Percutaneous internal ureteral stent placement: review of technical issues and solutions in 50 consecutive cases

Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction

Background

Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting.

Methods

We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating room equipped with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit and an ultrasound device. We prospectively studied the added value of this approach in 50 cases who failed retrograde ureteric stenting.

Results

Thirty-seven (74%) cases were done under a high level of spinal anesthesia. Mean operative time was 62 min. Antegrade ureteric stenting succeeded in 45/50 (90%) patients who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. GMV position facilitated simultaneous retrograde and antegrade management of MUO. Eight patients (16%) underwent auxiliary cystoscopic procedures to reduce the mass over the ureteric orifice (UO) guided by antegrade methylene blue or over a probing antegrade guidewire. Nephrostomy tube was inserted in the same setting in 16/50 (32%) cases. Antegrade flow of contrast to the bladder (P < 0.001) and ureteric kinks rather than tight stenosis or infiltration of UO (P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the success of antegrade ureteric stenting. No major complications were encountered.

Conclusion

GMV position is an ideal choice for management of MUO as it allows simultaneous access to the lower and the upper urinary systems to accomplish ureteric stenting either in a retrograde or an antegrade fashion as well as the ability to insert a nephrostomy tube in the same setting, thus shortening the inpatient care and this should be the standard of care in cases with MUO.

Usefulness of a long sheath in ureteral catheterization after failure of antegrade ureteral stent placement using a short sheath

BACKGROUND

When antegrade ureteral intervention fails due to severe ureteral stricture or tortuosity, a longer sheath can be used to facilitate ureteral catheterization.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of a long sheath in antegrade ureteral stent placement after failure of antegrade ureteral stent placement using a short sheath.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Among 1284 procedures in 934 patients who received ureteral stent placement, a long sheath was used after stricture negotiation failure using a short sheath in 57 (4.4%) procedures in 53 patients. The data of these 53 patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The most common reasons for long sheath use were failure of balloon catheter (59.6%) or guidewire (29.8%) advancement across the stricture. Technical success, successful stricture negotiation after using a long sheath, was achieved in 50/57 (87.7%) procedures. In two of seven failed procedures, an additional TIPS sheath was used and the technical success rate improved to 91.2% (52/57). The technical success rate was significantly higher in the patients who have failed balloon catheter advancement (97.1%, 33/34) than the patients who have failed guidewire advancement (64.7%, 11/17) (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.004). Self-limiting hematoma occurred in one patient after use of the long sheath and was considered a minor complication.

CONCLUSION

Ureteral catheterization using a long sheath is feasible and effective when antegrade ureteral intervention using a short sheath fails. When using a long sheath, the technical success rate was higher when advancing the balloon catheter over the guidewire than when advancing the guidewire through tight stricture.

Antegrade double-J stent placement for the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Ureteral double- J stent is usually inserted by retrograde approach to treating obstructed upper urinary tract. The antegrade approach, can be suitable alternative in certain situations without general or spinal anesthesia. The present study demonstrates the indications, success rate, and complications of this approach in treatmenting malignant obstructive uropathy.

Methods

Data of consecutive patients with malignant obstructive uropathy who underwent antegrade ureteral stenting in the Department of Interventional Radiology at Sahloul hospital from January 2013 to February 2020 was retrieved and retrospectively analyzed.

Result

A total of 188 attempts of antegrade ureteral stent insertion was performed during the study period (left side = 78, right side = 82, bilateral = 14). The mean age was 54 years (range: 9–91 years). The indication of the antegrade stenting was the failure of retrograde approach in 63 patients.The single-stage approach was performed 103 times. A percutaneous nephrostomy was placed for the average duration of 22.4 days (range: 2–60 days) for subsequent attempts. Only four patients required general anesthesia. Ureteral obstruction was caused by bladder cancer (n = 92), uterine cancer (n = 31), prostate cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 15) and retroperitoneal tumor (n = 8). A protective nephrostomy was left in situ in 44 cases for 48 h. Clinical success was achieved in 96% of the cases. Two and three patients required hospitalization for perirenal abscess and hematuria, respectively.

Conclusion

This retrospective study shows that antegrade ureteral stent insertion has a high success rate with minimal complications.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04649970. Registered december 2, 2020- Retrospectively registered,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04649970;

•

Ureters are easily affected by malignant conditions resulting in the interruption of urinary drainage.

•

Double J (JJ) stents placement is the most common method for relieving urinary obstruction in such cases.

•

The percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting (PAUS) technique is a relatively newer technique for ureteral stenting.

•

PAUS can be used as an alternative route for relieving ureteral obstruction due to malignancies.

Antegrade Double-J Stenting in Grossly Dilated and Tortuous Ureters

Failure of retrograde approach for ureteric stenting warrants percutaneous nephrostomy with antergrade stenting to relieve the pressure symptoms and prevent the need for external drainage. However, in some tight ureteric strictures with grossly dilated tortuous ureter it may not be possible to navigate a ureteric stent across. In such instances pull through or rendezvous techniques have been advocated. Here, we have illustrated simple and novel techniques for traversing tortuous ureters with tight strictures. In one instance, a guide wire was snared via the perurethral approach and the system stabilized from both ends; the flexometallic sheath was then advanced into the urinary bladder across the stricture and a ureteric stent was deployed. In the other situation where the ureter was very tortuous, plain twisting and turning maneuver with retraction of whole assembly was done to straighten the ureter followed by advancement of the flexometallic sheath and stationing of the ureteric stent. In both the cases no significant procedure-related complications were seen and patients were discharged in stable condition. Our experience has led us to believe that occasionally all facilities may not be accessible immediately or the desired armamentarium may be unavailable for interventional radiologists, especially when the patient is on the table; in such cases, simple improvisation and techniques can come in handy to place a ureteric stent across a dilated tortuous ureter.

Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare single and tandem ureteral stenting in the management of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO).

METHODS

Our hospital's institutional review board approved this prospective study. Between November 2014 and June 2017, single ureteral stenting was performed in 56 patients (94 renal units) and tandem ureteral stenting in 48 patients (63 renal units) for MUO. A comparative analysis of the technical success rate, patient survival, stent patency, and complications was performed.

RESULTS

Similar demographic data were observed in patients receiving either single or tandem ureteral stenting. The technical success rate was 93.6% (88/94) for single ureteral stenting and 95.2% (60/63) for tandem ureteral stenting. There was no difference in overall survival between patients receiving single or tandem ureteral stenting (p = 0.41), but the duration of stent patency in tandem ureteral stenting was significantly longer (p = 0.022). The mean patency time was 176.7 ± 21.3 days for single ureteral stenting, and 214.7 ± 21.0 days for tandem ureteral stenting. The complications of ureteral stenting were urinary tract infection (n = 18), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 5), haematuria (n = 3), and stent migration (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Tandem ureteral stenting is a safe and feasible treatment for MUO, and had better efficacy compared to single ureteral stenting.

KEY POINTS

• Ureteral stenting is an established treatment for the management of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) • Prospective single-centre study showed that tandem ureteral stenting is a safe and feasible treatment for MUO • Tandem ureteral stenting provides longer stent patency compared to single ureteral stenting in patient with MUO.

Antegrade Ureteral Stenting is a Good Alternative for the Retrograde Approach

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Double J (JJ) stents for treating obstructive ureteral pathology are generally inserted through a retrograde route with cystoscopic guidance. Antegrade percutaneous insertion using fluoroscopy can be performed alternatively but is less known. Indications, success rate and complications of antegrade ureteral stenting were evaluated.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients in which antegrade ureteral stenting was performed were retrospectively analysed using the radiology information system and patient records. Patient characteristics, details of the antegrade JJ stent insertion procedure and registered complications were collected. Furthermore, it was investigated if prior to the antegrade procedure a retrograde attempt for JJ stent insertion was performed.

RESULTS

Total 130 attempts for antegrade JJ stent insertion were performed in 100 patients. A percutaneous nephrostomy catheter had already been placed in the majority of kidneys (n = 109) for initial treatment of hydronephrosis. Most prevelant indication for a JJ stent was obstructive ureteral pathology due to malignancy (n = 63). A JJ stent was successfully inserted in 125 of 130 procedures. In 21 cases, previous retrograde ureteral stenting had failed but, subsequent antegrade ureteral stenting was successful. There were 8 procedure related complications; 6 infections, 1 false tract and 1 malposition.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade percutaneous insertion of a JJ stent is a good alternative for retrograde insertion.

Image-guided urological interventions: What the urologists must know

Advances in imaging technology, especially in the last two decades, have led to a paradigm shift in the field of image-guided interventions in urology. While the traditional biopsy and drainage techniques are firmly established, image-based stone management and endovascular management of hematuria have evolved further. Ablative techniques for renal and prostate cancer and prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hypertrophy have evolved into viable alternative treatments. Many urologic diseases that were earlier treated surgically are now effectively managed using minimally invasive image-guided techniques, often on a day care basis using only local anesthesia or conscious sedation. This article presents an overview of the technique and status of various image-guided urological procedures, including recent emerging techniques.

Cutting-balloon angioplasty of resistant ureteral stenosis as bridge to stent insertion

Ureteral stenting is a routine, minimally invasive procedure performed for relief of benign or malignant obstruction. In case of ureteral stenosis, to allow a correct insertion of the stent, a predilatation of the ureter stenosis with a conventional balloon catheter can be necessary. In exceptional cases, it can be difficult to advance an 7-8 Fr JJ-catheter over a tight resistant ureter stenosis following unsuccessful high-pressure balloon dilatation. In the present report, we describe two cases of resistant ureter stenosis successfully dilated by a cutting-balloon following the failure of high-pressure balloon dilatation, allowing a correct and uncomplicated antegrade stent insertion.

Interventional uroradiology

With advances in imaging capabilities and percutaneous instruments, many urologic diseases that were once managed surgically are now managed with minimally invasive image-guided techniques. Interventional uroradiology has evolved from simple renal biopsies for diagnostic confirmation, to percutaneous management of stones, to ablation of renal and adrenal tumors. Central to this evolution is the close cooperation with the urologist and nephrologist, each of whom provides specific skill sets and knowledge that can be used to successfully manage the patient. The purpose of this article is to detail the wide range of image-guided interventional techniques, including a discussion of indications, methods, success rates, and complications.

Is the routine check nephrostogram following percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent placement necessary?

Our aim was to review our experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent (PAUS) placement and to determine if the routinely conducted check nephrostogram on the day following ureteric stent placement was necessary. Retrospective review of patients who had undergone PAUS placement between January 2004 and December 2005 was performed. There were 83 subjects (36 males, 47 females), with a mean age of 59.9 years (range, 22-94 years). Average follow-up duration was 7.1 months (range, 1-24 months). The most common indications for PAUS placement were ureteric obstruction due to metastatic disease (n = 56) and urinary calculi (n = 34). Technical success was 93.2% (96/103 attempts), with no major immediate procedure-related complications or mortalities. The Bard 7Fr Urosoft DJ Stent was used in more than 95% of the cases. Eighty-one of 89 (91.0%) check nephrostograms demonstrated a patent ureteric stent with resultant safety catheter removal. Three check nephrostograms revealed distal stent migration requiring repositioning by a goose-snare, while five others showed stent occlusion necessitating permanent external drainage by nephrostomy drainage catheter reinsertion. Following PAUS placement, the serum creatinine level improved or stabilized in 82% of patients. The serum creatinine outcome difference between the groups with benign and malignant indications for PAUS placement was not statistically significant (p = 0.145) but resolution of hydronephrosis was significantly better (p = 0.008) in patients with benign indications. Percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent placement is a safe and effective means of relief for ureteric obstruction. The check nephrostogram following ureteric stent placement was unnecessary in the majority of patients.

Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications

In this review the technique, indication for and complications of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and antegrade ureter stent insertion are described. In the majority of the cases PCN is performed to relieve urinary obstruction, which can be of benign or malignant nature. Another indication for PCN is for treatment of urinary fistulas. PCN can be performed under ultrasound and/or fluoroscopic guidance, with a success rate of more than 90%. The complication rate is approximately 10% for major and minor complications together and 4-5% for major complications only. Percutaneous antegrade double-J stent insertion usually is performed if retrograde ureter stenting has not been successful. However, especially in malignant obstructions, the success rate for antegrade stenting is higher than for retrograde transvesical double-J stent insertion. In the case of severe infection and bleeding after PCN JJ-stent insertion may be contraindicated so long as there is no sufficient concomitant drainage via a PCN . Lower urinary tract dysfunction should be excluded before stent placement. The complication rate is 2-4%. Consequent stent surveillance with regular stent exchange is mandatory.

Combined antegrade and retrograde ureteral stenting: the rendezvous technique

Ureteral stenting is a routine procedure in endourology. To increase the success rate in difficult cases, it may be helpful to use the rendezvous technique, a combined antegrade and retrograde approach. We performed 16 urological rendezvous in 11 patients with ureteral strictures or urologic lesions. The combined approach was successful in all patients, without morbidity or mortality. In our experience the rendezvous technique increased the success rate of antegrade ureteral stenting from 78.6 to 88.09% (p > 0.05). This procedure is a valid option in case of failure of conventional ureteral stenting.

Ureteroscopic endoureterotomy

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the current status of ureteroscopic endoureterotomy (UE) by reporting extensive experience with the endoscopic management of ureteric strictures, with special emphasis on factors determining success, and by reviewing publications on the minimally invasive management of ureteric strictures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 50 patients (mean age 53 years, range 18-85, equal sex distribution) with ureteric strictures of varying causes; all had their stricture treated endoscopically. The follow-up was 0.5-9 years; 10 patients with recurrent strictures had two ipsilateral stents placed to try to improve the outcome, and eight patients with completely obliterating strictures were treated by ureteroscopic re-canalization.

RESULTS

The site of stricture had no bearing on the eventual outcome. Patients with uretero-enteric and malignant strictures did not fare so well. The most important predictor of failure was the length of the stricture, with failure in all seven patients with strictures of > 2 cm. In the 10 patients treated with two ipsilateral stents, eight were successful, which was very promising considering that these patients had recalcitrant strictures and placing one stent had previously failed. The overall success rate was 74%.

CONCLUSION

UE has become the procedure of choice for the initial management of ureteric strictures. Simple balloon dilatation is also effective in certain situations. The characteristics of the stricture often govern the eventual outcome. In properly selected cases success rates of approximately 75% can be expected.

Ureteral stent placement without postprocedural nephrostomy tube: experience in 41 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate one-stage antegrade ureteral stent placement without postprocedural nephrostomy tube.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tubeless ureteral stent insertion was attempted in 41 (30 men, 11 women; eight, benign obstruction; nine outpatients) of 97 adults (56 excluded). Patients were clinically stable with known ureteral obstruction and had been referred for antegrade ureteral stent insertion. Exclusion criteria were infection, coagulopathy, or emergency cases. After renal access was achieved, ureteral stents were inserted. If drainage was satisfactory and there was no marked procedural bleeding, all access was removed without leaving a nephrostomy tube behind. Technical and clinical success rates and complications were assessed with review of radiologic and clinical notes. If one-stage stent insertion was unsuccessful, a nephrostomy tube was inserted and two-stage stent placement was performed. All 56 patients excluded from this study underwent two-stage stent placement. Major complication rate was assessed (Fisher test).

RESULTS

One-stage stent insertion was technically successful in 36 (88%) patients; two with an identifiable risk factor (recent bladder operation, retrograde ureteral instrumentation) developed septicemia that required repeat nephrostomy tube insertion and 2-8 extra days of hospitalization. Clinical success rate was 83% (34 of 41). No major bleeding occurred. In 13 (36%) of 36 patients, hematuria lasted longer than 24 hours but resolved without further intervention or blood transfusion. In those who underwent two-stage stent placement (n = 61), technical success rate was 100%, but clinical success rate was 98%; one patient developed septicemia, and no major hemorrhage occurred. Difference in major complication rate between groups was not significant (6% [two of 36] vs 2% [one of 61]; P =.55).

CONCLUSION

One-stage tubeless antegrade ureteral stent insertion in selected cases showed 88% technical success rate and 83% clinical success rate, with no major hemorrhage.

Primary antegrade ureteric stenting: prospective experience and cost-effectiveness analysis in 50 ureters

AIM

To evaluate the success rate and cost efficiency of primary antegrade ureteric stenting (antegrade ureteric stent insertion as a single procedure without preliminary drainage).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A policy of primary stenting was tested in 38 patients (50 ureters) with obstructive hydronephrosis, of acute or chronic onset and of benign or malignant origin. Patients with suspected pyonephrosis were excluded. Patients successfully primarily stented (group 1) were compared to a group stented as a traditional two-stage procedure (group 2). End point assessments were screening time, equipment used, procedure-related costs, bed occupancy and technical and clinical success rate. Using these cost and outcome measures, a cost-efficiency analysis was performed comparing the two strategies.

RESULTS

40/50 (80%) ureters were considered primary stent successes. The average procedure-related bed occupancy was 2 days (range 1-2 days). Simple equipment alone was successful in 16 cases. Van ( pound46/case). The mean screening time was similar for the two groups (13.5 min vs Andel dilatation catheters and peel-away sheaths were frequently used (23 ureters). Expensive equipment was rarely necessary (four cases) and average extra equipment cost was small 15.3 min; P > or = 0.05). There was a minimum saving of pound800 per successful primary stent. The cost-effectiveness of a primary antegrade stenting strategy was pound1229 vs pound2093 for secondary stenting.

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected patients, the majority of obstructed ureters can be primarily stented using simple equipment. The reduced hospital stay and overall success rate significantly improves the cost competitiveness of antegrade ureteric stenting.

Antegrade ureteral stent placement: positioning without use of a retraction string

PURPOSE

To evaluate a simple method of antegrade ureteral stent insertion allowing optimal positioning of the stent without the use of a retraction string.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen stents were placed in sixteen patients with ureteral obstruction. Materials included a long vascular introducer sheath and radiopaque markers on the tips of both the sheath and the pusher catheter. For optimal positioning of the proximal pigtail in the renal pelvis, the distal end of the sheath was used to hold a large portion of the pigtail in the extended state prior to its deployment.

RESULTS

All stent placements were successful. In one case, the tip of the proximal pigtail was caught in a lower-pole calix. In another case, repeat stent placement was necessary because of recurrent stricture several months after removal of the first stent. All stents functioned properly, as demonstrated by follow-up nephrostography 2 or 3 days after each procedure.

CONCLUSION

The insertion method we describe is simple, easy to perform, and fast and avoids the risks associated with the use of a retraction string.

Endourologic management of malignant ureteral strictures

PURPOSE

This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of balloon dilatation, endoureterotomy, percutaneous ureteroneocystostomy with stenting, and insertion of Wallstents in the management of malignant ureteral strictures with an intact or compromised vascular supply.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 127 patients with ureteral strictures secondary to malignancies were assessed after at least 2-year follow-up (range 2-5 years; mean 3.5 years). Balloon dilation (antegrade approach) was applied in 46 patients, endoureterotomy with temporary stenting in 37, percutaneous ureteroneocystostomy with stenting in 34, bougie and stents in 13, and Wallstents in 31.

RESULTS

Balloon dilatation was successful in only two of four malignant midureteral stenoses with intact vascular supplies and was even less successful (10%) in midureteral strictures with a compromised vascular supply. Endoureterotomy failed in all cases to prevent ureteral obstruction. Percutaneous ureteroneocystostomy achieved patency in 11 of 34 patients (33%) having a compromised ureteral vascular supply. Wallstents were successful in 18 of 31 patients (58%) with stenoses of the pelvic ureter.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous ureteroneocystostomy with stenting meets the requirement for palliation in patients with obstruction secondary to pelvic neoplasms. Wallstents proved to be most successful when used in the pelvic ureter.

Techniques for stenting the normal and obstructed ureter

Ureteral obstruction is a common cause of urologic morbidity requiring quick and effective treatment, as prolonged obstruction can cause pain, infection, and eventual loss of renal function. Few would argue that initial drainage or bypassing of the obstruction is favorable initial management; however, urologists are often-times faced with technically difficult cases not responsive to the standard operative maneuvers. Recognizing the diversity of pathology and the potentially complicating issues, urologists should have in their armamentarium a systematic approach or algorithm for dealing with these common dilemmas, as well as an understanding of various tricks of the trade. This knowledge will prevent heightened anxiety at the time of surgery and will ensure the availability of the proper operative equipment. This article outlines an approach and discusses the obstacles and options in stenting the obstructed ureter.

A radiological approach to the through and through technique for percutaneous passage of ureteric strictures

Some ureteric strictures are so tight that they are difficult to traverse with balloon catheters or internal stents. We present five such cases, which were traversed using a modified through and through technique with a hydrophilic coated guide-wire. The reasons for the difficulty are discussed, and the merits of the modified technique compared with conventional techniques are described.

Retrograde radiological retrieval and replacement of double-J ureteric stents

Internal double-J stents are used to maintain ureteral patency and require replacement within 4-6 months. We present our experience with 15 consecutive patients who had 35 internal ureteral stents retrieved and in whom 27 were successfully replaced, retrogradely under fluoroscopic control. The double-J stents were retrieved using an Amplatz gooseneck snare. Replacement was more successful in female patients, and was technically more difficult via an ileal conduit or transplant ureter. We found this new technique to be straightforward and well tolerated by the patients. The procedure was performed on an outpatient basis, and no serious complications were reported. This technique is considerably cheaper than cystoscopic replacement under epidural or general anaesthesia, and is recommended for the retrieval and replacement of internal ureteral plastic stents in most patients.