New developments in the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen

Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization

Introduction:

Total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) are the most commonly used biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer. Despite standardization efforts, many available PSA assays may still produce discordant results. In the present study, we compared four PSA assays calibrated to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668 for tPSA and fPSA, respectively.

Methods:

Within the scope of the Prostate Cancer Early Detection Study Based on a ‘‘Baseline’’ PSA Value in Young Men (PROBASE), we tested tPSA and fPSA in serum samples from 50 patients in the four different PROBASE sites using four WHO-calibrated assays from Roche (Elecsys, Cobas), Beckman-Coulter (Access-II) and Siemens (ADVIA Centaur). The comparison was performed using the Passing–Bablok regression method.

Results:

Compared to Access, the median tPSA levels for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +3%, +11%–20%, and +17%–23%, respectively, while for median fPSA levels the differences for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +49%, +29%–31%, and +22%, respectively.

Discussion:

Despite all investigated assays being WHO-calibrated, the Elecsys and Cobas tPSA assays produced considerably higher results than the Access and Centaur assays. Differences in fPSA-recovery between all investigated assays were even more pronounced. When applying the tPSA cutoff of 3.1 μg/L recommended for WHO-calibrated assays, the use of higher calibrated assays may lead to unnecessary prostate biopsies. Conversely, if the historical threshold of 4 μg/L is applied when using WHO-calibrated assays, it could lead to falsely omitted prostate biopsies.

Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume (PV) in Korean men, as PV is a key predictor of both disease progression and response to medical therapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and PSA has been suggested as a proxy marker to estimate the total PV, mainly in Caucasians.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1999 to 2004, men aged 50-79 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and BPH were enrolled into this multicentre study. The analyses included 5716 patients presenting to 11 medical centres with LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score >8, peak urinary flow rate <15 mL/s); they had a mean age of 64.3 years, mean baseline PV of 36.9 mL, and mean baseline PSA level of 2.2 ng/mL. Men with a baseline PSA of >10 ng/mL were excluded, to reduce the likelihood of including occult prostate cancer. A biopsy was taken in those with suspicious findings on a digital rectal examination or serum PSA level of >4 ng/mL, to exclude prostate cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of serum PSA to predict threshold PV in men with BPH.

RESULTS

The PV and serum PSA level had an age-dependent log-linear relationship, the strength of which increased with age. The ROC curve analysis showed that PSA had good predictive value for various prostate volume thresholds (30, 40 and 50 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA-PV relationship in Korean men is similar to that in Caucasians, but Korean men have a slightly lower PSA level and a smaller PV than Caucasians. The approximate age-specific criteria for detecting Korean men with a PV of >40 mL were a PSA level of >1.3 ng/mL, >1.7 ng/mL and >2.0 ng/mL for men with BPH in their sixth, seventh and eighth decade, respectively.

Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update

BACKGROUND

The comparability of total and free prostate-specific antigen (tPSA and fPSA) results among commercial PSA assays has been suggested to be improved by calibration to WHO PSA reference materials and the development of equimolar-response assays. To characterize the current situation, we assessed 5 frequently used commercial assay combinations for tPSA and fPSA regarding the interchangeability of the PSA values and the ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA), equimolar characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Sera from 314 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 282 men with no evidence of prostate cancer (NPCa) were measured with tPSA and fPSA assays from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), Diagnostic Products Corporation (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010) and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur).

RESULTS

Method comparisons (Passing and Bablok regressions; Bland-Altman plots) showed assay-dependent results for tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA. With the Access tPSA values taken as 100%, tPSA concentrations varied from 87% (AxSYM and ADVIA Centaur) to 115% (Immulite), leading to different numbers of patients classified according to the commonly recommended tPSA cutoffs for performing a biopsy. Different %fPSA values also led to assay-dependent ROC analysis results, a finding that shows the importance for the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Interchangeability of tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA values obtained by commercial PSA assays remains inadequate, but attention to this issue may minimize the misinterpretation of PSA results obtained by different assays.

Evaluation of the clinical performance of equimolar- and skewed-response total prostate-specific antigen assays versus complexed and free PSA assays and their ratios in discriminating between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) exists in human serum in two principal forms, free PSA (fPSA) and protein-complexed PSA, predominantly PSA-ACT (alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin). Equimolar response (EMR) total PSA (tPSA) immunoassays measure each of these forms equally while skewed-response (SKR) assays overestimate or underestimate the tPSA concentration. The advantages of EMR over SKR tPSA assays are controversial.

METHODS

We used five nonhuman serum-based samples each containing a different proportion of fSPA:PSA-ACT (0:100 to 100:0, %:%) and patients' serum samples from men with histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n=94) or PCA (n=30) and a wide range of fPSA concentrations to investigate the molar response status of six tPSA assays. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the discriminatory power of these assays in distinguishing men with BPH from those with PCA.

RESULTS

The Bayer Immuno-1 tPSA (BtPSA) assay demonstrated EMR characteristics and diagnostic accuracy similar to the Hybritech Tandem-E and Tandem-R tPSA assays. At 90% sensitivity, EMR tPSA assays had higher specificity than SKR tPSA assays.

CONCLUSIONS

The BtPSA assay is an EMR tPSA assay and EMR assays provide improved diagnostic specificity over SKR tPSA assays.

Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of applying rigid threshold values in interpreting prostate specific antigen (PSA) results, by selecting and comparing five current methods for measuring free and total PSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples taken from an ongoing screening study for prostate cancer (total PSA by Tandem-E assay, 17 334 participants; biopsy criterion a PSA of 3.0 microg/L, 4 464 men) from men with a total PSA of 1.0-6.0 microg/L were measured for free and total PSA using the Access, Immulite, Elecsys and Prostatus analysis kits, in two patient groups, i.e. with prostate cancer or no evidence of disease.

RESULTS

Both patient groups had equal means for total PSA but not for free PSA. In all, 360 samples from men with cancer and 96 from men with no evidence of disease were analysed. All methods applied to both groups deviated statistically significantly from the Tandem-E result for total PSA, except for the Access kit. There was a close correlation among all the methods (correlation coefficients of 0.89-0.97). There were very discordant results for the combination of the Tandem-E vs Prostatus (8% difference), representing 315 participants at a threshold of 3.0 microg/L. For free PSA (free/total PSA) the situation was worse, with extreme differences of 32% and 36% for both patient groups (Elecsys vs Access).

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the threshold value applied as an indication for biopsy, when using the total PSA alone or combined with the free/total PSA, care is needed in interpreting patient groups because of the discordance among PSA assays.