Possible mechanism for the anemia induced by candesartan cilexetil (TCV-116), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in rats

Impact of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers on hematological parameters in type 2 diabetic patients

Antihypertensive medications have been associated with a reduction in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, leading to clinically significant anemia. We aimed to provide valuable insights into the impact of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on hematological parameters by measuring the levels of erythropoietin (EPO), ferritin, and complete blood count (CBC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly considering the duration of the antihypertensives use. In addition to comparing their effects on blood pressure, glycemic status, and renal function, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at the consultation unit of Alsalam Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Nineveh Province, between October 2022 and February 2023. A total of 160 participants were enrolled after being fully examined by the consultants to detect their eligibility for inclusion in the study and to rule out any abnormality. They consisted of 40 healthy controls, 30 T2DM patients (T2DM group), 30 T2DM patients with newly diagnosed hypertension (HT) (T2DM+HT group), 30 type 2 diabetic-hypertensives on ARBs (T2DM+HT+ARBs group), and 30 type 2 diabetic-hypertensives on CCBs (T2DM+HT+CCBs group). Five milliliters of blood was drawn from a vein and divided into two parts. Two milliliters was transferred into an anticoagulant tube for the measurement of HbA1c and complete blood picture. Serum was obtained from the remaining blood and used for assessment of ferritin, EPO, FSG, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Significantly reduced FSG and HbA1c levels were observed in T2DM+HT+CCBs and T2DM+HT+ARBs groups vs T2DM+HT group (p < 0.05). The T2DM+HT+CCBs group had statistically higher urea levels than the T2DM group (p < 0.05). Both CCBs and ARBs use resulted in reduced creatinine clearance (CrCl). T2DM+HT+CCBs group exhibited slightly higher uric acid levels compared to controls (p < 0.05). Prolonged use of CCBs and ARBs led to disturbances in hematological parameters, with CCBs users showing the lowest levels of hemoglobin (Hb), RBCs, and hematocrit (Hct) among the groups. ARBs users displayed the lowest values of EPO and ferritin compared to other patient groups, along with reduced levels of Hb, RBCs, and Hct, albeit slightly higher than CCBs users. Our study highlights the importance of a balanced approach in prescribing ARBs and CCBs to patients with T2DM, given their potential to induce blood abnormalities, particularly with prolonged usage.

The contribution of the AT1 receptor to erythropoiesis

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) comprises a broad set of functional peptides and receptors that play a role in cardiovascular homeostasis and contribute to cardiovascular pathologies. Angiotensin II (Ang II) is the most potent peptide hormone produced by the RAS due to its high abundance and its strong and pleiotropic impact on the cardiovascular system. Formation of Ang II takes place in the bloodstream and additionally in tissues in the so-called local RAS. Of the two Ang II receptors (AT1 and AT2) that Ang II binds to, AT1 is the most expressed throughout the mammalian body. AT1 expression is not restricted to cells of the cardiovascular system but in fact AT1 protein is found in nearly all organs, hence, Ang II takes part in several modulatory physiological processes one of which is erythropoiesis. In this review, we present multiple evidence supporting that Ang II modulates physiological and pathological erythropoiesis processes trough the AT1 receptor. Cumulative evidence indicates that Ang II by three distinct mechanisms influences erythropoiesis: 1) stimulation of renal erythropoietin synthesis; 2) direct action on bone marrow precursor cells; and 3) modulation of sympathetic nerve activity to the bone marrow. The text highlights clinical and preclinical evidence focusing on mechanistic studies using rodent models.

Erythropoietin Regulation by Angiotensin II

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a key regulator of blood pressure and blood volume homeostasis. The RAS is primarily comprised of the precursor protein angiotensinogen and the two proteases, renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Angiotensin I (Ang I) is derived from angiotensinogen by renin, but appears to have no biological activity. In contrast, angiotensin II (Ang II) that has a variety of biological functions in the cells is converted from Ang I through removal of two-C-terminal residues by ACE. The physiological effects of Ang II are due to Ang II signaling through specific receptor binding, resulting in muscle contraction leading to increased blood pressure and volume. To modulate RAS, three classes of drugs have been developed: (1) renin inhibitors to prevent angiotensinogen conversion to Ang I, (2) ACE inhibitors, to prevent Ang I processing to Ang II and (3) angiotensin receptor blockers, to inhibit Ang II signaling through its receptor. Studies using the RAS inhibitors and Ang II demonstrated that RAS signaling mediates actions of Ang II in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation of specific hematopoietic cell types, especially in the red blood cell lineage. Accumulating evidence indicates that RAS regulates EPO, an essential mediator of red cell production, for human anemia and erythropoiesis in vivo and in vitro. The regulation of EPO expression by Ang II may be responsible for maintaining red blood cell homeostasis. This review highlights the biological roles of RAS for blood cell and EPO homeostasis through Ang II signaling. The molecular mechanism for Ang II-induced EPO production of the cell or tissue type-specific expression is discussed.

Erythropoiesis and Blood Pressure Are Regulated via AT1 Receptor by Distinctive Pathways

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) plays a central role in blood pressure regulation. Although clinical and experimental studies have suggested that inhibition of RAS is associated with progression of anemia, little evidence is available to support this claim. Here we report that knockout mice that lack angiotensin II, including angiotensinogen and renin knockout mice, exhibit anemia. The anemia of angiotensinogen knockout mice was rescued by angiotensin II infusion, and rescue was completely blocked by simultaneous administration of AT1 receptor blocker. To genetically determine the responsible receptor subtype, we examined AT1a, AT1b, and AT2 knockout mice, but did not observe anemia in any of them. To investigate whether pharmacological AT1 receptor inhibition recapitulates the anemic phenotype, we administered AT1 receptor antagonist in hypotensive AT1a receptor knockout mice to inhibit the remaining AT1b receptor. In these animals, hematocrit levels barely decreased, but blood pressure further decreased to the level observed in angiotensinogen knockout mice. We then generated AT1a and AT1b double-knockout mice to completely ablate the AT1 receptors; the mice finally exhibited the anemic phenotype. These results provide clear evidence that although erythropoiesis and blood pressure are negatively controlled through the AT1 receptor inhibition in vivo, the pathways involved are complex and distinct, because erythropoiesis is more resistant to AT1 receptor inhibition than blood pressure control.

Physiology of the Renal Interstitium

Long overlooked as the virtual compartment and then strictly characterized through descriptive morphologic analysis, the renal interstitium has finally been associated with function. With identification of interstitial renin- and erythropoietin-producing cells, the most prominent endocrine functions of the kidney have now been attributed to the renal interstitium. This article reviews the functional role of renal interstitium.

A modern understanding of the traditional and nontraditional biological functions of angiotensin-converting enzyme

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a zinc-dependent peptidase responsible for converting angiotensin I into the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. However, ACE is a relatively nonspecific peptidase that is capable of cleaving a wide range of substrates. Because of this, ACE and its peptide substrates and products affect many physiologic processes, including blood pressure control, hematopoiesis, reproduction, renal development, renal function, and the immune response. The defining feature of ACE is that it is composed of two homologous and independently catalytic domains, the result of an ancient gene duplication, and ACE-like genes are widely distributed in nature. The two ACE catalytic domains contribute to the wide substrate diversity of ACE and, by extension, the physiologic impact of the enzyme. Several studies suggest that the two catalytic domains have different biologic functions. Recently, the X-ray crystal structure of ACE has elucidated some of the structural differences between the two ACE domains. This is important now that ACE domain-specific inhibitors have been synthesized and characterized. Once widely available, these reagents will undoubtedly be powerful tools for probing the physiologic actions of each ACE domain. In turn, this knowledge should allow clinicians to envision new therapies for diseases not currently treated with ACE inhibitors.

Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Both angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Many clinical studies have demonstrated and compared the organ-protection effects and adverse events of these drugs. However, few large-scale studies have focused on the effect of these drugs as monotherapy on laboratory parameters. We evaluated and compared the effects of ARB and CCB monotherapy on clinical laboratory parameters in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We used data from the Clinical Data Warehouse of Nihon University School of Medicine obtained between Nov 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011, to identify cohorts of new ARB users (n = 601) and propensity-score matched new CCB users (n = 601), with concomitant mild to moderate hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used a multivariate-adjusted regression model to adjust for differences between ARB and CCB users, and compared laboratory parameters including serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), non-fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), sodium, potassium, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), hemoglobin and hematocrit, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) counts up to 12 months after the start of ARB or CCB monotherapy.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction of serum TC, HbA1c, hemoglobin and hematocrit and RBC count and a significant increase of serum potassium in ARB users, and a reduction of serum TC and hemoglobin in CCB users, from the baseline period to the exposure period. The reductions of RBC count, hemoglobin and hematocrit in ARB users were significantly greater than those in CCB users. The increase of serum potassium in ARB users was significantly greater than that in CCB users.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that hematological adverse effects and electrolyte imbalance are greater with ARB monotherapy than with CCB monotherapy.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of erythropoiesis

The renin-angiotensin system is the major regulator of blood pressure by virtue of controlling vascular resistance and plasma volume. Much less recognition exists for the role of the renin-angiotensin system in regulating erythropoiesis, a biological function critical for oxygen delivery to tissues. In this review, we present evidence that angiotensin II (Ang II) is a physiologically important regulator of erythropoiesis with 2 key actions. First, Ang II is a growth factor of erythroid progenitors and, in cooperation with erythropoietin, increases red blood cell mass. Second, Ang II acts as an erythropoietin secretagogue to maintain increased erythropoietin levels despite increments in hematocrit. Among a multitude of physiologic and pathophysiologic implications, these lines of evidence provide an explanation for the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II type 1 receptor blockers to decrease hematocrit or cause anemia in various clinical conditions.

Relationship between angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and body composition, functional performance, and blood biomarkers in advanced cancer patients

PURPOSE

Nutritional and functional outcome measures have been shown to vary in patients with chronic diseases according to the polymorphic alleles of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), but little is known about the associations between ACE gene polymorphism (ACEGP) and the components of body composition, strength, and selected blood markers in advanced cancer patients (ACP).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Data were collected from an inception cohort of 172 newly diagnosed ACP with gastrointestinal and non-small cell lung cancer. ACEGP status was defined by the presence of one of the following three combinations of alleles: insertion/insertion, insertion/deletion, and deletion/deletion. Body composition measurements using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry comprised of the following: total fat mass, percent body fat, lean body mass, and appendicular lean mass. Body mass index; handgrip force by Jamar dynamometry; subjective recording of nutrition and performance status as per patient-generated subjective global assessment; cell blood count and differential, serum albumin, ACE, and C-reactive protein were also recorded.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis, controlling for gender, age, diagnosis, treatments (radio/chemo), survival, and medication use (ACE inhibitors, anti-inflammatories, statins) revealed the following significant (P </= 0.05) relationships in the insertion/deletion compared with insertion/insertion group: higher hemoglobin (Hb; beta, 6.39 g/dl; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-12.78), lower total fat mass (-5.78 kg; -11.62 to 0.07), percent body fat (-6.04%; -12.20 to 0.12), and lean body mass (-3.26 kg; -6.78 to 0.26). When comparing the DD to the II group, higher serum ACE (9.10; 1.96-16.25), Hb (6.25 g/dl; -0.63 to 13.12), and handgrip force by Jamar (6.85 lbs; 0.78-12.93) were found.

CONCLUSION

Of the variables studied, ACEGP seems to be primarily associated with differences in body composition, Hb, and muscle strength in ACP. Further data are needed to determine the clinical effect of ACEGP in cancer cachexia.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism is associated with anemia in non small-cell lung cancer

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) plays an important role not only in the regulation of vascular homeostasis but also in stimulation of hematopoiesis. We aimed to evaluate the association between insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene and anemia at the time of the diagnosis. We enrolled 75 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 85 age- and sex-matched healthy control participants. The I/D polymorphism of ACE was identified by using polymerase chain reaction from peripheral blood samples. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows. The distributions of the ACE genotypes and alleles are similar in patients and in healthy participants (P=0.29 and P=0.08, respectively). In patients with NSCLC, 34 (45.3%) had anemia; of whom 3 (8.8%) had genotype II, 24 (70.6%) had genotype ID, and 7 (20.6%) had genotype DD (P=0.001). The patients with the II and ID genotypes had more frequent anemia at the time of the diagnosis (odds ratio = 6.02; P=0.001). Our findings suggest that I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene may influence the development of anemia in patients with NSCLC.

Enhanced erythropoiesis mediated by activation of the renin‐angiotensin system via angiotensin II type 1a receptor

Although clinical and experimental studies have long suggested a role for the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the regulation of erythropoiesis, the molecular basis of this role has not been well understood. We report here that transgenic mice carrying both the human renin and human angiotensinogen genes displayed persistent erythrocytosis as well as hypertension. To identify the receptor molecule responsible for this phenotype, we introduced both transgenes into the AT1a receptor null background and found that the hematocrit level in the compound mice was restored to the normal level. Angiotensin II has been shown to influence erythropoiesis by two means, up-regulation of erythropoietin levels and direct stimulation of erythroid progenitor cells. Thus, we conducted bone marrow transplantation experiments and clarified that AT1a receptors on bone marrow-derived cells were dispensable for RAS-dependent erythrocytosis. Plasma erythropoietin levels and kidney erythropoietin mRNA expression in the double transgenic mice were significantly increased compared with those of the wild-type control, while the elevated plasma erythropoietin levels were significantly attenuated in the compound mice. These results provide clear genetic evidence that activated RAS enhances erythropoiesis through the AT1a receptor of kidney cells and that this effect is mediated by the elevation of plasma erythropoietin levels in vivo.

Superiority of combination of thiazide with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or AT1-receptor blocker over thiazide alone on renoprotection inl-NAME/SHR

The renal and glomerular dynamic effects of combining thiazide and angiotensin antagonists have not been reported. The present study was designed to examine the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) alone or in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or ANG II type 1-receptor blocker on renal hemodynamics, glomerular dynamics, renal function, and renal histopathology in the Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester-treated spontaneously hypertensive rat (l-NAME/SHR) model. HCTZ (80 mg·kg−1·day−1) alone or in combination with enalapril (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) or losartan (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) or enalapril (15 mg·kg−1·day−1) plus losartan (15 mg·kg−1·day−1) was administered to l-NAME/SHR (5.0 ± 0.10 mg·kg−1·day−1) for 3 wk. Mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance, renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, glomerular hydrostatic pressure, afferent and efferent glomerular arteriolar resistances, single nephron plasma flow, single nephron glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine concentration, 24-h urinary protein excretion, and glomerular and arteriolar injury scores were determined. HCTZ reduced mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance, glomerular hydrostatic pressure, and afferent and efferent glomerular arteriolar resistances ( P < 0.05, at least) but slightly increased renal plasma flow and single nephron plasma flow associated with reduced serum creatinine concentration, urinary protein excretion, and arteriolar injury score compared with l-NAME/SHR control. However, the combination of enalapril and/or losartan with HCTZ markedly improved each of these functions. These results demonstrated minor benefits of HCTZ monotherapy and a marked superiority of its combination with enalapril and/or losartan over HCTZ monotherapy on renoprotection in l-NAME/SHR, thereby providing strong evidence of their clinical benefits for hypertensive patients with renal functional impairment.

Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions. Drug dosing in these patients often proves to be a difficult task. Renal dysfunction-induced changes in human pathophysiology regularly results may alter medication pharmacodynamics and handling. Several pharmacokinetic parameters are adversely affected by CKD, secondary to a reduced oral absorption and glomerular filtration; altered tubular secretion; and reabsorption and changes in intestinal, hepatic, and renal metabolism. In general, drug dosing can be accomplished by multiple methods; however, the most common recommendations are often to reduce the dose or expand the dosing interval, or use both methods simultaneously. Some medications need to be avoided all together in CKD either because of lack of efficacy or increased risk of toxicity. Nevertheless, specific recommendations are available for dosing of certain medications and are an important resource, because most are based on clinical or pharmacokinetic trials.

Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism and ACE inhibition produce similar renoprotection in N(omega)-nitro-L>-arginine methyl ester/spontaneously hypertensive rats

This study was conducted to determine potentially differential effects between an angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist and an ACE inhibitor on systemic, renal, and glomerular hemodynamics and pathological changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with N(omega)-nitro-L>-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-exacerbated nephrosclerosis. The hemodynamic, renal micropuncture, and pathological studies were performed in 9 groups of 17-week-old male SHR treated as follows: group 1, controls (n=16); group 2, candesartan (10 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); group 3, enalapril (30 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=8); group 4, candesartan (5 mg/kg per day) plus enalapril (15 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=9); group 5, L-NAME (50 mg/L in drinking water for 3 weeks) (n=17); group 6, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus candesartan (10 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); group 7, L-NAME (50 mg/L) for 3 weeks followed by candesartan (10 mg/kg per day) for another 3 weeks (n=8); group 8, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus enalapril (30 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks) (n=7); and group 9, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus enalapril (30 mg/kg per day) and the bradykinin antagonist icatibant (500 microg/kg SC per day via osmotic minipump for 3 weeks) (n=7). Both candesartan and enalapril similarly reduced mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance index. These changes were associated with significant decreases in afferent and efferent glomerular arteriolar resistances as well as glomerular capillary pressure. Histopathologically, the glomerular and arterial injury scores were decreased significantly, and left ventricular and aortic masses also were diminished significantly in all treated groups. L-NAME-induced urinary protein excretion was prevented by both candesartan and enalapril. Thus, both AT(1) receptor and ACE inhibition prevented and reversed the pathophysiological alterations of L-NAME-exacerbated nephrosclerosis in SHR. Itatibant only blunted the antihypertensive effects of enalapril but did not attenuate the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on the L-NAME-induced nephrosclerosis. Thus, the AT(1) receptor antagonism and ACE inhibition have similar renal preventive effects, which most likely were achieved through reduction in the effects of angiotensin II, and ACE inhibition of bradykinin degradation demonstrated little evidence of renoprotection.

Coronary hemodynamic and ventricular responses to angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition in SHR: interaction with angiotensin type 2 receptors

This study was designed to determine the effects of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor inhibition on coronary hemodynamics and ventricular mass and hydroxyproline content and the additive effects of angiotensin II type 2 (AT(2)) receptor inhibition in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The selective AT(1) receptor antagonist candesartan (10 mg/kg per day) was administered alone or in combination with the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD 123319 (50 mg/kg per day) for 12 weeks. Control SHR received placebo for the same period. Left and right ventricular coronary blood flow, blood flow reserve, and minimal coronary vascular resistance were determined by using radiomicrospheres in male 35-week-old rats. Mean arterial pressure; total peripheral resistance; left and right ventricular, renal, and aortic weights; and hydroxyproline concentration were also determined. Candesartan reduced mean arterial pressure and left ventricular, renal, and aortic masses, as well as hydroxyproline concentration and minimal coronary vascular resistance of both ventricles. PD 123319 partially prevented the hypotensive effect of AT(1) receptor inhibition and reversed the effect on myocardial hydroxyproline concentration. These data suggest that AT(2) receptors contribute to the hypotensive and antifibrotic effects but not the coronary hemodynamic improvement or reduced left ventricular mass of AT(1) receptor inhibition in these adult SHR.

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy by AT1 receptor blockade in renal transplant recipients

AT1 receptor antagonists control blood pressure (BP) effectively and reduce left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. Because left ventricular hypertrophy is very common in renal transplant recipients, we examined the cardiovascular effects and the safety profile of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan in hypertensive renal transplant recipients. In 20 renal transplant recipients with stable renal graft function 50 mg of losartan was added to the preexisting antihypertensive treatment (no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) at least 6 months after renal transplantation. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP, two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiography, and duplex sonography, as well as renal function, red blood cell count, cyclosporine A and FK 506 levels, erythropoetin, and angiotensin II concentration were determined at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. With 24-h ambulatory BP measurement, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced by 7.5 +/- 2.4 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 4.5 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). Posterior, septal, and relative wall thickness decreased by 0.95 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.91 +/- 0.2 mm and 0.04 +/- 0.01 mm, respectively (all P < .001). Left ventricular mass index decreased by 18.1 +/- 4.7 g/m2 (P < .01). Ejection fraction and midwall fractional fiber shortening as systolic parameters and the relation of passive-to-active diastolic filling of the left ventricle were unaltered. Serum creatinine and cyclosporine A concentration remained stable in all patients. Hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased by 1.0 +/- 0.3 g/dL and 3.6% +/- 0.9%, respectively (P < .002 and P < .001) without a change in serum erythropoetin level. In renal transplant recipients the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan reduces left ventricular hypertrophy without altering systolic or diastolic function. It is safe with regard to renal function and immunosuppression, but slightly decreases hemoglobin level.

Candesartan cilexetil: an angiotensin II receptor blocker

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and critique the medical literature on candesartan cilexetil, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE searches (January 1966-January 1999) and manufacturer prescribing literature were used to identify articles on candesartan cilexetil. Bibliographies were also reviewed for germane articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Study and review articles describing the chemistry, human pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, placebo-controlled trials, comparative trials, and clinical application of candesartan cilexetil based on the published literature and premarketing clinical trials were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

All literature on the use of candesartan cilexetil for treating hypertension and congestive heart failure were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ARBs are a new class of drugs with increasing use in treating hypertension. Studies are ongoing to determine the role of these agents in preventing remodeling after myocardial infarction and in patients with congestive heart failure. Candesartan cilexetil is among the newest drugs in the class that includes losartan, irbesartan, and valsartan. Candesartan cilexetil has more than 1000 times more affinity for the angiotensin II, type AT1 receptor ARBs, and the binding affinity and competitive angiotensin II receptor antagonism is stronger than that of losartan. Clinical studies in patients with hypertension have demonstrated that candesartan cilexetil, in doses of 4-16 mg, is more effective in reducing sitting diastolic blood pressure than are placebo and losartan 50 mg. Candesartan cilexetil has demonstrated reductions in blood pressure comparable to those of enalapril, with the rate of adverse events greater in the enalapril group. Dosage adjustments are not necessary in elderly patients or in patients with mild hepatic or renal dysfunction. In diabetic patients, blood glucose, hemoglobinA1c, and serum lipids are not affected. The clinical studies demonstrated that the adverse effect profile of candesartan cilexetil was similar to that of placebo and there were no dose-dependent adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Candesartan cilexetil provides an alternative antihypertensive therapy that is well tolerated and effective in reducing blood pressure in a wide range of patients. Due to its greater binding affinity to the angiotensin II receptor, candesartan cilexetil appears to have a longer antihypertensive effect than losartan. This may be advantageous in decreasing morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension, although further studies are required to validate this potential advantage.

The impact of withdrawing ACE inhibitors on erythropoietin responsiveness and left ventricular hypertrophy in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have the capability of decreasing left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. On the other hand, recent reports provide conflicting information regarding the impact of ACE inhibitors on responsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo), and there are no data about the effect of withdrawing ACE inhibitors both on rHuEpo response and LVMI in HD patients.

METHODS

ACE inhibitors were switched to another antihypertensive medication in 23 out of 68 patients in our HD unit who were receiving both rHuEpo and an ACE inhibitor for more than 1 year. Blood pressure at the pre- and post-dialysis phases, haematocrit levels and rHuEpo doses were determined at the end of the first and of the third years, and the LVMI was determined at the end of the third year. Statistical analyses were done in 15 patients in whom the study could be completed.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) haematocrit level was increased from 26.3+6.4% to 29.8+/-6.3% at the first year (P<0.05), and to 29.4+/-6.5% at the third year (P<0.05 vs before), while the mean dose of rHuEpo was decreased from 208.3+/-99.0 UI/kg/week to 141.0+/-91.8 at the first year (P=0.01), and to 141.4+/-81.0 at the third year (P=0.01 vs before). Administration of rHuEpo had been stopped in two patients at the end of the first year. The mean blood pressure level and the mean LVMI were not changed (P>0.05 vs before). There were no significant changes in dialysis parameters, iron status, plasma renin activities, and levels of aldosterone, intact parathyroid hormone, aluminum and erythropoietin.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this small uncontrolled study indicate that withdrawal of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive chronic HD patients receiving rHuEpo may result in an increase in haematocrit level, and a decrease in dose of rHuEpo without any significant changes in the blood pressure level and LVMI. Controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify this issue.