Ischemic preconditioning in a rodent hepatocyte model of liver hypothermic preservation injury

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Is Efficient in Reducing Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Growing Rat Model and Does Not Promote Histologic Lesions in Distant Organs

OBJECTIVE

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) was developed to diminish ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). There are two main ways of performing it: direct ischemic-preconditioning (DIP) and remote ischemic-preconditioning (RIP). The objectives of this study were to investigate local and systemic effects of DIP and RIP in liver IRI.

METHODS

Thirty-two weaning rats (50-70 g body weight; 21 days old) were divided into 4 groups: control (C); ischemia followed by reperfusion (IR); DIP followed by ischemia and reperfusion; and RIP followed by ischemia and reperfusion. In the IR group, the vascular pedicles of medial and left lateral liver lobes were clamped for 60 minutes and then unclamped. In the DIP group, a 10-minute cycle of ischemia followed by a 10-minute reperfusion of the same lobes was performed before 60 minutes of ischemia. In the RIP group, three 5-minute cycles of clamping and unclamping of the femoral vessels were performed before liver ischemia. The animals were euthanized 24 hours after the surgical procedures.

RESULTS

The serum levels of liver enzymes were significantly lower in the RIP group compared to the control and IR groups and to the DIP group. The scores of histologic hepatic lesions were significantly lower in RIP animals than those of IR animals (P = .002) and similar to the C group animals. The Bax/BCl-xl relation was lower in the DIP group than that in the RIP group (P = .045) and no differences were observed in histologic analyses of kidney, lung, intestine, and heart.

CONCLUSION

In young animals, the beneficial effects of RIP are more evident than those of DIP.

Donor gluconate rescues livers from uncontrolled donation after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Ischemia from organ preservation or donation causes cells and tissues to swell owing to loss of energy-dependent mechanisms of control of cell volume. These volume changes cause substantial preservation injury, because preventing these changes by adding cell impermeants to preservation solutions decreases preservation injury. The objective of this study was to assess if this effect could be realized early in uncontrolled donation after cardiac death (DCD) livers by systemically loading donors with gluconate immediately after death to prevent accelerated swelling injury during the warm ischemia period before liver retrieval.

METHODS

Uncontrolled DCD rat livers were cold-stored in University of Wisconsin solution for 24 hours and reperfused on an isolated perfused liver (IPL) device for 2 hours or transplanted into a rat as an allograft for 7 days. Donors were pretreated with a solution of the impermeant gluconate or a saline control immediately after cardiac death. Livers were retrieved after 30 minutes.

RESULTS

In vivo, gluconate infusion in donors immediately before or after cardiac death prevented DCD-induced increases in total tissue water, decreased vascular resistance, increased oxygen consumption and synthesis of adenosine triphosphate, increased bile production, decreased lactate dehydrogenase release, and decreased histology injury scores after reperfusion on the IPL relative to saline-treated DCD controls. In the transplant model, donor gluconate pretreatment significantly decreased both alanine aminotransferase the first day after transplantation and total bilirubin the seventh day after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Cell and tissue swelling plays a key role in preservation injury of uncontrolled DCD livers, which can be mitigated by early administration of gluconate solutions to the donor immediately after death.

Advances in the regulation of liver regeneration

Liver regeneration is known to be a process involving highly organized and ordered tissue growth triggered by the loss of liver tissue, and remains a fascinating topic. A large number of genes are involved in this process, and there exists a sequence of stages that results in liver regeneration, while at the same time inhibitors control the size of the regenerated liver. The initiation step is characterized by priming of quiescent hepatocytes by factors such as TNF-α, IL-6 and nitric oxide. The proliferation step is the step during which hepatocytes enter into the cell cycle's G1 phase and are stimulated by complete mitogens including HGF, TGF-α and EGF. Hepatic stimulator substance, glucagon, insulin, TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 have also been implicated in regulating the regeneration process. Inhibitors and stop signals of hepatic regeneration are not well known and only limited information is available. Furthermore, the effects of other factors such as VEGF, PDGF, hypothyroidism, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, heat shock proteins, ischemic-reperfusion injury, steatosis and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on liver regeneration are also systematically reviewed in this article. A tissue engineering approach using isolated hepatocytes for in vitro tissue generation and heterotopic transplantation of liver cells has been established. The use of stem cells might also be very attractive to overcome the limitation of donor liver tissue. Liver-specific differentiation of embryonic, fetal or adult stem cells is currently under investigation.

Vascular clamping in liver surgery: physiology, indications and techniques

This article reviews the historical evolution of hepatic vascular clamping and their indications. The anatomic basis for partial and complete vascular clamping will be discussed, as will the rationales of continuous and intermittent vascular clamping.

Specific techniques discussed and described include inflow clamping (Pringle maneuver, extra-hepatic selective clamping and intraglissonian clamping) and outflow clamping (total vascular exclusion, hepatic vascular exclusion with preservation of caval flow). The fundamental role of a low Central Venous Pressure during open and laparoscopic hepatectomy is described, as is the difference in their intra-operative measurements. The biological basis for ischemic preconditioning will be elucidated. Although the potential dangers of vascular clamping and the development of modern coagulation devices question the need for systemic clamping; the pre-operative factors and unforseen intra-operative events that mandate the use of hepatic vascular clamping will be highlighted.

Role of ischaemic preconditioning in liver regeneration following major liver resection and transplantation

Liver ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) is known to protect the liver from the detrimental effects of ischaemic-reperfusion injury (IRI), which contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality following major liver surgery. Recent studies have focused on the role of IPC in liver regeneration, the precise mechanism of which are not completely understood. This review discusses the current understanding of the mechanism of liver regeneration and the role of IPC in this setting. Relevant articles were reviewed from the published literature using the Medline database. The search was performed using the keywords “liver”, “ischaemic reperfusion”, “ischaemic preconditioning”, “regeneration”, “hepatectomy” and “transplantation”. The underlying mechanism of liver regeneration is a complex process involving the interaction of cytokines, growth factors and the metabolic demand of the liver. IPC, through various mediators, promotes liver regeneration by up-regulating growth-promoting factors and suppresses growth-inhibiting factors as well as damaging stresses. The increased understanding of the cellular mechanisms involved in IPC will enable the development of alternative treatment modalities aimed at promoting liver regeneration following major liver resection and transplantation.

Ischemic preconditioning and liver tolerance to warm or cold ischemia: experimental studies in large animals

BACKGROUND

In the rodent, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been shown to improve the tolerance of the liver to ischemia-reperfusion under normothermic or hypothermic conditions. The aim of the present study was to test this hypothesis in a dog model, which may be more relevant to the human.

METHODS

Beagle dogs were used in two distinct animal models of hepatic warm ischemia and orthotopic liver transplantation (hypothermic ischemia). IPC consisted of 10 minutes of ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion. In the first model, livers were exposed to 55 minutes prolonged warm ischemia and reperfused for 3 days (n = 6). In the second model, livers were retrieved and preserved for 48 hours at 4 degrees C in University of Wisconsin solution, transplanted, and reperfused without immunosuppression for 7 days (n = 5). In each model, nonpreconditioned animals served as controls (n = 5 in each group). Also, isolated dog hepatocytes were subjected to warm and cold storage ischemia-reperfusion to model the animal transplant studies using IPC.

RESULTS

In the first model (warm ischemia), IPC significantly decreased serum aminotransferase activity at 6 and 24 hours post-reperfusion. After 1 hour of reperfusion, preconditioned livers contained more adenosine triphosphate and produced more bile and less myeloperoxidase activity (neutrophils) relative to controls. In the second model (hypothermic preservation), IPC was not protective. Finally, IPC significantly attenuated hepatocyte cell death after cold storage and warm reperfusion in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

IPC is effective in large animals for protecting the liver against warm ischemia-reperfusion injury but not injury associated with cold ischemia and reperfusion (preservation injury). However, the IPC effect observed in isolated hepatocytes suggests that preconditioning for preservation is theoretically possible.

In situ hypothermic perfusion of the liver versus standard total vascular exclusion for complex liver resection

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

We compare the results of liver resection performed under in situ hypothermic perfusion versus standard total vascular exclusion (TVE) of the liver <60 minutes and > or =60 minutes in terms of liver tolerance, liver and renal functions, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. The safe duration of TVE is still debated. Promising results have been reported following TVE associated with hypothermic perfusion of the liver with durations of up to several hours. The 2 techniques have not been compared so far.

METHODS

The study population includes 69 consecutive liver resections under TVE <60 minutes (group TVE<60', 33 patients), > or =60 minutes (group TVE> or =60', 16 patients), and in situ hypothermic perfusion (group TVEHYOPOTH, 20 patients). Liver tolerance (peaks of transaminases), liver and kidney function (peak of bilirubin, minimum prothrombin time, and peak of creatinine), morbidity, and in-hospital mortality were compared within the 3 groups.

RESULTS

The postoperative peaks of aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) and alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) were significantly lower (P[r] < 0.05) in group TVE HYPOTH (450 +/- 298 IU/L and 390 +/- 391 IU/L) compared with the groups TVE<60' (1000 +/- 808; 853 +/- 743) and TVE> or =60' (1519 +/- 962; 1033 +/- 861). In the group TVEHYPOTH, the peaks of bilirubin (micromol/L) (84 +/- 31), creatinine (micromol/L) (75 +/- 22), and the number of complications per patient (1.2 +/- 0.9) were comparable to those of the group TVE<60' (80 +/- 111; 109 +/- 77; and 0.8 +/- 1.1 respectively) and significantly lower to those of the group TVE> or =60' (196 +/- 173; 176 +/- 176, and 2.6 +/- 1.8). In-hospital mortality rates were 1 in 33, 2 in 16, and 0 in 20 for the groups TVE<60', TVE> or =60', and TVEHYOPOTH, respectively, and were comparable. On multivariate analysis, the size of the tumor, portal vein embolization, and a planned vascular reconstruction were significantly predictive of TVE > or =60 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard TVE of any duration, hypothermic perfusion of the liver is associated with a better tolerance to ischemia. In addition, compared with TVE > or =60 minutes, it is associated with better postoperative liver and renal functions and a lower morbidity. Predictive factors for TVE > or =60 minutes may help to indicate hypothermic perfusion of the liver.

Protection of the liver by ischemic preconditioning: a review of mechanisms and clinical applications

Ischemic preconditioning refers to the endogenous mechanism of protection against a sustained ischemic insult following an initial, brief ischemic stimulus. Ischemia-reperfusion injury of the liver is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in liver surgery and transplantation and ischemic preconditioning is a promising strategy for improving the outcome of liver surgery. The preconditioning phenomenon was first described in a canine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in 1986 and since then has been shown to exist in other organs including skeletal muscle, brain, kidneys, retina and liver. In the liver, the preconditioning effect has been demonstrated in rodents and a recent study has demonstrated human clinical benefits of preconditioning during hemihepatectomies. Ischemic preconditioning has been described as an adaptive response and although the precise mechanism of hepatoprotection from preconditioning is unknown it is likely to be a receptor-mediated process. Several hypotheses have been proposed and this review assesses possible mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning and its role in hepatic surgery and liver transplantation. The future lies in defining the mechanisms of the ischemic preconditioning effect to allow drug targeting to induce the preconditioning response.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and renal hypothermic preservation injury

The nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) has been implicated in ischemia-reperfusion injury in many tissues under normothermic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PARP contributes to mechanisms of the hypothermic ischemia-reperfusion injury that occurs when kidneys are cold stored for transplantation. Cortical tissue slice PARP enzyme activity rose significantly with prolonged cold storage and was dependent on both reperfusion and preservation quality. However, prior exposure to warm ischemia abrogated this increase. PARP protein increased with cold storage but was not dependent on reperfusion. PARP enzyme activity rose quickly after reperfusion in buffer and was not different when whole blood was used. Addition of exogenous hydrogen peroxide (3 mM) to normal renal slices significantly increased PARP activity over 4 h in the cortex but not in the medulla, but the medullary basal PARP synthesis rate was five times higher than that in the cortex. However, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitors catalase (2,000 U/ml), Trolox (200 microM), and DMSO (15 mM) did not reduce reperfusion-induced PARP activity in cold-stored cortical slices. Finally, PARP inhibitors potentiated preservation injury in isolated canine proximal renal tubules. In conclusion, canine renal PARP enzyme activity rises with prolonged cold storage after reperfusion and may play a protective rather than an injurious role in hypothermic preservation for transplantation. ROS are sufficient but not necessary to activate PARP under these conditions.