Oral mifepristone 600 mg and vaginal gemeprost for mid-trimester induction of abortion. An open multicenter study. UK Multicenter Study Group

Cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a scarred uterus: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov (1983 through 2015). Eligibility criteria were cohort or cross-sectional studies that reported on efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents in patients with previous cesarean delivery. Efficacy was determined based on the proportion of patients achieving vaginal delivery and vaginal delivery within 24 hours following administration of a cervical ripening agent. Safety was assessed by the risk of uterine rupture and complications such as retained placental products, blood transfusion requirement, and endometritis, when available, as secondary outcomes. Of the 176 studies identified, 38 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 17 studies were descriptive and 21 studies compared the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents between patients with previous cesarean and those with no previous cesarean. From included studies, we abstracted data on cervical ripening agents and estimated the pooled risk differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. To account for between-study heterogeneity, we estimated risk ratios based on underlying random effects analyses. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and across-study heterogeneity was assessed based on the I(2) measure.

RESULTS

The most commonly used agent was PGE1. In descriptive studies, PGE1 was associated with a vaginal delivery rate of 96.8%, of which 76.3% occurred within 24 hours, uterine rupture in 0.8%, retained placenta in 10.8%, and endometritis in 3.9% in patients with ≥1 cesarean. In comparative studies, the use of PGE1, PGE2, and mechanical methods (laminaria and dilation and curettage) were equally efficacious in achieving vaginal delivery between patients with and without prior cesarean (risk ratio, 0.99, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.00; risk ratio, 1.00, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.02; and risk ratio, 1.00, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.01; respectively). In patients with history of ≥1 cesarean the use of PGE1 was associated with higher risk of uterine rupture (risk ratio, 6.57; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-19.52) and retained placenta (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.43) compared to women without a prior cesarean. However, the risk of uterine rupture among women with history of only 1 cesarean (0.47%) was not statistically significant (risk ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-14.32), whereas among those with history of ≥2 cesareans (2.5%) was increased as compared to those with no previous cesarean (0.08%) (risk ratio, 17.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.00-102.8). Funnel plots did not demonstrate any clear evidence of publication bias. Across-study heterogeneity ranged from 0-81%.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and metaanalysis provides evidence that PGE1, PGE2, and mechanical methods are efficacious for achieving vaginal delivery in women with previous cesarean delivery. The use of prostaglandin PGE1 in the second trimester was not associated with significantly increased risk for uterine rupture among women with only 1 cesarean; however, this risk was substantially increased among women with ≥2 cesareans although the absolute risk appeared to be relatively small.

Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester

Labor induction abortion is effective throughout the second trimester. Patterns of use and gestational age limits vary by locality. Earlier gestations (typically 12 to 20 weeks) have shorter abortion times than later gestational ages, but differences in complication rates within the second trimester according to gestational age have not been demonstrated. The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is the most effective and fastest regimen. Typically, mifepristone 200 mg is followed by use of misoprostol 24-48 h later. Ninety-five percent of abortions are complete within 24 h of misoprostol administration. Compared with misoprostol alone, the combined regimen results in a clinically significant reduction of 40% to 50% in time to abortion and can be used at all gestational ages. However, mifepristone is not widely available. Accordingly, prostaglandin analogues without mifepristone (most commonly misoprostol or gemeprost) or high-dose oxytocin are used. Misoprostol is more widely used because it is inexpensive and stable at room temperature. Misoprostol alone is best used vaginally or sublingually, and doses of 400 mcg are generally superior to 200 mcg or less. Dosing every 3 h is superior to less frequent dosing, although intervals of up to 12 h are effective when using higher doses (600 or 800 mcg) of misoprostol. Abortion rates at 24 h are approximately 80%-85%. Although gemeprost has similar outcomes as compared to misoprostol, it has higher cost, requires refrigeration, and can only be used vaginally. High-dose oxytocin can be used in circumstances when prostaglandins are not available or are contraindicated. Osmotic dilators do not shorten induction times when inserted at the same time as misoprostol; however, their use prior to induction using misoprostol has not been studied. Preprocedure-induced fetal demise has not been studied systematically for possible effects on time to abortion. While isolated case reports and retrospective reviews document uterine rupture during second-trimester induction with misoprostol, the magnitude of the risk is not known. The relationship of individual uterotonic agents to uterine rupture is not clear. Based on existing evidence, the Society of Family Planning recommends that, when labor induction abortion is performed in the second trimester, combined use of mifepristone and misoprostol is the ideal regimen to effect abortion quickly and completely. The Society of Family Planning further recommends that alternative regimens, primarily misoprostol alone, should only be used when mifepristone is not available.

Midtrimester termination of pregnancy using gemeprost in combination with laminaria in women who have previously undergone cesarean section

AIM

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of midtrimester termination of pregnancy using gemeprost in combination with laminaria in women who had previously undergone cesarean section and in women who had not.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2006, we carried out a retrospective study of termination of pregnancy at 12-21 weeks of gestation at the University of Tsukuba Hospital. Termination of pregnancy was carried out by three-step uterine cervical dilation using laminaria followed by vaginal administration of 1 mg gemeprost every 3 h for up to four doses over 24 h.

RESULTS

A total of 173 women underwent midtrimester termination of pregnancy. The women were categorized into two groups: those who had previously undergone cesarean section (n = 26) (previous cesarean section group) and those who had not (n = 147) (control group). Seven women had undergone cesarean section at least twice. The gemeprost dose administered was 2.8 +/- 1.4 mg for the previous cesarean section group and 2.4 +/- 1.6 mg for the control group (difference in doses not significant). Although abnormal vaginal bleeding (>500 mL) was more likely to occur in the previous cesarean section group than in the control group (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-10.82), none of the woman required blood transfusion. Uterine rupture and failed abortion were not observed.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of our laminaria-gemeprost protocol for termination of pregnancy during the midtrimester are similar for women who have previously undergone cesarean section and those who have not.

Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management

Second trimester abortions constitute 10-15% of all induced abortions worldwide but are responsible for two-thirds of major abortion-related complications. During the last decade, medical methods for second trimester induced abortion have been considerably improved and become safe and more accessible. Today, in most cases, safe and efficient medical abortion services can be offered or improved by minor changes in existing health care facilities. Second trimester medical abortion can be provided by a nurse-midwife with the back-up of a gynaecologist. Because of the potential for heavy vaginal bleeding and serious complications, it is advisable that second trimester terminations take place in a health care facility where blood transfusion and emergency surgery (including laparotomy) are available. This article provides basic information on regimens recommended for second trimester medical abortion. The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is now an established and highly effective method for second trimester abortion. Where mifepristone is not available or affordable, misoprostol alone has also been shown to be effective, although a higher total dose is needed and efficacy is lower than for the combined regimen. Therefore, whenever possible, the combined regimen should be used. Efforts should be made to reduce unnecessary surgical evacuation of the uterus after expulsion of the fetus. Future studies should focus on improving pain management, the treatment of women with failed medical abortion after 24 hours, and the safety of medical abortion regimens in women with a previous caesarean section or uterine scar.

Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review

Mid-trimester abortion constitutes 10-15% of all induced abortion. The aim of this article is to provide a review of the current literature of mid-trimester methods of abortion with respect to efficacy, side effects and acceptability. There have been continuing efforts to improve the abortion technology in terms of effectiveness, technical ease of performance, acceptability and reduction of side effects and complications. During the last decade, medical methods for mid-trimester induced abortion have shown a considerable development and have become safe and more accessible. The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is now an established and highly effective method for termination of pregnancy (TOP). Advantages and disadvantages of medical versus surgical methods are discussed. Randomized studies are lacking, and more studies on pain treatment and the safety of any method used in patients with a previous uterine scar are debated, and data are scarce. Pain management in abortion requires special attention. This review highlights the need for randomized studies to set guidelines for mid-trimester abortion methods in terms of safety and acceptability as well as for better analgesic regimens.

Which factors influence the number of gemeprost pessaries used in inducing second-trimester abortions?

BACKGROUND

The course of second-trimester abortions with the intention to use gemeprost as the only abortifacient is described.

METHODS

The report is based on 278 consecutive second-trimester abortions, excluding missed abortions, during a 12-year period in a tertiary referral center. The women were treated with 1 mg gemeprost pessaries every fourth hour with a maximum of five applications during 24 h. If abortion had not occurred, a new treatment of gemeprost was prescribed after an interval of 12 h.

RESULTS

The median number of gemeprost pessaries used was 4 (range 1-16) and the mean number (+/-SD) 4.09 (+/-1.90). Abortion occurred within 24 h in 78% of the women and within 48 h in 96%. The efficiency of gemeprost was highly dependent on previous vaginal deliveries (p<0.001), with a mean number of applications of 4.63 (+/-2.04), 3.93 (+/-1.74), and 3.13 (+/-1.26) in those with none, one, and two or more previous vaginal deliveries, respectively. Previous spontaneous abortions were associated with a lower number of applications. Including previous vaginal deliveries and spontaneous abortions in a two-way analysis of variance (anova), only the number of spontaneous abortions was marginally significant (p=0.05). After excluding four patients with three or more spontaneous abortions from the analysis, the number of previous vaginal deliveries was significant (p=0.010) whereas that of spontaneous abortions became nonsignificant. Postprocedure complications were reported in 13% of the women.

CONCLUSION

The course of the abortions was dependent on previous vaginal deliveries and spontaneous abortions.

Medical termination of pregnancy in the early first trimester

Surgical abortion using vacuum aspiration or dilatation and curettage has been the method of choice for termination of pregnancy up to 63 days' gestation since the 1960s. Over the last three decades many studies have explored the use of medical methods for inducing abortion at these gestations. Earlier regimens assessed the systemic and intrauterine injection of prostaglandins. This was followed in the 1980s by the introduction of the antiprogesterone, mifepristone. Since its introduction, the uptake of medical abortion has been steadily increasing in countries where it has been available for routine use. Most current clinical protocols require the use of prostaglandins in combination with anti-progesterones or antimetabolites. The safety, efficacy and acceptability of the medical regimen are now well established at all gestations of pregnancy. Provision of medical abortion increases the choice available to women, in particular those wishing to avoid surgery.

Analgesia requirements and predictors of analgesia use for women undergoing medical abortion up to 22 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

To assess analgesia use and the predictors for requiring analgesia in women undergoing medical abortion at all gestations up to 22 weeks.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland.

POPULATION

Consecutive women undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act.

METHODS

Analgesia requirements and characteristics of women undergoing abortion were analysed using logistic regression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect of age, gestation, reproductive history, route and dose of misoprostol administration on analgesia requirements.

RESULTS

Of the total 4343 women included in this review, 3139 women (72%) required analgesia. Of these, 3054 women (97%) used oral analgesia, 75 women (2.4%) used opiates while 10 women (0.3%) had diclofenac sodium given rectally. There was no significant difference in analgesia use whether women used the vaginal or sublingual route of misoprostol administration. Logistic regression showed a significant positive association with gestation at termination (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.12), number of misoprostol doses used (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51) and induction to abortion interval (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.12) and a negative association with the age of women undergoing abortion (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) and previous live birth (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesia requirement was significantly higher in women of younger age, higher gestation, longer induction to abortion interval and with increased number of misoprostol doses used while women with previous live birth were significantly less likely to use analgesia.

Infection after medical abortion: A review of the literature

Medical abortion regimens have become widely used, but the frequency of infection after medical abortion is not well documented. This systematic review provides data on infectious complications after medical abortion. We searched Medline for articles written before July 2003 to determine the frequency of infection after medical abortion up to 26 weeks of gestation. We reviewed all articles and extracted data on the frequency of infection from 65 studies. The frequency of diagnosed and/or treated infection after medical abortion was very low (0.92%, N = 46,421) and varied among regimens. Results of this review confirm that, with respect to infectious complications, medical abortion is a safe and effective option for first- and second-trimester pregnancy termination. After accounting for regional variations in diagnosis, there is little difference in frequency of infection among the regimens reviewed. Future studies should report clear diagnosis and treatment standards for infection so that more precise information becomes available.

Ectopic Pregnancy and Medical Abortion

OBJECTIVE

Medical abortion regimens have become more widely used to terminate early pregnancies. Medical abortion providers are concerned to diagnose and exclude women with ectopic pregnancy before initiating treatment, as with any early pregnancy termination. Yet, there is little information about whether the various pretreatment screening methods used are adequate. We reviewed published literature to determine the overall success of screening for ectopic pregnancy before medical abortion treatment.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE for articles on medical abortion regimens published before July 2003.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We selected English language articles of studies of medical abortion with sample sizes greater than 100, which reported on ectopic pregnancy diagnosed after medical abortion treatment. Fifty-seven of 85 prospective studies and randomized trials (69%) met these inclusion criteria. We also included data from 2 unpublished studies because they were large and well-controlled and because they included serious adverse events known to us, which we did not deem fair to exclude from our analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Each article was reviewed by one author. Data from selected studies were compiled, and the frequency of ectopic pregnancy diagnosed after medical abortion treatment was calculated. Ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed very infrequently following medical abortion procedures, occurring in only 10 of 44,789 (0.02%) women.

CONCLUSION

The very low frequency of ectopic pregnancies diagnosed after medical abortion treatment demonstrates that the various pretreatment screening methods that providers use to exclude patients with ectopic pregnancies are successful. Further, there is no evidence to suggest that medical abortion treatment leads to unusual complications for women with ectopic pregnancies.

Pharmacological properties of mifepristone: toxicology and safety in animal and human studies

Roussel Uclaf in partnership with the INSERM unit of Prof. E.E. Baulieu first discovered mifepristone (RU486) as part of a large research program on steroidal compounds with antihormone properties. Exhibiting a strong affinity to the progesterone and the glucocorticoid receptors, mifepristone exerted competitive antagonism to these hormones both in in vitro and in animal experiments. Due to its antiprogesterone activity, it was proposed that mifepristone be used for the termination of early human pregnancy. Mifepristone, at a dose of 600 mg initially used alone, was then used with a subsequent low dose of prostaglandin that led to a success rate of 95% as a medical method for early termination of pregnancy (TOP). Its use was extended to other indications, such as cervical dilatation prior to surgical TOP in the first trimester, therapeutic TOP for medical reasons beyond the first trimester, and for labor induction in case of fetal death in utero. The efficacy and safety of this treatment has been confirmed based on its use for over a decade, with close adherence to the approved recommendations. This paper describes the safety studies conducted in animals as well as the safety follow-up and side effects reported with use of the compound in various indications either approved or unapproved. The rationale for warnings and contraindications for use of the product are also explained. At lower doses, the molecule has proven promising for contraceptive purposes with few reported side effects. However, development of the product for this indication would require long-term studies. Although political and philosophical obstacles have delayed research, the use of mifepristone for other potential indications in gynecology or oncology should be investigated.

Progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators: an overview

Since the original description of the structure of the antiprogestin, mifepristone, was published, numerous related compounds have been synthesized which may function as progesterone antagonists (PAs) or progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs). The latter are mixed agonists-antagonists. Both PAs and PRMs have therapeutic applications in female health care. Mifepristone is predominantly a PA and displays only minimum agonist activity in certain systems. Together with a prostaglandin, mifepristone can terminate pregnancies of less than 9 weeks duration, and it may also be used at later gestational ages. Mifepristone causes expulsion of the uterine contents following intrauterine fetal death. A mifepristone-prostaglandin combination has been shown to be very effective treatment in women with menses delay of 11 days or less. Many PAs and PRMs display antiproliferative effects in the endometrium. Serum estradiol levels however remain in the early to mid-follicular phase range. For this reason, they have application in the treatment of endometriosis and myoma without being associated with bone loss and hypoestrogenism. PRMs may also find application in the treatment of dysfunctional bleeding as well as an adjunct to estrogens in hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Many PAs have contraceptive potential by suppressing follicular development and blocking the LH surge. Low doses may also be potential contraceptives by retarding endometrial maturation without affecting ovulation or inducing bleeding. Mifepristone is an excellent agent for use as an emergency "postcoital" contraceptive. PAs may also be useful in IVF programs to prevent a premature LH surge and to delay the emergence of the implantation window. In addition to their use in women's health care, mifepristone and several other PAs are potent antiglucocorticoid agents and may be used to treat ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome. They may also be used in the treatment of tumors containing steroid receptors and in other situations which require suppression of the ACTH-cortisol axis.

Prostaglandins for induction of second-trimester termination and intrauterine death

The introduction of synthetic prostaglandin has revolutionized the treatment protocol for induction of second-trimester abortion and intrauterine death. Gemeprost is the only licensed synthetic prostaglandin analogue for second-trimester abortion in the United Kingdom. However, it is expensive and needs to be stored in a refrigerator. Misoprostol is marketed for use in the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer. It is inexpensive and can be stored at room temperature. It has been widely used for induction of second-trimester abortion and intrauterine death. Misoprostol, 400 microg given vaginally every 3hours, is probably the optimal regimen for second-trimester abortion. The combination of misoprostol and mifepristone significantly reduced the induction-to-abortion interval when compared with the misoprostol-only regimen. In addition, misoprostol can also be used as a cervical priming agent prior to dilatation and evacuation in second-trimester abortion.

Medical abortion in the second trimester

The introduction of prostaglandin analogues and mifepristone has changed the management of second trimester abortion in the last 2 decades. Gemeprost and misoprostol are the two most extensively studied prostaglandin analogues that are used in this period. The combination of either gemeprost or misoprostol with mifepristone is most effective. With these regimens, over 90% of women abort within 24 hours and the mean induction to abortion interval is about 6 hours. Mifepristone is expensive and is not available in many countries. Therefore, prostaglandin analogue-only regimens might be the only option. These regimens are still effective with an abortion rate of >90% in 48 hours. However, the induction to abortion interval (15 hours) is much longer. Intra-cervical tents can be used to shorten the induction to abortion intervals.

Low dose sulprostone for termination of second and third trimester pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of sulprostone (nalador) for labour induction in the event of foetal death or foetal malformations.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 284 women with intrauterine foetal death (n=137), or foetal abnormalities (n=147), who underwent labour induction with sulprostone in a continuous dose of 1microg/min intravenously.

RESULTS

All but three women had a successful vaginal delivery. The median induction-expulsion interval was significantly shorter (12h) in the foetal death group compared to the foetal malformation group (25h). Two uterine ruptures were recorded, one in a woman with a uterine anomaly, and one in a woman with a previous caesarean section. There were no other complications. Gestational age had a significant influence on spontaneous expulsion of the placenta: before 24 weeks 55%, and after 24 weeks 82% spontaneous expulsion. For the chance of a neonate born with signs of life, parity was the only significant determinant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intravenous sulprostone in a low continuous dose is both effective and safe. In addition, this study does not support former opinions that smoking and advanced maternal age are contraindications.

Second trimester pregnancy termination: a comparison of 600 and 800 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of 600 and 800 microg of misoprostol administered intravaginally every 12 hours for termination of second trimester pregnancies.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-three pregnant women at 14-26 weeks' gestation were randomized in 2 groups to receive either 600 microg (N = 67), or 800 microg (N = 76) of intravaginal misoprostol every 12 hours until abortion was induced.

RESULTS

The incidences of abortion within 24 hours after initial drug administration were 82.1% (n = 55) and 78.9% (n = 60), within 48 hours 92.5% (n = 62) and 92.1% (n = 70), the mean abortion intervals were 15.2 (10.5, 20.8) hours and 15.3 (10.2, 21.8) hours, the complete abortion rates 77.6% (n = 52) and 72.4% (n = 55), and body temperature of more than 38 degrees C were 26.9% (n = 18) and 71.1% (n = 54, p = < 0.001) in the 600 and 800 microg group, respectively. All other side-effects were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In consideration of effectiveness and febrile complication, we suggest that 600 microg applied every 12 hours is the most appropriate dose to use for second trimester termination

Vaginal misoprostol in termination of second trimester pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness and complications of 600 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for terminating second trimester pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred and seventy-two patients undergoing termination of pregnancy between March 1997 and April 1999 were studied. Each patient received 600 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol every 12 hours until abortion occurred.

RESULTS

The mean induction to abortion time was 24.1 +/- 21.6 hours. The percentage of women aborting within 24 and 48 hours was 68.6 and 89.5 respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean induction to abortion time and the percentage of women aborted within 48 hours between nulliparous and multiparous women. The mean amount of misoprostol used was 1405.5 +/- 1084.6 micrograms. Incomplete abortion occurred in 23.3% of women. The most common complication was temperature of more than 38 degrees C occurred in 41% followed by diarrhoea (20%), nausea and vomiting (15%).

CONCLUSION

Six hundred micrograms of vaginal misoprostol is effective, but whether the 48 hours abortion rate can be improved with a large dose or shortened the time interval between doses, requires further study.