Core promoter elements are essential as selective determinants for function of the yeast transcription factor GAL11

Distinct role of core promoter architecture in regulation of light-mediated responses in plant genes

In the present study, we selected four distinct classes of light-regulated promoters. The light-regulated promoters can be distinctly grouped into either TATA-box-containing or TATA-less (initiator-containing) promoters. Further, using either native promoters or their swapped versions of core promoter elements, we established that TATA-box and Inr (Initiator) elements have distinct mechanisms which are involved in light-mediated regulation, and these elements are not swappable. We identified that mutations in either functional TATA-box or Inr elements lead to the formation of nucleosomal structure. The nucleotide diversity in either the TATA-box or Inr element in Arabidopsis ecotypes proposes that the nucleotide variation in core promoters can alter the gene expression. We show that motif overrepresentation in light-activated promoters encompasses different specific regulatory motifs present downstream of TSS (transcription start site), and this might serve as a key factor in regulating light promoters which are parallel with these elements. Finally, we conclude that the TATA-box or Inr element does not act in isolation, but our results clearly suggests the probable involvement of other distinct core promoter elements in concurrence with the TATA-box or Inr element to impart selectivity to light-mediated transcription.

Genome-wide computational prediction and analysis of core promoter elements across plant monocots and dicots

Transcription initiation, essential to gene expression regulation, involves recruitment of basal transcription factors to the core promoter elements (CPEs). The distribution of currently known CPEs across plant genomes is largely unknown. This is the first large scale genome-wide report on the computational prediction of CPEs across eight plant genomes to help better understand the transcription initiation complex assembly. The distribution of thirteen known CPEs across four monocots (Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa ssp. japonica, Sorghum bicolor, Zea mays) and four dicots (Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa, Vitis vinifera, Glycine max) reveals the structural organization of the core promoter in relation to the TATA-box as well as with respect to other CPEs. The distribution of known CPE motifs with respect to transcription start site (TSS) exhibited positional conservation within monocots and dicots with slight differences across all eight genomes. Further, a more refined subset of annotated genes based on orthologs of the model monocot (O. sativa ssp. japonica) and dicot (A. thaliana) genomes supported the positional distribution of these thirteen known CPEs. DNA free energy profiles provided evidence that the structural properties of promoter regions are distinctly different from that of the non-regulatory genome sequence. It also showed that monocot core promoters have lower DNA free energy than dicot core promoters. The comparison of monocot and dicot promoter sequences highlights both the similarities and differences in the core promoter architecture irrespective of the species-specific nucleotide bias. This study will be useful for future work related to genome annotation projects and can inspire research efforts aimed to better understand regulatory mechanisms of transcription.

Disruption of gene YlODC reveals absolute requirement of polyamines for mycelial development in Yarrowia lipolytica

Polyamines are required for cellular growth and differentiation. In mammals and fungi they are synthesized via a pathway involving ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which transforms ornithine into putrescine. We have cloned and disrupted the gene coding for ODC in Yarrowia lipolytica to analyze the role of polyamines in dimorphism of this fungus. Substrate- and cofactor-binding motifs, as well as two putative PEST boxes were identified in the amino acid sequence. A single transcript 1.7 kb in size was identified by Northern hybridization, and confirmed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Null mutants lacked ODC activity and behaved as polyamine auxotrophs. When low levels of polyamines were supplied to the null mutant, only yeast-like, but not mycelial growth was sustained. This phenomenon was confirmed by introduction of the YlODC gene under the control of an inducible promoter into the null mutant.

Evidence that Gal11 protein is a target of the Gal4 activation domain in the mediator

The mediator is an approximately 20 protein complex that is essential for the transcription of most genes in yeast. It is contacted by a number of gene-specific activators, but the details of these interactions are not well understood in most cases. Here, evidence is presented that the mediator component Gal11 represents at least one target of the Gal4 activation domain (AD). Deletion of Gal11 is shown to decrease the affinity of the Gal4 AD for the mediator, and direct binding of an N-terminal domain of Gal11 with the Gal4 AD is demonstrated. Quantitative studies, however, indicate that the K(D) of the 1:1 Gal4 AD--Gal11 complex is modest. Combined with in vivo data showing that Delta gal11 cells exhibit reduced, but still significant, Gal4-mediated gene expression, these results suggest that the dimeric activator might also contact another protein in the mediator in addition to Gal11.

A novel domain of the yeast heat shock factor that regulates its activation function

Heat shock factor Hsf1 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to the heat shock element (HSE) of a subset of genes and activates their transcription in response to various environmental stresses. Hsf1 protein contains discrete domains respectively involved in DNA-binding, trimerization, transcription activation, and transcription repression. Here we have identified a novel domain rich in basic amino acids at the extreme C-terminus of Hsf1. Deletion or point mutations of the C-terminal basic region caused an inefficient heat shock response of genes containing noncanonical HSEs such as CUP1 and HSP26. The basic region is also essential for oxidative stress-inducible transcription of CUP1 by Hsf1. By contrast, it was dispensable for heat induction through the canonical HSE. We suggest that the basic region is a modulator involved in regulation of the Hsf1-mediated activation depending on the architecture of its binding site.

Activator-specific requirement for the general transcription factor IIE in yeast

The general transcription factor (TF) IIE is required for mRNA synthesis of many, but not all, genes in yeast. In the transcription process, TFIIE regulates TFIIH kinase activity that phosphorylates the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II. The CTD and the CTD kinase Kin28, a subunit of TFIIH, have been shown to be dispensable for activation of several heat shock genes and the copper metallothionein gene CUP1. Here we analyzed requirement of TFIIE for transcription of these genes and found that TFIIE is necessary for activation of the heat shock genes by heat shock transcription factor Hsf1. By contrast, transcription of CUP1 mediated by both Hsf1 and copper-activated transcription factor Ace1 was inducible after inactivating TFIIE. These results show that both TFIIE and the CTD/the CTD kinase exhibit "gene specificities" which are overlapping, but not identical to each other, and thereby suggest that TFIIE functions with or without involvement of the CTD/the CTD kinase depending on the gene to be transcribed.

Transcription initiation mediated by initiator binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Many instances of the initiator element in the core promoter of protein-coding genes have been reported in mammalian cells and their viruses, but only one has been reported in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the GAL80 gene. The initiator element of GAL80 directs transcription by itself and interacts with a nuclear protein designated yeast initiator binding factor (yIF). Here we show that yIF in a partially purified sample binds the sequence from -18 to +10 of GAL80. By employing a selected and amplified binding procedure, we have determined the preferred sequence for yIF binding to be -2 CACTN +3 (N indicates any nucleotide). Binding affinity of selected sequences to yIF correlated with their initiator-directed transcription in vivo, suggesting that the yIF-initiator interaction mediates transcription from the initiator in yeast. We also suggest that sequences flanking the preferred sequence affect both yIF binding and initiator activity.

Molecular genetics of the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery

Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) requires interaction between cis-acting promoter elements and trans-acting factors. The eukaryotic promoter consists of core elements, which include the TATA box and other DNA sequences that define transcription start sites, and regulatory elements, which either enhance or repress transcription in a gene-specific manner. The core promoter is the site for assembly of the transcription preinitiation complex, which includes RNA pol II and the general transcription fctors TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF, and TFIIH. Regulatory elements bind gene-specific factors, which affect the rate of transcription by interacting, either directly or indirectly, with components of the general transcriptional machinery. A third class of transcription factors, termed coactivators, is not required for basal transcription in vitro but often mediates activation by a broad spectrum of activators. Accordingly, coactivators are neither gene-specific nor general transcription factors, although gene-specific coactivators have been described in metazoan systems. Transcriptional repressors include both gene-specific and general factors. Similar to coactivators, general transcriptional repressors affect the expression of a broad spectrum of genes yet do not repress all genes. General repressors either act through the core transcriptional machinery or are histone related and presumably affect chromatin function. This review focuses on the global effectors of RNA polymerase II transcription in yeast, including the general transcription factors, the coactivators, and the general repressors. Emphasis is placed on the role that yeast genetics has played in identifying these factors and their associated functions.

Yeast Gal11 and transcription factor IIE function through a common pathway in transcriptional regulation

The global transcription regulator Gal11, a component of RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, is required for full expression of many genes in yeast. We previously reported that Gal11 binds the small (Tfa2) and large (Tfa1) subunits of the general transcription factor (TF) IIE through Gal11 functional domains A and B, respectively. Here we demonstrate that the C-terminal basic region in Tfa2 is responsible for binding to domain A, whereas both the N-terminal hydrophobic and internal glutamic acid-rich regions in Tfa1 are responsible for binding to domain B. Yeast cells bearing a C-terminal deletion encompassing the Gal11-interacting region in each of the two TFIIE subunits, being viable, exhibited no obvious phenotype. In contrast, combination of the two deletions (TFIIE-DeltaC) showed phenotypes similar to those of gal11 null mutations. The levels of mRNA from TATA-containing genes, but not from TATA-less genes, decreased in TFIIE-DeltaC to an extent comparable to that in the gal11 null mutant. Combination of TFIIE-DeltaC with a gal11 null mutation did not result in an enhanced effect, suggesting that both TFIIE and Gal11 act in a common regulatory pathway. In a reconstituted cell-free system, Gal11 protein stimulated basal transcription in the presence of wild-type TFIIE. Such a stimulation was not seen in the presence of TFIIE-DeltaC.

The type of basal promoter determines the regulated or constitutive mode of transcription in the common control region of the yeast gene pair GCY1/RIO1

The yeast genes, GCY1 and RIO1, are transcribed divergently from the 869-base pair intergenic region. GCY1 is inducible by galactose about 25-fold due to Gal4p-binding to a single UASGAL, whereas RIO1 is constitutively expressed. GCY1 has a TATA box obeying the consensus TATAAA, whereas the RIO1 5'-upstream region lacks such a motif. In vitro mutagenesis of the TATA motif of GCY1, on the one hand, and introduction of a TATA-element into the promoter of RIO1, on the other hand, as well as inversion of the intergenic region have revealed that transcription of GCY1 and RIO1 is only regulated by Gal4p when a consensus TATA motif is included in their core promoters but not in its absence. The data imply that only transcription complexes that assemble at a consensus TATA box are compatible with specific transactivators, such as Gal4p. As a result, the adjacent gene is subject to regulated expression. By contrast, if a consensus TATA sequence is absent, the initiation complex does not respond to regulatory transcription factors, and consequently, the respective gene is constitutively transcribed. On the other hand, we show that two blocks of homo-oligomeric (dA.dT) sequences do not function as boundary sequences that might confine regulatory action of Gal4p to GCY1.

Promoter structure-dependent functioning of the general transcription factor IIE in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

General transcription factor (TF) IIE is an essential component of the basal transcription complex for protein-encoding genes, which is widely conserved in eukaryotes. Here we analyzed requirement for TFIIE for transcription in vivo by using yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells harboring mutations in the TFA1 gene encoding the larger one of the two subunits of TFIIE. Deletion analysis indicated that the N-terminal half of Tfa1 protein has an essential function to support the cell growth. In a temperature-sensitive tfa1 mutant cell, the steady-state level of bulk poly(A)+ RNA decreased rapidly at the restrictive temperature. Surprisingly, levels of several mRNAs, whose transcription is directed by the promoters lacking the typical TATA sequence, were not affected in the mutant cells at that temperature. This promoter-specific functioning of TFIIE was reproduced in a cell-free system composed of TFIIE-depleted nuclear extracts. These results strongly suggest that requirement for TFIIE varies in each gene depending on the promoter structures in vivo.