Characterization of Ca2+ current inhibition by cilnidipine using a beta-subunit antisense oligonucleotide

Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study

To compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥140/90) of either gender, attending outpatient department of medicine, were included in the study. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients who have been prescribed tablet amlodipine 5–10 mg/day and the other 30 who have been prescribed tablet cilnidipine 10–20 mg/day orally by the consulting physician, depending upon the severity of hypertension were followed every fortnight, screened for the presence of pedal edema and blood pressure control over a period of 3 months. Antihypertensive efficacy between two groups was compared by unpaired t-test and incidence of pedal edema was compared by Fisher's exact test. Of 30 patients in the amlodipine group, 19 patients presented with pedal edema (63.3%) and 2 patients (6.66%) in cilnidipine group presented with pedal edema during the study period. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pedal edema between amlodipine and cilnidipine group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine (P > 0.05). Both amlodipine and cilnidipine have shown equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by amlodipine.

Different effects of L-type and L+N-type calcium channel blockers on hamster cheek pouch venules

Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are not uniform in terms of their action on calcium channel. L-type calcium channel blockers dilate the resistance arterioles. Cilnidipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that also acts on N-type calcium channels, and may dilate venules through its effect on the sympathetic receptor. The influence of an L-type calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) or this L+N type blocker at 10(-7) mol to 10(-4) mol on venular diameter was examined by superfusion of male Syrian hamster cheek pouches. Nifedipine dose dependently dilated the arterioles alone, whereas cilnidipine dilated both arterioles and venules. Application of 10(-7) mol omega conotoxin, an inhibitor of N-type channels, after nifedipine led to significant dilation of venules, while it had no influence when administered after cilnidipine. These findings indicate that the effects of calcium channel blockers on the venules differ according to the action on N-type calcium channels, and that cilnidipine (an L+N type calcium channel blocker) dilates venules through its additional action on N-type channels.