Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Preferential meropenem absorption activated by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and shared with foscarnet, a phosphate transporter substrate, in the rat ileum

Meropenem (MEPM) is used for the treatment of serious infectious diseases solely as. INJECTABLE: Therefore, the development of an oral formulation would expand its clinical utility. To this end, an exact understanding of the absorption characteristics of MEPM is essential. In this study, MEPM absorption in the rat small intestine was investigated using an in situ loop technique and an in vitro diffusion chamber method. The disappearance ratios of MEPM (0.1 mM) were in the order of ileum > duodenum > jejunum. The extensive MEPM disappearance in the ileum was significantly reduced in the presence of foscarnet, a Na+-dependent phosphate transporter (NaPi-T) substrate, whereas glycylsarcosine, thiamine, taurocholic acid, and biapenem had no effects. The mucosal-to-serosal (M-to-S) permeation of MEPM across the rat ileal segments was very small under normal experimental conditions. However, on addition of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) to the experimental medium, the M-to-S permeation of MEPM markedly increased, showing a more than 7-fold greater apparent permeation coefficient. The present results suggest that MEPM is preferentially absorbed in the rat ileum, sharing with foscarnet, and that 1,25(OH)2D3 potentially activates the absorption of MEPM there. A likely candidate for involvement in MEPM absorption was NaPi-T or a related transporter.

Antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving new innovative kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

The Tablo Hemodialysis System is a new innovative kidney replacement therapy (KRT) providing a range of options for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The use of various effluent rate and treatment durations/frequencies may clear antibiotics differently than traditional KRT. This Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) study was to develop antibiotic doses likely to attain therapeutic targets for various KRT combinations.

METHODS

Published body weights and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were used to predict drug exposure for cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in virtual critically ill patients receiving five KRT regimens. Standard free β-lactam plasma concentration time above minimum inhibitory concentration targets (40-60%fT> MIC and 40-60%fT> MICx4) were used as efficacy targets. MCS assessed the probability of target attainment (PTA) and likelihood of toxicity for various antibiotic dosing strategies. The smallest doses attaining PTA ≥ 90% during 1-week of therapy were considered optimal.

RESULTS

MCS determined β-lactam doses achieving ∼90% PTA in all KRT options. KRT characteristics influenced antibiotic dosing. Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam regimens designed for rigorous efficacy targets were likely to exceed toxicity thresholds.

CONCLUSION

The flexibility offered by new KRT systems can influence β-lactam antibiotic dosing, but doses can be devised to meet therapeutic targets. Further clinical validations are warranted.

Correlation of antimicrobial fraction unbound and sieving coefficient in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review

Background

Fraction unbound has been used as a surrogate for antimicrobial sieving coefficient (SC) to predict extracorporeal clearance in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but this is based largely on expert opinion.

Objectives

To examine relationships between package insert-derived fraction unbound (Fu-P), study-specific fraction unbound (Fu-S), and SC in critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

Methods

English-language studies containing patient-specific in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters for antimicrobials in critically ill patients requiring CRRT were included. The primary outcome included correlations between Fu-S, Fu-P, and SC. Secondary outcomes included correlations across protein binding quartiles, serum albumin, and predicted in-hospital mortality, and identification of predictors for SC through multivariable analysis.

Results

Eighty-nine studies including 32 antimicrobials were included for analysis. SC was moderately correlated to Fu-S (R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001) and Fu-P (R2 = 0.41, P < 0.001). SC was best correlated to Fu-S in first (<69%) and fourth (>92%) quartiles of fraction unbound and above median albumin concentrations of 24.5 g/L (R2 = 0.71, P = 0.07). Conversely, correlation was weaker in patients with mortality estimates greater than the median of 55% (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.84). SC and Fu-P were also best correlated in the first quartile of antimicrobial fraction unbound (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.001). Increasing Fu-P, flow rate, membrane surface area, and serum albumin, and decreasing physiologic charge significantly predicted increasing SC.

Conclusions

Fu-S and Fu-P were both reasonably correlated to SC. Caution should be taken when using Fu-S to calculate extracorporeal clearance in antimicrobials with 69%–92% fraction unbound or with >55% estimated in-hospital patient mortality. Fu-P may serve as a rudimentary surrogate for SC when Fu-S is unavailable.

A Robust Statistical Approach to Analyse Population Pharmacokinetic Data in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Current approaches to antibiotic dose determination in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy are primarily based on the assessment of highly heterogeneous data from small number of patients. The standard modelling approaches limit the scope of constructing robust confidence boundaries of the distribution of pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, especially when the evaluation of possible association of demographic and clinical factors at different levels of the distribution of drug clearance is of interest. Commonly used compartmental models generally construct the inferences through a linear or non-linear mean regression, which is inadequate when the distribution is skewed, multi-modal or effected by atypical observation. In this study, we discuss the statistical challenges in robust estimation of the confidence boundaries of the PK parameters in the presence of highly heterogenous patient characteristics.

METHODS

A novel stepwise approach to evaluate the confidence boundaries of PK parameters is proposed by combining PK modelling with mixed-effects quantile regression (MEQR) methods.

RESULTS

This method allows the assessment demographic and clinical factors' effects at any arbitrary quantiles of the outcome of interest, without restricting assumptions on the distributions. The MEQR approach allows us to investigate if the levels of association of the covariates are different at low, medium or high concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

This methodological assessment is deemed as a background initial approach to support the development of a class of statistical algorithm in constructing robust confidence intervals of PK parameters which can be used for developing an optimised antibiotic dosing guideline for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.

Effect of renal clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy on appropriateness of recommended meropenem dosing regimens in critically ill patients with susceptible life-threatening infections

Background

Meropenem plasma concentration above a pathogen's MIC over the whole dosing interval (100% ƒT>MIC) is a determinant of outcome in severe infections. Significant variability of meropenem pharmacokinetics is reported in ICU patients.

Objectives

To characterize meropenem pharmacokinetics in variable CLCR or renal replacement therapy and assess the appropriateness of recommended regimens for MIC coverage.

Methods

A pharmacokinetic analysis (NONMEM) was conducted with external model validation. Patient characteristics were tested on meropenem clearance estimates, differentiated according to the presence/absence of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT, CLCRRT or CLno-CRRT). Simulations evaluated the appropriateness of recommended dosing for achieving 100% fT>MIC in 90% of patients.

Results

A total of 101 patients were studied: median 63 years (range 49-70), 56% male, SAPS II 38 (27-48). 32% had a CLCR >60 mL/min, 49% underwent CRRT and 32% presented severe sepsis or septic shock. A total of 127 pathogens were documented: 76% Gram-negatives, 24% Gram-positives (meropenem MIC90 2 mg/L, corresponding to EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint). Three hundred and eighty plasma and 129 filtrate-dialysate meropenem concentrations were analysed: two-compartment modelling best described the data. Predicted meropenem CLno-CRRT was 59% lower in impaired (CLCR 30 mL/min) compared to normal (CLCR 100 mL/min) renal function. Simulations showed that recommended regimens appropriately cover MIC90 in patients with CLCR <60 mL/min. Patients with CLCR of 60 to <90 mL/min need 6 g/day to achieve appropriate coverage. In patients with CLCR ≥90 mL/min, appropriate exposure is achieved with increased dose, frequency of administration and infusion duration, or continuous infusion.

Conclusions

Recommended meropenem regimens are suboptimal in ICU patients with normal or augmented renal clearance. Modified dosing or infusion modalities achieve appropriate MIC coverage for optimized antibacterial efficacy in meropenem-susceptible life-threatening infections.

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam significantly improves pharmacokinetic target attainment in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of four years of clinical experience

PURPOSE

Standard dosing and intermittent bolus application (IB) are important risk factors for pharmacokinetic (PK) target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactams in critically ill patients, particularly in those with sepsis and septic shock. We assessed the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-guided (TDM), continuous infusion (CI) and individual dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP) on PK-target attainment in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of a database including 484 patients [933 serum concentrations (SC)] with severe infections, sepsis and septic shock who received TDM-guided CI of PIP in the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic teaching hospital. The PK-target was defined as a PIP SC between 33 and 64 mg/L [fT > 2-4 times the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA)].

RESULTS

PK-target attainment with standard dosing (initial dose) was observed in 166 patients (34.3%), whereas only 49 patients (10.1%) demonstrated target non-attainment. The minimum PK-target of ≥ 33 mg/L was overall realized in 89.9% (n = 435/484) of patients after the first PIP dose including 146 patients (30.2%) with potentially harmful SCs ≥ 100 mg/L. Subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustments significantly enhanced PK-target attainment to 280 patients (62.4%) and significantly reduced the fraction of potentially overdosed (≥ 100 mg/L) patients to 4.5% (n = 20/449). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) resulted in a relevant reduction of PIP clearance (CL_PIP): no RRT CL_PIP 6.8/6.3 L/h (median/IQR) [SCs n = 752, patients n = 405], continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) CL_PIP 4.3/2.6 L/h [SCs n = 160, n = 71 patients], intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) CL_PIP 2.6/2.3 L/h [SCs n = 21, n = 8 patients]). A body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m² significantly increased CL_PIP 9.6/7.7 L/h [SC n = 43, n = 18 patients] in these patients. Age was significantly associated with supratherapeutic PIP concentrations (p < 0.0005), whereas high CrCL led to non-target attainment (p < 0.0005). Patients with target attainment (33-64 mg/L) within the first 24 h exhibited the lowest hospital mortality rates (13.9% [n = 23/166], p < 0.005). Those with target non-attainment demonstrated higher mortality rates (≤ 32 mg/L; 20.8% [n = 10/49] ≥ 64 mg/L; 29.4% [n = 79/269]).

CONCLUSION

TDM-guided CI of PIP is safe in critically ill patients and improves PK-target attainment. Exposure to defined PK-targets impacts patient mortality while lower and higher than intended SCs may influence the outcome of critically ill patients. Renal function and renal replacement therapy are main determinants of PK-target attainment. These results are only valid for CI of PIP and not for prolonged or intermittent bolus administration of PIP.

The effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge on meropenem in critically ill patients requiring renal support

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge (DHP-PMX) on meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with sepsis requiring continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After intravenous infusion of 1 g meropenem over 3 h repeated every 8 h for at least 3 doses, 2 serial blood and ultrafiltration fluid samples were collected: one over a dose interval of meropenem with DHP-PMX therapy; and the other on the following day over a dose interval of meropenem with no DHP-PMX therapy. Meropenem concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of meropenem and extraction ratio of DHP-PMX were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean AUC_0-8 of meropenem on DHP-PMX day was comparable to that of the DHP-PMX free day (285.2 ± 138.2 vs 297.8 ± 130.2 mg ∗ h/L; paired t-test, p = .618). No statistical significance of peak and trough concentrations, volume of distribution, sieving coefficient, or half-life were found. Extraction ratio of DHP-PMX on meropenem was 0 [0-0.03] and clearance by DHP-PMX was 0.04 [0-0.2] L/h which was not considered clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant effect of DHP-PMX on meropenem pharmacokinetics was observed among severe sepsis/septic shock patients during CVVH treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry detail: NCT registry: 02413541 (First registered March 3, 2015, last update October 16, 2017).

Clinical Validation of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Imipenem in Spent Effluent in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Pilot Study

Objectives

The primary objective of this pilot study was to investigate whether the therapeutic drug monitoring of imipenem could be performed with spent effluent instead of blood sampling collected from critically ill patients under continuous renal replacement therapy.

Methods

A prospective open-label study was conducted in a real clinical setting. Both blood and effluent samples were collected pairwise before imipenem administration and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h after imipenem administration. Plasma and effluent imipenem concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of blood and effluent samples were calculated.

Results

Eighty-three paired plasma and effluent samples were obtained from 10 patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the imipenem concentrations in plasma and effluent was 0.950 (P<0.0001). The average plasma-to-effluent imipenem concentration ratio was 1.044 (95% confidence interval, 0.975 to 1.114) with Bland-Altman analysis. No statistically significant difference was found in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters tested in paired plasma and effluent samples with Wilcoxon test.

Conclusion

Spent effluent of continuous renal replacement therapy could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of imipenem instead of blood sampling in critically ill patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Infusion Meropenem With Concurrent Extracorporeal Life Support and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case Report

Pharmacokinetic parameters can be significantly altered for both extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This case report describes the pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion meropenem in a patient on ECLS with concurrent CRRT. A 2.8-kg, 10-day-old, full-term neonate born via spontaneous vaginal delivery presented with hypothermia, lethargy, and a ~500-g weight loss from birth. She progressed to respiratory failure on hospital day 2 (HD 2) and developed sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and liver failure as a result of disseminated adenoviral infection. By HD 6, acute kidney injury was evident, with progressive fluid overload >1500 mL (+) for the admission. On HD 6 venoarterial ECLS was instituted for lung protection and fluid removal. On HD 7 she was initiated on CRRT. On HD 12, a blood culture returned positive and subsequently grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for meropenem of 0.25 mg/L. She was started on vancomycin, meropenem, and amikacin. A meropenem bolus of 40 mg/kg was given, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/hr (240 mg/kg/day). On HD 15 (ECLS day 9) a meropenem serum concentration of 21 mcg/mL was obtained, corresponding to a clearance of 7.9 mL/kg/min. Repeat cultures from HDs 13 to 15 (ECLS days 7-9) were sterile. This meropenem regimen was successful in providing a target attainment of 100% for serum concentrations above the MIC for ≥40% of the dosing interval and was associated with a sterilization of blood in this complex patient on concurrent ECLS and CRRT circuits.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: Validation of clinical trial simulations

Meropenem is frequently prescribed in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We previously used clinical trial simulations to evaluate dosing regimens of meropenem in this population and reported that a dose of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours optimizes target attainment. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were investigated in this prospective, open-label study to validate our previous in silico predictions. Seven patients received meropenem (13.8-22 mg/kg) administered intravenously every 12 hours as part of standard care. A mean dose of 18.6 mg/kg of meropenem was administered, resulting in a mean peak concentration of 80.1 μg/mL. Meropenem volume of distribution was 0.35 ± 0.085 L/kg. CRRT clearance was 40.2 ± 6.6 mL/(min · 1.73 m(2) ) and accounted for 63.4% of the total clearance of 74.8 ± 36.9 mL/(min · 1.73 m(2) ). Simulations demonstrated that a dose of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours resulted in a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) of 100% in 5 out of 7 subjects, with a %fT > MIC of 93% and 43% in the remaining 2 subjects. We conclude that CRRT contributed significantly to the total clearance of meropenem. A dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg achieved good target attainment in critically ill children receiving CRRT, which is consistent with our previously published in silico predictions.

Meropenem population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy: influence of residual diuresis on dose requirements

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is complex, with the recommended maintenance doses being 500 mg to 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) to every 12 h. This multicenter study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of meropenem in this population to identify the sources of PK variability and to evaluate different dosing regimens to develop recommendations based on clinical parameters. Thirty patients with septic shock and CRRT receiving meropenem were enrolled (153 plasma samples were tested). A population PK model was developed with data from 24 patients and subsequently validated with data from 6 patients using NONMEM software (v.7.3). The final model was characterized by CL = 3.68 + 0.22 · (residual diuresis/100) and V = 33.00 · (weight/73)(2.07), where CL is total body clearance (in liters per hour), residual diuresis is the volume of residual diuresis (in milliliters per 24 h), and V is the apparent volume of distribution (in liters). CRRT intensity was not identified to be a CL modifier. Monte Carlo simulations showed that to maintain concentrations of the unbound fraction (fu ) of drug above the MIC of the bacteria for 40% of dosing interval T (referred to as 40% of the ƒ uT >MIC), a meropenem dose of 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min would be sufficient regardless of the residual diuresis. If 100% of the ƒ uT >MIC was chosen as the target, oligoanuric patients would require 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC < 2 mg/liter), while patients with preserved diuresis would require the same dose given as an infusion over 3 h. If bacteria with MICs close to the resistance breakpoint (2 to 4 mg/liter) were to be treated with meropenem, a dose of 500 mg every 6 h would be necessary: a bolus over 30 min for oligoanuric patients and an infusion over 3 h for patients with preserved diuresis. Our results suggest that residual diuresis may be an easy and inexpensive tool to help with titration of the meropenem dose and infusion time in this challenging population.

Can we use an ex vivo continuous hemofiltration model to describe the adsorption and elimination of meropenem and piperacillin?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the adsorption and elimination characteristics of meropenem and piperacillin during simulated continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and to compare the observed data from this ex vivo study with previous data from clinical studies.

METHOD

This was an experimental study utilizing a modified CRRT circuit and polysulfone membrane (1.2 m2), circulated with a blood-crystalloid mixture. Adsorption onto the CRRT circuit was tested over a 4-h period, and clearance was assessed separately using variable continuous hemofiltration settings.

RESULTS

A rapid 9% reduction in circulating meropenem and piperacillin concentrations was observed at approximately 0.5 and 1.0 h for each antibiotic, respectively. The post-dilution setting was associated with a significantly higher sieving coefficient (Sc) and filter clearance (CLfilter) (mean ± SD) (Sc 1.14 ± 0.10 versus 1.06 ± 0.04; CLfilter 19.05 ± 1.63 versus 17.59 ± 0.62 ml/min, P values < 0.05) for meropenem. No significant differences were observed for piperacillin pharmacokinetics. Clinically comparable Sc data were observed between data obtained from the ex vivo study and data from previous clinical studies, for both antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem and piperacillin appear to be rapidly adsorbed into the CRRT circuit, and the delivery site of fluid replacement significantly influences meropenem pharmacokinetics. However, these findings are likely to be clinically insignificant and not affect dosing requirements. This ex vivo method could be a surrogate for future clinical pharmacokinetic studies of CRRT. Further research is required to explore the applicability of the ex vivo method to further characterize antibiotic pharmacokinetics during CRRT.

The Use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Optimize Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacter Osteomyelitis

INTRODUCTION

Invasive infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are becoming increasingly more prevalent and provide significant morbidity and mortality. Providing curative therapy and overcoming bacterial resistance are difficult tasks with limited antibiotic options. Alternative antibiotics and approaches to therapy are required, with often a compromise in patient outcome.

AIM

To demonstrate the effective use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in difficult-to-treat infections due to multiresistant gram-negative bacteria.

CASE PRESENTATION

A case of an elderly woman with an invasive cervical spine infection due to CRE is presented. Her protracted therapeutic course was complicated by multiple treatment failures and severe cervical spine instability. Therapeutic success, as determined by wound healing, cervical spine stability, and continued suppression of inflammatory markers, was obtained by continuous daily ertapenem infusions with TDM guiding the optimal drug dosing.

CONCLUSION

In this unusual setting, TDM was utilized successfully to achieve favorable serum antibiotic concentrations and lead to control of the infection. TDM may be a useful tool in difficult-to-treat infections caused by multiresistant bacteria.

Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy is frequently used to manage acute renal failure in critically ill patients. Antibiotic drugs used to treat infections in critically ill patients need to be dosed on the basis of the method of renal replacement therapy to be used, degree of residual renal function, and the sensitivity of the organism to be treated. Antibiotic dosing regimens must then be continuously monitored and adjusted according to modifications made to the renal replacement circuit and the patient’s underlying condition.

A multicenter study on the effect of continuous hemodiafiltration intensity on antibiotic pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics and increase the risk of incorrect dosing. In a nested cohort within a large randomized controlled trial, we assessed the effect of higher (40 mL/kg per hour) and lower (25 mL/kg per hour) intensity CRRT on antibiotic pharmacokinetics.

Methods

We collected serial blood samples to measure ciprofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin levels. We calculated extracorporeal clearance (CL), systemic CL, and volume of distribution (Vd) by non-linear mixed-effects modelling. We assessed the influence of CRRT intensity and other patient factors on antibiotic pharmacokinetics.

Results

We studied 24 patients who provided 179 pairs of samples. Extracorporeal CL increased with higher-intensity CRRT but the increase was significant for vancomycin only (mean 28 versus 22 mL/minute; P = 0.0003). At any given prescribed CRRT effluent rate, extracorporeal CL of individual antibiotics varied widely, and the effluent-to-plasma concentration ratio decreased with increasing effluent flow. Overall, systemic CL varied to a greater extent than Vd, particularly for meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam, and large intra-individual differences were also observed. CRRT dose did not influence overall (systemic) CL, Vd, or half-life. The proportion of systemic CL due to CRRT varied widely and was high in some cases.

Conclusions

In patients receiving CRRT, there is great variability in antibiotic pharmacokinetics, which complicates an empiric approach to dosing and suggests the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. More research is required to investigate the apparent relative decrease in clearance at higher CRRT effluent rates.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00221013. Registered 14 September 2005.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0818-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How can we ensure effective antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving different types of renal replacement therapy?

Determining appropriate antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex. Worldwide unstandardized and heterogeneous prescribing of RRT as well as altered patient physiology and pathogen susceptibility all cause drug disposition to be much different to that seen in non-critically ill patients. Significant changes to pharmacokinetic parameters, including volume of distribution and clearance, could be expected, in particular, for antibiotics that are hydrophilic with low plasma protein binding and that are usually primarily eliminated by the renal system. Antibiotic clearance is likely to be significantly increased when higher RRT intensities are used. The combined effect of these factors that alter antibiotic disposition is that non-standard dosing strategies should be considered to achieve therapeutic exposure. In particular, an aggressive early approach to dosing should be considered and this may include administration of a 'loading dose', to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations and maximally reduce the inoculum of the pathogen. This approach is particularly important given the pharmacokinetic changes in the critically ill as well as the increased likelihood of less susceptible pathogens. Dose individualization that applies knowledge of the RRT and patient factors causing altered pharmacokinetics remains the key approach for ensuring effective antibiotic therapy for these patients. Where possible, therapeutic drug monitoring should also be used to ensure more accurate therapy. A lack of pharmacokinetic data for antibiotics during the prolonged intermittent RRT and intermittent hemodialysis currently limits evidence-based antibiotic dose recommendations for these patients.

Meropenem in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: clinical trial simulations using realistic covariates

Meropenem is frequently prescribed in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Fluid overload is often present in critically ill children and affects drug disposition. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model to (1) evaluate target attainment of meropenem dosing regimens against P. aeruginosa in children receiving CRRT and (2) estimate the effect of fluid overload on target attainment. Clinical trial simulations were employed to evaluate target attainment of meropenem in various age groups and degrees of fluid overload in children receiving CRRT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted from published literature, and 287 patients from the prospective pediatric CRRT registry database provided realistic clinical covariates including patient weight, fluid overload, and CRRT prescription characteristics. Target attainment at 40% and 75% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration was evaluated. Clinical trial simulations demonstrated that children greater than 5 years of age achieved acceptable target attainment with a dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours. In children less than 5, however, increased dosing of 20 mg/kg every 8 hours was needed to optimize target attainment. Fluid overload did not affect target attainment. These in silico model predictions will need to be verified in vivo in children receiving meropenem and CRRT.

Beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy

Although early and appropriate antibiotic therapy remains the most important intervention for successful treatment of septic shock, data guiding optimization of beta-lactam prescription in critically ill patients prescribed with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are still limited. Being small hydrophilic molecules, beta-lactams are likely to be cleared by CRRT to a significant extent. As a result, additional variability may be introduced to the per se variable antibiotic concentrations in critically ill patients. This article aims to describe the current clinical scenario for beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and CRRT, to highlight the sources of variability among the different studies that reduce extrapolation to clinical practice, and to identify the opportunities for future research and improvement in this field. Three frequently prescribed beta-lactams (meropenem, piperacillin and ceftriaxone) were chosen for review. Our findings showed that present dosing recommendations are based on studies with drawbacks limiting their applicability in the clinical setting. In general, current antibiotic dosing regimens for CRRT follow a one-size-fits-all fashion despite emerging clinical data suggesting that drug clearance is partially dependent on CRRT modality and intensity. Moreover, some studies pool data from heterogeneous populations with CRRT that may exhibit different pharmacokinetics (for example, admission diagnoses different to septic shock, such as trauma), which also limit their extrapolation to critically ill patients with septic shock. Finally, there is still no consensus regarding the %T_>MIC (percentage of dosing interval when concentration of the antibiotic is above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen) value that should be chosen as the pharmacodynamic target for antibiotic therapy in patients with septic shock and CRRT. For empirically optimized dosing, during the first day a loading dose is required to compensate the increased volume of distribution, regardless of impaired organ function. An additional loading dose may be required when CRRT is initiated due to steady-state equilibrium breakage driven by clearance variation. From day 2, dosing must be adjusted to CRRT settings and residual renal function. Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams may be regarded as a useful tool to daily individualize dosing and to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure.

How severe is antibiotic pharmacokinetic variability in critically ill patients and what can be done about it?

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobial agents administered to critically ill patients exhibit marked variability. This variability results from pathophysiological changes that occur in critically ill patients. Changes in volume of distribution, clearance, and tissue penetration all affect the drug concentrations at the site of infection. PK-pharmacodynamic indices (fCmax:MIC; AUC0-24:MIC; fT>MIC; fCmin:MIC) for both antimicrobial effect and suppression of emergence of resistance are described for many antimicrobial drugs. Changing the regimen by which antimicrobial drugs are delivered can help overcome the PK variability and optimise target attainment. This will deliver optimised antimicrobial chemotherapy to individual critically ill patients. Delivery of β-lactams antimicrobial agents by infusions, rather than bolus dosing, is effective at increasing the duration of the dosing interval that the drug concentration is above the MIC. Therapeutic drug monitoring, utilising population PK mathematical models with Bayesian estimation, can also be used to optimise regimens following measurement of plasma drug concentrations. Clinical trials are required to establish if patient outcomes can be improved by implementing these techniques.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe infections

BACKGROUND

Meropenem is an effective β-lactam antibiotic that is frequently used to treat serious infections in both intensive care unit (ICU) and febrile neutropenic hematology/oncology (Hem/Onc) patients. Studies suggest that to be effective, meropenem concentrations must be maintained above the inhibitory concentrations for the majority of a dosing interval. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem seem to differ in critically ill patients compared with healthy or less ill subjects used to select labeled dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate meropenem PK in critically ill patients and to see how often standard dosing regimens produced adequate plasma concentrations. A secondary objective was to investigate how achieved concentrations were related to outcomes (morbidity and mortality) in these patients.

METHODS

Meropenem plasma concentrations over time were measured using a high pressure liquid chromatography assay in febrile Hem/Onc and ICU patients who were treated with standard meropenem dosing schedules. Outcomes such as fever control and survival were assessed in these patients and compared with individual meropenem PK data and with recommended target concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 25 subjects including 10 febrile Hem/Onc and 15 ICU patients with a variety of serious illnesses and baseline renal function were studied. Mean peak concentrations were less variable than were pre-dose concentrations. Post peak and trough concentrations were often below recommended minimum inhibitory concentrations. Both clearance and volumes of distribution were greater than reported in less ill subjects, only in part explained by increased renal clearance. Therefore, serum concentrations often did not exceed recommended concentration targets even for moderately sensitive organisms. Inadequate concentrations were especially common in the mostly ill, febrile neutropenic Hem/Onc subjects and seemed to explain at least some therapeutic failures. Conversely, drug accumulation occurred in ICU subjects with decreased renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard meropenem dosing regimens were inadequate in many critically ill febrile, neutropenic Hem/Onc, and septic ICU patients. These data suggest a role for meropenem concentration monitoring in such patients.

Does Beta-lactam Pharmacokinetic Variability in Critically Ill Patients Justify Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? A Systematic Review

The pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in intensive care patients may be profoundly altered due to the dynamic, unpredictable pathophysiological changes that occur in critical illness. For many drugs, significant increases in the volume of distribution and/or variability in drug clearance are common. When “standard” beta-lactam doses are used, such pharmacokinetic changes can result in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations, treatment failure, and the development of antibiotic resistance. Emerging data support the use of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and individualized dosing to ensure the achievement of pharmacodynamic targets associated with rapid bacterial killing and optimal clinical outcomes. The purpose of this work was to describe the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-lactams in the critically ill and to discuss the potential utility of TDM to optimize antibiotic therapy through a structured literature review of all relevant publications between 1946 and October 2011. Only a few studies have reported the utility of TDM as a tool to improve beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is little agreement between studies on the pharmacodynamic targets required to optimize antibiotic therapy. The impact of TDM on important clinical outcomes also remains to be established. Whereas TDM may be theoretically rational, clinical studies to assess utility in the clinical setting are urgently required.

[Dosage of antipseudomonal antibiotics in patients with acute kidney injury subjected to continuous renal replacement therapies]

Critically ill patients are often affected by infections produced by Pseudomonas, which can be a cause of sepsis and renal failure. Early and adequate antibiotic treatment at correct dosage levels is crucial. Acute kidney injury is also frequent in critically ill patients. In those patients who require renal replacement therapy, continuous techniques are gaining relevance as filtering alternatives to intermittent hemodialysis. It must be taken into account that many antibiotics are largely cleared by continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). The aim of this review is to assess the clinical evidence on the pharmacokinetics and dosage recommendations of the main antibiotic groups used to treat Pseudomonas spp. infections in critically ill patients subjected to CRRT.

[Study of factors affecting drug extraction during continuous hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration, and the contribution of extraction to systemic clearance]

The aim of this study was to elucidate the factors affecting dialysis clearance and the need for additional doses of drugs during and after continuous hemofiltration (CHF) and hemodiafiltration (CHDF). We performed a literature search of MEDLINE using the terms hemofiltration OR hemodiafiltration AND pharmacokinetics to obtain the clearances of CHF and CHDF in a clinical setting. The relationships between molecular weight, the unbound fraction (fuB), ultrafiltration flow rate (UFR) and dialysis flow rate were analyzed. The need for additional doses of certain drugs was also discussed based on the ratio of dialysis and systemic clearances. The clearance of CHF for 32 reported drugs was significantly correlated with the product of fuB×UFR (r=0.841, p<0.001), and furthermore the plots obtained lay on a line of y=x. The clearance of CHDF also showed good correlation with the product of fuB×UFR (r=0.795, p<0.001), but the plots were higher than the line for y=x, suggesting that additional clearance by dialysis was not negligible. The elimination by both forms of dialysis for drugs excreted mainly via the kidneys, and with a higher fuB, was considerable. The extent of drug clearance by both CHF and CHDF is determined mainly by fuB and UFR. The ratio of dialysis clearance to systemic clearance should be estimated to determine the contribution of CHF and CHDF.

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis receiving high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Use of high ultrafiltrate flow rates with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVHF) in critically ill patients is an emerging setting, for which there are few data to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to investigate the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe sepsis who are receiving high-volume CVVHF with high-volume exchanges (> or = 4 liters/h); secondly, to determine whether standard dosing regimens (1,000 mg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h) are sufficient for treatment of less susceptible organisms such as Burkholderia pseudomallei (MIC, 4 mg/liter); and, finally, to compare the clearances observed in this study with data from previous studies using lower-volume exchanges (1 to 2 liters/h). We recruited 10 eligible patients and collected serial pre- and postfilter blood samples and ultrafiltrate and urine samples. A noncompartmental method was used to determine meropenem pharmacokinetics. The cohort had a median age of 56.6 years, a median weight of 70 kg, and a median APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) score of 25. The median (interquartile range) values for meropenem were as follows: terminal elimination half-life, 4.3 h (2.9 to 6.0); terminal volume of distribution, 0.2 liters/kg (0.2 to 0.3); trough concentration, 7.7 mg/liter (6.2 to 12.9); total clearance, 6.0 liters/h (5.2 to 6.2); hemofiltration clearance, 3.5 liters/h (3.4 to 3.9). In comparing the meropenem clearance here with those in previous studies, ultrafiltration flow rate was found to be the parameter that accounted for the differences in clearance of meropenem (R(2) = 0.89). In conclusion, high-volume CVVHF causes significant clearance of meropenem, necessitating steady-state doses of 1,000 mg every 8 h to maintain sufficient concentrations to treat less susceptible organisms such as B. pseudomallei.

The impact of continuous renal replacement therapy on drug therapy

Critically ill patients with multisystem organ failure often require daily administration of large volumes of fluid to provide electrolyte and nutrition support, medications, and blood products. This often results in fluid overload, which has historically been managed with intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Unfortunately, IHD entails a high rate of fluid and solute removal that often exacerbates hemodynamic instability. Accordingly, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), involving slow and continuous removal of water and solutes from the plasma, is currently preferred for managing these patients.

Dosing Regimes for Antimicrobials during Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH)

The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics used in critically ill patients during continuous haemofiltration is different both from healthy people and from stable patients on long-term dialysis. This article reviews the patient-related, drug-related and haemofiltration-related variables influencing drug elimination in this group of patients, and provides specific recommendations for antibiotic dosing for different classes of antibiotics. Loading doses do not need to be altered. Subsequent dose adjustment should be based on the estimated ultrafiltration capacity of the renal replacement technique and the degree of extracorporeal clearance. A table of recommended doses is provided.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem during intermittent and continuous intravenous application in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

The clinical effect of beta-lactam antibiotics depends on the time of drug concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a susceptible bacterium. Continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactams such as meropenem may therefore be a more rational approach than intermittent bolus injections (IB). The aim of this study was to test whether CI of meropenem achieves effective drug concentrations comparable to IB in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised cross-over study.

SETTING

Twelve-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Six ICU patients were randomised to receive either meropenem 1 g IB every 12 h or a 0.5 g i.v. loading dose followed by 2 g i.v. CI over 24 h. After 2 days, regimens were crossed over. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were determined on days 2 and 4.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Peak serum concentration [median (25% and 75% quartiles)] after short infusion of 1 g meropenem were 62.8 (51.4; 85.0) mg/l, trough levels at 12 h were 8.1 (4.5; 18.7) mg/l, and serum half-life was 5.3 (5.1; 7.0) h. Steady-state concentrations during CI were 18.6 (13.3; 24.5) mg/l. The AUCs during either treatment were comparable and determined as 233 (202; 254) mg/l*h (IB) and 227 (182; 283) mg/l*h (CI), respectively. Four hours after IB, drug concentrations dropped below CI steady-state concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate antibacterial concentrations of meropenem in patients with CRRT are easily achievable with CI. CI may be an effective alternative dosing regimen to IB. A prospective comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two dosage regimens is warranted.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of meropenem in adult patients

The objectives of this study were to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model using patient data and use it to explore alternative dosage regimens that could optimize the currently used dosing regimen to achieve higher likelihood of pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogenic bacteria. We gathered concentration data from 79 patients (ages 18-93 years) who received meropenem 0.5, 1, or 2 g over 0.5- or 3-hour infusion every 8 hours. Meropenem population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM program. A 2-compartment model fit the data best. Creatinine clearance, age, and body weight were the most significant covariates to affect meropenem pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to mimic the concentration-time profiles while 1 g meropenem was administrated via infusion over 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours. The 3-hour prolonged infusion improved the likelihood of obtaining both bacteriostatic and bactericidal exposures most notably at the current susceptibility breakpoints.

Meropenem and continuous renal replacement therapy: in vitro permeability of 2 continuous renal replacement therapy membranes and influence of patient renal function on the pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients

The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were characterized in 20 patients with different degrees of renal function who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy. Previously, no differences were detected in vitro in the removal of meropenem by continuous venovenous hemofiltration or continuous venovenous hemodialysis or when AN69 or polysulfone membranes were compared. In patients, no significant differences in the sieving coefficient or the saturation coefficient with the renal function were found, and the mean sieving coefficient/saturation coefficient value (0.80 +/- 0.12) was similar to the unbound fraction (0.79 +/- 0.08). An increase in total clearance and a decrease in elimination half-life were observed to the extent that the patient's creatinine clearance was higher. Likewise, the contribution of continuous renal replacement therapy to total clearance diminished in patients with less renal impairment. The results suggest that the renal function of the patient may influence meropenem pharmacokinetics during continuous renal replacement therapy. The lower trough plasma levels observed in nonrenal patients would not lead to adequate time during which serum drug concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration values in many infections.

Pharmacokinetics and total elimination of meropenem and vancomycin in intensive care unit patients undergoing extended daily dialysis*

OBJECTIVE

Extended daily dialysis (EDD) combines the advantage of both intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy: excellent detoxification accompanied by cardiovascular tolerability. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetics of meropenem and vancomycin in critically ill patients with renal failure undergoing EDD.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

We studied intensive care patients with anuric acute renal failure being treated with EDD and receiving meropenem (n = 10) or vancomycin (n = 10) therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

The antibiotics were administered 6 hrs (1.0 g meropenem) or 12 hrs (1.0 g vancomycin) before EDD was started in order to study the pharmacokinetics before and during EDD. In addition to the application of different methods to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters, the total dialysate concentration of both drugs was measured.

RESULTS

Based on the amount of the drug recovered from the collected spent dialysate, the fraction of drug removed by one dialysis treatment was 18% for meropenem and 26% for vancomycin. Dosing regimes for intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy cannot be used for critically ill patients treated with EDD.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that patients treated with EDD by means of a high-flux dialyzer (polysulphone; surface area, 1.3 m; blood and dialysate flow, 160 mL/min; EDD time, 480 mins) and current dosing regimens run the risk of being significantly underdosed, which may have detrimental effects on critically ill patients with life-threatening infections. The exact dose has to be tailored according to weight and severity of illness as well as the current minimal inhibitory concentration against the incriminated bacteria. Whenever possible, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed.

Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now commonly used as a means of support for critically ill patients with renal failure. No recent comprehensive guidelines exist that provide antibiotic dosing recommendations for adult patients receiving CRRT. Doses used in intermittent hemodialysis cannot be directly applied to these patients, and antibiotic pharmacokinetics are different than those in patients with normal renal function. We reviewed the literature for studies involving the following antibiotics frequently used to treat critically ill adult patients receiving CRRT: vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, nafcillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, colistin, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B (deoxycholate and lipid formulations), and acyclovir. We used these data, as well as clinical experience, to make recommendations for antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

Derivation of Meropenem Dosage in Patients Receiving Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration Based on Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment

BACKGROUND

Dosage recommendations for antibiotics in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) should be based on pharmacodynamic requirements. For meropenem, this would be achieving appropriate time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). We employed Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the bactericidal target attainment for various dosing regimens of meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species.

METHODS

Target attainment at 40% T > MIC was calculated for 5,000 simulated subjects receiving meropenem 1,000 mg every 12 and 8 h, and 500 mg every 12, 8 and 6 h. Pharmacokinetics were extrapolated from primary literature sources utilizing similar methods of CVVH. MIC data for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were derived from the US 2003 MYSTIC study. Target attainment at the breakpoint of 4 microg/ml was also calculated.

RESULTS

Only regimens of 1,000 mg every 8 h and 500 mg every 6 h essentially achieve 100% target attainment at the breakpoint. However, due to higher peak concentrations, 1,000 mg every 8 h is able to attain improved target attainment against more resistant populations of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species, thus providing the greatest probability of bactericidal exposure.

CONCLUSION

Meropenem 1,000 mg every 8 h optimizes the pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CVVH. Lower doses or increased dosing intervals should not be advocated for inpatients receiving this renal replacement technique. .

Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial agent. In order to optimize levels in plasma relative to the MICs, the ideal dose level and dosage regimen need to be determined. The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied in two groups, each comprising eight healthy volunteers who received the following doses: 500 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min three times a day (t.i.d.) versus a 250-mg loading dose followed by a 1,500 mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group A and 1,000 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min t.i.d. versus a 500-mg loading dose followed by a 3,000-mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group B. Meropenem concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, respectively. Pharmacokinetic calculations were done by use of a two-compartment open model, and the data were extrapolated by Monte Carlo simulations for 10,000 simulated subjects for pharmacodynamic evaluation. There were no significant differences in total clearance and renal clearance between group A and group B or between the intermittent treatment and the continuous infusion. The analyses of the probability of target attainment by MIC for the high- and low-dose continuous infusions were robust up to MICs of 4 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding values for intermittent infusions were only 0.5 mg/liter and 0.25 mg/liter. When these observations were correlated with MICs obtained from the MYSTIC database, intermittent infusion results in adequate activity against two of the most common nosocomially acquired pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae. However, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the evaluation shows a clear advantage of high-dose therapy administered as a continuous infusion. We believe that in the empirical therapy situation, the continuous-infusion mode of administration is most worth the extra efforts. We conclude that clinical trials for evaluation of the continuous infusions of meropenem in critically ill patients are warranted.

Drug dosing during intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy : special considerations in pediatric patients

Chronic renal failure is, fortunately, an unusual occurrence in children; however, many children with various underlying illnesses develop acute renal failure, and transiently require renal replacement therapy - peritoneal dialysis, intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). As children with acute and chronic renal failure often have multiple comorbid conditions requiring drug therapy, generalists, intensivists, nephrologists, and pharmacists need to be aware of the issues surrounding the management of drug therapy in pediatric patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. This article summarizes the pharmacokinetics and dosing of many drugs commonly prescribed for pediatric patients, and focuses on the management of drug therapy in pediatric patients undergoing IHD and CRRT in the intensive care unit setting. Peritoneal dialysis is not considered in this review. Finally, a summary table with recommended initial dosages for drugs commonly encountered in pediatric patients requiring IHD or CRRT is presented.

Pharmacokinetics and dosage adaptation of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients

Meropenem, a carbapenem broad-spectrum antibiotic, is regularly used in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Its disposition was studied over one dosage interval in 15 patients under CVVHDF on a steady regimen of 500 or 1000 mg every 8 to 12 hours. Meropenem levels were measured in plasma and filtrate-dialysate by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection. The mean CVVHDF flow rates were 7.1 +/- 0.9 L/h for blood (mean +/- SD), 0.5 +/- 0.3 L/h for predilution solution, 1.2 +/- 0.3 L/h for countercurrent dialysate, and 1.8 +/- 0.5 L/h for the total filtrate-dialysate. The pharmacokinetic analysis was based both on a noncompartmental approach and on a four-compartment modeling. The mean (coefficient of variation [CV]) total body clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and mean residence time were, respectively, 5.0 L/h (46%), 14.3 L (29%), and 4.8 h (36%). The hemodiafiltration clearances calculated from plasma data alone and plasma with filtrate-dialysate data were 1.2 L/h (26%) and 1.6 L/h (39%), respectively. The compartmental model was used to optimize the therapeutic schedule of meropenem, considering reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of sensitive strains (4 mg/L). The results indicate that two different therapeutic schedules of meropenem are equally applicable to patients receiving CVVHD: either 750 mg tid or 1500 bid.

Higher renal replacement therapy dose delivery influences on drug therapy

Higher doses of renal replacement therapy have profound effects on pharmacotherapy, yet little research has been conducted in this area. High-volume renal replacement therapies influence both the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic profiles of all drugs administered to these critically ill patients. Intermittent high-dose "hybrid" hemodialysis therapies remove drugs to a much different degree than standard thrice-weekly hemodialysis, yet pharmacokinetic studies have not been performed in patients receiving these therapies. High-volume continuous renal replacement therapies offer dosing challenges not seen with standard low-dose therapies. This article describes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues presented by high-volume renal replacement therapies. Given the importance that pharmacotherapy has on optimal patient outcomes, a better understanding of the influence that high-volume renal replacement therapy has on drugs is essential if these high volume therapies are to be used successfully in the intensive care unit.

Pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam in anuric intensive care patients during continuous venovenous hemodialysis

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam were investigated in eight anuric intensive care patients treated by continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). The elimination half-life of piperacillin was 4.3 +/- 1.2 h, and that of tazobactam was 5.6 +/- 1.3 h. The contribution of CVVHD to the overall elimination was relevant (>25%) for both drugs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in critically ill patients

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem were investigated in 14 critically ill patients with sepsis. Patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) higher than 50 ml/min received 1 g meropenem three times daily (Group I) and patients with CrCl lower than 50 ml/min received 1 g meropenem twice daily (Group II). Meropenum concentrations in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters differed between the two groups as follows, Group I, maximal concentration 56.3 +/- 19.1 microg/ml; trough concentration 3.3 +/- 2.5 microg/ml; elimination half life 2.5 +/- 1.2 h; clearance (Cl) 155.8 +/- 40.6 ml/min; MRT 2.2 +/- 0.4 h; steady state volume of distribution (V(ss)) 21.7 +/- 5.7 l, and AUC(-8) 119.4 +/- 32.6 microg/ml h. Group II, maximal concentration 71.1 +/- 5.1 microg/ml; trough concentration 3.4 +/- 1.8 microg/ml; elimination half life 3.9 +/- 1.6 h; Cl 77.7 +/- 15.8 ml/min; MRT 3.5 +/- 0.6 h; V(ss), 17.1 +/- 2.1 l, and AUC(0-12) 230.2 +/- 43.3 microg/ml h. The most frequently isolated bacteria from blood and wound infections were Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli; their meropenem minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 0.064 to 3.0 mg/l. In most cases the pharmacodynamic parameters, measured as T>MIC index, were higher than 75%. In both groups, patients with susceptible pathogens (MIC<1 mg/l) had meropenem plasma levels which exceeded the MIC for the whole dosing interval. When pathogens were highly resistant (A. baumanii or P. aeruginosa) the T>MIC indices were lower.

Pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

To study the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CWHF).

DESIGN

Prospective, open-labeled study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit of the University Medical Center Utrecht.

PATIENTS

Five critically ill patients receiving CWHF for acute renal failure treated with meropenem for documented or suspected bacterial infection.

INTERVENTION

All patients received meropenem (500 mg) administered intravenously every 12 hrs. Plasma samples and ultrafiltrate aliquots were collected during one dosing interval.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Mean age and body weight of the patients studied were 46.6 yrs (range, 28-61 yrs) and 85.8 kg (range, 70-100 kg), respectively. The following pharmacokinetic variables for meropenem were obtained: mean peak plasma concentration was 24.5 +/- 7.2 mg/L, mean trough plasma concentration was 3.0 +/- 0.9 mg/L, mean terminal elimination half-life was 6.37 +/- 1.96 hrs, mean total plasma clearance was 4.57 +/- 0.89 L/hr, mean CWHF clearance was 1.03 +/- 0.42 L/hr, mean nonrenal clearance was 3.54 +/- 1.06 L/hr, and mean volume of distribution was 0.37 +/- 0.15 L/kg.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients with acute renal failure, nonrenal clearance became the main elimination route. CWHF substantially contributed to the clearance of meropenem (23% of mean total plasma clearance). We recommend meropenem to be dosed at 500 mg intravenously every 12 hrs in patients receiving CWHF, according to our operational characteristics. This dosing regimen resulted in adequate trough plasma levels for susceptible microorganisms.