Important role of Ser443 in different thermal stability of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes1

Evolution of Glutamate Metabolism via GLUD2 Enhances Lactate-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity and Complex Cognition

Human evolution is characterized by rapid brain enlargement and the emergence of unique cognitive abilities. Besides its distinctive cytoarchitectural organization and extensive inter-neuronal connectivity, the human brain is also defined by high rates of synaptic, mainly glutamatergic, transmission, and energy utilization. While these adaptations' origins remain elusive, evolutionary changes occurred in synaptic glutamate metabolism in the common ancestor of humans and apes via the emergence of GLUD2, a gene encoding the human glutamate dehydrogenase 2 (hGDH2) isoenzyme. Driven by positive selection, hGDH2 became adapted to function upon intense excitatory firing, a process central to the long-term strengthening of synaptic connections. It also gained expression in brain astrocytes and cortical pyramidal neurons, including the CA1-CA3 hippocampal cells, neurons crucial to cognition. In mice transgenic for GLUD2, theta-burst-evoked long-term potentiation (LTP) is markedly enhanced in hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses, with patch-clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons revealing increased sNMDA receptor currents. D-lactate blocked LTP enhancement, implying that glutamate metabolism via hGDH2 potentiates L-lactate-dependent glia-neuron interaction, a process essential to memory consolidation. The transgenic (Tg) mice exhibited increased dendritic spine density/synaptogenesis in the hippocampus and improved complex cognitive functions. Hence, enhancement of neuron-glia communication, via GLUD2 evolution, likely contributed to human cognitive advancement by potentiating synaptic plasticity and inter-neuronal connectivity.

Hyperthermia potentiates cisplatin cytotoxicity and negative effects on mitochondrial functions in OVCAR-3 cells

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of hyperthermia, cisplatin and their combination on mitochondrial functions such as glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity and mitochondrial respiration rates, as well as survival of cultured ovarian adenocarcinoma OVCAR-3 cells. Cells treated for 1 h with hyperthermia (40 and 43 °C) or cisplatin (IC50) or a combination of both treatments were left for recovery at 37 °C temperature for 24 h or 48 h. The obtained results revealed that 43 °C hyperthermia potentiated effects of cisplatin treatment: combinatory treatment more strongly suppressed GDH activity and expression, mitochondrial functions, and decreased survival of OVCAR-3 cells in comparison to separate single treatments. We obtained evidence that in the OVCAR-3 cell line GDH was directly activated by hyperthermia (cisplatin eliminated this effect); however, this effect was followed by GDH inhibition after 48 h recovery. A combination of 43 °C hyperthermia with cisplatin induced stronger GDH inhibition in comparison to separate treatments, and negative effects exerted on GDH activity correlated with suppression of mitochondrial respiration with glutamate + malate. Cisplatin did not induce uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in OVCAR-3 cells but induced impairment of the outer mitochondrial membrane in combination with 43 °C hyperthermia. Hyperthermia (43 °C) potentiated cytotoxicity of cisplatin in an OVCAR-3 cell line.

Multiple Forms of Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Animals: Structural Determinants and Physiological Implications

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) of animal cells is usually considered to be a mitochondrial enzyme. However, this enzyme has recently been reported to be also present in nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes. These extramitochondrial localizations are associated with moonlighting functions of GDH, which include acting as a serine protease or an ATP-dependent tubulin-binding protein. Here, we review the published data on kinetics and localization of multiple forms of animal GDH taking into account the splice variants, post-translational modifications and GDH isoenzymes, found in humans and apes. The kinetic properties of human GLUD1 and GLUD2 isoenzymes are shown to be similar to those published for GDH1 and GDH2 from bovine brain. Increased functional diversity and specific regulation of GDH isoforms due to alternative splicing and post-translational modifications are also considered. In particular, these structural differences may affect the well-known regulation of GDH by nucleotides which is related to recent identification of thiamine derivatives as novel GDH modulators. The thiamine-dependent regulation of GDH is in good agreement with the fact that the non-coenzyme forms of thiamine, i.e., thiamine triphosphate and its adenylated form are generated in response to amino acid and carbon starvation.

Glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 3 (GDH3) of Arabidopsis thaliana is less thermostable than GDH1 and GDH2 isoenzymes

NAD(H)-glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH; EC 1.4.1.2) is an abundant and ubiquitous enzyme that may exist in different isoenzymic forms. Variation in the composition of the GDH isoenzyme pattern is observed during plant development and specific cell, tissue and organ localization of the different isoforms have been reported. However, the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the isoenzymatic pattern are still obscure. Regulation may be exerted at several levels, i.e. at the level of transcription and translation of the relevant genes, but also when the enzyme is assembled to originate the catalytically active form of the protein. In Arabidopsis thaliana, three genes (GDH1, GDH2 and GDH3) encode three different GDH subunits (β, α and γ) that randomly associate to form a complex array of homo- and hetero-hexamers. In order to asses if the different Arabidopsis GDH isoforms may display different structural properties we have investigated their thermal stability. In particular the stability of GDH1 and GDH3 isoenzymes was studied using site-directed mutagenesis in a heterologous yeast expression system. It was established that the carboxyl terminus of the GDH subunit is involved in the stabilization of the oligomeric structure of the enzyme.

The discovery of human of GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase and its implications for cell function in health and disease

While the evolutionary changes that led to traits unique to humans remain unclear, there is increasing evidence that enrichment of the human genome through DNA duplication processes may have contributed to traits such as bipedal locomotion, higher cognitive abilities and language. Among the genes that arose through duplication in primates during the period of increased brain development was GLUD2, which encodes the hGDH2 isoform of glutamate dehydrogenase expressed in neural and other tissues. Glutamate dehydrogenase GDH is an enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter in mammalian brain involved in a multitude of CNS functions, including cognitive processes. In nerve tissue GDH is expressed in astrocytes that wrap excitatory synapses, where it is thought to play a role in the metabolic fate of glutamate removed from the synaptic cleft during excitatory transmission. Expression of GDH rises sharply during postnatal brain development, coinciding with nerve terminal sprouting and synaptogenesis. Compared to the original hGDH1 (encoded by the GLUD1 gene), which is potently inhibited by GTP generated by the Krebs cycle, hGDH2 can function independently of this energy switch. In addition, hGDH2 can operate efficiently in the relatively acidic environment that prevails in astrocytes following glutamate uptake. This adaptation is thought to provide a biological advantage by enabling enhanced enzyme catalysis under intense excitatory neurotransmission. While the novel protein may help astrocytes to handle increased loads of transmitter glutamate, dissociation of hGDH2 from GTP control may render humans vulnerable to deregulation of this enzyme's function. Here we will retrace the cloning and characterization of the novel GLUD2 gene and the potential implications of this discovery in the understanding of mechanisms that permitted the brain and other organs that express hGDH2 to fine-tune their functions in order to meet new challenging demands. In addition, the potential role of gain-of-function of hGDH2 variants in human neurodegenerative processes will be considered.

Roles of cysteine residues in the inhibition of human glutamate dehydrogenase by palmitoyl-CoA

Human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) have been known to be inhibited by palmitoyl-CoA with a high affinity. In this study, we have performed the cassette mutagenesis at six different Cys residues (Cys59, Cys93, Cys119, Cys201, Cys274, and Cys323) to identify palmitoyl-CoA binding sites within hGDH2. Four cysteine residues at positions of C59, C93, C201, or C274 may be involved, at least in part, in the inhibition of hGDH2 by palmitoyl-CoA. There was a biphasic relationship, depending on the levels of palmitoyl-CoA, between the binding of palmitoyl-CoA and the loss of enzyme activity during the inactivation process. The inhibition of hGDH2 by palmitoyl-CoA was not affected by the allosteric inhibitor GTP. Multiple mutagenesis studies on the hGDH2 are in progress to identify the amino acid residues fully responsible for the inhibition by palmitoyl-CoA. [BMB Reports 2012; 45(12): 707-712]

Human GLUD1 and GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase localize to mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme central to glutamate metabolism, is thought to localize to the mitochondrial matrix, although there are also suggestions for the extramitochondrial presence of this protein. Whereas GDH in mammals is encoded by the GLUD1 gene, humans and the great apes have, in addition, a GLUD2 gene showing a distinct expression pattern. The encoded hGDH1 and hGDH2 isoenzymes are highly homologous, but their leader sequences are more divergent. To explore their subcellular targeting, we constructed expression vectors in which hGDH1 or hGDH2 was fused with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and used these to transfect COS 7, HeLa, CHO, HEK293, or neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cells. Confocal microscopy revealed GDH-EGFP fluorescence in the cytoplasm within coarse structures. Cotransfection experiments using organelle-specific markers revealed that hGDH1 or hGDH2 colocalized with the mitochondrial marker DsRed2-Mito and to a lesser extent with the endoplasmic reticulum marker DsRed2-ER. Western blots detected two GDH-EGFP specific bands: a ~90 kDa band and a ~95 kDa band associated with the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum containing cytosol, respectively. Deletion of the signal sequence, while altering drastically the fluoresce distribution within the cell, prevented GDH from entering the mitochondria, with the ~90 kDa band being retained in the cytosol. In addition, the deletion eliminated the ~95 kDa band from cell lysates, thus confirming that it represents the full-length GDH. Hence, while most of the hGDHs translocate into the mitochondria (a process associated with cleavage of the signal sequence), part of the protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum, probably serving additional functions.

Glutamate dehydrogenase activity in lymphocytes of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the pattern of glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) activity, GLUD1 and GLUD2 expressions in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of untreated B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) in healthy individuals (HI) and patients with infectious mononucleosis (IM).

DESIGN AND METHODS

GLDH activity was determined in a supernatant obtained from pelleted PBMC. GLUD1 and GLUD2 mRNA expression was determined using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. CD19(+) B cells from PBMC were purified by using positive selection.

RESULTS

The highest GLDH activity was found in PBMC of the B-CLL group followed by the HI group and IM group. The PBMC GLDH activity was higher in 60% of the B-CLL patients according to the established reference interval for our HI (2.17-5.70 microkat/g protein). The greater GLDH activity was also found in the CD19(+) cell preparation of the B-CLL patients (two of the three) but not in HI (n=3). The median value of GLUD1 expression was highest in the IM group (n=11), followed by the HI (n=14) and B-CLL groups (n=59) (median 4.69/3.78, P<0.005 and 4.69/2.91, P<0.0005, respectively). GLUD2 expression was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased GLDH activity is specific for the PBMC of B-CLL patients. The GLUD1 but not the GLUD2 gene expression pattern is different between the PBMC of IM and B-CLL patients.

The human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase: localization and functional aspects

In all mammals, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate, is encoded by a single gene (GLUD1 in humans) which is expressed widely (housekeeping). Humans and other primates also possess a second gene, GLUD2, which encodes a highly homologous GDH isoenzyme (hGDH2) expressed predominantly in retina, brain and testis. There is evidence that GLUD1 was retro-posed <23 million years ago to the X chromosome, where it gave rise to GLUD2 through random mutations and natural selection. These mutations provided the novel enzyme with unique properties thought to facilitate its function in the particular milieu of the nervous system. hGDH2, having been dissociated from GTP control (through the Gly456Ala change), is mainly regulated by rising levels of ADP/l-leucine. To achieve full-range regulation by these activators, hGDH2 needs to set its basal activity at low levels (<10% of full capacity), a property largely conferred by the evolutionary Arg443Ser change. Studies of structure/function relationships have identified residues in the regulatory domain of hGDH2 that modify basal catalytic activity and regulation. In addition, enzyme concentration and buffer ionic strength can influence basal enzyme activity. While mature hGDH1 and hGDH2 isoproteins are highly homologous, their predicted leader peptide sequences show a greater degree of divergence. Study of the subcellular sites targeted by hGDH2 in three different cultured cell lines using a GLUD2/EGFP construct revealed that hGDH2 localizes mainly to mitochondria and to a lesser extent to the endoplasmic reticulum of these cells. The implications of these findings for the potential role of this enzyme in the biology of the nervous system in health and disease are discussed.

Inhibitory properties of nerve-specific human glutamate dehydrogenase isozyme by chloroquine

Human glutamate dehydrogenase exists in hGDH1 (housekeeping isozyme) and in hGDH2 (nerve-specific isozyme), which differ markedly in their allosteric regulation. In the nervous system, GDH is enriched in astrocytes and is important for recycling glutamate, a major excitatory neurotransmitter during neurotransmission. Chloroquine has been known to be a potent inhibitor of house-keeping GDH1 in permeabilized liver and kidney-cortex of rabbit. However, the effects of chloroquine on nerve-specific GDH2 have not been reported yet. In the present study, we have investigated the effects of chloroquine on hGDH2 at various conditions and showed that chloroquine could inhibit the activity of hGDH2 at dose-dependent manner. Studies of the chloroquine inhibition on enzyme activity revealed that hGDH2 was relatively less sensitive to chloroquine inhibition than house-keeping hGDH1. Incubation of hGDH2 was uncompetitive with respect of NADH and non-competitive with respect of 2-oxoglutarate. The inhibitory effect of chloroquine on hGDH2 was abolished, although in part, by the presence of ADP and L-leucine, whereas GTP did not change the sensitivity to chloroquine inhibition. Our results show a possibility that chloroquine may be used in regulating GDH activity and subsequently glutamate concentration in the central nervous system.

Identification of amino acid residues responsible for different GTP preferences of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

Human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) differ markedly in their inhibition by GTP. These regulatory preferences must arise from amino acid residues that are not common between hGDH isozymes. We have constructed chimeric enzymes by reciprocally switching the corresponding amino acid segments 390-465 in hGDH isozymes that are located within or near the C-terminal 48-residue antenna helix, which is thought to be part of the regulatory domain of mammalian GDHs. These resulted in triple mutations in amino acid sequences at 415, 443, and 456 sites that are not common between hGDH1 and hGDH2. The chimeric enzymes did not change their enzyme efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) and expression level. Functional analyses, however, revealed that the chimeric mutants almost completely acquired the different GTP regulatory preference between hGDH isozymes. These results suggest that the 415, 443, and 456 residues acting in concert are responsible for the GTP inhibitory properties of hGDH isozymes.

Amino Acid Changes within Antenna Helix Are Responsible for Different Regulatory Preferences of Human Glutamate Dehydrogenase Isozymes

Human glutamate dehydrogenase (hGDH) exists in hGDH1 (housekeeping isozyme) and in hGDH2 (nerve-specific isozyme), which differ markedly in their allosteric regulation. Because they differ in only 16 of their 505 amino acids, the regulatory preferences must arise from amino acid residues that are not common between hGDH1 and hGDH2. To our knowledge none of the mutagenesis studies on the hGDH isozymes to date have identified the amino acid residues fully responsible for the different regulatory preferences between hGDH1 and hGDH2. In this study we constructed hGDH1(hGDH2(390-448))hGDH1 (amino acid segment 390-448 of hGDH1 replaced by the corresponding hGDH2 segment) and hGDH2(hGDH1(390-448))hGDH2 (amino acid segment 390-448 of hGDH2 replaced by the corresponding hGDH1 segment) by swapping the corresponding amino acid segments in hGDH1 and hGDH2. The chimeric enzymes by reciprocal swapping resulted in double mutations in amino acid sequences at 415 and 443 residues that are not common between hGDH1 and hGDH2 and are located in the C-terminal 48-residue "antenna" helix, which is thought to be part of the regulatory domain of mammalian GDHs. Functional analyses revealed that the doubly mutated chimeric enzymes almost completely acquired most of the different regulatory preferences between hGDH1 and hGDH2 for electrophoretic mobility, heat-stability, ADP activation, palmitoyl-CoA inhibition, and l-leucine activation, except for GTP inhibition. Our results indicate that substitutions of the residues in the antenna region may be important evolutionary changes that led to the adaptation of hGDH2 to the unique metabolic needs of the nerve tissue.

Identification of ADP-ribosylation site in human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

When the influence of ADP-ribosylation on the activities of the purified human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) was measured in the presence of 100 microM NAD+ for 60 min, hGDH isozymes were inhibited by up to 75%. If incubations were performed for longer time periods up to 3 h, the inhibition of hGDH isozymes did not increased further. This phenomenon may be related to the reversibility of ADP-ribosylation in mitochondria. ADP-ribosylated hDGH isozymes were reactivated by Mg2+-dependent mitochondrial ADP-ribosylcysteine hydrolase. The stoichiometry between incorporated ADP-ribose and GDH subunits shows a modification of one subunit per catalytically active homohexamer. Since ADP and GTP had no effects on the extent of modification, it would appear that the ADP-ribosylation is unlikely to occur in allosteric sites. It has been proposed that Cys residue may be involved in the ADP-ribosylation of GDH, although identification of the reactive Cys residue has not been reported. To identify the reactive Cys residue involved in the ADP-ribosylation, we performed cassette mutagenesis at three different positions (Cys59, Cys119, and Cys274) using synthetic genes of hGDH isozymes. Among the Cys residues tested, only Cys119 mutants showed a significant reduction in the ADP-ribosylation. These results suggest a possibility that the Cys119 residue has an important role in the regulation of hGDH isozymes by ADP-ribosylation.

Molecular basis of human glutamate dehydrogenase regulation under changing energy demands

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme central to glutamate metabolism, is located in the mitochondria although there is evidence for extramitochondrial localization of GDH. In the human, housekeeping and nerve tissue-specific isoforms, encoded by the GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes, have been identified. The two isoenzymes differ markedly in their baseline activities, allosteric regulation, and thermal stability. GTP potently inhibits GLUD1-derived GDH (IC(50) = 0.2 muM), whereas the GLUD2-derived isoenzyme is resistant to this compound. The GLUD2-derived GDH shows low basal activity and has the capacity to be activated fully by ADP or L-leucine. We used molecular biological tools to study the subcellular localization of GLUD1-derived GDH in cultured cells and the molecular basis of its regulation. COS7 cells, transfected with a GLUD1-pEGFP-N3 vector, revealed a GFP fluorescence pattern nearly identical to that of the mitochondrial marker pDsRed2-Mito. Site-directed mutagenesis of GLUD1 gene showed that replacement of Gly456 by Ala made the enzyme resistant to GTP (IC(50) = 2.8 +/- 0.15 microM) without altering its regulation by ADP. Substitution of Ser for Arg443 rendered the enzyme virtually inactive at its basal state, but fully responsive to ADP activation. The Arg443Ser mutant was more active at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0. The Gly456Ala change therefore dissociated GLUD2-derived GDH function from GTP, whereas the Arg443Ser change made enzyme regulation possible without this inhibitor. These properties may allow the brain isoenzyme to function well under conditions of intracellular acidification and increased turnover of ATP to ADP, as occurs in synaptic astrocytes during excitatory transmission.

Reactive amino acid residues involved in glutamate-binding of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

In the present study, the cassette mutagenesis at several putative positions (K94, G96, K118, K130, or D172) was performed to examine the residues involved in the glutamate-binding of the human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2). None of the mutations tested affected the expression or stability of the proteins. There was dramatic reduction in the catalytic efficiency in mutant proteins at K94, G96, K118, or K130 site, but not at D172 site. The K(M) values for glutamate were 4-10-fold greater for the mutants at K94, G96, or K118 site than for the wild-type hGDH1 and hGDH2, whereas no differences in the K(M) values for NAD(+) were detected between the mutant and wild-type enzymes. For K130Y mutant, the K(M) value for glutamate increased 1.6-fold, whereas the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(M)) showed only 2-3% of the wild-type. Therefore, the decreased catalytic efficiency of the K130 mutant mainly results from the reduced k(cat) value, suggesting a possibility that the K130Y residue may be involved in the catalysis rather than in the glutamate-binding. The D172Y mutant did not show any changes in k(cat) value and K(M) values for glutamate and NAD(+), indicating that D172Y is not directly involved in catalysis and substrates binding of the hGDH isozymes. For sensitivity to ADP activation, only the D172Y mutant showed a reduced sensitivity to ADP activation. The reduction of ADP activation in D172Y mutant was more profoundly observed in hGDH2 than in hGDH1. There were no differences in their sensitivities to GTP inhibition between the wild-type and mutant GDHs at all positions tested. Our results suggest that K94, G96, and K118 residues play an important role, although at different degrees, in the binding of glutamate to hGDH isozymes.