A survey of non-accidental injury imaging in England, Scotland and Wales

[Guideline adherence and quality assurance in radiological diagnostics in cases of suspected child abuse in Germany]

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic imaging plays a key role in the evaluation of non-accidental consequences of injuries in childhood. Fractures are the second most common consequence of child abuse, after skin lesions such as abrasions or bleeding. With the evidence of radiological criteria, non-accidental fractures can be differentiated from accidental fractures. Special types of fractures such as the classic metaphyseal lesion can only be differentiated if the image quality is high.

AIM

The goal of this prospective study was to assess adherence to guidelines and quality assurance of radiological diagnostics in the event of suspected abuse in Germany. For this purpose, the quantity and diagnostic quality in university and non-university hospitals as well as the existence of a pediatric radiology department were analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 958 X‑ray examinations of 114 suspected abuse cases (46 girls, 68 boys) were evaluated; 42 cases from university, 42 from maximum care and 30 from regular care clinics with a median age of 6 months (3 weeks-3 years of age) were assessed as DICOM data by 3 pediatric radiologists in a consensus procedure with regard to adherence to guidelines and various quality parameters. An accompanying questionnaire was used to compare the theoretical knowledge with the respective practical implementation.

RESULTS

A mean of 8.4 X‑rays (range 1-22) were made per case. In 12 of 114 assessed cases (10%) there was a complete skeletal status according to the S1 guideline. A babygram was performed in 13 cases (10.5%). Departments with focus on pediatric radiology produced significantly more X‑rays per skeletal status than facilities without this specialization (p < 0.04). Significantly higher qualitative implementation was recorded in university hospitals (p < 0.001). Regardless of the type of institution, there was only marginal agreement between the questionnaire response and the available image material.

CONCLUSION

In Germany, a guideline-compliant procedure in the event of suspected child abuse is largely lacking. It remains to be seen whether this will change in the future with the broader implementation of child protection groups and the S3+ child protection guideline adopted in 2019 (AWMF register 027-069). The establishment of reference centers for a second diagnosis and recommendations for imaging technology can also improve the quality of care over the long term.

Compliance With Skeletal Surveys for Child Abuse in General Hospitals: A Statewide Quality Improvement Process

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to perform a statewide quality improvement process to improve compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines in performing skeletal surveys for suspected child abuse. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively identified all outside hospital skeletal surveys for suspected child abuse in children younger than 3 years referred to our tertiary children's hospital in 2016-2017. We included a 3-month baseline and 21-month intervention period. The quality improvement process was based on sending educational material to all ACR member radiologists in the state and making telephone calls to radiology technologist team leaders whenever the surveys were not compliant, followed by e-mails with guidance on performing skeletal surveys. We documented the views obtained and compared them with the ACR guidelines. The percentage of compliance with each individual view was assessed with the chi-square test. The total number of compliant views per survey was evaluated with ANOVA. RESULTS. Two hundred twenty-seven patients (105 female) with a mean age of 0.8 year (SD, 0.67 year; range, 0.01-3 years) were evaluated. These 227 surveys (baseline, n = 27; postintervention, n = 200) were performed at 69 different outside hospitals. Compliance significantly (p = 0.006) improved from 25.9% (7/27) during baseline to 54.0% (108/200) after intervention. There was a nonsignificant trend of improved compliance between the first (51.9%; 41/79) and last 7-month (62.3%; 33/53) periods of intervention. Among individual views, only rib oblique views showed significantly (p = 0.02) improved compliance after the intervention, from 51.9% (14/27) to 73.5% (147/200). CONCLUSION. The compliance rate with ACR guidelines for skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse at outside general hospitals significantly increased after implementation of a quality improvement process.

The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys

BACKGROUND

Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children's hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children's hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2%) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4%) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4%) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2%) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7%). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8%) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6%). Four of 19 (21.1%) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.

Double-read of skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental trauma: what we learned

BACKGROUND

Missing a fracture in a child on skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma can have devastating results. Double-read has the potential to improve fracture detection. However the yield of double-read is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the advantage of double-read versus single-read of radiographic skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed in two phases. In the first phase (April 2013 to September 2013), double-read was performed for all skeletal surveys obtained during weekday working hours. Because we had no new double-read findings in studies initially read as negative, we conducted a second phase (January 2014 to March 2014). In the second phase we limited double-reads to skeletal surveys found positive on the first read. At the end of this period, we retrospectively performed double-read for all initially negative skeletal surveys. We excluded follow-up skeletal surveys. The difference in discrepancy (new fracture or false diagnosis of a fracture) ratio between negative and positive skeletal surveys was evaluated using the Fisher exact test, and change in discrepancy ratio between the first and second study phases was evaluated using the stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

Overall in the two phases, 178 skeletal surveys were performed in 178 children (67 girls) with mean age of 9 months (range 3 days to 3.7 years). Double-read found 16 discrepancies in 8/178 (4.5%) skeletal surveys. Seven of these studies showed additional fractures (n=15). In one study, an initial read of a skull fracture was read as a variant on the second read. There was a significant (P=0.01) difference between rate of disagreement in negative skeletal surveys (1/104, 1.0%) and positive skeletal surveys (7/74, 9.5%). No significant change in disagreement rate was demonstrated between the two phases of the study (P=0.59).

CONCLUSION

Double-read of skeletal survey for suspected non-accidental trauma found false-negative fractures in a few cases and rarely found false-positive diagnosis of a fracture. Double-read uncommonly found discrepancies in an initially normal skeletal survey. Limiting double-read to initially positive studies improves the yield of the double-read.

Dating fractures in infants

AIM

To document the timing of the appearance of the radiological features of fracture healing in a group of infants in which the date of injury was known and to assess the degree of interobserver agreement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three paediatric radiologists independently assessed 161 images of 37 long bone fractures in 31 patients aged 0-44 months. The following features were assessed: soft-tissue swelling, subperiosteal new bone formation (SPNBF), definition of fracture line, presence or absence of callus, whether callus was well or ill defined, and the presence of endosteal callus.

RESULTS

Agreement between observers was only moderate for all discriminators except SPNBF. SPNBF was invariably seen after 11 days but was uncommon before this time even in the very young. In one case SPNBF was seen at 4 days.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of SPNBF, the criteria relied on to date fractures are either not reproducible or are poor discriminators of fracture age.

Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse?

AIMS

To determine which radiological investigations should be performed and which children should be investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An all language literature search of original articles; from 1950-October 2005. Two reviewers independently reviewed each article. A third was carried out on disagreement. Each study was assessed using standardised data extraction, critical appraisal and evidence forms.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included. Fifteen addressed the question: which investigation has a higher yield, skeletal surveys (SS) or bone scintigraphy (BS)? Studies gave conflicting results. Overall neither investigation is as good as the two combined. BS predominately missed skull, metaphyseal and epiphyseal fractures, whereas SS commonly missed rib fractures. Two studies showed that a repeat SS 2 weeks after the initial study provided significant additional information about tentative findings, the number and age of fractures. A comparative study evaluated additional oblique views of ribs in 73 children and showed improved diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Four studies addressed the diagnostic yield for occult fractures with respect to age. This was significant for children under 2-years old.

CONCLUSIONS

In children under 2-years old, where physical abuse is suspected, diagnostic imaging of the skeleton should be mandatory. SS or BS alone is inadequate to identify all fractures. It is recommended that all SS should include oblique views of the ribs. This review suggests that the following options would optimize the diagnostic yield. However, each needs to be evaluated prospectively: SS that includes oblique views, SS and BS, a SS with repeat SS or selected images 2 weeks later or a BS plus skull radiography and coned views of metaphyses and epiphyses.

The role of the follow-up chest radiograph in suspected non-accidental injury

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures in children under the age of 2 years have a strong correlation with non-accidental injury (NAI). Follow-up radiographs can improve detection.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of the follow-up chest radiograph in suspected non-accidental injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included all children less than 2 years of age who were investigated for suspected NAI in our institution between January 1998 and October 2003. Prior to January 2000, only selected patients were asked to attend for a follow-up chest radiograph. From January 2000 onwards all children were asked to reattend.

RESULTS

Of 200 children included in the study, 59 (29.5%) reattended for a follow-up chest radiograph. The follow-up film provided useful additional information in 7 (12%) of the 59 children. In two children rib fractures were noted only on the follow-up chest radiograph. In a further two patients additional rib fractures were noted. Additional dating information was obtained for two patients. For one child both additional fractures and dating information were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The follow-up chest radiograph provides useful information in children with suspected NAI and it is recommended that it should be included routinely in the imaging investigations of these children.

A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury

INTRODUCTION

The skeletal survey is widely used as the principal radiological investigation in suspected physical abuse of infants and young children. However, the evidence on which current guidelines are based is limited, especially for siblings of index cases. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of children who underwent skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental injury (NAI) in the Edinburgh area; to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of skeletal surveys; and to identify any predictive factors that might guide clinical practice.

METHODS

All skeletal surveys performed at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh for suspected non-accidental injury between 1/1/99 and 31/12/03 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven children underwent skeletal surveys for suspected NAI. Data were available for 76 (70 index cases and 6 siblings). Of the index cases, 17 (24%) skeletal surveys were positive, with a mean of 2.5 fractures per child (range 0-9). The age of positive cases ranged from 2 weeks to 36 months with the majority (14, 82%) being under 12 months of age. Nine (53%) were boys. In index children with positive results, indications for skeletal survey were head injury (skull fracture in 2, 12%; intracranial injury in 4,24%); skeletal fracture (excluding skull fracture) in 6 (35%) and bruising in 4 (24%). chi(2) analysis revealed no significant differences in age, sex or primary reason for skeletal survey between those with a negative and positive skeletal survey. Six skeletal surveys were performed on siblings of children with known or suspected NAI. The siblings' ages ranged from 1 to 36 months although 3 (50%) were under 12 months of age. One (17%) of the siblings' surveys (a twin) was positive.

CONCLUSION

The age of a child (<12 months) and type of presenting injury (overt fracture or head injury) are factors which can help the clinician to decide whether or not to obtain a skeletal survey. There remains a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of skeletal survey in the siblings of index children. Guidelines for the process of repeating uncertain skeletal surveys are needed.