Pre- and postsynaptic inhibitory potencies of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists eprosartan and candesartan

Impaired neuronal and vascular responses to angiotensin II in a rabbit congestive heart failure model

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is characterised by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). Both systems are known to interact and to potentiate each other's activities. We recently demonstrated that angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances sympathetic nerve traffic via prejunctionally-located AT1-receptors. At present, little is known about the effects of Ang II at the level of the sympathetic neurones in CHF.

Accordingly, we investigated the effect of Ang II in the presence and absence of the AT1-receptor antagonist, eprosartan, on stimulation-induced nerve traffic in isolated thoracic aorta preparations obtained from rabbits suffering from experimentally-induced CHF. Control-preparations were obtained from age-matched animals. Sympathetic activity was assessed by a [3H]noradrenaline spill-over model. Additionally, Ang II constrictor responses were compared between CHF and control vessels in the presence and absence of eprosartan. Additionally, to study postjunctional facilitation, the effects of Ang II on postsynaptic α-adrenoceptor-mediated responses were studied using noradrenaline.

Stimulation-evoked SNS-neurotransmission was similar in both groups (CHF versus control). Ang II (0.1 nM—0.1 µM) caused a concentration-dependent increase of the stimulation-evoked sympathetic outflow in both groups, with a maximum at 10 nM (control [n=7], FR2/FR12.03±0.11 and CHF-preparations [n=7], FR2/FR11.71±0.07). The enhancement by Ang II was decreased in CHF-preparations compared with controls (p<0.05). Eprosartan concentration-dependently attenuated the Ang II-enhanced (10 nM) sympathetic outflow in both CHF- and control preparations. The sympathoinhibitory potency of eprosartan was similar in both groups (control pIC508.81±0.31; CHF 8.65±0.42).

Ang II (1 nM—0.3 µM) concentration-dependently increased the contractile force in control preparations (Emax21.64±3.86 mN, pD27.63±0.02, n=7). Eprosartan (1 nM—0.1 µM) influenced the Ang IIcontractions via a mixed form of antagonism. In CHF-preparations, Ang II caused impaired vascular contraction. The KCl-induced contraction was decreased in the CHF- compared with control preparations (13.02±0.64 mN versus 30.40±0.89 mN). The relative Ang II contraction (% of KCl) was also decreased (2.3% vs. 58.0%). Concentration-response curves to noradrenaline (%KCl) were similar (control pD26.93±0.05, Emax131.0±2.7; CHF pD27.00±0.05, Emax136.7±2.6) (p>0.05) and were not affected by Ang II.

We conclude that Ang II-enhanced sympathetic neurotransmission is mediated by the prejunctional AT1-receptor in both control and CHF-preparations. The decreased facilitation of SNS effects by Ang II may be explained by down-regulation or desensitisation of the neuronal AT1-receptor. Additionally, the aortic contractile capacity in heart failure rabbits appears to be decreased, probably as a result of heart failure-associated neuroendocrine and functional changes.

Antihypertensive effects and safety of eprosartan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The benefits of reducing blood pressure (BP) have been well established, but uncertainty remains about the comparative effects of different BP-lowering regimens. We aimed to estimate the efficacy and the tolerability of eprosartan compared with other agents as monotherapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the criteria was performed using Review Manager and Stata/SE.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles were ultimately included out of 78 studies, involving 6,460 patients. Eprosartan had a greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction than placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.86-8.25] and losartan (WMD: 2.24, 95% CI 0.08-4.40) and a greater diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction than placebo (WMD 3.95, 95% CI 2.77-5.13). Therapeutic response rate of BP favored eprosartan [risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24] compared with enalapril. There were no statistical differences in SBP or DBP reductions comparing eprosartan with enalapril or telmisartan. Original RCTs included comparing eprosartan with valsartan and nitrendipine reported no differences in BP-lowering efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Eprosartan monotherapy is equivalent to many first-line antihypertensive agents and is effective for the treatment of essential hypertension, especially for isolated systolic hypertension. The favorable efficacy and tolerability make eprosartan worthwhile to be taken into consideration by physicians.

Eprosartan: a review of its use in hypertension

Eprosartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB]) used in the treatment of hypertension. In large, randomized trials, eprosartan (with or without hydrochlorothiazide [HCTZ]) demonstrated superior antihypertensive efficacy to that of placebo and, when administered at comparable dosage regimens, had similar blood pressure-lowering effects to enalapril. Eprosartan was generally well tolerated in clinical trials and had a lower incidence of persistent dry cough than enalapril. Eprosartan has a neutral effect on metabolic parameters, such as serum lipid levels and glucose homeostasis, and a low propensity for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The use of eprosartan or other ARBs in combination with HCTZ tends to reverse the potassium loss associated with thiazide diuretics. Independent of its antihypertensive effects, eprosartan was associated with improved clinical outcomes (primary composite endpoint of all causes of mortality and all cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including all recurrent events) compared with nitrendipine in a randomized, secondary prevention trial in hypertensive patients with previous cerebrovascular events (MOSES trial). Eprosartan also reduced blood pressure and was associated with a modest improvement in cognitive function in a large observational study in patients > or =50 years of age with newly diagnosed hypertension (OSCAR study). In both of these trials, additional antihypertensive therapy, such as HCTZ, was permitted. Therefore, eprosartan is a useful treatment option in the management of a broad range of patients with hypertension, and its use with HCTZ provides a rational combination regimen.

Clinical profile of eprosartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker

Rationale. The goal of antihypertensive treatment is to reduce risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Apart from blood pressure lowering per se, also reducing the activities of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system appears to be important. Angiotensin II receptor blocker drugs (ARBs) have provided a useful class of anti-hypertensive drugs. Eprosartan is a relatively new ARB which is chemically distinct (non-biphenyl, non-tetrazole) from all other ARBs (biphenyl tetrazoles). An analysis has been made on available experimental and clinical data on eprosartan which not only is an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent, but also lowers the activities of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system. Experimental and pharmacokinetic studies on eprosartan have shown differences with the other ARBs. The distinct properties of this non-biphenyl, non-tetrazole ARB might be relevant in the effort to reduce cardiovascular risk, also beyond its blood pressure lowering capacity.

Peripheral sympatholytic actions of four AT1 antagonists: are they relevant for long-term antihypertensive efficacy?

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II causes hypertension not only by direct constriction of vascular smooth muscle, but also by facilitating the release of noradrenaline from sympathetic terminals and by enhancing vascular noradrenaline sensitivity. AT1 receptor antagonists attenuate all these actions, but display some evidence of substance-related selectivities.

OBJECTIVE

The contribution of pre- or postsynaptic impairment of sympathetic transmission to long-term antihypertensive efficacy should be determined for four structurally different, clinically approved AT1 antagonists.

DESIGN

Spontaneously hypertensive rats were treated with candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, or losartan via osmotic minipumps for 4 weeks at doses yielding identical reductions of blood pressure. Maximum efficacy was obtained with a tripled dose of candesartan.

METHODS

In the pithed rat model, stimulus/response dependencies were determined for vasopressor effectivity of preganglionic electrical stimulation, and of intravenous bolus applications of noradrenaline and angiotensin II.

RESULTS

Losartan, irbesartan, eprosartan, and candesartan at doses of 5, 40, 20, and 0.05 mg/kg per day, were equally effective in reducing basal systolic blood pressure (-42 mmHg), and the vasopressor potency of angiotensin II (approximately 10-fold). The efficacies of preganglionic stimulation and exogenous noradrenaline were unaltered, with the exception of irbesartan, which reduced vascular noradrenaline sensitivity. The tripled dose of candesartan further reduced basal and angiotensin II-stimulated blood pressures, and significantly attenuated vascular noradrenaline sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

AT1 antagonists at doses that effectively reduce blood pressure in chronic therapy do not generally suppress peripheral sympathetic function. A potential interaction consists in a reduction of vascular noradrenaline sensitivity, which can be considered as a class effect of AT1 antagonists at high dosage.

Eprosartan

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is approved for the treatment of essential hypertension and may be administered using a convenient once-daily regimen. The drug is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent with benefit in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events, independent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events and has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions, establishing it as a promising agent for combination antihypertensive strategies. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a tendency to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Accordingly, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension, including those who have had a stroke and those with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AT1-receptor blockade and sympathetic neurotransmission in cardiovascular disease

1. The present survey is dealing with the interactions between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in various organs and tissues, with an emphasis on the angiotensin AT-receptors located at the sympathetic nerve endings. 2. Angiotensin II, the main effector of the RAAS is known to stimulate sympathetic nerve traffic and its sequelae in numerous organs and tissues, such as the central nervous system, the adrenal medulla, the sympathetic ganglia and the sympathetic nerve endings. These stimulatory effects are mediated by AT(1)-receptors and counteracted by AT(1)-receptor antagonists. 3. Sympatho-inhibition at the level of the sympathetic nerve ending appears to be a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor blockers, mediated by presynaptic AT(1)-receptors. With respect to the ratio pre-/postsynaptic AT(1)-receptor antagonism important quantitative differences between the various compounds were found. 4. Both the pre- and postjunctional receptors at the sympathetic nerve endings belong to the AT(1)-receptor population. However, the presynaptic receptors belong to the AT(1B)-subtype, whereas the postjunctional receptors probably belong to a different AT(1)-receptor subpopulation. 5. Sympatho-inhibition is a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor antagonists. In conditions in which the SNS plays a pathophysiological role, such as hypertension and congestive heart failure, this property may well be of therapeutic relevance.