Chest radiography for general practitioners: scope for change?

REDUCE-PCP study: radiographs in the emergency department utilization criteria evaluation-pediatric chest pain

BACKGROUND

Many emergency physicians order chest x-rays (CXRs) for pediatric patients who present with a chief complaint of chest pain despite a paucity of research to support this testing, which exposes patients to radiation, cost, and delays.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to begin development of a decision making tool that will allow emergency physicians to selectively obtain CXR films in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 consecutive pediatric patients with a chief complaint of chest pain and reviewed charts to determine how many received a CXR and which clinical characteristics were present in all patients. Chest radiograph findings were graded for significance as follows: (1) no or minor clinical significance: normal result in the CXR film without effect on the immediate evaluation of a patient; (2) moderate clinical significance: only impact on plan for follow-up; and (3) major clinical significance: result in the CXR film directly affects immediate management. We then evaluated each chart for historical or examination findings that might identify criteria associated with positive radiographic findings to propose a set of criteria that could lead to the development of a decision rule that allows a reduced utilization while having a high sensitivity for clinically significant positive findings on CXR film.

RESULTS

Of the 400 pediatric patients reviewed, 63.5% (n = 254) received a CXR in the emergency department (ED). Of those receiving a CXR, only 8.26% (n = 21) had a finding that affected either ED management or follow-up planning. The criteria that would have identified all patients with positive results in the CXR films were abnormal vital signs, shortness of breath, palpitations, presence of comorbidities, abnormal or unilateral breath sounds, history of trauma, murmur, or cough.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates the potential for a decision rule to eliminate both cost and radiation exposure by using defined criteria to determine the need for a CXR in pediatric ED patients. We identified 8 simple criteria that would have identified all children who benefited from a CXR in this study. The next phase of this study will prospectively evaluate the utility of each of the criteria as part of a draft decision rule.

Relação entre a qualidade do exame clínico e o acerto na requisição da radiografia de tórax

OBJETIVO: A radiografia do tórax continua sendo um dos métodos diagnósticos mais solicitados, mas muitos exames seriam evitados se determinados critérios fossem priorizados no momento da requisição. Este trabalho propôs-se a estudar se a qualidade do exame clínico, representado pela realização do exame físico, está associada à presença de anormalidades com significado clínico na radiografia torácica. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Neste estudo transversal foram estudados 142 pacientes atendidos em ambulatórios de hospital universitário (Salvador, BA) e com pedido de radiografia do tórax. RESULTADOS: Menos da metade (46,5%) das radiografias apresentou alterações clinicamente significantes. Pacientes com 50 ou mais anos de idade apresentaram prevalência (P) 2,8 vezes maior de mostrar anormalidades nas radiografias torácicas, semelhante (P = 2,7) àqueles provenientes de ambulatórios das clínicas cardio-pneumológica e médica ou que estavam com algum tipo de tratamento referente à sua doença atual (P = 2,0). Entretanto, a variável que classificou a qualidade do atendimento médico não se mostrou associada à anormalidade na radiografia torácica, assim como a finalidade da solicitação e tipo de queixa referido pelo paciente. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados observados indicam a necessidade de estudos, com outras abordagens metodológicas, para melhor esclarecer o impacto na solicitação da radiografia do tórax, da história clínica e exame físico acurados.

How do general practitioners respond to reports of abnormal chest X-rays?

General practitioners (GPs) in the UK have long had direct access to hospital radiological services, which in theory shortens investigation time and improves the quality of service. Chest X-rays (CXRs) account for a substantial proportion of requests, and we investigated what happened when an abnormality was detected. In one year, 204 GPs in the Nottingham area requested CXRs in 605 patients. 362 were reported normal, 165 abnormal but hospital follow-up not indicated and 71 abnormal with radiological follow-up or hospital referral indicated (mass lesion suspicious of tumours 27, infective shadowing 35, other 9). 64 of the 71 were seen in hospital within three months, and in those with suspected cancer the median time to follow-up was 20 days. These results show that GPs do act on the results of abnormal CXRs, but only 37% of those with a mass suspicious of cancer were seen in hospital within two weeks as recommended by the British Thoracic Society. Time might be saved if GPs agreed to direct referral from the radiology department to respiratory physicians.

Chest radiography guidelines for general practitioners: a practical approach

An intensive programme of guideline development and dissemination is not always practical. We designed general practitioner guidelines for chest radiography and disseminated them to a group of 33 practices selected randomly from the practices that refer more than five patients for chest radiography annually. The subsequent 2500 requests were analysed and demographic data, the referring practice and the relevant history noted. We documented a reduction in the proportion of referrals that were contrary to the guidelines by 30.5% (from 8.2% to 5.7%, P = 0.016), a reduction in referral rate with an inadequate history by 29.7% (from 15.5% to 10.9%, P = 0.0008) and an increase in the frequency that a presumptive diagnosis was stated by 14.5% (from 42.9% to 49.1%, P = 0.0025). There was no overall reduction in referral rate in the study group and the reasons for this are discussed. We conclude that guidelines for chest radiography are effective in reducing inappropriate requests and can also improve the clinical information provided.

Influence of Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on referral from general practice. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effect on general practitioner referrals for radiography of introducing guidelines of good practice together with monitoring and peer review.

DESIGN

Collection of referral data during 1 January 1989 to 31 December 1990. Guidelines were introduced on 1 January 1990.

SETTING

Open access radiology services provided by one non-teaching district in England.

SUBJECTS

144614 registered patients from 22 practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of referrals per 1000 registered patients for radiography of the chest, skull, spine, abdomen, limbs, and joints and for barium investigation and excretion urography.

RESULTS

Overall referrals fell from 88.4/1000 registered patients to 77.2/1000 after the guidelines were introduced. The commonest reasons for referral were for examination of the chest, spine, and limbs and joints and referrals for these fell by 9.4%, 17.5%, and 13.5% respectively. Referrals for skull radiography fell by 30% (from 241 to 168).

CONCLUSIONS

By helping general practitioners to be more selective in their use of diagnostic radiology, the guidelines reduced the rate of referral and thus patients' exposure to radiation.