Inhibition of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis by mycophenolate mofetil, an inhibitor of purine metabolism

Mechanisms, Pathophysiology and Current Immunomodulatory/Immunosuppressive Therapy of Non-Infectious and/or Immune-Mediated Choroiditis

Non-infectious choroiditis comprises immune-mediated diseases resulting from diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. These conditions are sub-divided into two main groups, (1) diseases of the choriocapillaris and (2) diseases of the choroidal stroma. The purpose of this study is to expose the pathophysiology of the most common diseases of both these groups and recommend the optimal immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive therapy of each analyzed condition based on literature data and data from our own centers. Material and Methods: Narrative review. In the group of choriocapillaritis entities or primary inflammatory choriocapillaropathies (PICCPs) including multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS), acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), idiopathic multifocal choroiditis (MFC) and serpiginous choroiditis (SC), as well as secondary choriocapillaritides including acute syphilitic posterior multifocal placoid chorioretinitis (ASPMPC) and tuberculosis-related SC (TB-SC), were analyzed. In the group of stromal choroidites, HLA-A29 birdshot retinochoroiditis (BRC) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease were included. For each entity a literature search, in the PubMed database, on treatment was performed and analyzed and the therapeutic attitudes of our own centers were presented. Management of immune-mediated choroiditis implies vigorous immunosuppressive therapy given in a prompt and prolonged fashion in most of these entities.

Antimetabolite Drugs Exhibit Distinctive Immunomodulatory Mechanisms and Effects on the Intestinal Microbiota in Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of antimetabolite drugs on T-cell responses and intestinal microbial composition in autoimmune uveitis.

Methods

Experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) was induced in C57BL/6J mice treated with 0.00625 mg/mL methotrexate (MTX) or 0.625 mg/mL mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in drinking water for 4 weeks prior to immunization and 2 weeks thereafter. The effector T cell (Teff) and regulatory T cell (Treg) populations were identified using flow cytometry. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was applied for gut microbiome characterization. DESeq2 analysis was used to discriminate relative abundances of taxa and PLS-DA to integrate cytometric and microbiome data between groups.

Results

Both MTX and MMF abrogated uveitis in EAU without clinical signs of toxicity as compared to water-fed controls. MTX reduced Teff and Treg expansion in peripheral tissues and eyes. MTX decreased alpha diversity, increased Akkermansia, and reduced Lachnoclostridium abundances. Conversely, MMF enhanced Tregs in the mesenteric lymph node and the eyes. In parallel, MMF increased the gut alpha diversity, including an increased abundance of Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group and a decreased abundance of Lachnospiraceae UCG-001. A significant congruent correlation among intestinal microbial changes, T-cell responses, and clinical scores was observed for both antimetabolites.

Conclusions

Although MTX and MMF both abrogated uveitis in EAU, they showed different effects on T-cell subsets and the intestinal bacterial composition. This work indicates unique immunomodulation by each drug and is the first to demonstrate potential microbiota-related mechanisms.

Objetivo

Investigar el efecto de los fármacos antimetabolitos sobre las respuestas de células T y la composición microbiana intestinal en la uveítis autoinmune.

Métodos

Se indujo uveítis autoinmune experimental (UAE) en ratones C57BL/6J tratados con 0.00625 mg/ml de metotrexato (MTX) o 0.625 mg/ml de micofenolato mofetilo (MFM) en agua de bebida durante 4 semanas antes de la inmunización y 2 semanas después. Las poblaciones de células T efectoras (Tef) y reguladoras (Treg) se identificaron por citometría de flujo. La caracterización del microbioma intestinal se realizó mediante secuenciación del gen 16S ARNr. El análisis discriminante de abundancias relativas en los taxones se llevó a cabo por DESeq2 y se usó un análisis PLS-DA para integrar los datos microbianos y citométricos entre grupos.

Resultados

MTX y MFM inhibieron la UAE sin signos clínicos de toxicidad comparado con los controles. MTX disminuyó la expansión de Tef y Treg en los tejidos periféricos y oculares. MTX redujo la alfa diversidad, incrementando la abundancia de Akkermansia, y reduciendo la de Lachnoclostridium. En cambio, MFM aumentó los Tregs en el ganglio mesentérico y en los ojos. Paralelamente, MFM aumentó la alfa diversidad, incluyendo un aumento de la abundancia del grupo Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 y un descenso de la de Lachnospiraceae UCG-001. Se observó una correlación congruente significativa, para ambos fármacos, entre los cambios en el microbioma, las respuestas de células T y los grados clínicos de uveítis.

Conclusiones

Aunque ambos, MTX y MFM, suprimieron la UAE, mostraron efectos diferentes sobre los subtipos de células T y sobre la composición del microbioma. Este estudio indica un efecto inmunomodulador único para cada fármaco y es el primero en demostrar potenciales mecanismos relacionados con el microbioma.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Inflammatory Choriocapillaropathies (PICCPs): A Comprehensive Overview

Purpose: Primary inflammatory choriocapillaropathies (PICCPs) belong to a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases with the common characteristic of inflammatory choriocapillaris hypo- or non-perfusion as the main clinicopathological mechanism. The purpose of our article is to describe clinical characteristics and multimodal imaging, that can help the diagnosis and treatment of PICCPs. Methods: Narrative review with multimodal imaging analysis. Results: Choriocapillaris non-perfusion can affect the end-choriocappilaries, at the benign end of the PICCP spectrum (MEWDS), to larger choriocapillaris vessels or precapillary vessels at the origin of more severe forms such as acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), idiopathic multifocal choroiditis (MFC) and Serpiginous Choroiditis (SC). Diagnosis is mostly based on multimodal imaging and especially on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)/OCT-angiography (OCT-A). ICGA shows the typical pattern of patchy lobular hypofluorescence reflecting hypo- or non-perfusion of the choriocapillaris that can also take the aspect of geographic areas in the more severe forms. Treatment depends on the severity of the disease and goes from observation in MEWDS and some mild cases of APMPPE, to oral corticosteroid and/or immunomodulator agents in the more severe conditions of APMPPE and MFC and SC cases. Close multimodal monitoring is crucial in order to introduce or adjust treatment. Conclusion: PICCPs are resulting from one common clinicopathological mechanism, inflammatory choriocapillaris hypo- or non-perfusion. ICGA findings are essential for the diagnosis and follow-up of PICCPs, but non-invasive methods such as FAF and SD-OCT/OCT-A also have their role especially in follow-up of the diseases. Treatment should be individualized according to the pathology and the evolution of lesions.

Identification of unique proteins in vitreous fluid of patients with noninfectious uveitis

PURPOSE

Uveitis is a cause for concern in the developing countries like India. Its poor diagnosis and lack of proper therapeutics often cause blindness in children and young adults. Moreover, the exact mechanism of pathogenesis of different types of uveitis is still elusive. Modern proteomic techniques are found to be advantageous for an in-depth understanding of the ocular physiology using proteomic diversity. Our aim was to identify unique proteins involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune or noninfectious uveitis.

METHODS

Vitreous fluid samples (n = 90) were obtained from infectious (N = 34) and noninfectious (N = 56) uveitis patients, and their protein profiles were compared by analysing sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and 2D electrophoresis. Unique proteins were identified through matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and further studied for pathway analysis.

RESULTS

Protein spots having different molecular weights were observed in noninfectious vitreous fluid samples. Enzymatic digestion of these spots after MALDI-TOF MS analysis revealed different proteins. We identified 25 different proteins through SDS-PAGE and 22 through 2D electrophoresis. 50% of the proteins from SDS-PAGE were associated with heterotrimeric G-protein signalling pathway-rod outer segment phototransduction. 50% proteins from SDS-PAGE and 20% from 2D electrophoresis revealed association with de novo purine biosynthesis. Carbonic anhydrase 1 and serpin B3 were found to be common in both analyses.

CONCLUSION

High-throughput proteomic and pathway analyses have exposed the potential association of these proteins with autoimmune pathogenesis in uveitis. The exact role of most of the proteins in autoimmune uveitis is yet to be unfurled.

Modern Therapeutic Approaches for Noninfectious Ocular Diseases Involving Inflammation

Dry eye disease, age-related macular degeneration, and uveitis are ocular diseases that significantly affect the quality of life of millions of people each year. In these diseases, the action of chemokines, proinflammatory cytokines, and immune cells drives a local inflammatory response that results in ocular tissue damage. Multiple therapeutic strategies are developed to either address the symptoms or abate the underlying cause of these diseases. Herein, the challenges to deliver drugs to the relevant location in the eye for each of these diseases are reviewed along with current and innovative therapeutic approaches that attempt to restore homeostasis within the ocular microenvironment.

Mycophenolate mofetil in animal models of autoimmune disease

Mycofenolate mofetil (MMF-Cellcept) is an immunomodulatory drug utilized extensively in transplant medicine. The efficacy of regimes including Cellcept in preventing allograft rejection, and in the treatment of rejection, is now firmly established. The immunosuppressive actions of this drug enabled the investigation for the beneficial effects in autoimmune diseases. We review the evidence for the contribution of MMF in autoimmunity in animal models of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), mercury induced autoimmune glomerulonephritis, diabetes mellitus, experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, and experimental allergic encephalitis. MMF has an influence on the T and B cell pathways. It is immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory.

MMF and Eye Disease

Immunosuppressive treatment has shown to be effective in various ocular inflammatory disorders. Factors limiting their use are the individual response and the rate of side effects. This report summarizes our knowledge about the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), uveitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), prevention of graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and scleritis. Controlled studies have been performed for prevention of graft rejection after PK, showing MMF as effective in the prevention of graft rejection as cyclosporine A. In experimental uveitis, MMF has been demonstrated to be highly effective in prevention of retinal destruction. A number of studies have now shown that MMF also seems effective in uveitis. There are also studies with smaller patient groups which point out the effectiveness of MMF in OCP, AKC, and scleritis. In most of the studies, the spectrum of side effects was small, compared to other immunosuppressives.

Mycophenolate mofetil and animal models

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), is the morpholinoethyl ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Though initially developed as an anti-rejection treatment, MMF is beginning to find application in more common immune-mediated diseases. MMF has been shown to be effective against transplant-associated vascular disease, lupus and other inflammatory diseases via multiple mechanisms in several animal models. MMF treatment blocks the proliferation of T cells and B cells, attenuates the production of autoreactive IgG and IgM, diminishes complement deposition, and reduces the production of multiple proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-12. It also increases production of the anti-inflammatory mediator IL-10. In addition, MMF reduces the infiltration of immune cells into sites of inflammation by interfering with the expression of cell-surface molecules critical for this process, including MHC class II, CD40, CD80, CD86, I-A, and ICAM-1. Additional mechanisms involving mannosylation and N-linked glycosylation of cell-surface molecules are only beginning to be investigated. This article will focus on the contribution of animal models of disease as investigational tools in the development of MMF as an immunomodulatory drug. The use of mice, rats, rabbits, monkeys, baboons and interspecific xenografts will be discussed.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

Uveitis encompasses a spectrum of diseases whose common feature is intraocular inflammation, which may be infectious or noninfectious in etiology (Nussenblatt and Whitcup 2010). Infectious causes of uveitis are typically treated with appropriate antimicrobial therapy and will not be discussed in this chapter. Noninfectious uveitides are thought have an autoimmune component to their etiology and are thus treated with anti-inflammatory agents.

Pharmacokinetics, electrophysiological, and morphological effects of the intravitreal injection of mycophenolic acid in rabbits

PURPOSE

To determine the half-life of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the vitreous of New Zealand albino rabbits after intravitreal injection and the retinal toxicity of different doses of MPA.

METHODS

Ten micrograms of MPA (Roche Bioscience, Palo Alto, CA) was injected in the vitreous of 16 rabbits, animals were sacrificed at different time-points, and vitreous samples underwent high-performance liquid chromatography. For functional and morphological studies, 5 doses of MPA (0.05, 0.5, 2, 10, and 100 μg) were injected in the vitreous of 20 rabbits. As control, contralateral eyes were injected with aqueous vehicle. Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded before injection and at days 7, 15, and 30. Animals were sacrificed on day 30 and retinas were analyzed under light microscopy.

RESULTS

MPA half-life in the vitreous was 5.0±0.3 days. ERG revealed photoreceptor functional impairment in eyes injected with 0.5 μg and higher on day 30, while eyes injected with 100 μg presented the same changes already from day 15. No morphological change was found.

CONCLUSIONS

MPA vitreous half-life is 5.0 days. Intravitreal injection of 0.5 μg MPA and higher causes dose- and time-related photoreceptor sensitivity decrease in rabbits. The MPA dose of 0.05 μg may be safe for intravitreal use in rabbits.

In vitro evidence for mycophenolic acid dose-related cytotoxicity in human retinal cells

PURPOSE

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive agent that controls noninfectious uveitis. Intravitreal MPA delivery may be a potential adjuvant therapy in patients who have to discontinue steroid or immunosuppressive systemic therapy because of side effects. The aims of this study are to evaluate the in vitro effects of MPA over human retinal pigment epithelium (ARPE-19) and human Muller cells (MIO M-1).

METHODS

ARPE-19 cells and MIO M-1 cells were exposed to 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL of MPA (Roche Bioscience, Palo Alto, CA) for 24 hours. Toxicity was evaluated by trypan blue dye-exclusion cell viability assay, caspase-3/7 apoptosis-related assay, and JC-1 mitochondrial membrane potential assay.

RESULTS

The MPA (25 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL) did not cause reduction in cell viability or significant change in caspase-3/7 activity in both cell lines tested. Mycophenolic acid (100 µg/mL) caused a significant decrease in cell viability (P < 0.01) and higher caspase-3/7 activity (P < 0.05) in both cell lines compared with untreated cells. The JC-1 mitochondrial membrane potential did not show statistically significant differences for both cell lines and all concentration tested when compared with untreated controls (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intraocular delivery may be a potential alternative for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis, either by intravitreal injection or sustained-release drug-delivery systems, in doses of 50 µg/mL or lower.

Systemic therapies for inflammatory eye disease: past, present and future

In this review we consider the current evidence base for treatments in inflammatory eye disease, and in particular uveitis, from a historical perspective. We consider the challenges that have traditionally hindered progress in inflammatory eye disease including small target populations, heterogeneous disease groups, poorly defined phenotypes, diagnostic inconsistency, subjective outcome measures, specific issues around visual acuity as an outcome measure and low commercial interest. Strategies to address these issues are considered de novo and with reference to recent advances outside of ophthalmology and highlight the promise for ocular inflammation. Progress in these specialties has included the development of thriving clinical-trial cultures, public-private partnerships, pathogenetic- and structure-led drug design, efficient drug development pipelines, and biomarker-defined treatment protocols enabling personalization of medicine. Although there are challenges, these are exciting opportunities as we seek to develop safe and effective treatments for patients with inflammatory eye disease.

The potential of newer immunomodulating drugs in the treatment of uveitis: a review

Uveitis, or intraocular inflammation, remains an ongoing challenge to ophthalmologists and patients alike. In most patients, uveitis is limited to the anterior ocular structures and is readily managed with topical steroids. The inflammatory process can extend behind the lens to involve the pars plana, the vitreous cavity, the choroid and the retina. These intermediate and posterior uveitides are relatively rare but contribute disproportionately to visual morbidity and present serious diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Systemic steroids constitute the first line of treatment for most sight-threatening uveitides. Their long term use is limited by universal and debilitating adverse effects. Second-line, steroid-sparing agents allow a reduction in steroid dosage. Cyclosporin and azathioprine are the main steroid-sparing agents currently in use. However, these compounds are limited by a narrow therapeutic window and significant adverse effects. This paper offers a brief discussion of some of the immune mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of uveitis and reviews categories of investigational compounds. Inhibitors of T cell function: tacrolimus (previously FK506), licensed for use in liver transplantation, and sirolimus (rapamycin) are macrolide antibiotics. Sirolimus is a functional cytokine antagonist and in vitro studies suggest it could be up to 100 times more potent than cyclosporin. Drug synergy between sirolimus and cyclosporin has been demonstrated, resulting in immunosuppression at lower drug doses and with fewer adverse effects. Nucleotide synthesis inhibitors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and leflunomide. Human lymphocytes are only able to synthesise nucleic acids de novo. Having no alternative or 'salvage' pathway, they are exquisitely sensitive to interference with the de novo nucleotide synthesis enzymatic pathway. MMF is a purine synthesis inhibitor. Compared to other purine inhibitors, early data suggest that MMF is more efficacious and less toxic than azathioprine. Leflunomide is an inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis. Monoclonal surface receptor antibodies and immunoadhesins: the IL-2 receptor is essential for clonal expansion of activated T cells; this has led to the development of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies. Daclizumab is a genetically engineered humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody. In conjunction with cyclosporin, it significantly reduces renal allograft rejection rates and is also showing promise in the treatment of T cell mediated autoimmune disorders. The mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies to other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFalpha and IL-12 and data from animal and human uveitis trials are also discussed. Finally, new avenues of research in immunopharmaco-modulation are mentioned.

Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis using the methods of analysis advocated by the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group, and to compare this with other SUN-compliant reports of immunosuppression in ocular inflammation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series. MEDHODS: A predefined data set was retrospectively obtained from the case notes of 100 consecutive uveitis patients treated with MMF at a single academic referral center between April 1, 2000 and August 1, 2006. These data were then analyzed in accordance with SUN recommendations. The main outcome measures were: 1) rate of tapering oral prednisone to 10 mg daily, 2) requirement for alternative second-line immunosuppressive therapy, and 3) rate of MMF dose discontinuation because of side effects.

RESULTS

In this large cohort with noninfectious persistent, chronic, or recurrent uveitis, there was an 84.6% probability of achieving a prednisone dose of < or =10 mg daily after one year of MMF treatment. Alternative second-line immunosuppressive therapy was introduced at a rate of 0.18 per patient-year (PY) and MMF was discontinued because of intolerance at a rate of 0.09/PY, predominantly because of gastrointestinal upset. This corroborates the findings of the only previous SUN-compliant study of MMF in ocular inflammation and is comparable to the rates of treatment success and intolerance we have recently reported for tacrolimus.

CONCLUSION

This data generates concordant evidence with other SUN-compliant studies supporting the use of MMF in uveitis.

Mycophenolate mofetil as an immunosuppressive agent in refractory inflammatory eye disease

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in refractory inflammatory eye disease.

METHODS

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series of all patients commenced on MMF between 1999 and 2005 for refractory inflammatory eye disease at St Paul's Eye Unit (Liverpool, UK). Main outcome measures noted were control of inflammation, steroid-sparing effect, and adverse effects of MMF therapy.

RESULTS

Ten (10) patients (2 with sarcoid, 2 with intermediate uveitis, 1 with Vogt-Koyanagi Harada (VKH) syndrome, 1 with ankylosing spondylitis, 1 with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA), and 3 with scleritis) who were unresponsive or intolerant to previous therapy and/or as a steroid-sparing agent, received 2-3 g of MMF per day for a mean period of 40.5 months (range, 3-67). Nine (9) patients had a favorable response, with diarrhea and insomnia being the main side-effects. MMF had to be withdrawn in 1 patient because of side-effects and in another because of active arthropathy (with stable uveitis). Average number of relapses was reduced from 3.1 per patient per year to 0.8 per patient per year (P < 0.005). A steroid-sparing effect was achieved in all patients. Visual acuity improved in 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF appears to be a safe and effective second- or third-line adjunct/alternative immunosuppressant in these difficult cases and works well in combination with cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, and antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. It has potential as a firstor second-line agent and can be considered at a dose of 3 g/day in refractory cases.

Mycophenolate mofetil is a highly effective and safe immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of uveitis : a retrospective analysis of 106 patients

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the outcomes of patients with different forms of chronic uveitis treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunomodulatory and steroid-sparing agent. The multi-system side effects that arise after long-term treatment with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants prompted us to use MMF. MMF is a selective inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, thus blocking purine synthesis via the de novo pathway preferentially used by T and B lymphocytes.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2003, 106 patients were treated for uveitis (anterior n=26, intermediate n=51, posterior n=23, panuveitis n=6) with MMF at a dose of 1g twice daily. Treatment duration was at least 6 months (n=10), in most cases greater than 12 months (n=77) and in 25 cases between 24 months and 41 months, when the present retrospective evaluation was undertaken. Patient charts were analysed according to a standardized evaluation protocol.

RESULTS

In 95 patients MMF was combined with prednisolone at a dosage of 2.5-10 mg per day. In 8 patients MMF was used as a monotherapy, and in 3 cases one further systemic immunosuppressant was required. The number of recurrences during MMF treatment was none or one in 92 patients, two in 6 cases and three or more in 8 patients. In none of the patients had MMF been stopped at the time of data analysis. The most frequently observed side effects were gastrointestinal upset (15%), followed by headache (9.3%), fatigue (5.7%), eczema (5%), and hair loss (3.5%). Other side effects were sporadic. Most of these phenomena were transitory. Forty-two patients experienced no side effects at all. In 4 patients MMF was judged ineffective due to failure to reduce the number of recurrences of severe inflammation compared with the previous therapeutic regime, or indeed occurrence of persistent macular oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that MMF is an effective immunosuppressant in patients with uveitis. We provide evidence that MMF controls the disease in the majority of patients with an acceptable profile of side effects.

Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy for Inflammatory Eye Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment outcomes with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory eye disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-four consecutive patients with inflammatory eye disease treated with mycophenolate mofetil at an academic referral center.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. Dose of mycophenolate mofetil, response to therapy, dose of prednisone, use of other immunosuppressive drugs, and side effects associated with the use of mycophenolate mofetil were recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ability to control ocular inflammation with mycophenolate mofetil and to taper prednisone to < or =10 mg daily, and incidence of treatment-related side effects.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, 61% had uveitis, 17% had scleritis, 11% had mucous membrane pemphigoid, and 11% had orbital or other inflammatory disease. Forty-three percent of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil had been treated with at least one other immunosuppressive drug previously. The median dose of prednisone at the start of mycophenolate mofetil therapy was 40 mg, and 82% of the patients were considered a treatment success, as judged by the ability to control the inflammation and taper prednisone to < or =10 mg daily. Median time to treatment success was 3.5 months. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy was discontinued due to insufficient efficacy at a rate of 0.10 per person-year (PY) and due to side effects at a rate of 0.08/PY. The most frequent side effect was gastrointestinal upset, with a rate of 0.19/PY.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil may be an effective corticosteroid-sparing agent in the treatment of inflammatory eye disease with a manageable side effect profile.

Mycophenolate mofetil in animal models of autoimmune disease

Mycofenolate mofetil (MMF-Cellcept) is an immunomodulatory drug utilized extensively in transplant medicine. The efficacy of regimes including Cellcept in preventing allograft rejection, and in the treatment of rejection, is now firmly established. The immunosuppressive actions of this drug enabled the investigation for the beneficial effects in autoimmune diseases. We review the evidence for the contribution of MMF in autoimmunity in animal models of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), mercury induced autoimmune glomerulonephritis, diabetes mellitus, experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, and experimental allergic encephalitis. MMF has an influence on the T and B cell pathways. It is immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory.

MMF and eye disease

Immunosuppressive treatment has shown to be effective in various ocular inflammatory disorders. Factors limiting their use are the individual response and the rate of side effects. This report summarizes our knowledge about the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), uveitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), prevention of graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and scleritis. Controlled studies have been performed for prevention of graft rejection after PK, showing MMF as effective in the prevention of graft rejection as cyclosporine A. In experimental uveitis, MMF has been demonstrated to be highly effective in prevention of retinal destruction. A number of studies have now shown that MMF also seems effective in uveitis. There are also studies with smaller patient groups which point out the effectiveness of MMF in OCP, AKC, and scleritis. In most of the studies, the spectrum of side effects was small, compared to other immunosuppressives.

The role of tumour necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU)

The pleiotropic cytokine tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is released from cells that include macrophages and T-cells during inflammatory responses, orchestrating the initiation of further leucocytic infiltration via adhesion molecule upregulation, dendritic cell maturation and survival, macrophage activation and driving Th1 T-cells responses within tissues. Exposure to TNF also plays a role in maintaining tissue homeostasis, particularly relating to resident cell responses of both microglia and retinal pigment epithelium. Depending on the balance between duration and dose of TNF exposure, an environment where full expression of inflammatory and autoimmune responses within tissues may occur. In experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU), increased tissue concentrations of TNF facilitate the on-going T-cell effector responses and macrophage activation. These are responsible for targeted and bystander tissue damage and can be suppressed by anti-TNF therapies, in particular, those directed at the p55 TNF receptor. The ability to suppress disease experimentally has led to the successful translation of anti-TNF therapy for treatment of uveitis in cohort studies and phase I/II trials where, additionally, altered peripheral blood CD4(+) T-cell profiles can be demonstrated following each treatment.

Immunomodulatory Therapy in Ophthalmology – Is There a Place for Topical Application?

Topical corticosteroids, although effective in the treatment of ocular immune-mediated diseases, are well known for their ocular side-effects. Not surprisingly, a variety of alternative immunomodulatory agents have been tested for topical use including cyclosporin A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus (FK506), rapamycin (sirolimus) and leflunomide. Local application bears the possibility to avoid the severe side-effects of systemic therapy. The effect of topical therapy is naturally restricted to local immune response mechanisms, such as antigen presentation by Langerhans and dendritic cells. Moreover, many immunomodulatory agents (e.g. CsA) are lipophilic and thus have low water solubility and penetrate insufficiently intra-ocularly, often being stored in the lipophilic corneal epithelial barrier. Therefore, the therapeutical success is limited for intra-ocular immune-mediated diseases like anterior uveitis. However, a multitude of strategies have been introduced to circumvent these problems including complexing substances such as cyclodextrins (CDs) and liposomes. In the prevention and treatment of transplant rejection after keratoplasty, many attempts to introduce topical immunomodulatory therapy have failed; on the other hand, further therapeutic options not primarily expected are being evaluated today such as treatment of severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. In our own studies, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of topical treatment with different agents including MMF and evaluated the efficacy of topical treatment in animal models for uveitis and keratoplasty. Taken together, topical immunomodulatory therapy will not replace systemic therapy but further treatment options can be expected.

Use of immunosuppressive agents in uveitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes current patterns in the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with uveitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of immunosuppressive agents are currently available for the treatment of uveitis. Reports of safety and efficacy, although numerous, have been largely nonrandomized and performed without controls, limiting, to some extent, the strength and generalizability of their conclusions. Nonetheless, the volume of case reports and case series provides compelling evidence that immunosuppressive agents are effective at providing long-term control in patients with moderate to severe chronic or recurrent uveitis. The choice of immunosuppressive agent is complex, and depends on the cause and severity of the patient's underlying inflammation, the presence or absence of associated systemic inflammation, and the patient's prior response to immunosuppressive treatments.

SUMMARY

Although corticosteroids remain the primary initial treatment for patients with uveitis, use of noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents in selected patients with uveitis allows for improved control and decreased risk of corticosteroid-induced side effects.

Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of scleritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CellCept, Roche, Nutley, NJ), an antimetabolite immunosuppressant with a selective antiproliferative effect on T and B lymphocytes, for the treatment of scleritis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight patients with scleritis treated with MMF in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Review of the clinical records of patients evaluated at the National Eye Institute and prescribed MMF for the treatment of scleritis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Control of scleral inflammation, the ability to taper prednisone or other immunosuppressive medications, and adverse events were recorded for each patient. Mycophenolate mofetil was determined to be an effective steroid-sparing agent if the daily prednisone dosage could be reduced by 50% or more and was determined to be an effective adjunctive immunosuppressive agent if the scleral inflammation was controlled in patients with active scleritis.

RESULTS

Four patients with diffuse anterior scleritis, two with necrotizing scleritis with inflammation, one with nodular anterior scleritis, and one with nodular anterior and posterior scleritis, were identified. Mycophenolate mofetil administration was initiated as a steroid-sparing agent in 4 patients with controlled scleritis and as an additional immunosuppressive agent in 4 patients with active scleritis receiving concomitant treatment with prednisone and cyclosporine or methotrexate. In 3 of the 4 patients started on MMF as a steroid-sparing agent, the scleritis remained controlled while the prednisone dosage was tapered by more than 50%. One of the patients started on MMF as a steroid-sparing agent had recurrent scleritis, and each of the patients with active scleritis continued to have persistent scleral inflammation requiring additional immunosuppressive therapy. Adverse effects recorded in 4 of the 8 patients included a rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, paresthesias, and laboratory evidence of hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MMF maybe be useful as a steroid-sparing agent, it was not effective as an adjunctive immunosuppressive agent in patients with active scleritis in our small, tertiary referral series. The adverse effects encountered with the use of MMF in this study cannot be attributed conclusively to MMF and are more likely complications of the multiagent systemic immunosuppressive therapy required for the treatment of recalcitrant scleritis.

Mycophenolate mofetil as an immunomodulatory agent in the treatment of chronic ocular inflammatory disorders

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of patients with chronic ocular inflammatory disease treated with mycophenolate mofetil as an immunosuppressive and steroid-sparing agent.

DESIGN

Retrospective noncomparative interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients with ocular inflammatory disease treated with mycophenolate mofetil at a single institution between 1998 and 2001.

METHODS

Charts of patients seen on the Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were reviewed. Patients with chronic ocular inflammatory disease were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Control of inflammation, steroid-sparing effect, visual acuity, and adverse reactions were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were evaluated. Control of ocular inflammation with mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy was achieved in 35 patients (65%) and in 67 eyes (62%), and a steroid-sparing effect was achieved in 29 (54%) patients. Visual acuity was maintained or improved in 51 patients (94%) and in 97 eyes (90%). Side effects requiring discontinuation of medication occurred in 10 patients (18%). There was neither long-term morbidity nor mortality due to mycophenolate mofetil.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil is effective in the treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or -resistant chronic ocular inflammatory disorders that fail to respond to conventional steroid treatment. It is a safe and effective steroid-sparing immunomodulatory agent and can be considered an important addition to our armamentarium in the care of patients with ocular inflammatory disease.

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil in mercury-induced autoimmune nephritis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive drug whose active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), blocks the action of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, resulting in the inhibition of the novo purine synthesis. Thus, MPA has an antiproliferative effect on T and B lymphocytes and also inhibits the glycosylation of cell surface adhesion proteins involved in cell-cell contact and in the recruitment of circulating leukocytes to sites of tissue damage and inflammation. In this study, the effect of MMF in the mercury model of nephritis was examined. Repeated exposure to HgCl(2) induces an autoreactive Th2 cell subset-inducing polyclonal B cell activation in the Brown Norway (BN) rat. This leads to the development of an autoimmune syndrome characterized by synthesis of autoantibodies (mainly anti-glomerular basement membrane [GBM] Abs) with glomerular linear deposits of IgG, proteinuria, and tubulointerstitial nephritis. Results show that MMF has a preventive effect on mercury-induced disease as it blocks anti-GBM Ab synthesis, thus avoiding glomerular IgG deposits and proteinuria and the development of interstitial nephritis. However, the therapeutic effect of MMF seems to be restricted to its antiinflammatory properties blocking the extravasation of circulating leukocytes to renal interstitium by interfering with the very late activation antigen 4/vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) cell adhesion pathway. Also, MMF administration to mercury-injected rats reduces the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha. These findings confirm that MMF has a strong effect on the primary immune response in this model. Nevertheless, when the disease is in progress, MMF acts exclusively on the inflammatory response. MMF could be useful in the treatment of diseases associated with renal inflammation.

Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept(R)) is a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). This is the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo synthesis of guanosine nucleotides. T- and B-lymphocytes are more dependent on this pathway than other cell types are. Moreover, MPA is a fivefold more potent inhibitor of the type II isoform of IMPDH, which is expressed in activated lymphocytes, than of the type I isoform of IMPDH, which is expressed in most cell types. MPA has therefore a more potent cytostatic effect on lymphocytes than on other cell types. This is the principal mechanism by which MPA exerts immunosuppressive effects. Three other mechanisms may also contribute to the efficacy of MPA in preventing allograft rejection and other applications. First, MPA can induce apoptosis of activated T-lymphocytes, which may eliminate clones of cells responding to antigenic stimulation. Second, by depleting guanosine nucleotides, MPA suppresses glycosylation and the expression of some adhesion molecules, thereby decreasing the recruitment of lymphocytes and monocytes into sites of inflammation and graft rejection. Third, by depleting guanosine nucleotides MPA also depletes tetrahydrobiopterin, a co-factor for the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). MPA therefore suppresses the production by iNOS of NO, and consequent tissue damage mediated by peroxynitrite. CellCept(R) suppresses T-lymphocytic responses to allogeneic cells and other antigens. The drug also suppresses primary, but not secondary, antibody responses. The efficacy of regimes including CellCept(R) in preventing allograft rejection, and in the treatment of rejection, is now firmly established. CellCept(R) is also efficacious in several experimental animal models of chronic rejection, and it is hoped that the drug will have the same effect in humans.

Beneficial effect of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor mycophenolate mofetil on survival and severity of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-prone MRLlpr/lpr mice

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the course of disease in SLE-prone MRLlpr/lpr mice. Three-months-old mice displaying clinical symptoms of glomerulonephritis were given MMF (100 mg/kg per day) orally via the drinking water. Control mice received i.p. injections of cyclophosphamide (CYC) (1.8 mg/mouse per week) or saline. Survival, albuminuria and haematuria, immunoglobulin levels and anti-dsDNA antibodies in serum, frequencies of immunoglobulin-producing B lymphocytes and glomerular deposits of immunoglobulin and C3 were analysed. The results showed that MMF treatment significantly prolonged survival and reduced the occurrence of albuminuria and haematuria in MRLlpr/lpr mice. In addition, the number of immunoglobulin-producing B cells and serum levels of IgG and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies were reduced after MMF and CYC treatment. MMF treatment significantly reduced the extent of deposition of C3 in glomeruli. We conclude that the reduced severity of glomerulonephritis following treatment of lupus-prone mice with MMF was as efficacious as that of CYC. These results warrant clinical trials of MMF in SLE patients with glomerulonephritis.

Mycophenolate mofetil. A useful immunosuppressive in inflammatory eye disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Cellcept, Roche), a potent selective uncompetitive and reversible inhibitor of ionisine monophosphate dehydrogenase involved in purine synthesis, as an immunosuppressive and steroid-sparing agent in the management of ocular inflammatory disease.

DESIGN

Open-label, prospective, uncontrolled pilot study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven patients with uncontrolled ocular inflammation.

INTERVENTION

Mycophenolate mofetil, at a dosage of 1 g twice daily, was given in conjunction with steroids, as a steroid-sparing agent, or as an additional agent with cyclosporine (CsA), or instead of CsA or azathioprine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The inflammatory response, side effects, and toxicity were monitored.

RESULTS

The addition of MMF to immunosuppressive regimens led to the improvement in symptoms and the ability to reduce the dose of prednisone in most patients. Ten of 11 patients showed a favorable response to MMF, with few side effects noted.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that MMF is a useful immunosuppressive drug for controlling ocular inflammation with minimal side effects.

New therapeutic options in uveitis

Most patients with sight-threatening posterior uveitis eventually end up on systemic medication to control their disease. Although the more aggressive approach to the use of these drugs does offer the patient a better chance of significant visual improvement at least in the short term, this is often associated with severe systemic side-effects in both the young and older patient. Cyclosporin has become a very useful second-line agent as a steroid sparer in those patients who can tolerate it. However, it is not suitable for or effective in everyone and the other currently available drugs are often of limited effectivity or associated with major systemic sequelae. This paper summarises the therapeutic approaches currently being examined to define whether they have a role in the better management of these patients in the future. Particularly exciting is the potential for sustained intraocular drug delivery so that adequate drug levels are achieved inside the eye without the necessity for systemic administration.

Intraocular inflammatory disease (uveitis) and the use of oral tolerance: a status report

Intraocular inflammatory disease, or uveitis, is a disorder that mostly affects children and young adults. It is the cause of about 10% of the severe visual handicap in the United States. Many of the severe, sight-threatening uveitic conditions are thought to be driven by putative autoimmune mechanisms, often with high-dose oral prednisone use as treatment, along with cytotoxic agents, antimetabolites, and cyclosporine adjunctively. The feeding of the uveitogenic retinal S-Ag to rats immunized with the same antigen resulted in clinical protection. A pilot study in which two patients, one with pars planitis and the other with Behcet's disease, were fed with the retinal S-Ag resulted in these patients' immunosuppressive medication being decreased and/or stopped. The trial also provided us with information concerning dosage and expected immune responses. A randomized, masked study looking at the effect of feeding retinal antigens to uveitis patients is ongoing.