Functional regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1c: a role for phosphorylation in the desensitization of the receptor

mGluR5 in amygdala modulates fear memory generalization

Introduction

Fear memory generalization is regarded as the core characteristic of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) development. However, the mechanism that contributes to the generalization of conditioned fear memory is still unclear. The generalization is generally considered to be a mismatch that occurs during memory consolidation.

Methods

Foot shocks and tones were given as unconditioned stress and conditioned stress, respectively for fear conditioning training. Immunofluorescence staining, western blotting and qPCR were performed to determine the expression of different genes in amygdala of mice after fear conditioning training. Cycloheximide was used as a protein synthesis inhibitor and 2-methyl-6-phenylethynyl-pyridine was injected for mGluR5 inhibition.

Results

Fear conditioning using caused incremental generalization, which was clearly observed during training. The density of c-Fos⁺ cells or the synaptic p-NMDAR expression did not differ with stress intensities. Strong-shock fear conditioning could induce significant mGluR5 de novo synthesis in the amygdala, which was not observed in the weak-shock group. Inhibition of mGluR5 impaired fear memory generalization induced by strong-shock fear conditioning, but the generalization level induced by weak-shock training was enhanced.

Discussion

These results indicated that mGluR5 in the amygdala is critical to the function of inappropriate fear memory generalization and suggested that this may be a potential target for the treatment of PTSD.

Phosphorylation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1/5) in vitro and in vivo

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR5 subtypes) are densely expressed in mammalian brain. They are actively involved in the regulation of normal cellular activity and synaptic plasticity, and are frequently linked to the pathogenesis of various mental illnesses. Like ionotropic glutamate receptors, group I mGluRs are subject to the regulation by protein phosphorylation. Accumulative data demonstrate sufficient phosphorylation of the intracellular mGluR1/5 domains at specific serine/threonine sites by protein kinase C in heterologous cells or neurons, which serves as an important mechanism for regulating the receptor signaling and desensitization. Emerging evidence also shows the significant involvements of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, tyrosine kinases, and protein phosphatases in controlling the phosphorylation status of group I mGluRs. This review analyzes the recent data concerning group I mGluR phosphorylation and the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of group I mGluR function. Future research directions in this area with newly available high throughput and proteomic approaches are also discussed in the end.

Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation of the Metabotropic Glutamate ReceptormGluR5 on Serine 839 Regulates Ca2+Oscillations

The activation of Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR5 and mGluR1alpha, triggers intracellular calcium release; however, mGluR5 activation is unique in that it elicits Ca2+ oscillations. A short region of the mGluR5 C terminus is the critical determinant and differs from the analogous region of mGluR1alpha by a single amino acid residue, Thr-840, which is an aspartic acid (Asp-854) in mGluR1alpha. Previous studies show that mGluR5-elicited Ca2+ oscillations require protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent phosphorylation and identify Thr-840 as the phosphorylation site. However, direct phosphorylation of mGluR5 has not been studied in detail. We have used biochemical analyses to directly investigate the phosphorylation of the mGluR5 C terminus. We showed that Ser-839 on mGluR5 is directly phosphorylated by PKC, whereas Thr-840 plays a permissive role. Although Ser-839 is conserved in mGluR1alpha (Ser-853), it is not phosphorylated, as the adjacent residue (Asp-854) is not permissive; however, mutagenesis of Asp-854 to a permissive alanine residue allows phosphorylation of Ser-853 on mGluR1alpha. We investigated the physiological consequences of mGluR5 Ser-839 phosphorylation using Ca2+ imaging. Mutations that eliminate Ser-839 phosphorylation prevent the characteristic mGluR5-dependent Ca2+ oscillations. However, mutation of Thr-840 to alanine, which prevents potential Thr-840 phosphorylation but is still permissive for Ser-839 phosphorylation, has no effect on Ca2+ oscillations. Thus, we showed that it is phosphorylation of Ser-839, not Thr-840, that is absolutely required for the unique Ca2+ oscillations produced by mGluR5 activation. The Thr-840 residue is important only in that it is permissive for the PKC-dependent phosphorylation of Ser-839.

Cytoskeletal protein 4.1G is a binding partner of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 alpha

Recent evidence suggests that cytoskeletal proteins play important roles in the clustering and anchoring of glutamate receptors to the cell surface membrane. To examine further this issue, we tested for direct interactions between the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1alpha (mGlu1alpha) and 4.1G, which is a member of the erythrocyte membrane, cytoskeletal protein 4.1 family. First, co-localization of 4.1G and mGlu1alpha was observed in cultured hippocampal neurons. Second, in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells and in whole rat brain tissue, direct interactions between mGlu1alpha and 4.1G were observed. Third, we were able to identify the C-terminal tail of mGlu1alpha as an essential region for mGlu1alpha-4.1G interactions. Fourth, 4.1 G influences mGlu1alpha-mediated cAMP accumulation. Finally, we found that 4.1G increases the ligand-binding ability of mGlu1alpha and alters its cellular distribution. These observations identify 4.1G as a novel binding partner of mGlu1alpha that can regulate the action of mGlu1alpha.

Desensitization and internalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a following activation of heterologous Gq/11-coupled receptors

In this study we characterized the heterologous desensitization and internalization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) splice variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b following activation of endogenous G(q/11)-coupled receptors in HEK293 cells. Agonist activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine or P2Y1 purinergic receptors triggered the PKC- and CaMKII-dependent internalization of mGluR1a. In co-immunoprecipitation studies, both glutamate and carbachol increased the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. Co-addition of the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor GF109203X and the Ca(2+) calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) inhibitor KN-93 blocked the ability of glutamate and carbachol to increase the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. Glutamate also increased the association of GRK2 with mGluR1b, whereas carbachol did not. However, unlike mGluR1a, glutamate-stimulated association of GRK2 with mGluR1b was not reduced by PKC/CaMKII inhibition. Pretreatment of cells expressing mGluR1a or mGluR1b with carbachol rapidly desensitized subsequent glutamate-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation. The carbachol-induced heterologous desensitization and internalization of mGluR1a was blocked by LY367385, an mGluR1a antagonist with inverse agonist activity. Furthermore, LY367385 blocked the ability of carbachol to increase the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. On the other hand, LY367385 had no effect on the carbachol-induced desensitization and internalization of the nonconstitutively active mGluR1b splice variant. These results demonstrate that the internalization of mGluR1a, triggered homologously by glutamate or heterologously by carbachol, is PKC/CaMKII-, GRK2-, arrestin-, and clathrin-dependent and that PKC/CaMKII activation appears to be necessary for GRK2 to associate with mGluR1a. Furthermore, the heterologous desensitization of mGluR1a is dependent upon the splice variant being in an active conformation.

Characterization of GRK2 RH domain-dependent regulation of GPCR coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide (G)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form the largest family of integral membrane proteins. GPCR activation by an agonist promotes the exchange of GDP for GTP on the Galpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein. The dissociated Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits subsequently modulate the activity of a diverse assortment of effector systems. GPCR signaling via heterotrimeric G proteins is attenuated rapidly by the engagement of protein kinases. The canonical model for GPCR desensitization involves G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-dependent receptor phosphorylation to promote the binding of arrestin proteins that function to sterically block receptor:G-protein interactions. GRK2 and GRK3 have been shown to interact with Galphaq via the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) homology (RH) domain localized within their amino-terminal domains. It now appears that the G-protein uncoupling of many GPCRs linked to Galphaq, in particularly metabotropic glutamate receptors, may be mediated by the GRK2 RH domain via a phosphorylation-independent mechanism. This article reviews much of the background and methodology required for the characterization of the GRK2 phosphorylation-independent attenuation of GPCR signaling.

Agonist-induced internalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1A: structural determinants for protein kinase C- and G protein-coupled receptor kinase-mediated internalization

To investigate the role of the intracellular C-terminal tail of the rat metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a (mGlu1a) in receptor regulation, we constructed three C-terminal tail deletion mutants (Arg847stop, DM-I; Arg868stop, DM-II; Val893stop, DM-III). Quantification of glutamate-induced internalization provided by ELISA indicated that DM-III, like the wild-type mGlu1a, underwent rapid internalization whilst internalization of DM-I and DM-II was impaired. The selective inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), GF109203X, which significantly reduced glutamate-induced mGlu1a internalization, had no effect on the internalization of DM-I, DM-II, or DM-III. In addition activation by carbachol of endogenously expressed M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which induces PKC- and Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-dependent internalization of mGlu1a, produced negligible internalization of the deletion mutants. Co-expression of a dominant negative mutant form of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (DNM-GRK2; Lys220Arg) significantly attenuated glutamate-induced internalization of mGlu1a and DM-III, whilst internalization of DM-I and DM-II was not significantly affected. The glutamate-induced internalization of mGlu1a and DM-III, but not of DM-I or DM-II, was inhibited by expression of DNM-arrestin [arrestin-2(319-418)]. In addition glutamate-induced rapid translocation of arrestin-2-Green Fluorescent Protein (arr-2-GFP) from cytosol to membrane was only observed in cells expressing mGlu1a or DM-III. Functionally, in cells expressing mGlu1a, glutamate-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation was increased in the presence of PKC inhibition, but so too was that in cells expressing DM-II and DM-III. Together these results indicate that different PKC mechanisms regulate the desensitization and internalization of mGlu1a. Furthermore, PKC regulation of mGlu1a internalization requires the distal C terminus of the receptor (Ser894-Leu1199), whilst in contrast glutamate-stimulated GRK- and arrestin-dependent regulation of this receptor depends on a region of 25 amino acids (Ser869-Val893) in the proximal C-terminal tail.

Mechanisms of metabotropic glutamate receptor desensitization: role in the patterning of effector enzyme activation

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) constitute an unique subclass of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors are activated by the excitatory amino acid glutamate and play an essential role in regulating neural development and plasticity. In the present review, we overview the current understanding regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in the desensitization and endocytosis of Group 1 mGluRs as well as the relative contribution of desensitization to the spatial-temporal patterning of glutamate receptor signaling. Similar to what has been reported previously for prototypic GPCRs, mGluRs desensitization is mediated by second messenger-dependent protein kinases and GPCR kinases (GRKs). However, it remains to be determined whether mGluRs phosphorylation by GRKs and beta-arrestin binding are absolutely required for desensitization. Group 1 mGluRs endocytosis is both agonist-dependent and -independent. Agonist-dependent mGluRs internalization is mediated by a beta-arrestin- and dynamin-dependent clathrin-coated vesicle dependent endocytic pathway. The activation of Group 1 mGluRs also results in oscillatory Gq protein-coupling leading to the cyclical activation of phospholipase Cbeta thereby stimulating oscillations in both inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate formation and Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. These glutamate receptor-stimulated Ca(2+) oscillations are translated into the synchronous activation of protein kinase C (PKC), which has led to the hypothesis that oscillatory mGluRs signaling involves the repetitive phosphorylation of mGluRs by PKC. However, recent experimental evidence suggests that oscillatory signaling is an intrinsic glutamate receptor property that is independent of feedback receptor phosphorylation by PKC. The challenge in the future will be to determine the structural determinants underlying mGluRs-mediated spatial-temporal signaling as well as to understand how complex signaling patterns can be interpreted by cells in both the developing and adult nervous systems.

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 in striatal neurons

Protein phosphorylation, controlled by the coordinated actions of phosphatases and kinases, is an important regulatory mechanism in synaptic transmission and other neurophysiological processes. Ionotropic glutamate receptors are known targets of phosphorylation on serine, threonine and tyrosine residues, with functional consequences for cell excitability, plasticity and toxicity. While phosphorylation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) also impacts critical cellular processes, there has been no evidence for direct tyrosine phosphorylation of mGluRs. In the present study, anti-phosphotyrosine and specific mGluR antibodies were used to detect tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluRs in rat brain. In particular, we found that mGluR5 is an abundant phosphotyrosine protein in vivo as well as in primary striatal neurons and tissue slices in vitro. The protein phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate robustly increased the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluR5, suggesting the receptor is subject to an endogenous, active cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Furthermore, NMDA treatment also increased the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluR5, suggesting these endogenous phosphorylation regulatory mechanisms can be used to mediate crosstalk between synaptic glutamate receptors. While mGluR5-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis appears to be unaltered by pervanadate treatment, tyrosine phosphorylation of mGluR5 may be important in trafficking, anchoring, or signaling of the receptor through G protein-independent pathways.

Distinct physiological roles of the Gq-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors Co-expressed in the same neuronal populations

The group I metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR1 and mGluR5, exhibit a high degree of sequence homology, and are often found co-expressed in the same neuronal populations. These receptors couple to a broad array of effector systems, and are implicated in diverse physiological and pathophysiological functions. Due to the high degree of sequence homology, and the findings that these receptors couple identically in recombinant systems, it has been generally assumed that these two group I mGluR subtypes would exhibit redundant function when coexpressed in the same neurons. With the advent of subtype-selective pharmacological tools, it has become possible to tease apart the functions of mGluR1 and mGluR5 in the same neuron. The emerging picture is one of diverse function, which implies differential regulation. Interestingly, the group I mGluRs are modulated by a rich variety of regulatory systems, which may explain how these receptors can mediate divergent actions when present in the same cell.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 internalization induced by muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation: differential dependency of internalization of splice variants on nonvisual arrestins

In this study, we characterized the glutamate- or second-messenger kinase-dependent internalization of the rat metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) splice variants 1a, 1b, and 1c, and assessed the arrestin and dynamin dependence of these processes. To facilitate this we inserted a hemagglutinin epitope tag in the extracellular N-terminal domain of the splice variants. Quantification of glutamate-induced mGluR1 splice variant internalization provided by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and confirmed by immunofluorescent microscopy indicated that each splice variant underwent rapid internalization, which was strongly inhibited by coexpression of dominant-negative mutant (DNM) arrestin or dynamin. In addition glutamate-induced rapid translocation of arrestin-2-green fluorescent protein (GFP) or arrestin-3-GFP from cytosol to membrane was observed in cells expressing mGluR1 splice variants. Glutamate-induced internalization of mGluR1a and mGluR1c was partially blocked by a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), 2-[1-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)indol-3-yl]-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)maleimide (GF 109203X), whereas mGluR1b internalization was not significantly affected by this inhibitor. Similarly, inositol phosphate production after glutamate-induced activation of mGluR1a and mGluR1c was increased after PKC inhibition, whereas glutamate-induced mGluR1b stimulation was unaffected. Activation by carbachol of endogenously expressed M(1) muscarinic receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, induced the internalization of mGluR1 splice variants, which was partially blocked by pretreatment with inhibitors of either PKC or Ca(2+) calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). Expression of DNM-arrestin with mGluR1a or 1c strongly inhibited carbachol-induced internalization. However, coexpression of DNM-arrestin with mGluR1b was less effective in reducing carbachol-induced receptor internalization. In addition, arrestin-2-GFP or arrestin-3-GFP underwent significant carbachol-induced translocation from cytosol to membrane in cells coexpressing mGluR1a or 1c but not in cells coexpressing mGluR1b. This study demonstrates that the internalization of mGluR1 splice variants is subject to PKC and CaMKII regulation. In addition, regulation by these kinases confers differential arrestin dependence.

Supersensitivity of human metabotropic glutamate 1a receptor signaling in L929sA cells

The effect of antagonist pretreatment on the signaling properties of the human metabotropic glutamate 1a (hmGlu1a) receptor was examined in stably transfected L929sA cells. Pre-exposure of hmGlu1a receptor-expressing cells to the mGlu1 receptor antagonists (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine and 7-(hydroxyimino)cyclo-propa[b]chromen-1a-carboxylate ethyl ester dramatically enhanced subsequent glutamate-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis and intracellular [Ca(2+)] rise. We found clear indications that the antagonist-mediated enhancement of glutamate-evoked mGlu1a receptor signaling is caused by the development of mGlu1a receptor supersensitivity: the potency of glutamate was increased by 3-fold after 24 h antagonist pretreatment and the potency of the antagonists was significantly decreased in antagonist-pretreated cells. The kinetic profile of the antagonist-mediated enhancement showed that the maximal increase in intracellular [Ca(2+)] was already reached after 30-min pretreatment, suggesting that de novo receptor synthesis is not involved in the process of mGlu1a receptor supersensitization. Glutamate-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis increased up to 24 h after antagonist treatment. Although it seemed likely that the hmGlu1a receptor could desensitize after activation by endogenously present glutamate, removal of glutamate from the extracellular medium with GPT resulted in a much smaller enhancement of glutamate responsiveness. Moreover, the magnitude of antagonist-mediated receptor supersensitivity was much larger than the magnitude of agonist-induced receptor desensitization. These results suggest that antagonist-evoked mGlu1 receptor supersensitivity is not merely the result of a blockade of agonist-induced desensitization. Finally, we found that antagonist pretreatment doubled the amount of receptors at the cell surface. Our findings are the first lines of evidence that prolonged antagonist treatment can supersensitize the hmGlu1a receptor. In view of the potential therapeutic application of mGlu1 receptor antagonists, it will be important to know whether these phenomena occur in vivo.

Desensitization of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat sympathetic neurons

Desensitization of heterologously expressed metabotropic glutamate receptor 5a (mGluR5a) was examined in rat sympathetic neurons. Calcium currents in cells expressing mGluR5a exhibited substantial inhibition in response to glutamate exposure. In the continued presence of glutamate, inhibition attenuated rapidly over the course of about a minute. Desensitization was eliminated when a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue was substituted for ATP in the pipette solution, suggesting that desensitization was mediated by a phosphorylation event. Next, pharmacological agents were used to investigate the nature of the kinase involved in desensitization. Desensitization was sensitive to the nonspecific kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, but not H-7, another nonspecific kinase inhibitor. Inhibitors of myosin light chain kinase and calmodulin-dependent kinase were without effect on desensitization. However, desensitization was sensitive to the protein kinase C inhibitor bisindolymaleimide. In contrast, Gö6976, a selective inhibitor of conventional protein kinase C isoforms, was without effect. In addition, desensitization persisted in the presence of 10 mM intracellular bis-(o-aminophenoxy)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, a fast Ca(2+) chelator. Finally, overexpression of wild-type calmodulin, which can bind mGluR5 and inhibit phosphorylation, did not alter mGluR desensitization. Two Ca(2+)-binding-deficient calmodulin mutants were also without effect. These data indicate a role for nonconventional protein kinase C isoforms as a mediator of mGluR5 desensitization and that the phosphorylation of mGluR5a that competes with calmodulin binding does not mediate desensitization.

Structural, signalling and regulatory properties of the group I metabotropic glutamate receptors: prototypic family C G-protein-coupled receptors

In 1991 a new type of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) was cloned, the type 1a metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor, which, despite possessing the defining seven-transmembrane topology of the GPCR superfamily, bore little resemblance to the growing number of other cloned GPCRs. Subsequent studies have shown that there are eight mammalian mGlu receptors that, together with the calcium-sensing receptor, the GABA(B) receptor (where GABA is gamma-aminobutyric acid) and a subset of pheromone, olfactory and taste receptors, make up GPCR family C. Currently available data suggest that family C GPCRs share a number of structural, biochemical and regulatory characteristics, which differ markedly from those of the other GPCR families, most notably the rhodopsin/family A GPCRs that have been most widely studied to date. This review will focus on the group I mGlu receptors (mGlu1 and mGlu5). This subgroup of receptors is widely and differentially expressed in neuronal and glial cells within the brain, and receptor activation has been implicated in the control of an array of key signalling events, including roles in the adaptative changes needed for long-term depression or potentiation of neuronal synaptic connectivity. In addition to playing critical physiological roles within the brain, the mGlu receptors are also currently the focus of considerable attention because of their potential as drug targets for the treatment of a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Molecular determinants of metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling

Metabotropic glutamate (mglu) receptors are implicated in the regulation of many physiological and pathological processes in the CNS, including synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, motor coordination, pain transmission and neurodegeneration. Several recent studies have elucidated the molecular determinants of mglu receptor signaling and show that several mechanisms acting at different steps in signal propagation are involved. We attempt to offer an integrated view on how homologous and heterologous mechanisms regulate the initial steps of signal propagation, mainly at the level of mglu-receptor-G-protein coupling. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of phosphorylation mechanisms mediated by protein kinase C and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, and on the emerging importance of some members of the regulators of G-protein signaling family, such as RGS2 and RGS4, which facilitate the GTPase activity that is intrinsic to the alpha-subunits of G(q) and G(i).