Steroids affect collateral sensitivity to gemcitabine of multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cells

Effect of dexamethasone on the antileukemic effect of cytarabine: role of deoxycytidine kinase

Dexamethasone (DEX) is often used in the initial treatment of leukemia. Earlier we demonstrated that DEX decreased the activity of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) which is essential for the activation of cytarabine (ara-C). Therefore we investigated the effect of DEX on the in vivo sensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to ara-C and another deoxycytidine analog, gemcitabine, in the Brown Norway Myeloid Leukemia (BNML) rat model for AML, and its ara-C resistant variant B-araC, in relation to the effects on dCK activity.The antileukemic effect was evaluated as survival of the rats, while dCK activity was measured in leukemic spleen (completely consisting of BNML cells) with liver as representative normal tissue, 24 hr after treatment with ara-C or DEX with radioactive deoxycytidine (CdR) as a substrate.Treatment with ara-C increased life-span of BNML by 200%, which was not affected by DEX. Gemcitabine was ineffective. In the liver of BNML bearing rats DEX decreased dCK activity 33%, while ara-C increased dCK activity slightly (to 129%), but in the combination of ara-C/DEX dCK activity was also decreased. In the livers of Bara-C bearing rats dCK was 2.7-fold higher compared to BNML rats, which was increased 179% in the gemcitabine-DEX treated rats. In BNML leukemic spleens DEX decreased dCK activity 41% and gem/dex 46%, but ara-C increased dCK activity to 123%, but in the combination this effect was neutralized. In Bara-C spleens only ara-C/dex decreased dCK activity (32%).In conclusion; in an AML rat model DEX did not affect the antileukemic effect of ara-C, nor the dCK activity.

The single nucleotide variant rs2868371 associates with the risk of mortality in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A multicenter prospective validation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Definitive radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for non-metastatic unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, treatment outcomes can differ substantially and patients' genetic background could play a crucial role. Potential associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in Heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1) and survival have been reported in prior single-institution retrospective reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current assay aims to validate such connection in a prospective multicenter study in a European cohort including 181 NSCLC patients. Median follow-up time for all patients was 13 months (range, 3-57 months).

RESULTS

The results obtained show an association between the rs2868371 GG genotype and better overall survival (HR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.13-0.96; p = 0.042) in multivariate analysis. Two-year overall survival rate was 72% for patients carrying the rs2868371 GG genotype versus 36% for those patients harboring the rs2868371 CC/CG genotypes (p = 0.013). Additionally, the rs2868371 GG genotype was found to be associated with better disease-free survival in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.36; 95%CI: 0.13-0.99; p = 0.048). In silico analysis of the potential functional SNP suggested significant difference in the affinity of the Glucocorticoid Receptor binding site between alternative allelic variants, confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis displaying stronger affinity for the risk allele (C). Furthermore, our findings indicate that the rs2868371 influences (mRNA) HSPB1 expression, offering insight into the regulation of HSPB1 transcription.

CONCLUSION

The functional HSPB1 rs2868371 promoter variant may affect lung cancer survival by regulation of HSPB1 expression levels through glucocorticoid receptor interaction.

A phase I/II study of gemcitabine during radiotherapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

The purpose of this phase I/II, open-label, single-arm trial is to investigate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose and preliminary efficacy of the potential radiosensitizer gemcitabine, administered concomitantly to radiotherapy, in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Six doses of weekly gemcitabine were administered intravenously, concomitantly to 6 weeks of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Successive cohorts received increasing doses of 140, 175 and 200 mg/m² gemcitabine, respectively, following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation schedule without expansion cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were monitored during treatment period. Clinical response was assessed using predefined case report forms and radiological response was assessed using the modified RANO criteria. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using PedsQL questionnaires. Between June 2012 and December 2016, nine patients were enrolled. Treatment was well tolerated, and no DLTs were observed up to the maximum dose of 200 mg/m². All patients experienced reduction of tumor-related symptoms. QoL tended to improve during treatment. PFS and MOS were 4.8 months (95% CI 4.0–5.7) and 8.7 months (95% CI 7.0–10.4). Classifying patients according to the recently developed DIPG survival prediction model, intermediate risk patients (n = 4), showed a PFS and MOS of 6.4 and 12.4 months, respectively, versus a PFS and MOS of 4.5 and 8.1 months, respectively, in high risk patient (n = 5). Gemcitabine up to 200 mg/m²/once weekly, added to radiotherapy, is safe and well tolerated in children with newly diagnosed DIPG. PFS and MOS were not significantly different from literature.

New dimension of glucocorticoids in cancer treatment

Glucocorticoids have been used in clinical oncology for over half a century. The clinical applications of glucocorticoids in oncology are mainly dependent on their pro-apoptotic action to treat lymphoproliferative disorders, and also on alleviating side effects induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy in non-hematologic cancer types. Researches in the past few years have begun to unveil the profound complexity of glucocorticoids signaling and have contributed remarkably on therapeutic strategies. However, it remains striking and puzzling how glucocorticoids use different mechanisms in different cancer types and different targets to promote or inhibit tumor progression. In this review, we provide an update on glucocorticoids and its receptor, GR-mediated signaling and highlight some of the latest findings on the actions of glucocorticoids signaling during tumor progression and metastasis.

Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer

While chemotherapy provides useful palliation, advanced lung cancer remains incurable since those tumors that are initially sensitive to therapy rapidly develop acquired resistance. Resistance may arise from impaired drug delivery, extracellular factors, decreased drug uptake into tumor cells, increased drug efflux, drug inactivation by detoxifying factors, decreased drug activation or binding to target, altered target, increased damage repair, tolerance of damage, decreased proapoptotic factors, increased antiapoptotic factors, or altered cell cycling or transcription factors. Factors for which there is now substantial clinical evidence of a link to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) resistance to chemotherapy include MRP (for platinum-based combination chemotherapy) and MDR1/P-gp (for non-platinum agents). SPECT MIBI and Tc-TF scanning appears to predict chemotherapy benefit in SCLC. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the strongest clinical evidence is for taxane resistance with elevated expression or mutation of class III beta-tubulin (and possibly alpha tubulin), platinum resistance and expression of ERCC1 or BCRP, gemcitabine resistance and RRM1 expression, and resistance to several agents and COX-2 expression (although COX-2 inhibitors have had minimal impact on drug efficacy clinically). Tumors expressing high BRCA1 may have increased resistance to platinums but increased sensitivity to taxanes. Limited early clinical data suggest that chemotherapy resistance in NSCLC may also be increased with decreased expression of cyclin B1 or of Eg5, or with increased expression of ICAM, matrilysin, osteopontin, DDH, survivin, PCDGF, caveolin-1, p21WAF1/CIP1, or 14-3-3sigma, and that IGF-1R inhibitors may increase efficacy of chemotherapy, particularly in squamous cell carcinomas. Equivocal data (with some positive studies but other negative studies) suggest that NSCLC tumors with some EGFR mutations may have increased sensitivity to chemotherapy, while K-ras mutations and expression of GST-pi, RB or p27kip1 may possibly confer resistance. While limited clinical data suggest that p53 mutations are associated with resistance to platinum-based therapies in NSCLC, data on p53 IHC positivity are equivocal. To date, resistance-modulating strategies have generally not proven clinically useful in lung cancer, although small randomized trials suggest a modest benefit of verapamil and related agents in NSCLC.

Glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis resistance of solid tumors

More than a quarter of a century ago, the phenomenon of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in the majority of hematological cells was first recognized. More recently, glucocorticoid-induced antiapoptotic signaling associated with apoptosis resistance towards cytotoxic therapy has been identified in cells of epithelial origin, most of malignant solid tumors and some other tissues. Despite these huge amounts of data demonstrating differential pro- and anti-apoptotic effects of glucocorticoids, the underlying mechanisms of cell type-specific glucocorticoid signaling are just beginning to be described. This review summarizes our present understanding of cell type-specific pro- and anti-apoptotic signaling induced by glucocorticoids. We shortly introduce mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance of hematological cells. We highlight and discuss the emerging molecular evidence of a general induction of survival signaling in epithelial cells and carcinoma cells by glucocorticoids. We give a summary of our current knowledge of decreased proliferation rates in response to glucocorticoid pre- and combination treatment, which are suspicious to be involved not only in protection of normal tissues, but also in protection of solid tumors from cytotoxic effects of anticancer agents.

Regulation of differential pro- and anti-apoptotic signaling by glucocorticoids

More than a quarter of a century ago, the phenomenon of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in the majority of hematological cells was first recognized. More recently, glucocorticoid-induced antiapoptotic signaling associated with apoptosis resistance has been identified in cells of epithelial origin, most of malignant solid tumors and some other tissues. Despite these huge amount of data demonstrating differential pro- and anti-apoptotic effects of glucocorticoids, the underlying mechanisms of cell type specific glucocorticoid signaling are just beginning to be described. This review summarizes our present understanding of cell type-specific pro- and anti-apoptotic signaling induced by glucocorticoids. In the first section we give a summary and update of known glucocorticoid-induced pathways mediating apoptosis in hematological cells. We shortly introduce mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance of hematological cells. We highlight and discuss the emerging molecular evidence of a general induction of survival signaling in epithelial cells and carcinoma cells by glucocorticoids. We provide a model for glucocorticoid-induced resistance in cells growing in a tissue formation. Thus, attachment to the extracellular matrix and cell-cell contacts typical for e.g. epithelial and tumor cells may be crucially involved in switching the balance of several interacting pathways to survival upon treatment with glucocorticoids.

Glucocorticoid use in prostate cancer and other solid tumours: implications for effectiveness of cytotoxic treatment and metastases

Glucocorticoids have been used widely in conjunction with other treatment for patients with cancer because they have potent proapoptotic properties in lymphoid cells, can reduce nausea, and alleviate acute toxic effects in healthy tissue. However, glucocorticoids are used in a supportive-care role, even though to our knowledge no prospective clinical studies have assessed the effect of these steroids on the growth of solid tumours. Data from preclinical and, to some extent, clinical studies, suggest that glucocorticoids induce treatment resistance in solid tumours, including prostate cancer. Research has focussed on disseminated cells that have been shed by the tumour: the potential of glucocorticoids to render these cells resistant to apoptosis--and to downregulate the immune response--might contribute to tumour metastasis. Here, we review the benefits of glucocorticoids and their negative effects, such as induction of resistance in tumour cells and concomitant induction of apoptosis in immune cells, with particular emphasis on prostate cancer.

Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized?

Adverse drug-drug interactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cancer patients are at particularly high risk of such interactions because they commonly receive multiple medications, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal agents and supportive care drugs. In addition, the majority of cancer patients are elderly, and so require medications for co-morbid conditions such as cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and rheumatological diseases. Furthermore, the age-related decline in hepatic and renal function reduces their ability to metabolize and clear drugs and so increases the potential for toxicity. Not all drug-drug interactions can be predicted, and those that are predictable are not always avoidable. However, increased awareness of the potential for these interactions will allow healthcare providers to minimize the risk by choosing appropriate drugs and also by monitoring for signs of interaction. This review considers the basic principles of drug-drug interactions, and presents specific examples that are relevant to oncology.

Substrate cycles and drug resistance to 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (araC)

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults. After diagnosis, patients with AML are mainly treated with standard induction chemotherapy combining cytarabine (araC) and anthracyclines. The majority of them achieve complete remission (CR) (65-80%). However, prospects for long-term survival are poor for the majority of patients. Resistance to chemotherapy therefore remains a major obstacle in the effective treatment of patients with AML. In this review, we highlight the current knowledge of substrate cycles involved in normal deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTPs) metabolism and their possible role in drug resistance to araC.

Dexamethasone-induced cisplatin and gemcitabine resistance in lung carcinoma samples treated ex vivo

Chemotherapy for lung cancer not only has severe side effects but frequently also exhibits limited, if any clinical effectiveness. Dexamethasone (DEX) and similar glucocorticoids (GCs) such as prednisone are often used in the clinical setting, for example, as cotreatment to prevent nausea and other symptoms. Clinical trials evaluating the impact of GCs on tumour control and patient survival of lung carcinoma have never been performed. Therefore, we isolated cancer cells from resected lung tumour specimens and treated them with cisplatin in the presence or absence of DEX. Cell number of viable and dead cells was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion and viability was measured by the MTT-assay. We found that DEX induced resistance toward cisplatin in all of 10 examined tumour samples. Similar results were found using gemcitabine as cytotoxic drug. Survival of drug-treated lung carcinoma cells in the presence of DEX was longlasting as examined 2 and 3 weeks after cisplatin treatment of a lung carcinoma cell line. These data corroborate recent in vitro and in vivo xenograft findings and rise additional concerns about the widespread combined use of DEX with antineoplastic drugs in the clinical management of patients with lung cancer.

Do antidepressants regulate how cortisol affects the brain?

Although the effects of antidepressants on glucocorticoid hormones and their receptors are relevant for the therapeutic action of these drugs, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. Studies in depressed patients, animals and cellular models have demonstrated that antidepressants increase glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) expression and function; this, in turn, is associated with enhanced negative feedback by endogenous glucocorticoids, and thus with reduced resting and stimulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. In a series of studies conducted over the last few years, we have shown that antidepressants modulate GR function in vitro by inhibiting membrane steroid transporters that regulate the intracellular concentration of glucocorticoids. In this paper, we will review the effects of membrane steroid transporters and antidepressants on corticosteroid receptors. We will then present our unpublished data on GR live microscopy in vitro, showing that ligand-induced translocation of the GR starts within 30 seconds and is completed within minutes. Furthermore, we will present our new data using an in situ brain perfusion model in anaesthetised guinea-pigs, showing that entry of cortisol to the brain of these animals is limited at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Finally, we will present a comprehensive discussion of our published findings on the effects of chemically unrelated antidepressants on membrane steroid transporters, in mouse fibroblasts and rat cortical neurones. We propose that antidepressants in humans could inhibit steroid transporters localised on the BBB and in neurones, like the multidrug resistance p-glycoprotein, and thus increase the access of cortisol to the brain and the glucocorticoid-mediated negative feedback on the HPA axis. Enhanced cortisol action in the brain might prove to be a successful approach to maximise therapeutic antidepressant effects.

In vitro studies on the immunosuppressive effect of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC) and its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU)

The effect of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC) on in vitro human lymphocyte response was assessed in comparison with that of its major metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) from healthy human volunteers were used for assay of mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), blastogenesis and colony forming by PHA. Both substances inhibited mitogen and alloantigen responses of PBMNC in a dose-dependent manner, but dFdU was up to 10,000-fold less potent than its parent compound dFdC. The data indicate that activation by alloantigen is more sensitive to the action of dFdU and dFdC than the response to PHA. Thus, dFdU inhibits MLR-induced response at significantly lower doses than PHA-induced proliferation (IC50 +/- SD, 23.55 +/- 8 microM versus 133.2 +/- 12 microM) (p = 0.0003). dFdC also proved to be about 12.3-fold more potent against alloantigen response compared to PHA-induced proliferation of PBMNC (IC50 +/- SD, 2.28 +/- 0.5 nM versus 28.1 +/- 0.5 nM) (p = 0.0001). To get an insight into the toxic profile of dFdU and dFdC, both substances were additionally tested on the in vitro clonal growth of CD34+ cells. Cells were cultured in methylcellulose in the continuous presence of dFdU and dFdC in doses up to 640 microM and 16 nM, respectively. The results show a marked inhibition of erythroid (BFU-E) and myeloid progenitors (CFU-GM) in a dose-dependent manner, but BFU-E was more sensitive to the action of dFdU and dFdC than CFU-GM (p=0.0001). Compared to T-lymphocytes, however, similar or even higher doses of dFdU and dFdC were required for complete inhibition of colony formation obtained from CD34+ cells. To test the role of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) in the metabolism of dFdU in comparison to that of dFdC, reversal studies with deoxycytidine (dCyd), the natural substrate of dCK, were performed on dFdU- and dFdC-treated HL-60 cells. The data show that relatively low concentrations of dCyd (10 microM) were sufficient to protect HL-60 cells from cytotoxicity of lethal doses of dFdU (160 microM), whereas 100-fold higher concentrations of deoxycytidine (dCyd) (1 mM) were required for a complete reversal of dFdC-mediated toxicity. This suggests that activation of dFdU is due to its phosphorylation by dCK, but dFdU has low affinity to dCK. These effects of dFdU and dFdC in relation to T-lymphocytes and CD34+ cells suggest their possible use as immunosuppressive agents.

The antidepressant clomipramine regulates cortisol intracellular concentrations and glucocorticoid receptor expression in fibroblasts and rat primary neurones

Incubation of LMCAT fibroblasts cells with antidepressants potentiates glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene transcription in the presence of cortisol, but not of corticosterone. We have suggested that antidepressants do so by inhibiting the LMCAT cells membrane steroid transporter and thus by increasing cortisol intracellular concentrations. We now confirm and extend this model to primary neuronal cultures. Clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant, increased the intracellular accumulation of 3H-cortisol, but not 3H-corticosterone, in LMCAT cells (+80%) and primary rat neurones (+20%). The latter finding is the first demonstration that a membrane steroid transporter is present in neurones. Moreover, verapamil, a membrane steroid transporter inhibitor, reduced the effects of clomipramine on the intracellular accumulation of 3H-cortisol in LMCAT cells. Finally, clomipramine also decreased GR expression (whole-cell Western blot) in LMCAT cells (50% reduction) and primary rat neurones (80% reduction). This GR downregulation can explain the reduced GR-mediated gene transcription previously described under experimental conditions that do not elicit the effects on the LMCAT cells steroid transporter. This work further supports the hypothesis that membrane steroid transporters regulating the access of glucocorticoids to the brain in vivo are a fundamental target for antidepressant action.

Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing human cancer cell lines

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a deoxycytidine analogue that is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently to its triphosphate dFdCTP, which is incorporated into both RNA and DNA, leading to DNA damage. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is characterised by an overexpression of the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein (P-gP) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). Gemcitabine was tested against human melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, epidermoid carcinoma and ovarian cancer cells with an MDR phenotype as a result of selection by drug exposure or by transfection with the mdr1 gene. These cell lines were nine- to 72-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental cell lines. The doxorubicin-resistant cells 2R120 (MRP1) and 2R160 (P-gP) were nine- and 28-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental SW1573 cells, respectively (P<0.01), which was completely reverted by 25 micro M verapamil. In 2R120 and 2R160 cells, dCK activities were seven- and four-fold higher than in SW1573, respectively, which was associated with an increased dCK mRNA and dCK protein. Inactivation by deoxycytidine deaminase was 2.9- and 2.2-fold decreased in 2R120 and 2R160, respectively. dFdCTP accumulation was similar in SW1573 and its MDR variants after 24 h exposure to 0.1 micro M gemcitabine, but dFdCTP was retained longer in 2R120 (P<0.001) and 2R160 (P<0.003) cells. 2R120 and 2R160 cells also incorporated four- and six-fold more [(3)H]gemcitabine into DNA (P<0.05), respectively. P-glycoprotein and MRP1 overexpression possibly caused a cellular stress resulting in increased gemcitabine metabolism and sensitivity, while reversal of collateral gemcitabine sensitivity by verapamil also suggests a direct relation between the presence of membrane efflux pumps and gemcitabine sensitivity.

Pharmacogenetics of anticancer drug sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer

In mammalian cells, the process of malignant transformation is characterized by the loss or down-regulation of tumor-suppressor genes and/or the mutation or overexpression of proto-oncogenes, whose products promote dysregulated proliferation of cells and extend their life span. Deregulation in intracellular transduction pathways generates mitogenic signals that promote abnormal cell growth and the acquisition of an undifferentiated phenotype. Genetic abnormalities in cancer have been widely studied to identify those factors predictive of tumor progression, survival, and response to chemotherapeutic agents. Pharmacogenetics has been founded as a science to examine the genetic basis of interindividual variation in drug metabolism, drug targets, and transporters, which result in differences in the efficacy and safety of many therapeutic agents. The traditional pharmacogenetic approach relies on studying sequence variations in candidate genes suspected of affecting drug response. However, these studies have yielded contradictory results because of the small number of molecular determinants of drug response examined, and in several cases this approach was revealed to be reductionistic. This limitation is now being overcome by the use of novel techniques, i.e., high-density DNA and protein arrays, which allow genome- and proteome-wide tumor profiling. Pharmacogenomics represents the natural evolution of pharmacogenetics since it addresses, on a genome-wide basis, the effect of the sum of genetic variants on drug responses of individuals. Development of pharmacogenomics as a new field has accelerated the progress in drug discovery by the identification of novel therapeutic targets by expression profiling at the genomic or proteomic levels. In addition to this, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics provide an important opportunity to select patients who may benefit from the administration of specific agents that best match the genetic profile of the disease, thus allowing maximum activity.