Colorectal polyps: a correlation of radiological and pathological findings

Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants

AIM

To analyse sensitivity, specificity and complication rate of endoscopy, and barium enema for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed (1980-2000) directed at the endoscopic and radiologic literature on barium enema. Articles were selected based on the type of study, availability of sensitivity and specificity values in sizeable patient groups, and reports on complications. Sixty articles were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Endoscopy proved to have superior sensitivity for polyps in patients at high-risk for colorectal neoplasia. The role of endoscopy and radiology in average-risk screening populations is not known. Sensitivity and specificity rates ranged widely, probably due to bias. For the detection of small polyps endoscopy has superior performance, whereas sensitivity is similar for endoscopy and barium enema for the detection of larger (>1 cm) polyps and tumours. Overall, endoscopy is associated with a higher complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy is the preferred detection method in high-risk patients. The role of endoscopy and radiology in a screening setting requires evaluation. This review provides the test characteristics of endoscopy and radiology which are relevant for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Double-contrast barium enema may play an important role for screening purposes, owing to its good sensitivity for detecting larger (>1 cm) polyps and its lack of major complications. de Zwart, I. M.et al. (2001). Clinical Radiology56, 401-409.

Colonoscopic diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Methods of diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding depend on the rate of bleeding and the amount of blood lost. If bleeding is occult, colonoscopy is the single best way to determine the source, if bleeding is gross but mild, causing melena or small amounts of hematochezia, colonoscopy or a combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema should be used to evaluate the colon. In most patients with melena, the upper tract must be examined endoscopically. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding stops spontaneously in 75 to 90 per cent of patients, permitting preparation of the colon before colonoscopy. If bleeding is continuing, diagnostic options include colonoscopy with no preparation of the colon, relying on the cathartic effect of blood, or a red cell radionuclide scan followed by angiography if the scan is positive. A bleeding lesion seen on angiography is usually treated by infusion of vasopressin. Colonoscopic treatment of a bleeding site uses the BICAP probe, heater probe, or argon laser. Patients who bleed severely and those who do not respond to treatment or rebleed after treatment are candidates for operation. Segmental resection is preferred if the bleeding site is known. If not, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis may be necessary. A mortality rate of 10 to 15 per cent in patients with severe bleeding reflects the advanced age of many of these patients and the difficulty of managing gastrointestinal bleeding in the presence of associated medical conditions.