Mechanism of allosteric modulation of Escherichia coli carbamoyl phosphate synthetase probed by site-directed mutagenesis of ornithine site residues

Development of an engineered carbamoyl phosphate synthetase with released sensitivity to feedback inhibition by site-directed mutation and casting error-prone PCR

Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase (CPS) is a key enzyme in both pyrimidine and arginine biosynthesis. However, it is inhibited strongly by uridine monophosphate (UMP), which is an intermediate of the de-novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleoside. In this study, the native carbamoyl phosphate synthetase, from Escherichia coli, was evolved by site-directed mutation and casting error-prone PCR. Compared with the wild-type, the variant N1015 F had released sensitivity to UMP and exhibited 100% of the initial activity in the presence of UMP. Variant K1006A exhibited 0.14-fold improvement in initial activity and kept above 65% of relative activity under the saturated concentration of inhibitor. Structure analysis of variants demonstrated that the reduced sensitivity to inhibitor was largely attributed to the decreased hydrogen bonds, which could reduce the binding affinity with UMP. Also, Phe with large side chain could narrow the binding pocket and generate more steric hindrance. Based on the results in this study, N1015F was an ideal alternative catalyst for the wild-type CPS for pyrimidine biosynthesis.

Regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthesis in Escherichia coli: an amazing metabolite at the crossroad of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis

In all organisms, carbamoylphosphate (CP) is a precursor common to the synthesis of arginine and pyrimidines. In Escherichia coli and most other Gram-negative bacteria, CP is produced by a single enzyme, carbamoylphosphate synthase (CPSase), encoded by the carAB operon. This particular situation poses a question of basic physiological interest: what are the metabolic controls coordinating the synthesis and distribution of this high-energy substance in view of the needs of both pathways? The study of the mechanisms has revealed unexpected moonlighting gene regulatory activities of enzymes and functional links between mechanisms as diverse as gene regulation and site-specific DNA recombination. At the level of enzyme production, various regulatory mechanisms were found to cooperate in a particularly intricate transcriptional control of a pair of tandem promoters. Transcription initiation is modulated by an interplay of several allosteric DNA-binding transcription factors using effector molecules from three different pathways (arginine, pyrimidines, purines), nucleoid-associated factors (NAPs), trigger enzymes (enzymes with a second unlinked gene regulatory function), DNA remodeling (bending and wrapping), UTP-dependent reiterative transcription initiation, and stringent control by the alarmone ppGpp. At the enzyme level, CPSase activity is tightly controlled by allosteric effectors originating from different pathways: an inhibitor (UMP) and two activators (ornithine and IMP) that antagonize the inhibitory effect of UMP. Furthermore, it is worth noticing that all reaction intermediates in the production of CP are extremely reactive and unstable, and protected by tunneling through a 96 Å long internal channel.

Biosynthesis of Arginine and Polyamines

Early investigations on arginine biosynthesis brought to light basic features of metabolic regulation. The most significant advances of the last 10 to 15 years concern the arginine repressor, its structure and mode of action in both E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the sequence analysis of all arg structural genes in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the resulting evolutionary inferences, and the dual regulation of the carAB operon. This review provides an overall picture of the pathways, their interconnections, the regulatory circuits involved, and the resulting interferences between arginine and polyamine biosynthesis. Carbamoylphosphate is a precursor common to arginine and the pyrimidines. In both Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is produced by a single synthetase, carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase), with glutamine as the physiological amino group donor. This situation contrasts with the existence of separate enzymes specific for arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis and fungi. Polyamine biosynthesis has been particularly well studied in E. coli, and the cognate genes have been identified in the Salmonella genome as well, including those involved in transport functions. The review summarizes what is known about the enzymes involved in the arginine pathway of E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium; homologous genes were identified in both organisms, except argF (encoding a supplementary OTCase), which is lacking in Salmonella. Several examples of putative enzyme recruitment (homologous enzymes performing analogous functions) are also presented.

Understanding carbamoyl phosphate synthetase deficiency: impact of clinical mutations on enzyme functionality

Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I (CPSI) deficiency, a recessively inherited error of the urea cycle, causes life-threatening hyperammonaemia. CPSI is a multidomain 1500-residue liver mitochondrial matrix protein that is allosterically activated by N-acetyl-l-glutamate, and which synthesises carbamoyl phosphate (CP) in three steps: bicarbonate phosphorylation by ATP, carbamate synthesis from carboxyphosphate and ammonia, and carbamate phosphorylation by ATP. Several missense mutations of CPSI have been reported in patients with CPSI deficiency, but the actual pathogenic potential and effects on the enzyme of these mutations remain non-characterised. Since the structure of Escherichia coli CPS is known and systems for its overexpression and purification are available, we have constructed and purified eight site-directed mutants of E.coli CPS affecting the enzyme large subunit (A126M, R169H, Q262P, N301K, P360L, V640R, R675L, S789P) that are homologous to corresponding missense mutations found in patients with CPSI deficiency, studying their stability and their ability to catalyse the CPS reaction as well as the partial reactions that reflect the different reactional steps, and analysing the substrate kinetics for the overall and partial reactions. The results show that all the mutations significantly decrease CP synthesis without completely inactivating the enzyme (as reflected in the catalysis of at least one partial reaction), that one of these mutations (Q262P) causes marked enzyme instability, and validate the use of E.coli CPS as a pathogenicity testing model for CPSI deficiency. The causality of the reported clinical mutations is supported and the derangements caused by the mutations are identified, revealing the specific roles of the residues that are mutated. In particular, the findings highlight the importance for carbamate phosphorylation and for allosteric activation of a loop that coordinates K(+), stress the key role of intersubunit interactions for CPS stability, and suggest that lid opening at both phosphorylation sites is concerted.

Unmasking a functional allosteric domain in an allosterically nonresponsive carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase

Although carbamoyl-phosphate synthetases (CPSs) share sequence identity, multidomain structure, and reaction mechanism, they have varying physiological roles and allosteric effectors. Escherichia coli CPS (eCPS) provides CP for both arginine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis and is allosterically regulated by metabolites from both pathways, with inhibition by UMP and activation by IMP and ornithine. The arginine-specific CPS from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (sCPS), however, apparently responds to no allosteric effectors. We have designed and analyzed a chimeric CPS (chCPS, in which the C-terminal 136 residues of eCPS were replaced by the corresponding residues of sCPS) to define the structural basis for the allosteric nonresponsiveness of sCPS and thereby provide insight into the mechanism for allosteric selectivity and responsiveness in the other CPSs. Surprisingly, ornithine and UMP each had a significant effect on chCPS activity, and did so at concentrations that were similar to those effective for eCPS. We further found that sCPS bound both UMP and IMP and that chCPS bound IMP, although none of these interactions led to changes in enzymatic activity. These findings strongly suggest that the nonresponsive sCPS is not able to communicate occupancy of the allosteric site to the active site but does contain a latent allosteric interaction domain.