Does Thoracic Bioimpedance Accurately Determine Cardiac Output in COPD Patients During Maximal or Intermittent Exercise?

High-intensity exercise impairs extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscle perfusion in patients with COPD

The study investigated whether high-intensity exercise impairs inspiratory and expiratory muscle perfusion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared respiratory local muscle perfusion between constant-load cycling[sustained at 80% peak work rate (WRpeak)] and voluntary normocapnic hyperpnea reproducing similar work of breathing (WoB) in 18 patients [forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁): 58 ± 24% predicted]. Local muscle blood flow index (BFI), using indocyanine green dye, and fractional oxygen saturation (%StiO₂) were simultaneously assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) over the intercostal, scalene, rectus abdominis, and vastus lateralis muscles. Cardiac output (impedance cardiography), WoB (esophageal/gastric balloon catheter), and diaphragmatic and extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscle electromyographic activity (EMG) were also assessed throughout cycling and hyperpnea. Minute ventilation, breathing pattern, WoB, and respiratory muscle EMG were comparable between cycling and hyperpnea. During cycling, cardiac output and vastus lateralis BFI were significantly greater compared with hyperpnea [by +4.2 (2.6-5.9) L/min and +4.9 (2.2-7.8) nmol/s, respectively] (P < 0.01). Muscle BFI and %StiO₂ were, respectively, lower during cycling compared with hyperpnea in scalene [by -3.8 (-6.4 to -1.2) nmol/s and -6.6 (-8.2 to -5.1)%], intercostal [by -1.4 (-2.4 to -0.4) nmol/s and -6.0 (-8.6 to -3.3)%], and abdominal muscles [by -1.9 (-2.9 to -0.8) nmol/s and -6.3 (-9.1 to -3.4)%] (P < 0.001). The difference in respiratory (scalene and intercostal) muscle BFI between cycling and hyperpnea was associated with greater dyspnea (Borg CR10) scores (r = -0.54 and r = -0.49, respectively, P < 0.05). These results suggest that in patients with COPD, 1) locomotor muscle work during high-intensity exercise impairs extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscle perfusion and 2) insufficient adjustment in extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscle perfusion during high-intensity exercise may partly explain the increased sensations of dyspnea.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We simultaneously assessed the blood flow index (BFI) in three respiratory muscles during hyperpnea and high-intensity constant-load cycling sustained at comparable levels of work of breathing and respiratory neural drive in patients with COPD. We demonstrated that high-intensity exercise impairs respiratory muscle perfusion, as intercostal, scalene, and abdominal BFI increased during hyperpnea but not during cycling. Insufficient adjustment in respiratory muscle perfusion during exercise was associated with greater dyspnea sensations in patients with COPD.

Performance evaluation of a portable bioimpedance cardiac output monitor for measuring hemodynamic changes in athletes during a head-up tilt test

The use of impedance cardiography to monitor physiological changes in sports is rarely reported. Using head-up tilt test, we evaluated a portable noninvasive impedance cardiography device (PhysioFlow) by comparing it with a reference Doppler monitor (USCOM). Accuracy in tracking hemodynamic changes deteriorated with higher tilt, implying a gravitational influence on its performance. Stroke volume measurements were overestimated, but the changes were underestimated. Despite its convenient physical features, the suitability of PhysioFlow for sports use is questionable.

Effect of expiratory loaded breathing during moderate exercise on intercostal muscle oxygenation

BACKGROUND

In patients with obstructive lung disease, maintaining adequate ventilation during exercise may require greater contraction of the respiratory muscles, which may lead to a compression of muscle capillaries. Furthermore, dynamic hyperinflation (DH) is frequent during exercise in these patients, as it allows to reach higher expiratory flows and to satisfy respiratory demand. However, in such situation, intercostal muscles are likely to be stretched, which could affect the diameter of their capillaries. Thus, in a context of high level of expiratory resistance, intercostal muscle oxygenation may be disturbed during exercise, especially if DH occurs.

METHODS

Twelve participants (22±2 years) performed two sessions of moderate exercise (20 min) by breathing freely with and without a 20-cmH2O expiratory threshold load (ETL). Tissue saturation index (TSI) and concentration changes from rest (Δ) in oxygenated ([O2Hb]) and total haemoglobin ([tHb]) were measured in the seventh intercostal space using near-infrared spectroscopy. Respiratory, metabolic and cardiac variables were likewise recorded.

RESULTS

Throughout exercise, dyspnea was higher and TSI was lower in ETL condition than in control (p<0.01). After a few minutes of exercise, Δ [O2Hb] was also lower in ETL condition, as well as Δ [tHb], when inspiratory capacity started to be reduced (p<0.05). Changes in [O2Hb] and dyspnea were correlated with changes in expiratory flow rate (Vt/Te) (r = -0.66 and 0.66, respectively; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

During exercise with ETL, impaired muscle oxygenation could be due to a limited increase in blood volume resulting from strong muscle contraction and/or occurrence of DH.

Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two techniques for the continuous assessment of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF): a radial artery pulse contour analysis method that uses an indicator dilution method for calibration (LiDCO) and an impedance cardiography technique (Physioflow), using the Fick method as a reference. Ten male CHF patients (New York Heart Association class II–III) were included. At rest, cardiac output values obtained by LiDCO and Physioflow were compared with those of the direct Fick method. During exercise, the continuous Fick method was used as a reference. Exercise, performed on a cycle ergometer in upright position, consisted of two constant-load tests at 30% and 80% of the ventilatory threshold and a symptom-limited maximal test. Both at rest and during exercise LiDCO showed good agreement with reference values [bias ± limits of agreement (LOA), −1% ± 28% and 2% ± 28%, respectively]. In contrast, Physioflow overestimated reference values both at rest and during exercise (bias ± LOA, 48% ± 60% and 48% ± 52%, respectively). Exercise-related within-patient changes of cardiac output, expressed as a percent change, showed for both techniques clinically acceptable agreement with reference values (bias ± LOA: 2% ± 26% for LiDCO, and −2% ± 36% for Physioflow, respectively). In conclusion, although the limits of agreement with the Fick method are pretty broad, LiDCO provides accurate measurements of cardiac output during rest and exercise in CHF patients. Although Physioflow overestimates cardiac output, this method may still be useful to estimate relative changes during exercise.