easy strategy to test and detect analytical interferences in routine practice

BACKGROUND

As other immunoassays, PTH determination is not free from interferences. Indeed, natural antibodies like heterophile antibodies (HAMA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) can induce falsely elevated results, leading to misdiagnosis and expensive unnecessary explorations. However, in routine practice, these interferences are not always obvious to detect.

METHODS

On 2084 PTH samples, we applied a validation strategy in four steps to screen for HAMA and rheumatoid factor interferences.

RESULTS

36% of our samples presented an elevated PTH. We found a clinically plausible reason for 91% of them. The remaining 63 suspicious samples were treated with HBT and 40% of them were found to be HAMA positive. RF determination was performed on the HAMA-negative samples and RF was positive in 21 of them. They were then treated with RF-Absorbent. Nine of these 21 samples presented RF interference.

CONCLUSION

Applying this strategy in our routine validation, we managed to avoid spuriously elevated PTH results, which could have caused medical errors as well as unnecessary cost-effective extra-investigations.

Negative Interference in Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassays by Circulating Troponin Autoantibodies

Background: There are numerous potential sources of interference in immunoassays. Our aim was to identify the blood component that causes negative interference in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) immunoassays based on antibodies against the central part of cTnI.

Methods: We isolated an interfering factor (IF) from a sample with low recovery of added cTnI, using several consecutive purification steps: caprylic acid precipitation, ammonium sulfate precipitation, and purification on Cibacron Blue gel and protein G columns. Purified IF was identified by gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometric analysis of protein bands. For the direct detection of human antibodies to cardiac troponin in serum samples, we developed immunoassays using three different anti-human immunoglobulin antibodies and measured troponin antibodies in samples with low and normal cTnI recovery.

Results: Treatment with caprylic acid did not precipitate IF, but IF precipitated at 40% ammonium sulfate saturation. IF bound to a Cibacron Blue gel column, from which it was eluted with a linear salt gradient; it also bound to protein G. Gel electrophoresis of purified IF showed two major bands with molecular masses corresponding to the heavy (∼50 kDa) and light chains (∼25 kDa) of immunoglobulin, and their identities were confirmed by mass spectrometry. The presence of troponin-specific autoantibodies was confirmed in samples with low recoveries of cTnI by three different immunoassays. The median signals were significantly higher in 10 samples with low recovery than in 10 samples with normal recovery of cTnI (P ≤ 0.007).

Conclusions: Circulating autoantibodies to cTnI or other proteins of the troponin complex can be a source of negative interference in cTnI immunoassays.

Quality specifications for biochemical markers of myocardial injury

BACKGROUND

The current approach to the diagnosis and monitoring of myocardial damage, recognizes to biochemical markers, and in particular to troponins, a key role being well demonstrated that all elevated values were associated with a worsened prognosis. In 2001, the IFCC Committee on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage published guidelines addressing the quality specifications for troponin assays in order to guarantee an analytical performance satisfying medical requirements and to standardize the quality of commercial methods. We describe how the application of quality specifications may be useful in daily practice, in order to provide advice to clinicians in the investigations of complex clinical cases of patients suffering from myocardial damage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The samples from three patients (cases 1-3) admitted to the hospital with symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease, showing high troponin I (cTnI) values not correlated with clinical condition, were investigated in order to verify the accuracy of the laboratory data. The standard of quality specifications related to assay specificity, imprecision and interferences were evaluated using different platforms for cTnI assays, carrying out imprecision profile and specific studies on more common interferents in immunoassays.

RESULTS

The obtained results allow us to demonstrate two cases of false-positive cTnI values attributable to a macrocomplex between a modified "in vivo" cTnI and immunoglobulin G (case 1) and to a presence of heterophilic antibodies affecting the RxL Dimension procedure (case 3). Instead, the accuracy of data obtained in case 2 was evidenced by the imprecision profile obtained in our laboratory and by the comparison of results between different laboratories using same platform.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of standardization as well as the wide differences in the development of each assay give rise to major concerns regarding cTnI determinations. The laboratory must therefore check the compliance between the analytical characteristics of the method utilised against recommended quality specifications for a reliable understanding of the frequency of false-positive results as well as other serious analytical errors.

Troponin I as a specific marker of myocardial injury: from theory to clinical practice in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of troponin I (TnI) elevation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 166 patients with elevated TnI and electrocardiographic (ECG) change consistent with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. They were transferred from the ED to our coronary care unit (CCU) to undergo coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Significant coronary stenosis were identified in 101 (61%) of patients. The other 65 patients were found to have different cardiac diseases (n=52) and in 13 patients diagnoses were not even related to the cardiovascular system. Wall motion abnormalities were assessed by echocardiographic wall motion score index (WMSI). Positive predictive value (PPV) of TnI varied from 53 to 65% for higher progressive values of the biomarker. The following PPVs were then calculated: PPV(TnI+CK-MB)=64%; PPV(TnI+WMSI)=72%, PPV(TnI+CK-MB+WMSI)=74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal values of TnI were detected in a variety of diseases not related to ACS. Even if troponin release indicates myocardial injury, it is not always synonymous with infarction or ischemia. A misinterpretation of TnI elevation may give rise to a diagnostic dilemma and cause unnecessary morbidity. An integration of biomarkers (TnI and CK-MB), ECG and WMSI will help identify false-positive ACS patients and avoid inappropriate admissions to CCU.

Common causes of troponin elevations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction: incidence and clinical significance

Cardiac troponin is a preferred biomarker of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Unfortunately, elevation of troponin can be detected in a variety of conditions other than acute MI. This review focuses on the incidence and clinical significance of increased troponin in conditions commonly associated with troponin elevations, particularly in those that may resemble acute MI.

An interfering component in cardiac troponin I immunoassays—Its nature and inhibiting effect on the binding of antibodies against different epitopes

OBJECTIVES

We recently reported on the occurrence of a common interfering factor (IF) that negatively affects determinations of cardiac troponin I (cTnI). The aim of the present investigation was to extend our initial finding by a detailed epitope-based determination of the location of IF and to reveal the approximate size and characteristics of IF.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Two-site immunoassays using combinations of 16 monoclonal and 2 polyclonal cTnI antibodies and 1 monoclonal troponin C (TnC) antibody were used to measure the analytical recovery of cTnI or cTnI-TnC in serum samples. Gel filtration of serum samples containing IF was performed and the analytical recovery of cTnI in the fractions was determined. EDTA-plasma samples to which cTnI had been added and serum samples containing endogenous cTnI were also separated by gel filtration.

RESULTS

The mean analytical recoveries of cTnI were 28.3% (range 7.5-55.1%) and of cTnI-TnC were 23.5% (range 8.7-51.8%) in samples containing IF when antibodies against midfragment epitopes of cTnI were used. The mean recovery of cTnI was 65.1% and 73.3% for antibodies with N- and C-terminal epitopes. Gel filtration of samples with low recovery of cTnI showed that the approximate molecular mass of IF was 50-200 kDa and that the cTnI elution profiles of samples containing IF were shifted towards higher molecular mass compared with samples with less IF.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibodies against midfragment epitopes of cTnI are affected by IF to a considerable but variable extent, and the presence of IF can be demonstrated by gel filtration.

Interferences in hormone immunoassays

Despite the numerous potential interferences that were discussed in this article, immunoassays, in general, are robust measurement systems. There is no practical way to identify specimens a priori that are likely to have immunoassay interference. Therefore, laboratories must rely on communication from clinicians to identify suspicious test values that may be caused by assay interference. After laboratories are alerted, multiple investigations can be undertaken. The common causes of immunoassay interferences (see Box I) are dependent on the analytic format. Competitive assays are most likely to have problems with cross-reactivity, whereas immunometric assays most often have problems with heterophile antibodies. The simple steps to test for dilutional linearity, spiked recovery, heterophile antibody blocking,and testing with alternate technology can help in the evaluations of cases that are suspected to have assay interference.

Negative interference in cardiac troponin I immunoassays from a frequently occurring serum and plasma component

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a sensitive marker of cardiac injury, but cTnI assays, like other immunoassays, are susceptible to interferences. We evaluated the presence of interfering substances by measuring the recovery of cTnI added to samples from volunteers and from patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

We added a ternary complex of human cardiac troponin (30-500 microg/L) or cTnI from serum to samples from healthy volunteers and ACS patients. We measured cTnI with a two-site sandwich time-resolved immunofluorometric assay using two antibodies against epitopes in the central stable part of cTnI. We also analyzed 108 heparin-plasma samples from 16 ACS patients with this assay, with an assay based on four antibodies, and with two commercial cTnI assays, AxSYM and ACS:180.

RESULTS

In samples from both healthy persons and ACS patients, recoveries for our assay were 1-167% (range). Recoveries were increased by addition of an antibody with an epitope in the N-terminal region of cTnI to the solid phase and an antibody with an epitope in the C-terminal region as a second detection antibody. In 2 of 16 patients with ACS, normal cTnI concentrations found when measured with the original assay demonstrated clinically abnormal (up to 10-fold higher) results with the additional N- and C-terminal antibodies in the early phase of infarction. Both commercial cTnI assays also demonstrated clinically misleading, falsely low cTnI concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Some yet unidentified, variable component, present in the blood from healthy volunteers and ACS patients, interferes with the binding of antibodies against epitopes in the central part of cTnI used in two commercial assays. Our approach to supplement the mid-fragment cTnI antibodies with antibodies in the N- and C-terminal parts of the molecule in an experimental assay represents a step in resolving this interferent.

Wrong Biochemistry Results: Two Case Reports and Observational Study in 5310 Patients on Potentially Misleading Thyroid-stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Immunoassay Results

Background: Immunoassays are used in almost all medical and surgical specialties, but they suffer from interference from proteins such as antibodies in some patients’ sera. Such interferences are usually reported in the literature only as case reports after the introduction of a new assay.

Methods: We undertook a prospective observational study on 5310 patients for whom the common immunoassay tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and/or gonadotropins were requested. All TSH and gonadotropin results were critically assessed for a mismatch between the clinical details and analytical results to identify samples suspected of analytical unreliability. These were tested further by three approaches to screen for interference.

Results: From the 5310 sets of results, 59 patients’ samples were identified as suspect and were tested further. Analytically incorrect results were found in 28 (0.53% of the total studied). The magnitude of interference varied, but in 23 of 28 patients (82%), it was considered large enough to have a potentially adverse effect on cost and/or the clinical care of these patients. Two cases, described in detail, illustrate the adverse effect of error on patient care and cost, and the second highlights the difficulties and limitations of current approaches for identifying interference and inaccuracy in immunoassays.

Conclusions: Because millions of TSH/gonadotropin tests are carried out in UK hospital laboratories alone, our data suggest that thousands of patients could be adversely affected by errors from interferences. Early identification of interference in cases with unusual results could be valuable.

The measurement of cardiac markers: where should we focus?

Cardiac markers are presently a hot topic, with active debate on their use. They now have a major role for cost-effective management of acute chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome. The laboratory has a pivotal role in proper selection and interpretation of available markers, depending on the creation of evidence-based knowledge about test utilization and sources of variation. This article reviews this knowledge in the field of biomarkers determination and summarizes the major analytic and clinical issues, with reference to various recent recommendations of laboratory medicine and cardiology expert groups.

Trusting numbers: uncertainty and the pathology laboratory

Diagnostic laboratories are increasingly seen as no more than "factories" that generate fast, reliable test results. The dangers of complacency about the use of tests are highlighted by recent cases of unnecessary surgery and chemotherapy based solely on false-positive test results. There are many causes of misleading laboratory data that can potentially lead to clinical mismanagement. Re-emphasis of the value of patient-relevant communication between the requesting doctor and the laboratory, and better undergraduate and postgraduate education about the appropriate use of tests, will help reduce the risks of test results leading to harm.

Recent approaches to the standardization of cardiac markers

The development of commercial assays for the determination of cardiac proteins has been one of the most important innovations in the field of cardiovascular diagnostics in the last decade. Some assays are, however, inadequately appraised prior to their introduction to clinical use. This paper focuses on some important preanalytical, analytical and interpretative problems, and summarizes the status of the ongoing local and international standardization efforts. The most urgent issue at the moment is the development of international reference materials, which can be used for the calibration of different assays, thus decreasing between-assay biases. In order to achieve comparability of test results, another important item is the standardization of the epitopes of the antibodies used for the assay development. Efforts to improve the precision of cardiac marker assays are also warranted. Finally, the effect of storage time and temperature on apparent marker concentration and the possible influence of different anticoagulants on measured marker values should clearly be evaluated.

Recent approaches in standardization of cardiac markers

The development of commercial assays for the determination of new cardiac proteins has been one of the most important innovations in the field of cardiovascular diagnostics in the last decade. This significant and sudden advancement has however led to some analytical and interpretative problems. There are problems in test standardization, imprecision, interference and preanalytical variability. We also need to standardize utilization of biomarkers in diagnosis and management of acute cardiac syndromes and clearly define decision thresholds. Powerful tests, such as cardiac markers, on which critical decisions will rest, need highly reliable methods. The feeling is that some assays are inadequately appraised prior to their introduction in clinical use. More studies are needed to implement new devices in the laboratory routine, and only well documented assays should be used in hospital-based laboratories. The technology to address many analytic problems is at hand, but commitment on the part of manufacturers and their customers in the laboratory community is essential.

Clinical significance of low-positive troponin I by AxSYM and ACS:180

We compared troponin I (TnI) assays (AxSYM [Abbott]; ACS:180 [Bayer]) in blood samples with concentrations less than 10 ng/mL (< 10 micrograms/L). Discordant results were evaluated by linearity studies and by testing for rheumatoid factor. Patients with discordant TnI results were compared with patients with concordant results and patients with negative TnI who had a new myocardial infarction or died within 2 months of initial testing. Positive TnI cutoffs by AxSYM and ACS:180 were 0.7 ng/mL (0.7 microgram/L) and 0.13 ng/mL (0.13 microgram/L), respectively. We identified 173 specimens that were repeatedly positive by at least 1 assay; 143 specimens were positive by both assays. Twenty samples positive for TnI by AxSYM were negative by ACS:180, while 10 samples positive by ACS:180 were negative by AxSYM. The discordant samples showed no evidence of interfering substances, including rheumatoid factor. Clinical follow-up showed that 26% of patients with elevated TnI by both assays, 33% with TnI positive only by AxSYM, 22% with TnI positive only by ACS:180, and 8% with negative TnI by AxSYM encountered at least 1 clinical end point. Variable detection rates by these assays for low-positive TnI represent a clinically significant problem.

Multicenter Evaluation of Five Assays for Myoglobin Determination

Background: Lacking assay standardization, different myoglobin methods may produce results that differ significantly.

Methods: A multicenter study was carried out to compare the analytical performance of five commercially available assays for myoglobin measurement. Linearity, imprecision, interferences, and method comparison were studied according to NCCLS guidelines, whereas reference values were determined following IFCC recommendations.

Results: The BNA and Opus showed relatively high imprecision (all but one total CV &gt;7.4%). Other assays showed lower CVs, but they varied among laboratories, particularly at a normal myoglobin concentration (Access, 6.0–11%; Hitachi, 3.8–5.8%; Stratus, 3.4–6.5%). Results were lower in anticoagulated samples on the Access, in heparin and citrate samples on the Stratus, and in citrate samples on the BNA and Opus, and increased in heparin and EDTA samples on the Hitachi. Use of separator gel produced results significantly lower (P &lt;0.001) on the Hitachi and higher (P = 0.016) on the Opus. Bilirubin, turbidity, and hemoglobin had no effect on evaluated methods, but rheumatoid factor affected the Access. In method comparisons, high correlation coefficients (≥0.98) were obtained. The Stratus gave higher results; however, the Access and BNA gave the lowest. The following upper reference limits (μg/L) for men and women, respectively, were obtained: Access, 70 and 52; BNA, 51 and 49; Hitachi, 67 and 58; Opus, 80 and 50; and Stratus, 86 and 63.

Conclusion: The possibility of high imprecision and marked disagreement among commercial myoglobin assays should be carefully considered in clinical practice.