Oral and vaginal misoprostol 800 microg every 8 h for early abortion

Effectiveness and safety of misoprostol-only for first-trimester medication abortion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to update our 2019 systematic review of data on the effectiveness and safety of misoprostol-only for first-trimester abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched PubMed on December 18, 2022, to find published articles describing the outcomes of treatment with misoprostol-only for abortion of viable intrauterine pregnancy at ≤91 days of gestation. From each article identified, two authors independently abstracted relevant data about each group of patients treated with a distinct regimen. We assessed the risk of bias using four defined indicators. We estimated the proportion of patients with treatment failure using meta-analytic methods as well as the proportion hospitalized or transfused after treatment. We examined associations between treatment failure and selected characteristics of the groups.

RESULTS

We identified 49 papers with 66 groups that collectively included 16,354 evaluable patients, of whom 2960 (meta-analytic estimate 15%, 95% CI 12%, 19%) had treatment failures. Of 9228 patients assessed for ongoing pregnancy after treatment, 521 (meta-analytic estimate 6%, 95% CI 5%, 8%) had that condition. Failure risk was significantly associated with misoprostol dose, the total allowed number of doses, the maximum duration of dosing, and certain indicators of risk of bias. Among 11,007 patients allowed to take at least three misoprostol doses, the first consisting of misoprostol 800 mcg administered vaginally, sublingually, or buccally, the meta-analytic estimate of the failure risk was 11% (95% CI 8%, 14%). At most, 0.2% of 15,679 evaluable patients were hospitalized or received transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some studies in this updated review were adjudicated to have a high risk of bias, the results continue to support the key conclusion of our 2019 analysis: misoprostol-only is effective and safe for the termination of first-trimester intrauterine pregnancy.

IMPLICATIONS

Misoprostol-only is a safe and effective option for medication abortion in the first trimester if mifepristone is unavailable or inaccessible.

Women's experiences using drugs to induce abortion acquired in the informal sector in Colombia: qualitative interviews with users in Bogotá and the Coffee Axis

In 2006, abortion in Colombia was decriminalised under certain circumstances. Yet some women continue to avail themselves of ways to terminate pregnancies outside of the formal health system. In-depth interviews (IDIs) with women who acquired drugs outside of health facilities to terminate their pregnancies (n = 47) were conducted in Bogotá and the Coffee Axis in 2018. Respondents were recruited when they sought postabortion care at a health facility. This analysis examines women's experiences with medication acquired outside of the health system for a termination: how they obtained the medication, what they received, how they were instructed to use the pills, the symptoms they were told to expect, and their abortion experiences. Respondents purchased the drugs in drug stores, online, from street vendors, or through contacts in their social networks. Women who used online vendors more commonly received the minimum dose of misoprostol according to WHO guidelines to complete the abortion (800 mcg) and received more detailed instructions and information about what to expect than women who bought the drug elsewhere. Common instructions were to take the pills orally and vaginally; most women received incomplete information about what to expect. Most women seeking care did not have a complete abortion before coming to the health facility (they never started bleeding or had an incomplete abortion). Women still face multiple barriers to safe abortion in Colombia; policymakers should promote better awareness about legal abortion availability, access to quality medication and complete information about misoprostol use for women to terminate unwanted pregnancies safely.

Efficacy of Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize available data on the effectiveness and safety of single-agent misoprostol for medical abortion in the first trimester.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, CABI, Cochrane, EMBASE, LILACS, the Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for English-language studies that evaluated misoprostol alone for abortion of a viable pregnancy in the first trimester.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Our search yielded 1,562 citations, of which 38 included data from 53 trial groups that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We abstracted data about each trial group, including study characteristics, treatment regimen, clinical protocol, number of women treated and followed, and numbers with outcomes of interest. We used meta-analytic methods and logistic regression to examine factors associated with surgical intervention after treatment. Among all 12,829 evaluable women, 2,536 (meta-analytic estimate 22.0%, 95% CI 18.8-25.5%) had surgical uterine evacuation. Multiple factors were significantly associated with this proportion, including misoprostol amount per dose and route of administration, loss to follow-up rate, publication date, geographic region, number of misoprostol doses, duration of dosing, and time between dosing and evaluation. Of 6,359 evaluable women, 384 (meta-analytic estimate 6.8%, 95% CI 5.3-8.5%) had ongoing pregnancies. At most 26 of 12,184 evaluable women (meta-analytic estimate 0.7%, 95% CI 0.4-1.0%) were transfused or hospitalized for abortion-related reasons. In trials that provided satisfaction data, most women were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment (meta-analytic estimate 78%, 95% CI 71-85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Misoprostol alone is effective and safe and is a reasonable option for women seeking abortion in the first trimester. Research is indicated to further refine the regimen and to establish efficacy in the late first trimester.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42018083589.

Effect of oral misoprostol, alone or in combination with aglepristone, on mid-term pregnancy termination in cats

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol (MIS) administration in the induction of mid-term pregnancy termination in cats.

METHODS

Twenty-eight cats that were pregnant for 30-40 days were allocated to four groups. The aglepristone (AGL) group (n = 7) received 10 mg/kg SC aglepristone q24h for two consecutive days. In the AGL+MIS group (n = 7), AGL (as administered in the AGL group) and MIS (200 µg/cat PO q12h until the start of abortion) were administered. The MIS200 (n = 7) and MIS400 groups (n = 7) received MIS (200 or 400 µg/cat misoprostol, respectively) alone PO q12h until the start of abortion. Blood samples were collected at the start of treatment (d0), 4 days after the start of treatment (d4) and on the day of complete abortion/end of administration (dA/d7).

RESULTS

The efficacy of the treatment was 71.4% in the AGL group, 100% in the AGL+MIS group, 0% in MIS200 group and 57.4% in MIS400 group (P = 0.004). No significance was found in relation to the interval from treatment to the start/end of abortion and the duration of abortion in all groups. The most observed side effect was vomiting in both groups administered MIS, particularly in the MIS400 group (56.7%). Progesterone (P4) concentrations were reduced during the abortion, but not to basal levels, in all groups. P4 concentrations were significantly lower at dA/d7 in the MIS400 group compared with the AGL and AGL+MIS groups (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results obtained from this study showed that low doses of MIS do not induce abortions in cats but increase the effect of AGL. Although higher doses could terminate pregnancies, this also causes intense unwanted side effects. Therefore, the use of MIS alone as an abortifacient in cats is not recommended. For mid-term pregnancy termination in cats, the combination of misoprostol and aglepristone provides a more effective abortifacient than using either of them alone.

Medical Abortion

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the provision of first-trimester medical induced abortion, including patient eligibility, counselling, and consent; evidence-based regimens; and special considerations for clinicians providing medical abortion care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, registered nurses, midwives, residents, and other healthcare providers who currently or intend to provide pregnancy options counselling, medical abortion care, or family planning services.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended first trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library between July 2015 and November 2015 using appropriately controlled vocabulary (MeSH search terms: Induced Abortion, Medical Abortion, Mifepristone, Misoprostol, Methotrexate). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from June 1986 to November 2015 in English. Additionally, existing guidelines from other countries were consulted for review. A grey literature search was not required.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force for Preventive Medicine rating scale (Table 1).

BENEFITS, HARMS AND/OR COSTS

Medical abortion is safe and effective. Complications from medical abortion are rare. Access and costs will be dependent on provincial and territorial funding for combination mifepristone/misoprostol and provider availability.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

Introduction Pre-procedure care Medical abortion regimens Providing medical abortion Post-abortion care

RECOMMENDATIONS

Introduction Pre-procedure care Medical abortion regimens Providing medical abortion Post-abortion care.

Improving care of women at risk of unsafe abortion: implementing a risk-reduction model at the Uruguayan-Brazilian border

OBJECTIVE

To describe the initial stages of the implementation of a risk-reduction model designed by Iniciativas Sanitarias to shield women from unsafe abortion in a traditional community on the Uruguay-Brazil border.

METHODS

This mixed-design study was conducted first between 22 and 26 March 2010, and then between 2 and 7 May 2011, in Rivera, Uruguay, to gather information from women seen at health centers, healthcare providers, and local policy makers before the project started and midway through the project.

RESULTS

At baseline most women and providers considered abortion justifiable only on narrow grounds, yet favored the implementation of a risk-reduction model that would include preabortion as well as postabortion counseling, the former providing information on different abortion methods and their risks. By the midterm assessment, the counseling service had assisted 87 women with unwanted pregnancies. Of the 52 who came for a postabortion visit, 50 had self-administered misoprostol, with no complications. Women were highly satisfied with the counseling. At baseline, misoprostol seemed to be available from both pharmacists and informal sellers. At midterm, it was still available from informal vendors but pharmacists said they did not provide misoprostol. The risk-reduction initiative heightened public attention to the abortion issue but the controversy it generated did not seriously impede its implementation.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to implement the proposed risk-reduction model in a traditional community such as Rivera, not only in Uruguay but in any country irrespective of its abortion laws.

Does methotrexate confer a significant advantage over misoprostol alone for early medical abortion? A retrospective analysis of 8678 abortions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare efficacy for four medical abortion regimens used in one clinic setting: (1) misoprostol alone, (2) oral methotrexate + buccal misoprostol, (3) oral methotrexate + vaginal misoprostol, and (4) intramuscular methotrexate + vaginal misoprostol.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data from clinical records.

SETTING

An anonymous women's health centre in Latin America, providing medical abortion services since 2001 in a highly restrictive setting.

POPULATION

A total of 8678 women with gestations <56 days, who sought a medical abortion between April 2002 and December 2004.

METHODS

Chi-square test was performed to compare patient characteristics by abortion outcome (success/failure). The impact of selected variables on method success was explored through logistic regression. A second regression analysis was conducted with a subsample (n = 4022), for which data on parity and previous abortion(s) were available.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Abortion outcome (success/failure) at 2-week follow up.

RESULTS

Success rates for the three methotrexate regimens ranged from 81.7 to 83.5% and did not differ significantly; misoprostol-alone regimen had a success rate of 76.8%. Efficacy was significantly higher for the three combined methotrexate regimens compared with misoprostol alone and remained so in the multivariate model (OR = 1.35). In the final regression, lower gestational age, being nulliparous, and having no previous abortions were positively correlated with method success.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-use setting, methotrexate appears to confer a significant advantage over misoprostol alone for early medical abortion. This finding is important for settings where mifepristone remains unavailable. Additional factors such as gestational age limits and patient preference should be considered in regimen selection.

Alternatives to mifepristone for early medical abortion

OBJECTIVE

To review published reports of first-trimester medical abortion regimens that do not include mifepristone.

METHODS

Reports listed in Pubmed and Medline on prospective and controlled trials of the efficacy of misoprostol, alone or associated with methotrexate, for first-trimester abortion were analyzed if they included more than 100 participants and were published since 1990.

RESULTS

The efficacy of regimens using misoprostol alone ranged from 84% to 96%, and when misoprostol was used with methotrexate the efficacy ranged from 70% to 97%. Efficacy rates were influenced by follow-up interval. Treatment for infection, bleeding, and incomplete abortion were infrequent with both methods (0.3%-5%).

CONCLUSION

Alone or in combination with methotrexate, misoprostol is an efficacious alternative to mifepristone for the medical termination of pregnancy.

First-trimester pregnancy termination with 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 12 h

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 800 microg of misoprostol every 12 h, for a period of 36 h for pharmacological abortion. A group of 162 volunteer women with gestations between 50 and 63 days received misoprostol every 12 h up to a maximum of three doses for abortion. Outcome measures assessed included: successful abortion (complete abortion without requiring surgery), side effects, and a decrease in hemoglobin, mean time of vaginal bleeding, mean expulsion time and mean time of returning of menses. Complete abortion occurred in 148 of 162 (91%, 95% confidence interval 87.95) patients. The mean decrease in hemoglobin was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Vaginal bleeding lasted 8.0 +/- 3.2 days, spotting 8.0 +/- 3.5 days, and total bleeding 16 +/- 4.0 days. The mean expulsion time was 8.5 +/- 4.0 h. According to the observed outcomes, 800 microg of misoprostol vaginally could be a valid method to terminate pregnancies up to 9 weeks of gestation.

Misoprostol alone for early abortion: an evaluation of seven potential regimens

INTRODUCTION

A growing body of literature has shown that misoprostol alone could be effective for early medical abortion. We evaluated seven potential regimens in women up to 56 days of gestation in order to potentially identify an optimal regimen.

METHODS

In phase I of the study, women requesting early abortion were randomized to one of three misoprostol regimens (4x400 microg po every 3 h, 2x800 microg po every 6 h, 1x600 pv microg); in phase II, women were randomized to one of two regimens (2x800 microg po every 3 h, 1x800 pv microg). In phase III, we consecutively tested two regimens (800 microg pv wetted with saline repeated after 24 h if intact gestational sac, 2x800 microg pv wetted with saline) to validate previously published results.

RESULTS

Although most women experienced some side effects, all regimens were tolerable and acceptable. Five of the seven regimens resulted in complete abortion rates of 60% or less. Only repeated doses of 800 microg pv misoprostol resulted in efficacy exceeding 60%.

DISCUSSION

Misoprostol-alone abortion regimens using oral misoprostol are too ineffective for clinical use or further investigation. Regimens with repeated dosing of misoprostol 800 microg pv warrant further study to find the optimal treatment protocol.

Evidence for shortening the time interval of prostaglandin after mifepristone for medical abortion

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare regimens that shorten the interval between mifepristone and the prostaglandin misoprostol or gemeprost for medical abortion.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE were systematically searched for the words mifepristone and abortion. Only randomized controlled trials comparing different mifepristone regimens with either misoprostol or gemeprost were included. The outcome was a complete abortion not requiring surgical evacuation.

RESULTS

Five randomized trials were identified and all were published since 1999. Four were from the United States and three had enrollments of >1000. The route of administration of the prostaglandin was used vaginally, except in one study where misoprostol was divided in two doses 2 h apart. Four studies provided information about a 1-day interval and two trials provided information about an interval of 6-8 h evaluating mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol 800 microg vaginally. There were no significant differences noted between the current 2-day interval compared with the 1-day interval. There was one study suggesting no difference with an interval of 6-8 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The interval between mifepristone and misoprostol 800 microg vaginally can be decreased from 48 to 6-8 h without loss of efficacy.