Renal effects of endothelin in anesthetized rabbits

Endothelin type A and B receptors in the control of afferent and efferent arterioles in mice

BACKGROUND

Endothelin 1 contributes to renal blood flow control and pathogenesis of kidney diseases. The differential effects, however, of endothelin 1 (ET-1) on afferent (AA) and efferent arterioles (EA) remain to be established.

METHODS

We investigated endothelin type A and B receptor (ETA-R, ETB-R) functions in the control of AA and EA. Arterioles of ETB-R deficient, rescued mice [ETB(-/-)] and wild types [ETB(+/+)] were microperfused.

RESULTS

ET-1 constricted AA stronger than EA in ETB(-/-) and ETB(+/+) mice. Results in AA: ET-1 induced similar constrictions in ETB(-/-) and ETB(+/+) mice. BQ-123 (ETA-R antagonist) inhibited this response in both groups. ALA-ET-1 and IRL1620 (ETB-R agonists) had no effect on arteriolar diameter. L-NAME did neither affect basal diameters nor ET-1 responses. Results in EA: ET-1 constricted EA stronger in ETB(+/+) compared to ETB(-/-). BQ-123 inhibited the constriction completely only in ETB(-/-). ALA-ET-1 and IRL1620 constricted only arterioles of ETB(+/+) mice. L-NAME decreased basal diameter in ETB(+/+), but not in ETB(-/-) mice and increased the ET-1 response similarly in both groups. The L-NAME actions indicate a contribution of ETB-R in basal nitric oxide (NO) release in EA and suggest dilatory action of ETA-R in EA.

CONCLUSIONS

ETA-R mediates vasoconstriction in AA and contributes to vasoconstriction in EA in this mouse model. ETB-R has no effect in AA but mediates basal NO release and constriction in EA. The stronger effect of ET-1 on AA supports observations of decreased glomerular filtration rate to ET-1 and indicates a potential contribution of ET-1 to the pathogenesis of kidney diseases.

Function of the endothelinB receptor in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology

One of the two receptors by which the potent vasoactive effects of endothelin (ET)-1 are mediated is the ET(B) receptor (ET(BR)), which is found in several tissues, but, more importantly from a cardiovascular point of view, on the endothelial cell. The endothelial cell also has the unique capability of releasing ET-1, as well as other factors, such as the endothelial-derived relaxing factors and prostacyclin, which counteract the myotropic effects of the peptide. The secretory and contractile responses to ET-1 rely on G-protein-coupled ET(BR)s, as well as ET(A)-G-protein-coupled receptor-like proteins. The mitogenic properties of ET-1 via ET(A) receptors (ET(AR)s) coupled to mitogen-activated protein kinases and tyrosine kinases on the vascular smooth muscle may occur in conjunction with the anti-apoptotic characteristics of the endothelial ET(BR)s. Interestingly, most of the relevant antagonists and agonists for both ET(AR)s and ET(BR)s have been developed by the pharmaceutical industry. This highlights the therapeutical potential of compounds that act on ET receptors. In normal as well as in physiopathological conditions, the ET(BR) plays an important role in the control of vascular tone, and must be taken into account when using ET receptor antagonists for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. For the management of congestive heart failure, renal failure and primary pulmonary hypertension, the most recent literature supports the use of selective ET(AR) antagonists rather than mixed antagonists of ET(AR)s and ET(BR)s. Nonetheless, validation of this view will have to await the first clinical trials comparing the actions of ET(A) to mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists.

Use of A-192621 and IRL-2500 to unmask the mesenteric and renal vasodilator role of endothelin ET(B) receptors

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is known to cause a transient (<1 min) depressor followed by a sustained (>1 h) pressor response. The former through the activation of ET(B) receptors, and the latter through the activation of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. This study examines if ET(B) receptors mediate sustained mesenteric and renal dilation in anesthetized rats. Intravenous bolus ET-1 (0.8, 1.4, and 2 nmol/kg) and IRL-1620 (ET(B) agonist, 2, 5, and 10 nmol/kg) caused transient decrease followed by sustained increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) that were accompanied by increases in total peripheral resistance (TPR), reductions in cardiac output (CO), and mesenteric and renal vasoconstriction. Pretreatment with FR-139317 (ET(A) antagonist, 1 mg/kg) attenuated the pressor and constrictor effects of ET-1 but did not alter responses to IRL-1620. IRL-2500 (ET(B) antagonist, 5 mg/kg) slightly inhibited the renal constrictor effect of IRL-1620, whereas A-192621 (ET(B) antagonist, 5 mg/kg) abolished all hemodynamic responses to IRL-1620. Both IRL-2500 and A-192621 markedly enhanced MAP, TPR, and mesenteric, and the renal constrictor effects of ET-1. Therefore, A-192621 was more effective than IRL-2500 in blocking IRL-1620-induced vasoconstriction, but both augmented constrictor responses to ET-1. The potentiation of ET-1-induced vasoconstriction by ET(B) receptor antagonists revealed a sustained vasodilator role of ET(B) receptors.

An oral endothelin-A receptor antagonist blocks collagen synthesis and deposition in advanced rat liver fibrosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endothelin 1 induces contraction, proliferation, and collagen synthesis of hepatic stellate cells in vitro, which may be mediated via the endothelin A receptor. It is unknown if specific blockade of the endothelin A receptor inhibits hepatic fibrosis in vivo.

METHODS

Groups of 10-20 rats with bile duct occlusion were treated with the nonpeptide endothelin-A receptor antagonist LU 135252 at 80 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) from week 1-6 or from week 4-6, or with LU at 10 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) from week 1-6. Animals with bile duct occlusion alone and sham-operated rats without or with LU at 80 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) over 6 weeks served as controls. After 6 weeks, parameters of fibrogenesis were determined.

RESULTS

LU treatment led to improved histology, paralleled by a dose-dependence up to 60% reduction of liver collagen, even when administered at an advanced fibrosis stage. This was accompanied by a decreased messenger RNA of hepatic procollagen alpha1(I) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, 2 major effectors of fibrosis, and of serum procollagen type III, a surrogate marker of liver fibrogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective endothelin-A receptor blockade can dramatically reduce collagen accumulation in rat secondary biliary fibrosis, a model refractory to most potential antifibrotic agents. Endothelin-A receptor antagonists are promising antifibrotic agents in chronic liver disease.

ET-receptor subtypes: roles in regional renal vascular actions of exogenous and endogenous endothelins in anesthetized rabbits

The roles of endothelin (ET)-receptor subtypes, in the regional renal vascular effects of exogenous and endogenous ETs, were examined in pentobarbitone-anesthetized rabbits. The effects of renal arterial infusion of ET-1 (0.05-12.8 ng/kg/min) and the ET(B)-agonist [Ala1,3,11,15]-ET-1 (12.5-800 ng/kg/min) were compared. We then tested the effects of the ET(A)-antagonist BQ610 and the ET(B)-antagonist BQ788 (both 200 microg/kg plus 100 microg/kg/h, i.v.) on basal hemodynamics and on responses to renal arterial ET-1. Both ET-1 and [Ala1,3,11,15]-ET-1 dose-dependently reduced total renal blood flow (RBF) and cortical blood flow (CBF), but not medullary blood flow (MBF). ET-1 was 34-fold more potent than [Ala1,3,11,15-ET-1. BQ610 reduced mean arterial pressure (MAP; 14%), and increased RBF (21%) and CBF (12%), but not MBF. BQ788 increased MAP (13%), and reduced RBF (29%) and CBF (15%) but not MBF. Coadministration of both agents increased RBF (18%) and CBF (9%), without significantly affecting MAP. Neither antagonist (alone or combined) significantly affected responses to renal arterial ET-1. We conclude that the predominant renal vascular effects of exogenous and endogenous ETs are cortical vasoconstriction, but not at vascular sites controlling MBF. ET(A)-receptors contribute to the renal vasoconstrictor effects of endogenous ETs. ET(B2)-like receptors appear to contribute to the vasoconstrictor effects of [Ala1,3,11,15]-ET-1.

Renal endothelin in hypertension

Due to the potent vasoconstrictor action of endothelin-1 and its synthesis throughout the vasculature and other tissues, most investigators believe that it is an active participant in the pathogenesis of hypertension. However, the autocrine and paracrine nature of the endothelin system has made its role difficult to define. In recent years, it has become apparent that endothelin-1 contributes to the regulation of renal salt and water excretion and that it is a major contributor to the hypertension associated with salt-dependency. Evidence suggests that endothelin-1 within the renal medulla is activated in conditions of salt loading and inhibits reabsorption of sodium in a nitric oxide-dependent manner. Blockade of endothelin A receptors lowers arterial pressure in animal models of salt-dependent hypertension. Furthermore, circulating levels of endothelin-1 are generally higher in African-Americans compared to white Americans as is the prevalence of salt-dependent hypertension. Therefore, it would appear that use of endothelin A-selective receptor antagonists should be targeted to those individuals at risk for salt-dependent hypertension. Blockade of endothelin B receptors would not be desirable because of their important role in eliminating a salt load.