Felbamate inhibits cloned voltage-dependent Na+ channels from human and rat brain

Potential induction of epileptic spasms by nonselective voltage-gated sodium channel blockade: Interaction with etiology

PURPOSE

Epileptic spasms are often preceded by focal (or multifocal) seizures. Based on a series of case reports suggesting that carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine may induce epileptic spasms, we set out to rigorously evaluate the potential association between exposure to voltage-gated sodium channel blockade and latency to epileptic spasms.

METHODS

We identified 50 cases (children with focal seizures and evolution to epileptic spasms) and 50 controls (children with focal seizures without evolution to epileptic spasms). For each patient, we reviewed all sequential neurology encounters between onset of epilepsy and emergence of epileptic spasms. For each encounter we recorded seizure-frequency and all anti-seizure therapy exposures. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, we evaluated the association between voltage-gated sodium channel exposure (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, or phenytoin) and latency to epileptic spasms onset, with adjustment for etiology and seizure-frequency.

RESULTS

Latency to epileptic spasms onset was independently associated with exposure to sodium channel blockade (hazard ratio = 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.2; P = 0.03) and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.1; P = 0.001). With assessment for interaction between sodium channel blockade and etiology, we identified an estimated 7-fold increased risk of epileptic spasms with the combination of sodium channel blockade and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 7.0, 95% CI 2.5-19.8; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that voltage-gated sodium channel blockade may induce epileptic spasms among children at risk on the basis of etiology. Further study is warranted to replicate these findings, ascertain possible drug- and dose-specific risks, and identify potential mechanisms of harm.

Effects of anti-epileptic drugs on spreading depolarization-induced epileptiform activity in mouse hippocampal slices

Epilepsy and spreading depolarization (SD) are both episodic brain disorders and often exist together in the same individual. In CA1 pyramidal neurons of mouse hippocampal slices, induction of SD evoked epileptiform activities, including the ictal-like bursts, which occurred during the repolarizing phase of SD, and the subsequent generation of paroxysmal depolarization shifts (PDSs), which are characterized by mild depolarization plateau with overriding spikes. The duration of the ictal-like activity was correlated with both the recovery time and the depolarization potential of SD, whereas the parameters of PDSs were not significantly correlated with the parameters of SD. Moreover, we systematically evaluated the effects of multiple anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) on SD-induced epileptiform activity. Among the drugs that are known to inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels, carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, and zonisamide reduced the frequency of PDSs and the overriding firing bursts in 20–25 min after the induction of SD. The GABA uptake inhibitor tiagabine exhibited moderate effects and partially limited the incidence of PDSs after SD. AEDs including gabapentin, levetiracetam, ethosuximide, felbamate, and vigabatrin, had no significant effect on SD-induced epileptic activity. Taken together, these results demonstrate the effects of AEDs on SD and the related epileptiform activity at the cellular level.

The NMDA receptor complex as a therapeutic target in epilepsy: a review

A substantial amount of research has shown that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) may play a key role in the pathophysiology of several neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Animal models of epilepsy and clinical studies demonstrate that NMDAR activity and expression can be altered in association with epilepsy and particularly in some specific seizure types. NMDAR antagonists have been shown to have antiepileptic effects in both clinical and preclinical studies. There is some evidence that conventional antiepileptic drugs may also affect NMDAR function. In this review, we describe the evidence for the involvement of NMDARs in the pathophysiology of epilepsy and provide an overview of NMDAR antagonists that have been investigated in clinical trials and animal models of epilepsy.

Diverse antiepileptic drugs increase the ratio of background synaptic inhibition to excitation and decrease neuronal excitability in neurones of the rat entorhinal cortex in vitro

Although most anti-epileptic drugs are considered to have a primary molecular target, it is clear that their actions are unlikely to be limited to effects on a single aspect of inhibitory synaptic transmission, excitatory transmission or voltage-gated ion channels. Systemically administered drugs can obviously simultaneously access all possible targets, so we have attempted to determine the overall effect of diverse agents on the balance between GABAergic inhibition, glutamatergic excitation and cellular excitability in neurones of the rat entorhinal cortex in vitro. We used an approach developed for estimating global background synaptic excitation and inhibition from fluctuations in membrane potential obtained by intracellular recordings. We have previously validated this approach in entorhinal cortical neurones [Greenhill and Jones (2007a) Neuroscience 147:884–892]. Using this approach, we found that, despite their differing pharmacology, the drugs tested (phenytoin, lamotrigine, valproate, gabapentin, felbamate, tiagabine) were unified in their ability to increase the ratio of background GABAergic inhibition to glutamatergic excitation. This could occur as a result of decreased excitation concurrent with increased inhibition (phenytoin, lamotrigine, valproate), a decrease in excitation alone (gabapentin, felbamate), or even with a differential increase in both (tiagabine). Additionally, we found that the effects on global synaptic conductances agreed well with whole cell patch recordings of spontaneous glutamate and GABA release (our previous studies and further data presented here). The consistency with which the synaptic inhibition:excitation ratio was increased by the antiepileptic drugs tested was matched by an ability of all drugs to concurrently reduce intrinsic neuronal excitability. Thus, it seems possible that specific molecular targets among antiepileptic drugs are less important than the ability to increase the inhibition:excitation ratio and reduce overall neuronal and network excitability.

NMDA receptors in clinical neurology: excitatory times ahead

Since the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunits were cloned less than two decades ago, a substantial amount of research has been invested into understanding their physiological function in the healthy CNS. Research has also been directed at their pathological roles in various neurological diseases, including disorders resulting from acute excitotoxic insults (eg, ischaemic stroke, traumatic brain injury), diseases due to chronic neurodegeneration (eg, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), disorders arising from sensitisation of neurons (eg, epilepsy, neuropathic pain), and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with NMDAR hypofunction (eg, schizophrenia). Selective NMDAR antagonists have not produced positive results in clinical trials. However, there are other NMDAR-targeted therapies used in current practice that are effective for treating some neurological disorders. In this Review, we describe the evidence for the use of these therapies and provide an overview of drugs being investigated in clinical trials. We also discuss new NMDAR-targeted strategies in clinical neurology.

Molecular determinants of the anticonvulsant felbamate binding site in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

The antiepileptic effect of felbamate (FBM) is ascribable to gating modification of NMDA receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis and electrophysiological studies, we found that single-point mutations of four pairs of homologous residues in the external vestibule of the receptor pore, namely V644(NR1)-L643(NR2B) (the two inner pairs) and T648(NR1)-T647(NR2B) (the two outer pairs), significantly decrease FBM binding. Moreover, double mutations involving either the inner or the outer pair always show cooperative (nonadditive) effects on FBM binding, whereas double mutations involving both inner and outer pairs always show additive (noncooperative) effects. Most interestingly, triple mutations of any three of the four critical residues essentially abolish the effect of FBM. These findings indicate that T648(NR1)/T647(NR2B) and V644(NR1)/L643(NR2B) act cooperatively to contribute directly to the "outer binding region" and "inner binding region" in the FBM binding site, respectively. The outer and inner binding regions, however, seem to contribute independently to FBM binding. We conclude that residues L643 and T647 in NR2B as well as homologous residues V644 and T648 in NR1 are the major, and very likely the exclusive, molecular determinants constituting the FBM binding site in the NMDA receptor.

Felbamate but not phenytoin or gabapentin reduces glutamate release by blocking presynaptic NMDA receptors in the entorhinal cortex

We have shown that a number of anticonvulsant drugs can reduce glutamate release at synapses in the rat entorhinal cortex (EC) in vitro. We have also shown that presynaptic NMDA receptors (NMDAr) tonically facilitate glutamate release at these synapses. In the present study we determined whether, phenytoin, gabapentin and felbamate may reduce glutamate release by blocking the presynaptic NMDAr. Whole cell patch clamp recordings of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) were used as a monitor of presynaptic glutamate release. Postsynaptic NMDAr were blocked with internal dialysis with an NMDAr channel blocker. The antagonist, 2-AP5, reduced the frequency of sEPSCs by blocking the presynaptic facilitatory NMDAr, but did not occlude a reduction in sEPSC frequency by gabapentin or phenytoin. Felbamate also reduced sEPSC frequency, but this effect was occluded by prior application of 2-AP5. Thus, whilst all three drugs can reduce glutamate release, only the action of felbamate seems to be due to interaction with presynaptic NMDAr.

Levetiracetam and felbamate interact both pharmacodynamically and pharmacokinetically: an isobolographic analysis in the mouse maximal electroshock model

PURPOSE

Polytherapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is generally required for approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy, who do not respond satisfactorily to monotherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, producing synergistic anticonvulsant efficacy and minimal adverse effects, is therefore of significant importance. The present study sought to ascertain the potential usefulness of levetiracetam (LEV) and felbamate (FBM) in combination in the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model.

METHODS

The anticonvulsant interaction profile between LEV and FBM in the mouse MES-induced seizure model was determined using type II isobolographic analysis. Acute adverse effects (motor performance) were ascertained by use of the chimney test. LEV and FBM brain concentrations were measured by HPLC in order to determine any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect.

RESULTS

LEV in combination with FBM, at the fixed ratios of 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, were supraadditive, whereas at the fixed ratio of 1:4, additivity was observed in the mouse MES model. Furthermore, none of the investigated combinations altered motor performance in the chimney test. Brain FBM concentrations were unaffected by concomitant LEV administration. In contrast, FBM significantly increased LEV brain concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

LEV in combination with FBM was associated with pharmacodynamic supraadditivity in the MES test. However, this anticonvulsant supraadditivity was associated with a concurrent increase in brain LEV concentrations indicating a pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed pharmacodynamic interaction between LEV and FBM.

Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs

The management of seizures in the patient with epilepsy relies heavily on antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. Fortunately, for a large percentage of patients, AEDs provide excellent seizure control at doses that do not adversely affect normal function. At the molecular level, the majority of AEDs are thought to modify excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission through effects on voltage-gated ion channels (e.g., sodium and calcium) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors, respectively. In addition to these effects, two of the "second-generation" AEDs have been found to limit glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission (i.e., felbamate and topiramate). Not surprisingly, those AEDs with broad spectrum clinical activity are often found to exert an action at more than one molecular target. Emerging evidence suggests that receptor and voltage-gated subunits are modified by chronic seizures. Thus, attempts to understand the relationship between target and effect continue to provide important information about the neuropathology of the epileptic network and to facilitate the development of novel therapies for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Felbamate is a subunit selective modulator of recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

Felbamate (2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate) is clinically available for the treatment of refractory epileptic seizures, and is known to modulate several ion channels including gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors. To determine felbamate subunit selectivity for GABA(A) receptors we expressed 15 different GABA(A) receptor combinations in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Felbamate positively modulated GABA-currents of alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S), alpha(1)beta(3)gamma(2S), alpha(2)beta(2)gamma(2S) and alpha(2)beta(3)gamma(2S), whereas felbamate was either ineffective or negatively modulated the other 11 receptor combinations. Regional distributions of GABA(A) receptor subunits suggest that felbamate may differentially modulate distinct inhibitory circuits, a possibility that may have relevance to felbamate efficacy in refractory epilepsies.

Diverse mechanisms of antiepileptic drugs in the development pipeline

There is a remarkable array of new chemical entities in the current antiepileptic drug (AED) development pipeline. In some cases, the compounds were synthesized in an attempt improve upon the activity of marketed AEDs. In other cases, the discovery of antiepileptic potential was largely serendipitous. Entry into the pipeline begins with the demonstration of activity in one or more animal screening models. Results from testing in a panel of such models provide a basis to differentiate agents and may offer clues as to the mechanism. Target activity may then be defined through cell-based studies, often years after the initial identification of activity. Some pipeline compounds are believed to act through conventional targets, whereas others are structurally novel and may act by novel mechanisms. Follow-on agents include the levetiracetam analogs brivaracetam and seletracetam that act as SV2A-ligands; the valproate-like agents valrocemide, valnoctamide, propylisopropyl acetamide, and isovaleramide; the felbamate analog flurofelbamate, a dicarbamate, and the unrelated carbamate RWJ-333369; the oxcarbazepine analog licarbazepine, which probably acts as a use-dependent sodium channel blockers, and its prodrug acetate BIA 2-093; various selective partial benzodiazepine receptor agonists, including ELB139, which is a positive allosteric modulator of alpha3-containing GABA(A) receptors. A variety of AEDs that may act through novel targets are also in clinical development: lacosamide, a functionalized amino acid; talampanel, a 2,3-benzodiazepine selective noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist; NS1209, a competitive AMPA receptor antagonist; ganaxolone, a neuroactive steroid that acts as a positive modulator of GABA(A) receptors; retigabine, a KCNQ potassium channel opener with activity as a GABA(A) receptor positive modulator; the benzanilide KCNQ potassium channel opener ICA-27243 that is more selective than retigabine; and rufinamide, a triazole of unknown mechanism.

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of pharmacoresistance in epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common and devastating neurological disorder. In many patients with epilepsy, seizures are well-controlled with currently available anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), but a substantial (approximately 30%) proportion of patients continue to have seizures despite carefully optimized drug treatment. Two concepts have been put forward to explain the development of pharmacoresistance. The transporter hypothesis contends that the expression or function of multidrug transporters in the brain is augmented, leading to impaired access of AEDs to CNS targets. The target hypothesis holds that epilepsy-related changes in the properties of the drug targets themselves may result in reduced drug sensitivity. Recent studies have started to dissect the molecular underpinnings of both transporter- and target-mediated mechanisms of pharmacoresistance in human and experimental epilepsy. An emerging understanding of these underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms is likely to provide important impetus for the development of new pharmacological treatment strategies.

Interaction between lamotrigine and felbamate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice: an isobolographic analysis

Isobolographic profile of interactions between lamotrigine (LTG) and felbamate (FBM), two second-generation antiepileptic drugs, against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures, and neurotoxic adverse effects in the chimney test in mice were determined. LTG combined with FBM at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 exerted merely additive interactions against MES-induced seizures. In the chimney test, isobolography revealed that LTG coadministered with FBM at the fixed ratio of 1:1 displayed subadditivity (antagonism), whereas the remaining combinations tested (1:3 and 3:1) exerted additivity in terms of their neurotoxic side effects. LTG (at the dose of 2.3 mg/kg) coadministered with FBM (25.7 mg/kg) at the fixed ratio of 1:1 from the MES test did not impair long-term memory of mice challenged with the passive avoidance task. Furthermore, FBM (25.7 mg/kg) altered neither the free plasma nor brain concentration of LTG, hence pharmacokinetic events, which might affect the observed interactions in the MES test, are unlikely. Considering benefit indices for the respective fixed ratio combinations, it may be concluded that the combination of LTG with FBM at the fixed ratio of 1:1 is advantageous from a preclinical point of view, offering the highest benefit index reaching the value of 1.46. Likewise, the two-drug combination of 1:3 was also beneficial and is worth recommendation with benefit index amounting to 1.36. Only the combination of 3:1 was neutral with a benefit index of 1.08. Protection offered by LTG in combination with FBM against maximal electroconvulsions and its favorable neurotoxic side effect profile might provide the patients with intractable seizures with an efficacious treatment, as the rational polytherapy however, it requires to be clinically confirmed and verified.

Isobolographic and subthreshold analysis of interactions among felbamate and four conventional antiepileptic drugs in pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice

PURPOSE

Despite possibility of idiosyncratic reaction development, felbamate (FBM) is recommended in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial refractory epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of interactions between FBM and four conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ESM), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA), in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions in mice, a model of myoclonic seizures in humans.

METHODS

Data obtained from PTZ-evoked seizures were compared by use of two basic procedures, the subthreshold method and isobolographic analysis. Results of the chimney test (evaluating motor coordination) also were elaborated isobolographically. Thus it was possible to determine both median toxic dose (TD50) and protective index (PI) for each drug combination.

RESULTS

FBM reduced the clonic seizure activity [with an ED50 of 9.7 mg/kg; TD50, 439.1 mg/kg; and PI, 45.3]. FBM at the dose of 10 mg/kg, but not 7.5 mg/kg, significantly reduced PTZ-induced convulsions in mice. In the subthreshold method, FBM (7.5 mg/kg) did not affect the protective activity of conventional AEDs used in the study. However, when applied at 10 mg/kg, it enhanced the protective activity of PB and ESM, but not that of VPA or CZP. The nature of these interactions could not be precisely estimated with this method. The exact profile of drug interactions was determined with the use of isobolography. In terms of seizure inhibition, antagonism was found between FBM and VPA applied at the fixed-dose ratio of 3:1. Synergy was detected between FBM and PB (1:3). Combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3, 1:1), PB (1:1, 3:1), and ESM or CZP (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) led to additive interactions. As regards motor impairment, the combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) were synergistic. Remaining combinations exhibited pure additivity. Pharmacokinetic events may influence FBM/ESM and FBM/CZP interactions, because FBM lowered the brain concentration of ESM and increased that of CZP.

CONCLUSIONS

The profitable benefit index was found only for the combination of FBM with PB (1:3). Conversely, the combinations of FBM with either VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) do not seem promising for the therapy of refractory myoclonic convulsions. Isobolographic analysis provides more reliable clues to be considered by the clinicians willing to introduce AED combinations for the therapy of epilepsy.

Use-dependent inhibition of the N-methyl-D-aspartate currents by felbamate: a gating modifier with selective binding to the desensitized channels

Felbamate (FBM) is a potent nonsedative anticonvulsant whose clinical effect may be related to the inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) currents, but the exact molecular action remains unclear. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recording in rat hippocampal neurons, we found that submillimolar FBM effectively modifies the gating process of NMDA channels. During a single high-concentration (1 mM) NMDA pulse, FBM significantly inhibits the late sustained current but not the early peak current. However, if the 1 mM NMDA pulse is preceded by a low-concentration (10 microM) NMDA prepulse, then FBM significantly inhibits both the peak and the sustained currents in the 1 mM pulse. In sharp contrast, the NMDA currents elicited by micromolar NMDA are only negligibly inhibited or even enhanced by FBM. These findings indicate that the inhibitory effect of FBM on NMDA currents is stronger with both higher NMDA concentration and longer NMDA exposure, and is thus "use-dependent". FBM also slows recovery of the desensitized NMDA channel, and quantitative analyses of FBM effects on the activation kinetics and the desensitization curve of the NMDA currents further disclose dissociation constants of approximately 200, approximately 110, and approximately 55 microM for FBM binding to the resting, activated, and desensitized NMDA channels, respectively. We conclude that therapeutic concentrations (50-300 microM) of FBM could bind to and modify a significant proportion of the resting NMDA channel even when NMDA or other glutamatergic ligand is not present and then decrease the NMDA currents at subsequent NMDA pulses by stabilization of the desensitized channels. Because the inhibitory effect is apparent only when there is excessive NMDA exposure, FBM may effectively inhibit many seizure discharges but preserve most normal neuronal firings.

Antiepileptic drugs and agents that inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels prevent NMDA antagonist neurotoxicity

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonists are used in clinical anesthesia and are being developed as therapeutic agents for preventing neurodegeneration in stroke, epilepsy, and brain trauma. However, the ability of these agents to produce neurotoxicity in adult rats and psychosis in adult humans compromises their clinical usefulness. In addition, an NMDA receptor hypofunction (NRHypo) state might play a role in neurodegenerative and psychotic disorders, like Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Thus, developing pharmacological means of preventing these NRHypo-induced effects could have significant clinically relevant benefits. NRHypo neurotoxicity appears to be mediated by a complex disinhibition mechanism that results in the excessive stimulation of certain vulnerable neurons. Here we report our findings that five agents (phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and riluzole), thought to possess anticonvulsant activity because they inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels, prevent NRHypo neurotoxicity. The ability of tetrodotoxin, a highly selective inhibitor of voltage-gated sodium channels, to prevent the same neurotoxicity suggests that inhibition of this ion channel is the likely mechanism of action of these five agents. We also found that three other anticonvulsants (felbamate, gabapentin and ethosuximide), whose mechanism is less clear, also prevent NRHypo neurotoxicity, suggesting that inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels is not the only mechanism via which anticonvulsants can act to prevent NRHypo neurotoxicity. Several of these agents have been found to be of clinical use in bipolar disorder. It would be of interest to determine whether these agents might have therapeutic benefits for conditions in which a NRHypo state may exist.

Voltage-gated sodium channels in epilepsy

Animal experiments, and particularly functional investigations on human chronically epileptic tissue as well as genetic studies in epilepsy patients and their families strongly suggest that some forms of epilepsy may share a pathogenetic mechanism: an alteration of voltage-gated sodium channels. This review summarizes recent data on changes of sodium channel expression, molecular structure and function associated with epilepsy, as well as on the interaction of new and established antiepileptic drugs with sodium currents. Although it remains to be determined precisely how and to what extent altered sodium-channel functions play a role in different epilepsy syndromes, future promising therapy approaches may include drugs modulating sodium currents, and particularly substances changing their inactivation characteristics.

The mechanisms of action of commonly used antiepileptic drugs

In the past decade, nine new drugs have been licensed for the treatment of epilepsy. With limited clinical experience of these agents, the mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs may be an important criterion in the selection of the most suitable treatment regimens for individual patients. At the cellular level, three basic mechanisms are recognised: modulation of voltage-dependent ion channels, enhancement of inhibitory neurotransmission, and attenuation of excitatory transmission. In this review, we will attempt to introduce the concepts of ion channel and neurotransmitter modulation and, thereafter, group currently used antiepileptic drugs according to their principal mechanisms of action.

The pharmacologic basis of antiepileptic drug action

The development of medications used in the treatment of epilepsy has accelerated over the past decade, and has benefited from a parallel growth in our knowledge of the basic mechanisms underlying neuronal excitability and synchronization. This understanding of the pharmacologic basis of antiepileptic drug (AED) action has, in large part, arisen from recent advances in cellular and molecular biology, coupled with avenues of drug discovery that have departed somewhat from the largely empiric approaches of the past. Physicians now have available to them an ever-growing armentarium of AEDs, necessitating a firmer appreciation of their mechanisms of action if more rational approaches toward both clinical application and research are to be adopted. An important example in this regard is the concept of rational polypharmacy for patients with epilepsy who are refractory to monotherapy. This review summarizes our current understanding of the molecular targets of clinically significant AEDs, comparing and contrasting their differing mechanisms of action.

Electrophysiological effects of felbamate

Felbamate is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug recently introduced into clinical practice for controlling seizures in patients affected by Lennox-Gastaut epilepsy, complex partial seizures or otherwise intractable epilepsies. However, the cellular mechanisms by which the drug exerts its anticonvulsant actions are not fully understood. The aim of the present article is to outline the possible mechanisms of action of felbamate as suggested by findings obtained with electrophysiological approaches.